0xcc2688350d29623e2a0844cc8885f9050f0f6ed5 (Q491): Difference between revisions

From Nouns Dev
(‎Created a new Item)
 
(‎Changed an Item)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 106 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 106 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 52 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 52 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 51 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 51 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 49 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 49 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 5
Amount5
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 47 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 47 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 5
Amount5
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 46 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 46 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 5
Amount5
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 45 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 45 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 5
Amount5
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 44 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 44 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 5
Amount5
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 43 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 43 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 4
Amount4
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 42 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 42 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 41 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 41 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 297 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 297 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 297 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 24 VOTES** **AGAINST - 10 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *Some of these ideas are useful, some are not. Consider resubmitting with the specific initiatives called out in different funding requests.* **ABSTAINS - 5 VOTES**
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 296 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 296 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 296 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 40 VOTES** **byhardy** | *Lots of Nounish folks on this. For such a global effort, cost seems reasonable. Worth a shot. Would like to see more details on proliferation / onboarding / growth / general nounishness if returning for more funding. But as a trial run, I think this makes sense. Good to see the rails already in place.* **Bigshot Klim** | *wholesome and nounish activity can be repeated at any event to build a broader community. Super NOUNIsh * **EltonPenguin** | *Its a tad pricy, but still voting for it.* **AGAINST - 4 VOTES** **ABSTAINS - 3 VOTES**
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 289 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 289 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 289 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 38 VOTES** **Bigshot Klim** | *This is an absolute HELL YES * **profwerder** | *Nounish is the core marketing infrastructure for Nouns. Their content has been amazing!* **CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧** | *anyone who votes against this based on numbers and cost has no idea how content is made or how brands grow...your newbie is showing...cost of views does not include cost to produce the content...how do you not understand that?* *nounish is the best thing to happen to nouns and we are lucky to have people willing to dedicate their professional lives and reputations making content for nouns. 100% yes* **AGAINST - 14 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *Our last $969,000 that we paid nounish got us 3M views. Thats a CPM of $323. For reference, Google search ads average CPM is $38.40. This means we paid roughly 10x a pretty average CPM for this exposure.* *The budget is way too high and, from what their track record shows, the impact just isnt there.*
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 288 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 288 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 288 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 44 VOTES** **Bigshot Klim** | *this is a fantastic way to recap and celebrate what we have all been working on. funds go back to the dao and to fund more fun.* **AGAINST - 6 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *Mint price too high*
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 287 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 287 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 287 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 41 VOTES** **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *I’ve been watching BigShot in the DAO for about a year now: he’s received tons of feedback from the community during that time. He’s made some good adjustments & taken the feedback seriously—it’s a YES for me now* **AGAINST - 5 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *$125k ask divided by 6,000 figurines = $21 for each 3 figurine. 🤨 Oh, but then we sell them for $9 wholesale, so were only losing $12 on each sale. Run from this proposal.* **.Wide Eye ⌐◨-◨** | *1. Would love to see indication of existing retail boutique willing to take in this toys as inventory for sale, we could we sitting on a inventory of 6000 toys (unsold). 2. Wish that marketing campaign for said toys could be clearer. 3. A smaller size run would be more appropriate if this is a proof-of-concept. 4. If sold, a portion of the profit will be used to developed series 2 - Why not reinvest 100% of the profit to develop series 2 given demand? It is unclear what the other portion of the profit will be used for, more details on this would be appreciated.*
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 285 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 285 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 285 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 40 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *It works out to roughly $3/attendee. Not bad.* **CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧** | *⌐◨-◨🇧🇷⌐◨-◨* **AGAINST - 6 VOTES**
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 282 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 282 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 282 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 35 VOTES** **profwerder** | *Glad to see this readjustment of THRESHOLD back to 15%. There was no need to increase in the first place. * **AGAINST - 5 VOTES**
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 269 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 269 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 269 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 34 VOTES** **Benbodhi** | *🎼🎶🎵🎹🎸🥁🎤🤘* **dot** | *🤘* **Sasquatch** | *:pepe_jam:* **AGAINST - 5 VOTES**
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 263 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 263 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 263 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 43 VOTES** **Benbodhi** | *This crew just keep crushing.* ⌐◨-◨ **byhardy** | *Huge momentum in a vertical that continues to expand, and is tangential to Nouns (tech). Big supporter of esports pod.* **Josep** | *I like the integration and I think it’s a good way to proliferate the meme* **AGAINST - 9 VOTES** **Classic_Craig** | *expensive for niche* **EltonPenguin** | *Waaaay too much money for uncertain benefits*
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 260 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 260 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 260 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 33 VOTES** **Benbodhi** | *⌐◨-◨* **AGAINST - 10 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *Seems silly*
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 259 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 259 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 259 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 40 VOTES** **Benbodhi** | *⌐◨-◨* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *JOEL = AUTOMATIC YES* **profwerder** | *LOVE this!! There were so many amazing submissions —would love to see us maximize this opportunity!* **byhardy** | *easy yes. sick team. cant wait to see what gets made here.* **AGAINST - 2 VOTES**
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 257 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 257 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 257 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 40 VOTES** **Classic_Craig** | *Yes, yes, yes. Proliferate to the gigabrains, please.* **EltonPenguin** | *Good to raise awareness of Nouns **Josep** | *The work of Mono and Ale has been excellent during their implication with the DAO. Really looking forward to see what they can do with this Nouns Fair* **AGAINST - 4 VOTES** **nonodynamo** | *I do not think there is enough time or enough products to do this well.*
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 254 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 254 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 254 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 41 VOTES** **Coral Orca** | *delinouns?* **Classic_Craig** | *Yes! Yes! this is the way!!!! long lasting prolonged proliferation as long as the food is good* **Bigshot Klim** | *this is a worthwhile experiment and something many have talked about doing. this will also open up opportunities for other builders to engage with art, design, product and proliferating. a repeatable model* **byhardy** | *Love this so much. Awesome team. Best of luck!!* **systemdm.⌐◨-◨** | *Love this. Purchased Nounscafe.eth for developing a similar idea.. 🤞🏻😄* **profwerder** | *Perfect location to experiment with a Nouns restaurant! Already a successful location & team.* **AGAINST - 4 VOTES**
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 253 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 253 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 253 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 38 VOTES** **heyjeff.eth** | *hack = win* **byhardy** | *loved this idea from the first time martin posted it on Twitter. hes been grinding on it. absolutely huge idea that can bring a ton of positive attention to the ecosystem. win for everyone imo. cant wait!* **nonodynamo** | *Seems like it just a lot of prop houses in one week. I am not sure it will get the best ideas because it is so much all at once. Or the right attention to the ideas.* **AGAINST - 9 VOTES** **Classic_Craig** | *Would like to see Marketing added*
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 251 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 251 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 251 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 44 VOTES** **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *This will be great to continue to move forward on as the last one was so successful!* **profwerder** | *Give Danit all the eth she wants! shes killing it!!! LFG* **Bigshot Klim** | *Danit has been doing some amazing work and her presentation in paris was one of the highliughts of the show. Lets do this again IN NY* **Classic_Craig** | *previous successes, i like the marketing visibility* **AGAINST - 10 VOTES** **byhardy** | *I am strongly in support of Danit, love the clothes and the content, but I am voting no because I do not support NFT NYC (the main conference). Would like to see $$ spent on presence a more authentic NFT related satellite event (or events) during the week.*
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 249 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 249 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 249 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 36 VOTES** **Wide Eye ⌐◨-◨** | *For the culture* **Sasquatch** | *culture* **Benbodhi** | *1 ⌐◨-◨, every block, forever* *♾️ ⌐◨-◨* **Akva** | *⌐◨-◨* **AGAINST - 16 VOTES** **Josep** | *It seems to me to be a poor proposal, with little data on how the 30 ETH can impact on growing Nouns and offers no way to analyse how successful the proposal is.** **ABSTAIN - 3 VOTES**
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 245 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 245 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 9
Amount9
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 245 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 46 VOTES** **Toady_Hawk** | *YES* **RobotFishGirl** | *The only problem with the short was that it was short. This solves that problem. Im already hyped about this movie and the prop hasnt even passed yet!* **Benbodhi** | *Would love to see more from this team.* **Akva** | *Track record is the way, yes for me* **profwerder** | *The first short by this team was amazing! The level of detail and integration of nounish fun but in a way that it still accessible and enjoyable by normies is exactly what we need more of!* **Bigshot Klim** | *this team is doing great work and i look forward to seeing what they come up with next* **AGAINST - 5 VOTES** **Josep** | *I dont see a clear vision of how they want to successfully distribute this film, I also miss that they provide tools to know what is the real conversion of the film in new members for the DAO.* **byhardy** | *I love the idea of a Nouns movie. but I cant support this until I see more plans laid out about what happens once the movie is made, specifically marketing and how it returns $$ to the DAO. to me, droposals for portions of the film are just not enough to return funds to the DAO at such a high cost.* **ABSTAIN - 5 VOTES**
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 244 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 244 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 9
Amount9
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 244 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 40 VOTES** **Pizza** | *An amazing tool that would greatly help the rest of the Nounish ecosystem.* **Josep** | *Prop Lot has shown to be a good tool during the time it has been active, I would like to continue to see how it evolves and contributes to Nouns growth.* **Sasquatch** | *brian the goat* **NO - 10 VOTES** **ABSTAIN - 5 VOTES**
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 241 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 241 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 9
Amount9
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 241 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 44 VOTES** **RobotFishGirl** | *DigitalOil is a brilliant builder and I believe the tools outlined in this prop will be a valuable add- its why I also said yes to the first prop. The changes made in v2 have only reaffirmed that belief and choice.* **NO - 3 VOTES** **ABSTAIN - 7 VOTES**
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 237 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 237 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 237 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 55 VOTES** **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *Would be fun to mint this animated video. At such a low price I feel it can get a couple hundred sales and be beneficial to the nouns dos and the creator of the video.* **Benbodhi** | *nounish af ⌐◨-◨* **wiz** | *amazing work would love to mint through the dao* **NO - 2 VOTES** **ABSTAIN - 1 VOTE**
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 236 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 236 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 236 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 59 VOTES** **Bigshot Klim** | *can not wait to see this* **Toady_Hawk** | *Hell yes.* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *Another cool animated video to mint. Seems to be a cool new meta and modern day movie premiers on the blockchain!* **Benbodhi** | *nounish af ⌐◨-◨* **wiz** | *wiz 🤝 wiz* **Josep** | *I think its a good way to commemorate a very nounish project, completely in favor.*
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 231 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 231 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 231 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: --- **FOR - 44 VOTES** --- **pin.pusher** | ⌐🖼-🖼 **systemdm.⌐◨-◨** | *Love this.. Art is everything!!* **Classic_Craig** | *feels cheap for a curated gallery and exposure for nounish art on a legacy platform* **byhardy** | *awesome experiment that puts nouns in front of more artists + art supporters. low cost. easy win. big yes.* **Bigshot Klim** | *a great way to expose the Ecosystem to a broader NFT audience* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *Nouns Collab with Nifty Gateway would be really great if done right!* **Benbodhi** | *art is nounish* ⌐◨-◨ *This is a thoughtful and effective way to integrate with nifty and showcase some rad artists. Potential to pay for itself built in is awesome too.* **Josep** | *I believe it is a well-structured collaboration that can create value for Nouns.* **Mindtoasted** | *Nounish Art is powerful.* --- **AGAINST - 7 VOTES** --- **0xDariush** | *Im also an artist and curator ! it make no sense to pay this musch for a curation!* *if the artists are good and they believe in themselves they join the projects and rely on sales. it doesnt matter if its nounish or not.* *an Open call for artists will do all of this for free.* --- **ABSTAIN - 3 VOTES** --- **greta_gremplin** | *I will abstain, because im one of the people that will benefit with this proposal. But if i wasnt, i would vote Yes!*
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 228 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 228 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 228 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Prop 228: Nouncil Votes YES** **YES - 38 votes** - LOVE small proliferation. - Japan is Nounish AF and this is a very commited and passionate team - lfg japan - Good value to further nouns awareness in Japan. **NO - 10 votes** **ABSTAIN - 2 votes**
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 225 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 225 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 225 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Prop 225: Nouncil Votes YES** **YES - 31 votes** - Need a “hell yes!” option Nerman cuz issa vibe! Excited to see this next phase especially the work with Save the Music! - Big yes - 👐 - seems a bit risky for the cost but who could say no to ghostface killah - I think this is very Nounish - LOVE this. MORE music. - music is nounish and so is this team witha proven record of continuous commitment to nounish excellence - rich vein for proliferation + woody is smashing it - My life up until this point was always about trying to make it somewhere with music and if this can help give people more opportunity then I want to support it **NO - 15 votes** - It seems to me that there are ways to more adequately dissipate these funds, I dont think it is worth anywhere near what is being asked. - I support Noun Sounds and Woodys efforts. Having this music arm of Nouns is awesome. And I love LOVE the playlist idea - has some viral components. But I would like to see more budget aimed at on onboarding indie/web3-focused musicians rather than the big $$ budget on a Ghostface collab. Would support with a simple shift of that budget to more Prop House rounds & marketing those rounds. - It’s a huge red flag you’re asking for 250eth from the DAO & won’t even answer questions in the discord Nouners are asking. Paying “artists & influencers” is as inauthentic as it gets in web3
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 224 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 224 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 224 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Prop 224: Nouncil Votes YES** **YES - 21 votes** - we like art - If marketed right, this can return much of the $$ to the DAO (via auction increase bc the art is included for 7 days). At worst, its a cool experiment with an awesome group, which seems worth the go. - we need more fun explorao like this - Fun ⌐◨-◨ - Might be worth the experiment to see if the nouns sell for more. **NO - 20 votes** - It seems to me that there are ways to more adequately dissipate these funds, I dont think it is worth anywhere near what is being asked. - I love art, but I dont think this proliferates much for the DAO. **ABSTAIN - 2 votes**
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 223 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 223 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 223 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Prop 223: Nouncil Votes YES** --- **YES - 33 votes** - I use HON everyday for the show and I love the direction that they want to take it. I believe there is a need for a central discussion point for those who want to participate in the DAO but dont have time to go to multiple sites digging for conversation and prop information. - yes BUT! can you implement the key elements of the nouns creative direction? Fonts, color scale, etc. I feel like for phase 2 this would be grand!! - but please change that hideous header - HON is excellent - I think it is appropriate, House of Nouns has shown to be of great help to the DAO. **NO - 13 votes** - I am likely in the minority, but Im not a big fan of these unique clients that need to be used, but perhaps I just need to be educated on it all. I do not think a unique dashboard is the difference. - The cost is way too high **ABSTAIN - 3 votes** --- (7 Nouncillors abstained from this decision.)
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 221 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 221 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 221 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Prop 221: Nouncil Votes YES** --- **YES - 29 votes** - a lot of us have multiple jobs to desl with basic life stuff and need more time to read proposals - seems reasonable, i dig it. more time for promotion and awareness - whatever helps voters vote - This should of been in place since day 1 - I think its reasonable - More time to think means better decisions. --- **NO - 22 votes** - Its long enough. - The five days were just added a little bit ago. I think it is too soon to see if that works to change it again. I am not against changing it I just think it is too soon. - i dont see any reasons to extend the delay at the moment. 5/5 works well to me --- **ABSTAIN - 1 vote** - I dont have an opinion or experience to apply to this change, thus abstaining.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 218 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 218 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 218 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Prop 218: YES WINS** 58 Yes, 8 No, 0 Abstain 5 Nouncillors abstained from the decision --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Mach** | *seems nounish, thats enough for me* **ChrisCoCreated** | *Hell yer, Swami and Ben are passionate about the mountains and nouns, and with Swamis roll are uniquely placed to do something significant with the resort, and create a template, as well as a load of great content. wen Europe! ;)* **Benbodhi** | *⌐◨-◨* **profwerder** | *I hate snow but I love this prop and this team! Would love to see a nounish resort come to life!* **byhardy** | *very nounish* **Classic_Craig** | *I love irl proliferation and if this exists for years at a resort that gets guests constantly, it very likely can resonate with enough people to bring awareness and value back to the DAO.* **0xapril** | *Its absolute yes from me. Always love irl proliferation and alps dao vision is 100℅ nounish.* **BENJAMIN LATSKO ⌐◧-◧** | *i think it doesnt make sense to drive attention to nouns. drove attention to gnars dao or another extension / nouns brand that is fostering a community around the same purpose and obsession. if you’re already considering launching your own DAO - what’s your positioning? i love the naming but think there needs to be more thought in positioning, community obsession and communication. driving people from a ski resort to nounsDAO doesn’t make sense. great opportunity. concept needs focus and refinement.* **Bigshot Klim** | *This is a great opportunity to curate an immersive group experience with an enetire resort being transformed sounds epic and this team has been on this for a while* **0xDariush** | *I like this prop, i believes the fund is reasonable for this scale and time line, also Rebranding a place which is already running! going to be a good case study for long term activities in same scale.* *plus to that, i believe lots of investors and many travelers and tourists usually go to ski! so i guess proliferation in places like this is a wise move.* **!𝚡𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚜** | *So excited!* **Coral Orca** | *I like IRL stuff and the team is nounish* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 217 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 217 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 217 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Prop 217: YES WINS** 39 Yes, 11 No, 3 Abstain 16 Nouncillors abstained from the decision --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Mach** | *I dont see why not* **Josep** | *Its a way to get some return on an ETH that otherwise will stay in the treasury without moving, sounds good to me.* **Classic_Craig** | *After Don educated me on the difference between decentralized staking and CeFi, I think earning yield on funds in the DAO is an amazing play toward sustainability beyond just auction revenue!* **pemburux** | *Defi summer 🎉* **profwerder** | *Im not against staking but it seems unwise to put an additional 5000eth in the same pool. Would like to see more discussion around this.* **lilpizza.eth** | *no brainer move* **Mindtoasted** | *I believe in stake, i vote yes on this* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 216 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 216 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 216 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Prop 216: YES WINS** 24 Yes, 15 No, 2 Abstain 14 Nouncillors abstained from the decision --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Bigshot Klim** | *i think that we owe some levle of honesty and feedback to the people that sownd their valuable time and energy dreaming up theiur peops a s putting them on chain. having a random toaster ir amcrocodile press no on hour dream without a reason is a good way tondrive away future builders* **profwerder** | *We already have some big issue with Hey Anoun -- including legal concerns -- so before we get into more anonymous ways to libel people, maybe we pass it by the Foundations legal team? Just a thought. This may do more harm than good and goes against transparency so maybe more thought and discussion is needed before we fund this much eth.* **Classic_Craig** | *I find this very interesting and would love to dive deeper and have solutions that allow for private voting.* **Josep** | *It seems to me that private voting is something important in order to improve governance, I agree with the proposal.* **byhardy** | *Excited to see what people come up with here!* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 215 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 215 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 215 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Prop 215: YES WINS** 37 Yes, 7 No, 0 Abstain 9 Nouncillors abstained from the decision --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **JoshuaFisher** | *been working woth this team and love the passion, pivots, derermination and skills. we need these tools!* **Classic_Craig** | *At first glance, i loved the idea, but after more thought, this will glut up the already terrible nft twitter feed with people shilling links to win eth. this is not the way. good idea, but not the execution that proliferates. this, imo, puts things deeper into the echo chamber.* **Mach** | *skeptical but willing to see if it works* **Benbodhi** | *Very helpful platform ⌐◨-◨* **Josep** | *I think it can be very beneficial considering the large number of draws in Nouns. For me it is worth to dedicate 50ETH.* **byhardy** | *Awesome roadmap for the $. Easy yes.* **Mindtoasted** | *I would like to say yes on this, as a freelance artist I feel that Nouns Contest on twitter is giving a large impact to some people who work around digital art, a place where anyone who had an interest in art could also growth the community by their own Nounish idea in each contest they participate.* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 214 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 214 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 214 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Prop 214: YES WINS** 46 Yes, 7 No, 1 Abstain 8 Nouncillors abstained from the decision --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **bk** | *honk diddly* **Classic_Craig** | *The marketing aspect of the proposal is very weak and does not instill confidence that this investment will ever yield return. I love the website and how easy it is to generate noggles artwork, but cant wrap my head around the impact it will have when other AI software has the same abilities already.* **Sasquatch** | *bribe our ai overlords before its too late* **JoshuaFisher** | *let the Pod run, tools are awesome and powerful* **Akva** | *honk diddly* **Benbodhi** | *Been loving this. Lots of interesting use cases and growing arsenal of tooling. ⌐◨-◨* **kerimbonia** | *ai is the future and the ai team has done nothing but deliver knowledge, nounish content creation tools, awesomeness and the future to the nouns community week after week... absolute no-brainer yes!* **Josep** | *The work you have already created is great, I want to continue to see what you are able to do to optimize the DAOs mission.* **byhardy** | *beep boop. Nouns should continue to build on the cutting edge of tech, and this team seems very committed to making it happen. Love the expanded marketing/grants budget as well.* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *More Ai & more Honk please* **JackWyldes** | *Shep and da boys are great- while it is an expensive prop I think they have already shown that theyve been putting in the work* **Mindtoasted** | *It is real that NounsAi Pod has become one of the remarkable journey in understanding the growth of AI around the space, curious what could happen next. I voted yes on this.* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 209 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 209 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 209 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Prop 209: YES WINS** 37 Yes, 5 No, 2 Abstain 7 Nouncillors abstained from the decision --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **ilpizza.eth** | *❤️* **Classic_Craig** | *This feels the most nounish of the props Ive seen lately, by the doing good/positivity interpretation of the phrase. People helping people is worthy of funding. If they get enough right for this reasonable ask, they can begin generating donations, sell merch, etc. to self sustain like other non-profits.* **Bigshot Klim** | *One of the most NOUNIsh projects and groups in our ecosystem Definite yes!* **Mach** | *much better revised version that addressed concerns* **mikegood** | *Love to see public goods like this!* **0xapril** | *mucho love has been doing amazing things. Its easy yes from me!* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *more much love please* **Mindtoasted** | *Reflects a good sub culture and very Nounish, even though the number of requests is quite large I vote yes on this, hopefully everything flows in the right direction and still encourages a lot more anythin Nounish.* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *There has been excellent proliferion and organization from Mucho Love it should continue growing* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 208 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 208 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 208 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Nouncil Vote:** 29 Yes, 16 No, 2 Abstain 12 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Classic_Craig** | *While I love the depth and detail in the proposal, I believe the impact this will have is minimal. It is like VC funding a whisky brand that has very limited marketing potential, imo.* **Bigshot Klim** | *I love the passion and commitment of this team and the long game will be worth the wait* **Josep** | *The liquor sector is a sector with many brands that have been #1 for centuries. This makes them slow and not receiving technology in the right way.* *Nouns can leverage the technological and creative talent of the community to cause a major disruption in the sector.* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *Take my money* **0xDariush** | *Im a whiskey guy, its a professional proposal and i can trust it , or at least i like to give the chance to try their best. proliferation through daily products are super nounish imo* **Mindtoasted** | *Have seen this prop since the beginning and seems this could bring some different outcome that related with regards to embrace wishkey or any other booze which can be managed leaning towards web3, I would like to vote yes on this.* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 207 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 207 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 207 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Nouncil Vote:** 51 Yes, 5 No, 2 Abstain 2 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *David Horvaths business acumen is next level. The deliverables on this prop & ask is plenty reasonable for someone of his creative stature* **Classic_Craig** | *Ive been torn on the toy/animated front for nouns, since the average person doesn’t have a frame of reference and wont know whay theyre looking at. Im more inclined to back Seth Green’s company for things like this. 😝* **JoshuaFisher** | *when this train reaches its destination the celebration is going to be unreal! ⌐◨-◨* **Josep** | *I believe in the vision in David and it seems to me that Korea has enough potential that it makes sense to invest $200,000 in trying to open up that market.* **Bigshot Klim** | *I hve worked with David for years and have had the opportunity to travel with him to Japan and Korea to see and understand his vision and I think that what he is doing with the Nouns is unique and brilliant . I can not wait to see where he takes the Project in the next year* **kerimbonia** | *if the goal of nouns is to proliferate then david horvaths track record combined with what he did with the ugly dolls brand working all of 2023 to breaking nouns into the japanese and asian markets = hell yes from me!* **Mindtoasted** | *I am curious about the outcome of this Nounish plan, especially from David who have experienced around this field. Its clear that he has a unique perspective and approach. I voted yes on this.* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 206 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 206 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 206 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Nouncil Vote:** 41 Yes, 17 No, 1 Abstain 5 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **byhardy** | *i love aubtoshi and what OTG has done. but the budget is too high based on past results.* **Classic_Craig** | *I love what NounsOTG is doing irl and on social. with a robust 2023 outline, I believe it can be one of the top visibility gainers of the next few years!* **JackWyldes** | *I like the idea behind this proposal but I dont think there is enough to show from the original 6 months content wise to provide me with the confidence in everything they plan to do. I strongly believe in OTG proliferation and content creation so I am a little conflicted.* **BENJAMIN LATSKO ⌐◧-◧** | *not scalable. recommended an alternative prop: craft an IRL activation playbook* **JoshuaFisher** | *couldnt imagine not giving this team the tools request to keep going* **Josep** | *I think an iteration of the proposal should be made, the proposal could be divided by quarters.* **Benbodhi** | *nounish af ⌐◨-◨* **nonodynamo** | *I think that it is important to have an in-person presence at events. The impact is not just in the secondary media after the fact it is at the event itself. Nouns On The Ground give a connection to the community as a whole.* **Blu ⌐◨-◨** | *Nouns OTG is about building friendships & connecting us all 💙 we need that.* **Mach** | *cost is too high with little deliverables, no quantification of impact, majority non impact events. No concrete goals to propel nouns forward.* **pin.pusher** | *Aubtoshi is the best but don’t tell her - Toady Hawk from OTG Discord* **profwerder** | *There is an extensive amount of organization for events and event travel. We do need a go to person who can not only carry out events but as a contact for other IRL opportunities that might present itself. Decentralization is a feature and a bug. Sometimes we need those ambassadors who can help bring others in while proliferating and Aubtoshi does this extremely well. This should not prohibit other approaches but this type of outreach is vital at this early stage of the DAO.* **kerimbonia** | *Yes Yes Yes... a nouns presence at all of the events proposed with a nouns community member that has showed nothing but passion for proliferating nouns is a no-brainer yes from me. the budget is definitely in line with the ambi
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 205 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 205 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 205 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Nouncil Vote:** 47 Yes, 5 No, 1 Abstain 9 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Brook** | *would have voted AGAINST on Prop 202 had I known this would happen.* **0xDariush** | *they removed the eth from the prop and problem solved, so YES* **Classic_Craig** | *this makes sense as an easy solution for sending and receiving.* **Josep** | *I believe it will be beneficial for the DAO to have a recognizable ENS.* **Benbodhi** | *Wen nouns.⌐◨-◨* **kerimbonia** | *well, now that you put it like that how can we say no?* **lilpizza.eth** | *Easy yes since there is no 1 eth ask included.* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 202 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 202 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 202 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Nouncil Vote:** 31 Yes, 30 No, 1 Abstain 8 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **vsvsvs** | *How had this not already been in place -- my first Hell yess* **Josep** | *Amazing idea, Nouns gets lot of transactions and this would be helpfull.* **Brook** | *the provision of 1 Ξ for suggesting an idea sets an interesting precedent. wonder what it means for upcoming props such as prop 194* **lilpizza.eth** | *great idea, but the 1 eth bounty for it seems excessive. I would vote yes without it.* **JoelCares** | *1 ETH feels excessive here.* **pemburux** | *I agree with the idea, but for the value of 1 ETH I cant agree with it yet* **andreitr** | *Love the simplicity and utility of this proposal but voting against it - I am concerned about the precedent 1ETH compensation sets for the future props.* **0xDariush** | *I love to see that but agree with you all, 1 Eth make no sense for a simple transaction and I dont call it an idea to be honest.* *But Im wondering why they didnt set the ENS til now anyway* *I see foundation.nouns.eth 0x37b8e20646d174b00198b7e183dd1f25520c0f60 owns that ENS at the moment.* **kerimbonia** | *im all for compensating nouns contributors for their time and ideas, but a 1eth tip is a bit exaggerated. if there was some breakdown of time spent working on the prop with reference to how others have been compensated in the past for similar ideas or work, i think the tip could be justified.* **JoshuaFisher** | *idea is cool but why the extra 1eth fee haha* **Benbodhi** | *I like the idea and rewarding ideas but feel like 1 eth for it might be a bit high. Especially considering that a second version of this prop went up without the reward.* **Mindtoasted** | *The idea is simple but for 1 eth its kinda hard to agree on this, IMO it just less reasonable* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 201 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 201 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 11
Amount11
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 201 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Nouncil Vote:** 47 Yes, 5 No, 1 Abstain 6 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Bigshot Klim** | *This will be a fun tool for people coming in that may be able to create simple games or animated content* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *great way to proliferate, I play world Wide Web game a lot and have first hand seen how exposure in this metaverse generates sales and awareness of the collection while people talking in text chats and point people to where to discover more about nounse* **0xapril** | *This proposal is well explained and the product seems very nounish with the reasonable ask. I vote 100℅ yes for this.* **bradq** | *Kerembonia has been exemplary in his handling of feedback and ideas through the Nouncil incubator of this prop. Prop is pitched at the right cost for the DAO and high value--beyond gaming. Content creators will benefit as well. And he clearly has the chops to do it. Hell yes.* **Mach** | *While I think this could end up as wasted money, the potential behind could lead to bigger value in the future if the assets are adopted and integrated* **Josep** | *I think it is an interesting proposal with an adequate funding requirement considering that it can facilitate the entry of more members interested in Web 3.0 to Nouns DAO.* **Benbodhi** | *Valuable resource that people can use in many ways!* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *the deliverables & sprite sheets for integration into worldwidewebb3 is a hell yeah from me* **systemdm.⌐◨-◨** | *Love this . Think many will find it very useful and inspiring!!* **Mindtoasted** | *Im sticking with my first vote on this prop, IMO webb is one of the most interesting world that I ever found in the world of MMO/etc and with this maybe could grow the Nounish culture on someway, I voted yes on this. **JoshuaFisher** | *Fun!* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 200 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 200 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 11
Amount11
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 200 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Nouncil Vote:** 35 Yes, 20 No, 1 Abstain 8 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **lilpizza.eth** | *Amazing utility. Really into this idea.* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *Nouns having a delgated email address per owner to use for on-chain activity is a great idea* **ChrisCoCreated** | *anything that helps people flex their noun adds value* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *would be a great way to communicate with one another and like everyone business it would be cool for nouns to have there own 😃* **bradq** | *This seems like an interesting idea but Im not convinced there is need for it. And I think Nouners only is too narrow a focus. This idea for a couple hundred active Nouners max, and probably far less doesnt seem to make sense. Appreciate the builders and effort, though.* **Mach** | *Novel idea but dont think the use case is that widespread that its something that should be funded like this. Limited scope and small chance for adoption* **Josep** | *I do not think it is the best way to add value to the DAO to allocate this amount of resources to a service that I doubt will become the primary form of communication in Nouns DAO, which is why I am against funding this project.* **Blu ⌐◨-◨** | *So looking at this, Skiff still run their own servers but messages are encrypted so they don’t have access which could be an issue. If skiff gets shut down though then emails don’t work. Wish something like this could merge with handshake to make it truly decentralized. That being said I voted for it to see what they come up with since it’s a great idea.* **Benbodhi** | *I love the concept and tech but feel like it wont get a lot of use, especially with the limited subset of users that are interested noun holders. It also seems har to evaluate the work involved. Looks like the build is a token gated claim for custom domain and frontend interface for claim, which if this is the full development requirement, seems like its possibly overpriced.* *Unfortunately I have to vote no on this proposal as it is.* **Mindtoasted** | *Love the idea, an exclusive email address. I think the request is quite big in my opinion, but still curious about what will happen if this idea goes on chain. I would like to vote yes on this.* **0xDariush** | *i dont see any demands for this in the ecosystem, at least at the moment. or maybe Im not
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 199 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 199 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 11
Amount11
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 199 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Nouncil Vote:** 51 Yes, 2 No, 2 Abstain 8 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **lilpizza.eth** | *This looks like a fun initiative!* **Satori** | *Easy yes in my opinion. Awesome to see a relatively new Nouner have an idea, build it while taking in feedback and collaborating with community members, and get it put on chain so quickly.* **Akva** | *simple and effective: yes* **Bigshot Klim** | *these are really nice and it would be great to have more of them out there in the wild* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *Shades for the boys* **modrovsky** | *⌐◨-◨* **Josep** | *This facilitates the creation of nounish content by networks as well as being a nice gesture to some of the members who have decided to support the DAOs mission through the purchase of one or more Nouns.* **Art Is My Weapon** | *Proliferation.* **0xDariush** | *I mean why not!* *But they can get it easily if they want!* **kerimbonia** | *distribute some nouns glasses to some nouns holders, seems like the right thing to do... so yes* **.ZllW ⌐◨-◨** | *A no brainer imo, Nouns holder should receive these Nouns Vision* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *nice little reward* **Benbodhi** | *⌐◨-◨* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 198 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 198 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 11
Amount11
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 198 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Nouncil Vote:** 30 Yes, 13 No, 4 Abstain 14 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Mach** | *Saw this proposal from conception to on-chain and happy to support it. This could have huge implications for nouns and a one of the first major events where nouns is put in front of a non-native audience and explained in clarity.* **Bigshot Klim** | *Lots of great opportunities for proliferation and discovery for a whole new audience on a global scale* **Coral Orca** | *esport is the way* **Josep** | *I dont have a deep knowledge of the esports sector, I will spend more time investigating the possibilities it offers for new proposals. In this case I abstain as my lack of knowledge about this industry makes it impossible for me to vote for the option that is in the DAOs best interest.* **metamonk** | *E-sports is a great niche to build a presence in. Nouns E-sports has done a fantastic job so far in proliferating Nouns in the space.* **Mindtoasted** | *This is very Nounish, hell yes from me, I love dota since I was in highschool, created a lot of interesting moments every quite period of time until now.* **andreitr** | *This looks legit but I am completely ignorant when it comes to anything Esports. Going to sit this one out (abstain) and educate myself on the space.* **Voadz** | *I love Dota. Huge potential & exposure for Nouns. Legit 💯* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 197 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 197 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 11
Amount11
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 197 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Nouncil Vote:** 34 Yes, 8 No 14 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧** | *This is a very interesting prop. Touching on product design, event planning, community building, in Paris none the less. A true intersection of art, culture and tech. That is 100% Nounish.* *It is interesting to read back through the first two props on the Roadmap. Very cool to see the project laid out in stages, solidify itself and steadily work to this point. DAO support of the project completion cycle is fundamentally important. That does not mean with out discussion.* *Including the 30 NFT Paris event tickets is smart and hopefully will line up with other nounish things going on. I think it will be a key event for Nouns in Europe. People have been talking about it for months. This project can begin to solidify nouns as a fashion incubator. The press opportunities are tremendous. The on-boarding is tremendous. Paris is one of the best locations to potentially on-board affluent buyers who would be capable of joining the DAO.* *Event planning is very time intensive and requires major planning and organization. Nothing is cheap. Nouns should grasp the opportunities that are presenting themselves to engage with focused and excited audiences.* *Curious what the next steps could be after the event, but I think the artist and team is motivated and will be equip with excellent assets and display materials for on-going proliferation.* *CHEFFO = YES* **andreitr** | *For me this is a no brainer. I love Danits work and this prop is Nounish AF. I also love how innovative (experimental?) this is. Strong YES for me.* **Coral Orca** | *danit is nounish* **kerimbonia** | *the ask is a high but i feel like the product looks great and the potential exposure/upside of a nouns x fashion in paris show is worth the risk. good luck* **.ZllW ⌐◨-◨** | *Given Danit who has been delivering per milestones since prop #26 & 41, would love to see this materialized with prop #197.* **Josep** | *I believe this is a highly innovative proposal that aligns with the DAO. I have seen the work that has already been done and what is intended to be done in the coming months and I think it is a great way to target DAO funds.* **Mindtoasted** | *I voted yes for this, this is very nounish!* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 195 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 195 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 11
Amount11
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 195 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Nouncil Vote:** 47 Yes, 7 No, 1 Abstain 3 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **byhardy** | *low cost, love the trial format, cool creator, easy yes. interesting to see if this inspires future first asks.* **CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧** | *I really like the art and the style of story telling. The short pilot was endearing and very nounish.* *I cant speak to the cost completely, but we are starting to see other animated, multi-minute videos for under 10 eth...or under 5. We have seen animation for much more. It seems like we are in the range here, although the range is large. I am not experienced enough in animation pricing to say more here.* *As far as on chain, I think that it is an experiment. But ultimately there should be ways to fund new builders in this range without on-chain voting, especially as the DAO grows. Its not the builders fault, or anyones, it is just an opportunity to continue to define the funding mechanisms or create new ones.* *CHEFFO = YES* **Mach** | *Great cost for what would get out of this* **Benbodhi** | *Reasonable ask for what could be a great thing!* **Josep** | *I think that the attention we will receive for the animation is not worth the 20ETH that is being asked for.* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *we already have people working on 3D nouns & the metaverse* **Akva** | *I love this* **JoelCares** | *Amazing animation, reasonable costs. Hell ya. Looking forward to seeing the finished product.* **kerimbonia** | *given the production quality, proven outreach and plans to release cc0 assets, this is an absolute no-brainer yes!* **bradq** | *100%. Teaser is fantastic. I like the cv of the team--esp. Pixar chops. If they get the script right, 20 ETH is a steal and might give us one of our best videos. Also on Nouncil call they said all assets cc0! Available to build off of.* **byhardy** | *Low cost. Cool creator. The trailed on Twitter is really cool. Im in.* **.ZllW ⌐◨-◨** | *Low cost, great intro vid, creator 3D print guy have nice track record (formerly with Pixar, Netflix & HBO)* **0xapril** | *Easy yes. The intro video is amazing!* **0xDariush** | *good team, good content, i just think the price could be less, if they go viral , its worthy* **Mindtoasted** | *its cool to have them taking part in this, already know some of the artists from twitter and they have different uniq
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 194 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 194 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 11
Amount11
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 194 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Nouncil Vote Results: YES wins** 45 Yes, 4 No, 3 Abstain 4 Nouncillors abstained from the decision --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Benbodhi** | *more time to chat about props prior to voting and this is a reasonable length imo* ⌐◨-◨ **Josep** | *I believe that extending the decision period on proposals can help to make better decisions that lead to a better allocation of funds.* **Wattsy** | *In general, more time is better for getting the right people involved.* **Mach** | *Doesnt hurt* **Mindtoasted** | *<3 this idea* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *Some proposals take swift action: doubling the wait time to activate a propsal helps nobody* **JoelCares** | *The way this prop is written... it flows so smoothly... pure poetry. I dont even know what it says, I just support it. Plain and simple.* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 193 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 193 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 11
Amount11
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 193 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Nouncil Vote:** 45 Yes, 5 No, 1 Abstain 2 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Sasquatch** | *Looks amazing* **Benbodhi** | *Love this and been a supporter since the ideas started flowing.* ⌐◨-◨ **Josep** | *Having Victor continue his journey as a Nouns builder is very interesting. In his previous proposals he has proven to deliver on his proposals, I think we should support his cause.* **Wattsy** | *I dont know enough about sports and their community impact to make a fair decision here.* **profwerder** | *Excited for this initiative from a proliferation and social good perspective!* **Mach** | *I like the idea, think marketing could be saved a little but something permanent in LA could be big.* **Mindtoasted** | *From how they applied Kintsugi embellishes an objects on the basketball court they once repaired, that is the thing, can bring up many possibilities that come from those who are active in the world of basketball, Its a huge amount of request. I voted yes for this and if this goes on chain, hope there will be lots of Nounish culture growing in many direction.* **Coral Orca** | *its nounish and a good cause* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *it’s worth trying out this model with Victor & if all goes well bringing it to scale across the country would be unreal* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 192 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 192 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 11
Amount11
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 192 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Nouncil Vote:** 37 Yes, 5 No, 2 Abstain 6 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Benbodhi** | *Thoughtful and skilful giga brains.* ⌐◨-◨ **Wattsy** | *These are not industry standard salaries, they are much higher.* **Mach** | *Voting yes, but will be looking at the work done. I do not think that 450,000 per year in work has been done so far. Expect big contributions over the next 6 months.* **Mindtoasted** | *I proudly vote yes on this, the previous proposal went smoothly. A concrete team with a vision.* **Coral Orca** | *we like the verbs* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *No brainer* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 191 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 191 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 11
Amount11
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 191 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Nouncil Vote:** 30 Yes, 11 No, 1 Abstain 6 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **0xapril** | *Really love what mucho loved did. I think its great idea to expand what they did to world wide.* **heyjeff.eth** | *mucho love is bringing real change by directly interacting with people, that is very powerful* **Benbodhi** | *Nouns being recognised/learnt about it in this context is powerful. Nouns are good.* *⌐◨-◨* **Wattsy** | *This project seems to straddle both the overly ambitious context, as well as being hard to follow past the marketing in terms of truly actionable and measurable results.* **byhardy** | *Love having a charity arm of Nouns & I really really love the content arm. Social good content has huge potential. But retrofunding should be better explained to include past funding sources & why theyre being retrofunded. Also would like more transparency in how $$$ is being spent & on who? What are their roles? Why is the price of activations what it is (albeit reasonable)? Just need more answers here.* **Mindtoasted** | *IMO, Its a huge amount of request, with all the funding budget details for a 4 month time extension, it also proven that the previous proposal was running great, but Im not sure to vote yes for this amount of request so I vote no.* **Mach** | *Too much personnel pay to production usage. 50-50 is too much.* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *self explanatory* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 189 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 189 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 11
Amount11
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 189 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Nouncil Vote:** 44 Yes, 10 No, 1 Abstain 3 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Benbodhi** | *nounish af Gnars is a power pod of proliferation and is spreading the culture far and wide in the best way possible imo. ⌐◨-◨* **.ZllW ⌐◨-◨** | *Sub-DAO have proven to proliferate and expand nouns branding. (Lil Nouns, Gnar, FoodNouns,etc) No doubt a large ask, but Gnar led by Gami have been providing impactful proliferation around Nouns; thus trust that Gnar team would put this 694E to good use in crossing the chasm and scaling what they are doing* **Josep** | *I think other ways to finance the project over time should be explored, I dont see a plan to be reasonably self-sustainable over time. I believe that Gnars brings a lot to the image of Nouns DAO and for this reason I would like to see the proposal revisited by reducing the capital required over the time period, setting goals and creating a strategy to make Gnars profitable.* **Akva** | *As part of GnarsDAO core team, I abstain from voting on this proposal even though I really want to see it succeed* **Mach** | *Love how gnars is spreading the culture and using money efficiently to build a brand/the nouns brand* **systemdm.⌐◨-◨** | *Definetly Yes… In my opinion this kind of activations and proliferation and social impact is exactly what its all about….* **Sasquatch** | *easy yes* *the inspiration for a lot of work done at Nouns* *let our best builders have a clear runway for takeoff* **JoshuaFisher** | *you had me a gnello* **andreitr** | *Love Gnars and what they are doing. Lets keep the momentum going.* **Satori** | *Gnars are paving the way for subDAOs in many areas and I think it would be hugely beneficial for Nouns in the long run to facilitate their growth.* **JoelCares** | *keep on shreddin* **pemburux** | *Great initiative, great proliferation, and big yes from me* **Mindtoasted** | *This is a huge amount of request, but from a long term perspective, IMHO it can continue to push something that covers a wide range of things related to sports and athletes, especially for the Nouns itself, which has never been separated from anything highlighted before. I vote yes for this* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *Gami has done a great job previously with the grant he was give and theres no doubt he will so ever bigger and greater things wit
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 188 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 188 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 11
Amount11
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 188 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Nouncil Vote:** 34 Yes, 8 No, 2 Abstain 6 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Coral Orca** | *i like it* **marxistmillionaire** | *Nice to see this prop on-chain! The first Creator Contests were held for SharkDAO, so I witnessed the whole process from the very beginning. Solid team, very useful tool. Its a clear YES for me!* **andreitr** | *Love the UI and product direction. Solid prop, imho. @nick , lmk if you guys need any help with Twitter integration.* **Benbodhi** | *This platform has been a joy to use and reduces admin of running contests efficiently by a LOT. The team are receptive to changes and additions and I have had the pleasure of helping shape the direction and features for the last couple of months. We use it at TNS and have the ability to use this across a number of other communities/projects/DAOs that Im involved in.* ⌐◨-◨ **Coral Orca** | *sounds interesting and usefull* **Josep** | *I have been looking at your project and have been able to see the involvement of the team and functionality of your project for the DAO. I want to see what you are able to do in the future.* **JoshuaFisher** | *app has been great to use and very helpful* **byhardy** | *Bad timing here with the recent large funding of Prop House. Im of the belief that products with similar end goals should collaborate to benefit everyone, not divide attention.* **kerimbonia** | *even though im not 100% clear on the question of overlap with prop house and some of the push back on this proposal, im voting yes for the team on this one.* **wiznav** | *I think this overlaps too much with prop house* **Satori** | *This is a hugely beneficial tool for contests hosted on social media and I think this could co-exist or even be integrated into Prop House one day.* **pemburux** | *Its bad timing for this funding, actually we need more proliferation and less tooling* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 187 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 187 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 11
Amount11
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 187 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Nouncil Vote:** 45 Yes, 8 No, 0 Abstain 8 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Coral Orca** | *i like it* **Josep** | *I think these animations can be used in many ways to proliferate DAO Nouns, I like the idea and I trust the background of the builders.* **profwerder** | *I love this because I see it as creating base assets for builders to create with. This can really open options and make it easier for builders. As well as just a fun touch point/game to introduce nouns to normies.* **Mach** | *seems more like a prophouse project* **JoelCares** | *love the animations* **pemburux** | *I agree with this proposal, the animations created can later be used for other projects because they are CC0* **Benbodhi** | ** ⌐◨-◨ *for the culture* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *Love this interchangeable animations of nouns!* **lilpizza.eth** | *This seems like a big win for NounsDAO. I imagine a lot of people would utilize this API for animations as a public good. Im also a firm believer that gaming will be a great use-case for NFTs in the future and this is something NounsDAO needs to focus more heavily on for proliferation.* **Satori** | *Id like to see creative assets like this more widely available for creators. Also think we need more fun ways for people to use their Nouns and games like this may be a worthwhile experiment.* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 185 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 185 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 11
Amount11
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 185 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Nouncil Vote:** 52 Yes, 2 No, 0 Abstain 3 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **baba | 1579** | *This Prop is a YES for me, but also wish Lils had been included 😦* **CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧** | *yeah i wish FOODNOUNS was included in this too but we will take the build and do a lil something @Al409 😋 ...* *CHEFFO = YES* **Sasquatch** | *would love to see this prop done again with a different set of sub-communities* **Art Is My Weapon** | *Proliferation.* **modrovsky** | *⌐◨-◨* **Mach** | *all for, lets get the noggles out** **JoelCares** | *Love seeing these Noggles go to good use. I would have preferred an open call for noggle recipients, but I do see these communities using the noggles well.* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *Definitely need more noggles IRL* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *The Nouns Vision glasses to these 3 groups is a no brainer* **Benbodhi** | *⌐◨-◨* **.ZllW** | *Although wish that other sub-community were also included, example lil nouns, nounsbrazail, nounsinsg, etc. Overall good initiatives to have those nouns vision sitting in NounsDAO treasury being put to good use. Yes for me.* **BitcoinBob ⌐◨-◨** | *Yes* **Sasquatch** | *need to get these noggles out in the world proliferatin* **kerimbonia** | *in terms of proliferation and extending nouns visibility beyond the nft space, this proposal is a no-brainer.* **Mindtoasted** | *Yes from me its also great to see the other Nounish sub-communities included, hope this creates a nice outlook on each people who receive the sunglasses* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 184 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 184 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 11
Amount11
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 184 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Nouncil Vote:** 48 Yes, 3 No, 1 Abstain 4 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **0xFloyd** | *I view this as a crypto public service that benefits our whole industry* **Mach** | *same as before* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *ZachXBT is a machine & does great work for the web3 space* **Benbodhi** | *Zach’s work is a public good that benefits the entire space and hes clearly underfunded. Very nounish to help here.* **.ZllW** | *What Zach is doing is clearly good for the web3 space; a form of public goods that should be recognized. Yes for me.* **BitcoinBob ⌐◨-◨** | *yes* **Mindtoasted** | *Its still the same as what I voted before, from how detailed Zach investigated and revealed several projects in the past this could be a good new insight for Nouns. lately i personally follow some influential twitter people who provide good and bad concrete information in crypto space, in fact we need someone like this so I vote yes* **kerimbonia** | *full support for the work ZachXBT does so its a strong yes from me.* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 183 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 183 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 11
Amount11
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 183 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Nouncil Vote:** 49 Yes, 1 No, 0 Abstain 3 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **samellis ⌐◨-◨** | *more prop house please* **Benbodhi** | *Prop House is a powerful tool and I support the continuation of it.* **andreitr** | *hell yes* **JoelCares** | *Prop House is significantly useful Nounish architecture. Easy yes here. Let these smart people continue to build!* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *No brainer yes, prop house has been working great and will keep doing so long as it keeps getting funded and ran by the people currently in charge* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *Excited to start the Tiny Dinos 1st prophouse round in the coming weeks. Huge fan of the protocal* **BitcoinBob ⌐◨-◨** | *yes* **Mindtoasted** | *Tight team, proven impact, I vote yes.* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 182 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 182 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 11
Amount11
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 182 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Nouncil Vote:** 38 Yes, 6 No, 1 Abstain 7 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **profwerder** | *Love this. BUT I WANT A FLAMINGO OR I’M VOTING NO! 🦩🦩🦩🦩🦩* *(jk already voted yes)* **SuperTightWoody** | *This is a no brainer for me- the use we all get out of these filters is priceless and Coral is the bestest :)* **Bigshot Klim** | *big yes for this. The builder has been doing great work and has proven to make high quality content. AR filets are high value assets for proliferation and we need more of these* **.ZllW** | *Love the filter, strong proof of work, nounish and will live on the internet forever 2x Nounish!* **Benbodhi** | *These filters have the potential to reach outside the Nouns bubble and theyre fun to use. Also helpful for people looking to retain some anonymity online with video calls and live streams.* **JoelCares** | *Love these. Super useful and set the stage for lots of future marketing endeavours with them. Price is reasonable, OG Nouns builder. Lets do it.* **fiveoceans_dev** | *I love these ar filters. it makes sense to me to fund more filters* **Mach** | *love the AR filters, they do great in the esports realm, happy to support more* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *The more the better! These filters being all across multiple social platforms will be really good for new people to discover!* **kerimbonia** | *AR is the future and I see great value in having as many nouns filters ready to go asap. coral orca, being one of the creators behind 3d nouns, gets my support as well knowing that he is a solid community member with a proven track record of delivering high quality nounish content.* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *We’ve used Corals Orcas Snap Camera heads for video content for The Noun Square through Riverside & they’re a great resource* **Mindtoasted** | *So Nounish and used by many people including me! I vote totally yes on this!* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 181 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 181 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 11
Amount11
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 181 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Nouncil Vote:** 35 Yes, 7 No, 2 Abstain 4 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Bigshot Klim** | *I think this will be a very interesting experiment, especialy once there is more awareness and engagement after the Rose Bowl parade. I am for all of this prop.* **CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧** | *I think @samellis ⌐◨-◨ summed it up on this one 👏 . My only thing would maybe bring the minimum view up a little, but that might be ambitious to start.* *Content is king. If anyone saw the screens from Beyond Basel and other exhibits..it is clear that content wins. We need young creative talent to keep Nouns and all related projects relevant.* *The Prop House element is excellent and a great use of that tech.* *CHEFFO = YES* **Mach** | *Low criteria with too high a reward. Poorly incentivizes growth and could potentially reward insane viewership $s* **profwerder** | *This prop is a bit confusing tbh but there are some good team members here so I ultimately came to a yes after chatting with a zebra. I recommend the team create some clarity around the process so participants are clear on expectations and create some AMA sessions to answer questions. You may also want to jump on some spaces to talk about it & answer questions.* **kerimbonia** | *i am interested in seeing how the mechanics of this proposal plays out as there is a lot to be learned in terms of attracting high caliber teams to the nouns ecosystem and getting the most impactful nouns content out of it. good luck!* **Benbodhi** | *This model has proven positive on a smaller scale, will be interesting to see how it goes with such large rewards.* **andreitr** | *Always yes for more content.* **fiveoceans_dev** | *A very well written proposal! I like the idea and already can see that it will bring a lot of attention from creators. I feel that it will be a successful proliferation campaign!* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *I feel like the reward at the end for participation in this will be a really cool incentive for people to create compelling nouns content for the next few months* **Mindtoasted** | *This could give a huge boost to the underrated video creator teams out there, can also continue to encourage the production of more Nounish videos in a wider scope. If this goes smoothly there is a possibility that Nounish hype content will explode in some way. I vot
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 180 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 180 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 11
Amount11
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 180 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Nouncil Vote:** 50 Yes, 5 No, 1 Abstain 2 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **heyjeff.eth** | *looks super dope - just voted yes* **CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧** | *This looks great. Again we are starting to see props where groups of OG nounish builders are using the established vibes and channels to start to bring in other talent...in a creatively managed way. This is one of the future styles of onboarding that needs to be experimented with and doubled down on now.* *One of the best ways to proliferate will be to create lore. Lore allows for creative growth, story telling and IRL experience marketing.* *The prop also does a good job of fund allocation/re-allocation. The budget is correct and relatively speaking could drive engagement on a much higher level than other items in this range.* *The team is pro and will do a great job of finding and working with talent. Incorporating Prop House is also a good way to open the build and utilize and promote one of the strongest tools in the eco. CHEFFO = YES* **!xargs** | *no brainer. love it.* **fiveoceans_dev** | *I love proposals that have creative elements and focused on interaction with community. This proposal will definitely create a lot of positive vibes.* **Bigshot Klim** | *more proliferation like this gets more eyeballs* **kerimbonia** | *i like the short story format as it encourages the creation of high quality, funny content with a clear punchline. only the best of the best can survive this 15 second format and that sets the bar high, which is a good thing... solid team gets my support as well.* **Mach** | *Like the idea, and believe there is always more room for media production* **profwerder** | *I love this talented crew and can’t wait to see how this goes!* **BENJAMIN LATSKO ⌐◧-◧** | *BIG YES* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *Great group of nouncilers coming together for new short story content! Cant wait to see all the new animations coming out of this prop* **JoshuaFisher** | *Narrative Nouns for the win!* **Mindtoasted** | *Shorts is something that people mostly consume on many platforms now, every shorts memes will have a distinct taste, so i vote yes on this and i hope every shorts that come from this are Nounish* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 179 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 179 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 11
Amount11
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 179 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Prop 179 Nouncil Vote Results** 41 Yes, 9 No, 0 Abstain 4 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧:** *this builder is fascinating and also has done a great job of making videos and explaining the idea. we need to be a space for conceptual art...also the community being able to participate in scripting and concepts is fun and nounish...I also like that the budget includes promotion.* *CHEFFO = YES* **!xargs:** *We would meme the sh@t out of it. hahaha! big fun.* **Joel Cares:** *The videos make me laugh, the characters with noggles look great, love Marcs performance history, lets do it!* **kerimbonia:** *i love the concept. i love the art. i love the vibe. its outside of the nounish box and think there is something important to be discovered with this proposal when it comes to nounish conceptual art more on the absurd side of things. its well thought out with a budget for marketing which is super important for this style of show.* **Mach:** *love the direction and from a quality outside member. Excited to see the production* **BENJAMIN LATSKO ⌐◧-◧:** *Im working with the team to further develop their marketing efforts and produce BTS content* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨:** *Voting yes here because this creator looks to have a lot of previous experience creating cool and engaging video content and it would be really cool to see more Nouns videos by him! =)* **Mindtoasted:** *Unique details, concepts and goals from a concrete background team could create a new unique spark in the spread of Nounish videos. Curious about the behind-the-scenes stages and more of the people behind this, big yes from me as a big fan of video production concept* **JoshuaFisher:** *These videos are extremely Nounish* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 178 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 178 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 11
Amount11
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 178 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Nouncil Vote Results** 31 Yes, 13 No, 0 Abstain 5 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons** --- **andrewladdusaw** *Seems like a no-brainer. Great team, great mission, overhead far below the norm for capital allocation in the rest of the community. Easy yes for me.* **profwerder** *Agree —great team and seems like a good trial run but I think the team should have included more comp for themselves. This is going to be more work than you may realize. Love the experiment!* **Bigshot Klim** *no brainer for me too* **CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧** *this prop is good. it will attract high level talent with a clear on-boarding and application process. the numbers are clear and proportional, the team comps are correct. cant wait to see what is built. CHEFFO = YES* **shad_0** *it’s a lovely idea!* **fiveoceans_dev** *I vote for this proposal because I believe there should be competition for best allocation of treasury. The team is nounish and I trust that they will do a good job.* **Bigshot Klim** *We need more ways to keep new builders engaged and learn as they go in this space* **Joel Cares** *Fully support experiments in on-boarding new builders.* **Mach** *seems like something that could be done and reward retroactive funding instead of active comp* **BENJAMIN LATSKO ⌐◧-◧** *I think its a fun experiment. But not convinced its something sustainable and scalable. I also dont see how it will actually benefit the flywheel dynamics* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** *Looks like a great way to bring in new established creatives into the nouns ecosystem!* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 177 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 177 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 11
Amount11
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 177 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: --- **Nouncil Vote Results** --- 43 Yes, 12 No, 3 Abstain 3 Nouncillors abstained from the decision --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Benbodhi** *ZachXBT does amazing work and has a solid crypto audience. Probably wise to help fund him for the benefit of the space and some cross promo to his audience.* **JoshuaFisher** *supporting good works is Nounish* **profwerder** *This needs more work & development. What are the deliverables? How does this proliferate the meme? Why not support 0xquit or foobar? Why him? I don’t think that has been explained in this prop OR any support for this particular person’s qualifications. Not fully against this but thats a lot of eth on a vague prop.* **Sasquatch** *zachxbt goat* **Don** *Zach is a the crypto communitys version of super heroes! Easy yes.* **Brook** *- i wish there was more clarity in the proposal - what sort of precedent does it set for others like zach? for example, do nouners up and fund another person who is doing something similar? - it would be nice to hear back from zach about this proposal. his last tweet was on Nov 29, 2022 - it wasnt about this proposal. - what was the rationale behind determining the amount? ^^^ all things that should be thought about as we move forward funding Public Goods / Persons.* **Mach** *zach does great work, will love to continue supporting it* **ThaSwami** *Not enough information provided that clearly defines the use of funds* **JoelCares** *Hell ya - would be proud to support Zachs work.* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** *ZachXBT is the Michael Jordan of uncovering crypto grifers & scammers. I’ve followed his work for a long time & he works off donations. About 3 months ago he almost quit bc he was making zero revenue & mentally taxed. The space needs more ZachXBTs bc we have so many bad actors right under our noses. This is a 100% yes vote on my end: hopefully this helps him add more players to his roster* **Mindtoasted** *This is quite a big amount, but from how detailed Zach investigated and exposed several projects in the past this could be a good new insight for Nouns. Lately I personally follow several influential Twitter figures who provide concrete information both good and bad in the crypto space, in fact we need people like this so I vote yes.* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** *Looking through Twitter I see a lot of examples of Zach exposing a lot of bad actors in the
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 176 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 176 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 11
Amount11
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 176 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Results: How should Nouncil vote: 43 YES, 1 NO, 2 ABSTAIN 3 Nouncillors abstained from the decision. --- Discussion from Nouncil Discord --- --- (https://discord.gg/nouncil) --- CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧ The Archive is important and will hold so much beautiful art and stories. Joel Cares This prop feels necessary and I would be excited to browse through all of this art regularly. Oh - and the website is great, but Id also love if the Notion DB was publically viewable, so I could sort and query and explore right from that. heyjeff.eth I love this idea overall - i think its needed in the ecosystem. Bigshot Klim I love this idea and the interface is sweet
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 175 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 175 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 11
Amount11
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 175 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Nouncil is overall in favor of 175. Nouncillors voted 34 YES, 7 NO, and 2 ABSTAIN (using the new anonymous Discord voting powered by Nerman Bot.) Some excerpts from the discussion thread: There should be multiple options for builders to choose as partners for their props. These things are our babies and we want them to be handled by people who share same values and care. If we dont have these options I think that we will drive away many ... the only people that have interacted with my requests for help there are the same people putting this prop together so I am all in to support this prop which I think will help so many -Klim I have voted yes because I see this as a pilot and a building block for growth. The team includes some of the smartest, strongest communicators and most well meaning people in the ecosystem. I trust the intentions, durability and consistency of the team. -Cheffo Prop discussion is a very valuable service that people in Nouncil have been providing without any clear reward in sight, and the people in this prop have all been actively providing prop feedback without compensation for months. -Joel This (reads) like a request to allocate 10 ETH with an overhead of 65 ETH to fund the team, which is roughly ~90% overhead -Juan
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 174 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 174 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 11
Amount11
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 174 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Nouncil Vote Results: YES - 57 NO - 0 ABSTAIN - 0 Discussion from Nouncil Discord (https://discord.gg/nouncil) marxistmillionaire I really enjoy your newsletters and summaries, maty. Really helpful for people who aren‘t able to follow everything themselves. byhardy Very reasonable ask for such a great tool & Nounish builder. That notion is a behemoth. Excited to see the data become prettier — the notion can only go so far. Also love the Newsletter! profwerder Such an easy yes! Great work maty!! metamonk this is much needed. great prop
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 173 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 173 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 11
Amount11
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 173 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Vote Results: 64 YES, 6 NO, 4 ABSTAIN - DISCUSSION HIGHLIGHTS - andrewladdusaw Oh, for a life at sea... Wattsy | Nouns Game Engine (NGE) Really organized proposal. And as a former sailor, Im biased. ChrisCoCreated Plenary to like about this I’m a yes. One question comes to mind, what happens if the weather is terrible? andreitr I love this. Good job on the prop, fiveoceans_dev marxistmillionaire I‘m a big fan of your nounish sailing campaigns. They create awesome imagery. I think it would be important to get a bunch of journalists and reporters on board. This campaign has the potential to get lots of people interested into Nouns imo. But only, if we get some media coverage. Bigshot Klim I think with proper documentation like drone footage around the Statue of Liberty and the lower Manhattan would be epic. If you can engage a new york club perhaps doing something with the sails at fleet week would be possible too --- For more Nounish proposal discussions join our discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 172 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 172 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 11
Amount11
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 172 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Nouncils Vote Results: 62 YES, 3 NO, 3 ABSTAIN Discussions from Nouncil Discord: Al409 this is fantastic Joel Cares This will be a useful tool for many builders. Noice. andreitr agree, solid utility motiondesign.eth What’s the issue with distributing in eth? Brook Very important utility. An useful way to support builders outside of crypto. But as a crypto-native protocol, shouldn’t nouns leverage ETH more than USDC? Being ETH-exclusive is more than just the currency, it opens up doors to onboard others into crypto. To balance both helping builders and being crypto-native, I think a threshold (if more than x Ξ is requested, convert to USD) could be in place Join the Nouncil Discord for some of the best Proposal discussion happening in the ecosystem: https://discord.gg/nouncil
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 171 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 171 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 11
Amount11
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 171 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: “There is a valid need for Nouns programs to provide funding in this range, and the team is a solid group of Nounish Folk. My only concern is that the admin costs are 40% of the ask. I support this prop but hope that in future iterations, as the group scales, they can improve on the ratio of admin costs to allocated ETH.” - Joel Cares “Love this idea as its an existing grey area that Ive encountered myself at nounfrica,where we have a prop but no definite place to apply for funding. Agree with Joel Cares about the admin costs needing improvements. Otherwise a good prop.” - Don “I like the prop! My personal concern are the different areas it’s supporting - pretty much anything from software/tech to art and marketing. I think especially for a pod it makes sense to choose a specific industry, product or product category and not just go after everything - aka a niche.” - Benjamin Latsko “I support this fully, as is. A tremendous amount of admin time is a simple reality if what Juan just said is to become a reality. All team members have delivered above and beyond consistently.” - !xargs “As a prop builder this is so relatable, being stuck in a awkward stage of mid tier ask aiming to scale up gradually. Fully support DCS pod.” - .ZllW
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 170 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 170 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 11
Amount11
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 170 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Nouncil is voting FOR this proposal after an internal poll saw 53 YES, 10 NO and 11 ABSTAIN votes. Some excerpts from Nouncil discussion: This is super exciting! very well written/thought out Al409 Yes - a wonderful way to proliferate. Interesting to gamify naming systems, too, by reserving 0-669 to Nouners. Almost synonymous with the value of early number ENS’s. -Brook As one of the very first projects to integrate the NNS initial code into a front end, FOODNOUNS loves NNS. The high level concept is a no brainer. We will all benefit from an exponential and creative growth of NNS. -Cheffo Love this initiative -Boanez I think nns is fun, i like seeing it in the auctions, but i feel like at the end of the day, its still just a gimmick. -Maty Join the Nouncil Discord for some of the best Proposal discussion happening in the ecosystem: https://discord.gg/s9aGsAzzM2
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 169 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 169 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 11
Amount11
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 169 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Results: 54 Yes, 1 Abstain **Sidenoun** with more DAO’s and multisigs, this I feel will add that extra motivation for people to vote. As a Nouncil signer, this will definitely help **JoelCares** With Gnosis Safe transactions it makes sense to refund the gas directly to the person who paid it rather than sending the refund to the safe. I agree with this change.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 166 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 166 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 14
Amount14
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 166 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: 62 Yes, 3 No, 6 Abstain XIN I almost exclusively vote no on all props for physical advertising campaigns. I think afk/irl advertising with merch etc doesn’t actually make anyone interested in a project. Especially at events that are filled with advertisements and tons of companies i domt think it makes sense for the huge amounts of money required. I think the money is always spent better on either digital art or software since they can reach everyone with no costs and doesnt produce things like tshirts that get very small use and then thrown away I think afk/irl stuff should be very limited and done when they have a strong value and are innovative in some way or help people in some way (like the glasses donated to children) Juan ⌐◨-◨ a bit confused as to what content & efforts Stoopid Buddy is doing vs OTG, arent we already shooting tons of footage? Also, it seems to me that the big media draw is going to be the parade float, not the t-shirts and stickers thrown out along the route. andrewladdusaw Interesting take. My first thought was no as well until I saw the numbers of items and people that plan to get out. Im actually for this now because if were already in on the float and the documentary, why wouldnt we want to attempt to maximize as much as possible? I do like where your head is at with it though. profwerder This is a big YES for me! This isn’t just about an event—-this is TONS of content that will be used for YEARS to come! We should seek out every way to bolster this opportunity and maximize it. For the amount of FREE advertising this event will get Nouns, this is a small ask. JoshuaFisher we’re shooting a 1M documentary of this event so we should def make the most of it Would be awesome if someone put up a really robust digital campaign for this too When it comes to Nouns, at this stage, I’m always thinking Yes AND systemdm.⌐◨-◨ Big YES for me as well.. I disagree with the idea that IRL events and merch are not effective. I dont think there is a better way of onboarding Humanity, new people on to Nouns and web3 in general. Online only is like preaching to the choir. I think this is an amazing idea for a hitsoric family oriented event enjoyed by millions, not just in the US BTW. I would watch every year with my family as a child in Santo Domingo.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 165 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 165 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 14
Amount14
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 165 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: “Voting yes here but think :30 and :60 is a huge difference in time.” - Joshua Fisher “I’d love to see two experiments. This one for an explainer and another 100ETH to retro 100 video creators with 1ETH to make their best Nouns video and 10 ETH to a team to decide which 100 get the reward. I just think that the latter would win out by far in proliferation. That’s why I’m against 150k explainer videos. It’s a real struggle for me.” - Andrew Laddusaw “I love the work and concept the studio is bringing here, but voted a no because I dont see a plan for getting this video seen. Id change my vote if the team is able to come back with a plan for generating views. Unlike BAYC, or any centralized project, we have no in house marketing team that can effectively make use of the content, so by default that responsibility falls on the head of the proposing team.” - Yitong “Top talent on this team, would love to see more nounish content from them!” - Benbodhi
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 164 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 164 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 14
Amount14
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 164 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Love the DAO x DAO collaboration with Gnars also sponsoring, love the proposals focus on clearly describing the exact proliferation plans, love the people involved. Easy yes.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 163 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 163 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 15
Amount15
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 163 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Nouncil has proved to be a solid ground for proposal discussion and the initiatives within have been a powerful method of proliferation.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 162 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 162 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 15
Amount15
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 162 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Votes: (44 Y, 2 N, 0 A) This group has done excellent work in prior events and we support their continued efforts.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 161 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 161 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 15
Amount15
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 161 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ Nouncil votes FOR Prop 161. (64 Yes, 2 No, 1 Abstain) **Discussion from Nouncil Discord:** https://discord.gg/nouncil **JoelCares** Strong yes from me. I would like to increase both of these values further, but am ok with this in the interim. Voting Delay + Voting Period needs to be at least 7 days combined in order to guarantee each prop will be discussed on various subdao weekly meetings.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 156 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 156 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 14
Amount14
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 156 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ This work is fascinating and Nouncil voted strongly in favour. This is a talented group building foundational things for Nouns. We look forward to your continued work and seeing more Nounish videos generated by AI.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 155 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 155 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 17
Amount17
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 155 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ Nouncil supports CDT with a a deafening roar of support and an overwhelming 69 yes votes. CDTs work must continue. In conclusion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZYJ_6Xo4-E
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 154 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 154 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 14
Amount14
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 154 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Nouncil has voted in favour of Agora Continuation. Initially there was less support on the first iteration of the proposal, but after a few rounds of iteration, the support from Nouncil has grown to an overwhelming majority (57 FOR / 2 Against / 0 Abstain). The potential for increased participation in governance is a clear benefit and empowering people to showcase their desire to be a delegate with incentives on the way is an interesting approach.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 152 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 152 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 152 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ **Results** YES wins with 98% support **Reasons** Great prop. Very important to improve the protocol - @akva#0001 great to see the nuts and bolts side on things - @metamonk#0001 This looks excellent. I hope we can implement most if not all into FOODNOUNS. Thats a Yes for me dog! - @CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧#2859 Very happy to see development on the Nouns DAO protocol. Gas Refunds for voting is an obvious win, same with the bug fixes. Im curious about how Dynamic Quorum will play out - which proposals will get rejected because of the change, and how we will configure the parameters in the future. Interesting change nonetheless! - @JoelCares#5898
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 151 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 151 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 15
Amount15
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 151 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Nouncil has voted YES unanimously to refill NSFW. A lot of prop builders got their start via NSFW funding and the potential for impact is large. Some Nouncillors posed the question who makes up the rest of the NSFW team with Noun22? during Nouncil calls - this was the only real feedback.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 150 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 150 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 15
Amount15
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 150 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Nouncil is voting FOR this proposal with a majority vote of 56 for, 5 against, 4 abstains and 0 abstaining from the vote altogether. There was some concern from a few members about how this might affect the DAO when people can comment anonymously. But theres overwhelming support to see this proposal go forward and consensus is that it will be positive.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 147 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 147 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 15
Amount15
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 147 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ 🙏 Yes wins. (28 yes, 2 no, 25 abstain) ~~ marxistmillionaire ~~ It doesnt feel right to me that some of the curators are also among the winners. I sometimes work as a curator in real life and such overlaps are not accepted there for obvious reasons. Even if the curators dont choose the winners. ~~ fiveoceans_dev ~~ I think everyone will agree if competition for winning trait will be 100 eth. Currently, compensation is 132 for 11 winning traits. We literally spending lots of time to cut 12 eth per trait to 9 eth per trait, roughly. I think it is not such a big difference…. It’s better to pass this prop on focus on future props ~~ samellis ~~ I think all traits should be awarded the same.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 146 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 146 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 15
Amount15
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 146 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ 🙏 Yes wins. (50 yes, 1 no, 7 abstain, 1 x) ~~ ThaSwami ~~ I think its great to reward everyone who submitted traits, but Coordinape voting might be overkill. Im of the view that anyone who took the time to contribute some art should get rewarded, irrespective of how many they submitted, quality of work or who they interacted with. Im in favour of a simple pro-rata of ETH amongst the number of artists. We could setup clearer guidelines for rewards next season ~~ JoelCares ~~ Personally think this would be fun, help build community across the broad group of participants, and give the community a voice in evaluating quality. The current structure (3 GIVE tokens) would not be rewarding general participation, it would be rewarding the runner up work valued most by the community.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 145 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 145 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 15
Amount15
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 145 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Nouncil Results: Yes: 94% No: 0% Abstain: 6% Bring Nouns to the people ⌐◨-◨ 🙏
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 144 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 144 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 15
Amount15
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 144 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Nouncil Results: Yes: 64% No: 8% Abstain: 28% This will allow one click for any subDAO as well, so well instantly have a multitude of other nounish bots giving Twitter updates on auctions and other activities. Thats the main benefit for me. I think its going to be a proliferation monster for the price. - andrewladdusaw they also have a good record making these bots - fiveoceans_dev
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 143 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 143 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 14
Amount14
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 143 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ reading ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ reading ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ reading ⌐◨-◨ Yep, looks nounish.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 142 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 142 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 14
Amount14
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 142 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Nouncil has voted almost unanimously FOR this proposal. The ask is low for high impact with a few aspects including educating kids about the DAO and onboarding them to crypto in general in a country where NFT usage is 2nd highest in the world. The DAO to DAO proposal pipeline is also a really interesting approach to funding things that extension communities support but cant necessarily fund directly and have the ability to submit an on chain proposal at Nouns DAO.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 141 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 141 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 14
Amount14
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 141 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: I’ve been waiting for this. I have faith in Klim! Good luck, Klim. love the enthusiasm and hard work. overall, getting a lot of vibe rooting for this.... toys are cool, nounish toys--even cooler! ^ Some of the feedback from the Nouncil Votes Chat. Nouncil voted almost unanimously to support Klims proposal and put it on chain, and then 48-1-2 in favor of a YES vote here. We believe in Klims vision and his value as a Nouncillor and a builder, and we cant wait to see these toys in production. ⌐◨-◨
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 140 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 140 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 14
Amount14
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 140 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Without Prop House, Nouncil would be, like, 5 builders, instead of 100 strong. Nouncil <3 Prop House
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 139 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 139 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 14
Amount14
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 139 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Big giant yes. Awesome video. Nouns garage band! Love love loveeeee this project and idea!!! This is great on so many levels, presentation is spoot on and the concept is excellent Nothing but positivity about this proposal can be found anywhere in Nouncil channels. Woody has been a fixture in nouncil and in nouns for the past 7+ months has brought so much joy with his musical and production skills (Nouncil theme song, Woodys Soundboard, etc.) A soundscape / sonic aesthetic is important for any brand and nobody had tried to do one for nouns yet, so it feels like a no-brainer to give the Grammy-nominated noun-pilled a producer to blow our minds. Nouncil voted 55-0-0 unanimously in support of this proposal and this builder.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 138 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 138 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 14
Amount14
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 138 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: During the weekly nouncil call, it felt like most were initially against the proposal. Through discussions, the point was made that the ask is fairly small by on-chain prop standards, and the potential reach could be outsized considering the parties involved, and for that reason a fair number of nouncillors changed their votes to yes. It was nonetheless still a contentious vote, with only 21 YES, 12 NO and a whopping 17 undecided Abstentions. Because we calculate our Nouncil quorum including Abstentions, we are voting FOR this prop and we hope it will bring thousands of new eyeballs to nouns.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 137 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 137 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 14
Amount14
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 137 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: We need to not only extend but also multiply this action, said Nouncillor Klim in Nouncil Votes Chat, and clearly Nouncil agreed, Voting unanimously FOR with 54 votes. Necfas and co, keep on proliferating nouns with public goods in the DR (and hopefully beyond!)
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 136 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 136 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 14
Amount14
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 136 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Nouncil voted to put this proposal on chain on behalf of Brennen (who delegates his tokens to Nouncil.) During discussions on the weekly call with the proposer, Nouncillors liked the idea of having a conference to shape to Nouns vision over time, and the idea of proliferating the Noggles meme directly to people interested in web 3 seemed like a worthy pursuit. Ultimately, Nouncil voted 29-2-12 in favor of this proposal.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 135 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 135 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 14
Amount14
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 135 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Nouncil was impressed by the effort and detail that went into this proposal. Many also expressed excitement around the repository of assets that will be made available as part of the deal. It was mentioned that during his appearance on Noun O Clock at The Noun Square, Blu and his partner seemed genuinely passionate about Nouns and excited to work on this project in collaboration. Some raised questions about whether the production costs might be high, but ultimately most Nouncillors felt it will be worth the investment, both for the exposure that could come from the production itself and from the assets that will be created for free future use.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 133 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 133 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 14
Amount14
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 133 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ SharkDAO have been great contributors to the Nouns ecosystem and Nouncillors recognise this with a unanimous vote FOR this proposal. We hope to see them enabled to make more impact through this initiative.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 132 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 132 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 14
Amount14
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 132 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 130 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 130 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 14
Amount14
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 130 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Nouncil has voted in favor of The Nouns Almanac 2nd Edition. There was discussion around props like this aiming to become self sufficient, knowing there would be plans for further editions. The cost has been brought up by Nouners as being too much as well.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 129 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 129 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 14
Amount14
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 129 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: #nouncil-votes results: 22 Yes, 21 No, 6 Abstain
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 128 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 128 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 13
Amount13
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 128 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Nouncil voted unanimously in favor of this proposal, with 51 YES, 0 NO, 8 ABSTENTIONS, 2 BAN EMOJIS, 4 MANGIA HAND EMOJIS, 3 100 EMOJIS and a GOOD LUCK CLOVER for good measure. Some Nouncillor comments from the Discord discussion thread: This is a cost of 3 days of noun auctions. There is no question about the ROI, easy yes vote I vote yes for a dream NounOClock team! too much handsomeness not to co-sign ⌐◨-◨
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 126 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 126 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 13
Amount13
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 126 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 125 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 125 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 13
Amount13
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 125 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: With 51 yes votes, 18 thumbs up, 2 wows, 38 vibes, 6 mandancings, and 373 corn reacts, Nouncil has boldy declared its support for this controversial proposal. We like Nouns, we like art, we like the number 8, we like birthdays, couches, hangers, grease. Cant go wrong on this one. ⌐◨-◨ 🙏
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 124 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 124 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 10
Amount10
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 124 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 123 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 123 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 10
Amount10
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 123 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 121 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 121 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 10
Amount10
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 121 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Nouncil has voted 41-0-3 in favor of this proposal. Sam spoke on our weekly call and gave an outline of his teams project. He argued that top tier animation talent will not leave secure employment for a short term gig, so if the DAO wants something truly amazing to be produced here, a sufficiently scaled project is required to attract them. We know Sam to be a consistent builder in the space and a talented illustrator and so even though this Proposal ask is quite large, overall we support his efforts to try and make something really special here that could truly raise the profile of the Nouns brand tremendously if executed properly. If this Proposal fails, we hope Sam and team will find another way to iterate, reframe, and try again.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 120 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 120 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 10
Amount10
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 120 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Unfortunately there was a bit of contention among nouncil members. While wellness is a good focus that is seemingly nounish, this prop feels to some like it is not nounish enough and the previous experience mentioned is not in the current app market.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 119 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 119 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 10
Amount10
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 119 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ Nouncil likes the Esports pod! Continued proliferation in an impactful way. Keep up the good work. gg ⌐◨-◨
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 118 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 118 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 10
Amount10
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 118 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Nouncil has voted almost unanimously (50-1-1) in favor of this initiative. A comment from the discussion thread: At broad level, am leaning in to props in emerging economies... because grants go further there, and opportunity is larger due to sheer population density. -Mintfaced On the Nouncil call, Nouncillors expressed an affinity for and trust in B, and general excitement to see how much proliferation this pod can achieve in Brazil.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 116 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 116 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 116 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ Nouncil has voted unanimously in support of this proposal. We like the nounish comics and look forward to seeing how this progresses.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 114 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 114 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 10
Amount10
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 114 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: https://tenor.com/3zDN.gif
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 113 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 113 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 10
Amount10
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 113 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: This will be a good way to introduce Nouns to ordinary folk.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 112 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 112 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 10
Amount10
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 112 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Unanimous support from Nouncil for this Proposal. The previous trial was a resounding success and we are as excited as everyone to see how much more Proliferation this team can kickstart with another round of funding.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 111 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 111 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 111 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ Noun22 has been an amazing Nounish ambassador! The effects of his work will be long experienced by the people he supports and the wider ecosystem. There was a unanimous YES vote from Nouncil! We like Noun22! 🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨 🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨 🟨🟥🟥🟥⬜️⬛️🟥🟥🟥⬜️⬛️🟥🟨 🟨🟥🟨🟥⬜️⬛️🟥🟨🟥⬜️⬛️🟥🟨 🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨 🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 110 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 110 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 110 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ The Nouncil has voted in favour of prop 110 with with a huge majority consensus. Aubtoshi, also a Nouncillor, absolutely crushed this mission the first time around and is an amazing nounish ambassador with involvement in multiple endeavours including: Nouns on the Ground The Nouncil The Noun Square at ⌐ⓝ°ⓒ ⌐◨-◨ This support is reflected in our discussions and voting as Nouncil. There are so many opportunities for unexpected positive results with this prop execution and we’re excited to see the next phase. ⌐◨-◨ Nouners! The Nouncil votes using delegated Nouns. If you like the work of The Nouncil and would like to delegate your votes, please consider delegating your nouns to nouncil.eth. ⌐◨-◨
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 109 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 109 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 109 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ The Nouncil has voted in favour of prop 109 as majority consensus is supportive of the mission. We like the cut and sew.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 108 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 108 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 108 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 105 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 105 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 105 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 104 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 104 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 104 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 103 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 103 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 103 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 102 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 102 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 102 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 101 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 101 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 101 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: One Noun Square, every day, forever. 🙏
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 100 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 100 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 100 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ 🍻
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 99 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 99 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 99 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ 💨⛵
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 98 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 98 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 98 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 97 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 97 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 97 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Premium OpenSauce baked beans 🙏
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 95 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 95 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 13
Amount13
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 95 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Nouncil was impressed by the sheer amount of proliferation included in this Proposal for such a relatively low ask. Well done B, we cant wait to see the results! One suggestion was made to potentially engage a photographer to capture professional images of the initiatives for social media and marketing purposes (perhaps this could be funded by Small Grants if it requires additional funding.)
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 94 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 94 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 13
Amount13
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 94 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: This was one of our most contentious votes to date, with 17 Y, 15 N and 5 Abstentions. Overall feedback was that the project is a great idea but maybe lacked overt Nounishness. Project proposers dropped into Nouncil channel to discuss, and argued that CC0 image repositories are inherently Nounish, and this ultimately swayed enough support for a Yes Result. Ser Noadz made a suggestion of tying in some kind of Nounish art contest to make the connection more overt, we hope to see something like this integrated during execution.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 92 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 92 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 13
Amount13
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 92 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 91 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 91 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 13
Amount13
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 91 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: r-[ g ]-[ g ]
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 90 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 90 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 13
Amount13
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 90 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 89 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 89 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 13
Amount13
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 89 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: we support noggles on wall 🙏 _|___|___|___|___|___| ___|___|___|___|___|__ _|___⌐◨-◨___|___|___| ___|___|___|___|___|__ _|___|___|___|___|___| ___|___|___|___⌐◨-◨__ _|___|___|___|___|___| ___⌐◨-◨___|___|___|__ _|___|___|___|___|___| ___|___|___|___|___|__
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 87 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 87 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 10
Amount10
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 87 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Looking forward to seeing these posters, such a solid roster of artists. ⌐◨-◨🙏
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 85 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 85 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 10
Amount10
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 85 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Dutch Impressionist Vincent Van Gogh once famously wrote: Great things are done by a series of small things brought together. Its amazing that he was able to predict Nouns Small Grants more than 130 years ago. Keep up the great work Small Grants Team!
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 84 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 84 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 10
Amount10
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 84 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: We overall support this team. They did a great job on their last similar project. Nouns coffee is something that has been talked about a lot and this is the first serious effort to make it happen. We trust the product and branding will be high quality, so for these reasons we are voting Yes. One piece of feedback that did come up during Nouncillor discussion was that we would like to see Proposals (especially those with relatively substantial asks) go up on Discourse for at least a couple days for discussion and feedback before going on chain. This way Nouncil (and the broader Nouns community) has time to ask clarifying questions about budget, success metrics, etc. We are voting YES here in spite of this not having been done in this case, but would encourage future Proposers to consider this route when possible. By the way, we also welcome Proposers to Post their ideas in Nouncil for feedback, or ask to have it added to our weekly call Agenda.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 83 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 83 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 8
Amount8
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 83 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Brandons Nounish art is really special, and the world needs to see more of it. wen Nouncillor Brandon? https://tenor.com/bSR8O.gif
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 82 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 82 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 8
Amount8
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 82 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: As a representative council of mostly Nounish extension projects, Nouncil thinks Proposal 82 is a more responsible precedent to set in this regard. There are many ways that Nounish projects may (and do) give back to the DAO and pay the spirit of CC0 forward, and we think Nouns should be careful not to unduly reward certain types of contributions over others. Goes without saying, we love Nouncillor Dot and his Lil Nouns, and are excited to see all his success since launch. We are also excited to see an historic DAO-DAO Noun purchase if this Proposal is successful!
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 77 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 77 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 77 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Even if we had never heard of this Joel guy before (Who is he? Does he really Care?), this proposal would have impressed Nouncil. First, Joel successfully sought funding for an MVP, and delivered. Then, he wrote a very detailed execution plan for an expanded scope, posted it to Discourse, and then hustled for feedback from Nouners and Nouncillors alike. The final on-chain proposal is front-loaded with an easily digested paragraph outlining Deliverables, Timeline, Budget, and then the detailed proposal that follows explains exactly what the DAO will be getting for its ETH. We are looking forward to all the challenges Nerman Bot will be able to help solve within Nouns DAO discord (including several applications for Nouncil), as well as the other websites and bots that Joel’s team will build to help proliferate the meme. Nouncil is proud to have sponsored this Proposal (our first, after our own) and we wish Joel luck with the vote, and hopefully soon, with building out all these awesome tools for Nouns.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 75 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 75 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 75 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: This was probably our most contentious YES vote to date (final tally was 20 votes for, 10 against, 6 abstentions.) Overall, I think the common theme from our discussions on Nouncil call this week was that MadHappy is a great brand, and this potentially represents a great opportunity for Nouns to get positive exposure in the streetwear community. Also, we overall acknowledge that established artists and brands can be afforded a certain baseline of trust to execute on ideas. However, having said that, many Nouncillors expressed concern at the fact that the Proposal included no mockups or design plans, and no Development Phases tied to Milestones. We would like to see, even from established brands, at least some basic mockups to determine whether the designs will be desirable, and/or Nounish. And some Phase Breakdowns, maybe with a design consultation Phase to start, would have made this Proposal more amenable to more Nouncillors (we think.) Were voting FOR, and excited to see the result, but hopefully this feedback is taken to heart by future proposers so that good ideas dont lose votes due to a lack of detail in their on-chain Proposal.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 73 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 73 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 6
Amount6
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 73 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: We thought this Proposal was far from stupid, buddy. The team is a veritable league of legends, and we are looking forward to dancing with you all at the Rose Parade to celebrate (suggested dances to learn in preparation: The Robot, The Chicken Dance.) In all seriousness, this is a great opportunity for the proliferation of Nouns, and we appreciated how detailed and structured the Proposal was, with Phases that are tied to percentages of the ask. Would recommend future proposers structure similarly, for bigger asks especially, to help voters better understand the process and breakdown of costs.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 72 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 72 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 6
Amount6
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 72 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Klim is a valued enthusiastic member of the Nouns community (and Nouncil!) with lots of great ideas, and he is devoting a great deal of energy and resources to Nounish initiatives like this one. The DAO needs creatives like him to stick around and BUIDL, and we think he should be given the opportunity here to have his team focus on this project, consulting and iterating until a consensus can be reached on final aesthetic for the toys before production. Klim pls include Nouncil toga as one of the bodies and also Joel head thank you. Sincerely, Nouncil
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 71 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 71 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 6
Amount6
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 71 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Nouncil wants to support this Prop because Leo is a great contributor to the DAO, Dean is an excellent artist, and we like the fact that all raw footage will be returned to the DAO to be used in marketing. A few Nouncil members did vote against or abstained with the feedback that perhaps the scope of the documentary could have been more broadly about Nouns, or about a more varied selection of extension projects / artists rather than just one. Good luck to Leo and team!
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 70 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 70 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 6
Amount6
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 70 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: We like the Sharks. And for that reason, were IN.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 69 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 69 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 6
Amount6
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 69 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Nouncil halten es für wichtig, Initiativen zu unterstützen, die unserem Projekt helfen, ein breiteres internationales Publikum zu erreichen. Das passt auf die Rechnung.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 68 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 68 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 6
Amount6
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 68 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ESports are big already and that audience is only growing, seems a great opportunity for Nouns to increase reach within the gaming community.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 67 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 67 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 6
Amount6
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 67 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: nouncil <3 nouncil
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 65 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 65 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 6
Amount6
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 65 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: We read through the proposal, considered it a bit, and in doing so, developed a favorable consensus, which birthed an obligation of supportive votes. ⌐◨-◨
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 64 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 64 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 6
Amount6
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 64 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨-◨-◨-◨-◨
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 63 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 63 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 5
Amount5
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 63 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ ❄
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 62 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 62 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 62 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Nouncil <3 Prop House
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 61 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 61 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 61 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: CDT bullied us into doing this
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 58 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 58 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 58 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Time is precious.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 56 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 56 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 56 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: nouncil supports fun
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 54 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 54 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 54 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: We read this one, and you know, thought it was pretty good.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 53 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 53 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 53 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: we liked it
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 318 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 318 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 318 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 28 VOTES** **benbodhi** | *This approach to games for the nouniverse is really powerful imo. I do believe we should be funding games and I think this model is a great way to do it.* **eltonpenguin** | *Would prefer to see more synergies between these games (e.g. reusing assets, building a common framework, etc.), but overall supportive.* **profwerder** | *This is a new direction for Nouns but I think it will drive attention from the brand side. The games are fun and addicting! And Kwik clearly knows the gaming industry and has his pulse on web3 developments in the industry.* **AGAINST - 14 VOTES** **bigshotklim** | *@kwik knows what he is doing and I think he is a solid candidate to make nouns gaming a reality* **ABSTAINS - 2 VOTES**```
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 317 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 317 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 317 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 31 VOTES** **profwerder** | *Cant wait to see the next chapter!* **robotfishgirl** | *After seeing whats been done so far, this feels like a no brainer. Instant yes.* **benbodhi** | *I love the quality of work from this team! I think wed be crazy to not continue to fund this into a full length film, or even a series.* **bigshotklim** | *the work and enthusiasm for the process has been great and I think that it is worth funding again and again* **AGAINST - 9 VOTES** **eltonpenguin** | *The first movie got just 14,000 views. This is not successful. If we got the same for v2, thatd be a CPM of nearly $27k. For reference, a good CPM is like $1.50, 4 orders of magnitude less than we paid. Strong vote against.* **ABSTAINS - 1 VOTES**
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 316 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 316 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 316 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 33 VOTES** **benbodhi** | *contract ⌐◨-◨ { function proliferate() public { while (true) { ⌐◨-◨ } } }* **guiriba** | *Perfect glasses for IRL proliferation ⌐◨-◨* **eltonpenguin** | *This should likely be a recurring funding that gets greenlit each year* **AGAINST - 3 VOTES** **ABSTAINS - 4 VOTES**
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 315 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 315 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 315 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 27 VOTES** **AGAINST - 4 VOTES** **ABSTAINS - 6 VOTES**
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 311 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 311 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 311 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: For - Wins **FOR - 27 VOTES** **AGAINST - 9 VOTES** **eltonpenguin** | *Unclear what the impact is of this spend* **ABSTAINS - 4 VOTES**
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 310 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 310 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 310 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: For - Wins **FOR - 37 VOTES** **fiveoceans** | *Awesome* **thaswami** | *Arash has created some great content in the past and continues to create amazing videos without remuneration. Love these nursery rhyme videos. Would like to see more detail around marketing and promotion, but overall think this is a great prop* **eltonpenguin** | *In favor of doing this, however more work has to be put into marketing. Some of this creators former efforts have views measured in the hundreds, probably mostly Nouns DAO people. We need to reach children with this, so please dont just post & forget.* **robotfishgirl** | *Arashs animations are incredible, and the kids youtube potential is HUGE. These might already be among the most-viewed nouns videos on the internet and hes not even funded yet. Easy yes.* **AGAINST - 3 VOTES** **ABSTAINS - 2 VOTES**
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 307 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 307 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 307 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 41 VOTES** **guiriba** | *Will be awesome celebrate this moment, nice idea!* **AGAINST - 5 VOTES** **eltonpenguin** | *The Discord link for the requestors has --THREE-- members. This is far too untested to send a check for 50 ETH. https://discord.gg/uPJam9t3ej* **ABSTAINS - 2 VOTES**
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 304 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 304 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 304 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 39 VOTES** **AGAINST - 4 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *Not enough direct benefit for Nouns* **ABSTAINS - 5 VOTES**
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 303 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 303 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 303 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 28 VOTES** **fiveoceans_dev** | *I love proposals to rebuild nounish places for people. If this trend continues we can rebuild entire cities! * **pin.pusher** | *Will always vote for skatepark revamps. Especially if its Nouns x TSP🤘🛹⌐◨-◨* **Bigshot Klim** | *Skateboarding is nounish and this is a good use of funds that creates good vibes, awareness and connections. * **AGAINST - 13 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *Nouns is being asked to disproportionately fund the park for the benefit received. Tony Hawks NGO should shoulder more of it. The current plan has under 5% of the total budget dedicated to Nouns. * **byhardy** | *Very very Nounish. But would like to see Gnars involved in some way. No for now.* **ABSTAINS - 7 VOTES**
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 302 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 302 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 302 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 40 VOTES** **DonJon** | *No brainer* **AGAINST - 0 VOTES** **ABSTAINS - 9 VOTES**
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 300 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 300 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 300 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 34 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *Seems reasonable, next time please include the expected attendance for the event* **AGAINST - 9 VOTES** **CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧** | *lack of focus* **ABSTAINS - 11 VOTES**
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 323 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 323 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 323 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 40 VOTES** **Kwik** | *Beer is good!* **eltonpenguin** | *I support this but would like to see more done to build their Twitter following in Brazil (196 followers) - https://twitter.com/PublicGoodBeer* **benbodhi** | *Cheers to growth.* **toady_hawk** | *🍻* **akva556** | *lets fucking beer ⌐🍺-🍺* **AGAINST - 4 VOTES** **ABSTAINS - 3 VOTES**
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 321 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 321 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 321 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 36 VOTES** **benbodhi** | *Love this tool! The voting power board is epic and goes above and beyond the voting power spreadsheet generator I made available on nftcsv.tools (I was not funded so no expectations to be met there). I love the diverse range of tooling being built at reasonable prices to the DAO recently and hope to see the trend continue and more open source tooling created for DAOs in general.* **eltonpenguin** | *Voting transparency is important (this is Elton Penguin btw)* **robotfishgirl** | *martins work is consistently awesome. Dont know how much Ill personally use this tool but it looks absolutely fantastic, for the cost its a no-brainer* **toady_hawk** | *Very useful tool, very passionate builder.* **AGAINST - 3 VOTES** **ABSTAINS - 3 VOTES**
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 319 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 319 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 319 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 39 VOTES** **benbodhi** | *Nerman is a valuable resource! ⌐◨-◨* **jackwyldes** | *Thats gonna be a hell yeah from be brother* **AGAINST - 3 VOTES** **fiveoceans** | *I think Nerman is a useful tool that keeps all discords synchronized with Nouns.wtf events. However, I believe the proposal would be much better if the names of full stuff dev would have been included. I guess Nouns values is in transparency and favoring builders. In the current form of the proposals, I feel like we do not know the devs and if they get the fair pay check. Of course, Joel is the trusted member of the community but I feel that the proposal sets a not good example for future builders who study proposals before submitting their own.* **eltonpenguin** | *93 ETH for a Discord bot that could be built with off-the-shelf MEE6 bot config seems very sus.* **ABSTAINS - 1 VOTES**
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 328 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 328 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 328 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 37 VOTES** **AGAINST - 4 VOTES** **eltonpenguin** | *I prefer 327* **supertightwoody** | *Need more clarity in this proposal. Im not sure how/why everyone is voting yes for this when its extremely unclear what the tx and final deliverables are.* **ABSTAINS - 6 VOTES** *sent from voter.wtf*
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 326 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 326 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 326 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 38 VOTES** **benbodhi** | *Ambitious proposal and the growth trajectory is exciting when you look at the steps taken by this crew from the beginning. I still like the idea of nouns as team compensation too, when the team is likely to continue participating in the community ⌐◨-◨* **eltonpenguin** | *I like compensation long-term builders with Nouns, as it aligns incentives.* **byhardy** | *Muchooooo love. No doubt this team will make every dollar of this proposal worth it. Big yes.* **bigshotklim** | *Mucho love for mucho love* **AGAINST - 10 VOTES** **ABSTAINS - 4 VOTES** *sent from voter.wtf*
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 325 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 325 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 325 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 49 VOTES** **benbodhi** | (•v•) ( •v•)> ⌐◨-◨ (⌐◨v◨) **akva556** | *pudgy pudgy* **bigshotklim** | *met this crew i. person and this is a good fit.* **AGAINST - 3 VOTES** **eltonpenguin** | *I love Pudgy Penguins and Luca Netz but this benefits them way more than it benefits us. The mechanics are unclear, as is the benefit. It seems like the proposal capitalizes most on the Pudgy Penguin brand without being specific about the execution.* **ABSTAINS - 1 VOTES** *sent from voter.wtf*
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 107 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 107 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 295 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 295 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 295 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 25 VOTES** **byhardy** | *Brazil loves Nouns. Worth it.* **AGAINST - 10 VOTES** **ABSTAINS - 7 VOTES**
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 286 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 286 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 286 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 32 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *I went into reading this proposal pretty skeptical, but I dig it. Its small (~$30k), time-bounded (1mo) and performance based (team only makes money if it sells). Plus I like that one of the founders works in this space as a pharmacist.* **metamonk** | *Design (A) by SkipperLee* **.Wide Eye ⌐◨-◨** | *Thanks for the re-submission. Design (A) by SkipperLee* **AGAINST - 11 VOTES**
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 284 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 284 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 284 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 30 VOTES** **profwerder** | *PizzaDAO is nounish, supporting small businesses is nounish, free pizza is nounish. AND also…keep Nouns weird.* **.Wide Eye ⌐◨-◨** | *Pizza* **Bigshot Klim** | *having been to one of these events I am a HELL YES and bullish AF on pizza and FUNding FUN* **JoshuaFisher** | *🎶 hi nice to meet ya, i like pizza 🎶* **AGAINST - 10 VOTES** **Benjamin ⌐◨-◨** | *With these type of stunts, we should at least aim for (guinness) world records* **EltonPenguin** | *Surely we must have better things to do with $42,000* **byhardy** | *I dont think cobranding & ideation around the cobranding is strong enough to support subsidizing PizzaDAOs costs.*
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 274 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 274 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 274 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 23 VOTES** **Bigshot Klim** | *Oni has been a great point of contact fro all nounish things. This is a great idea* **DonJon** | *We love the Oni ⌐◨-◨!* **profwerder** | *Although I have concerns, I do believe it’s worth the effort to shift the tone & culture of the aptly named Jungle.* **Classic_Craig** | *1000% yes. we need this* **AGAINST - 19 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *62E a year to run a Discord server? Yikes!*
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 272 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 272 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 272 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 19 VOTES** **Classic_Craig** | *get that shmoney* **AGAINST - 16 VOTES** **.Wide Eye ⌐◨-◨** | *Am FOR of returning ETH AGAINST the use to nouns ENS*
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 271 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 271 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 271 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 22 VOTES** **fiveoceans_dev** | *All novels, books, journals would last centuries which makes them good proliferation mediums* **byhardy** | *Nounish storytellers = v good* **.Wide Eye ⌐◨-◨** | *We need more storytelling content (vid, book etc) to showcase what Nouns is about.* **CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧** | *primary layers ⌐◨-◨* **AGAINST - 13 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *The author is asking for waaaaay too much. A typical first-time author gets a $7,500 advance and 10% of royalties. These types of novels sell for around $10, which means hed have to sell over 40,000 copies to make 25 ETH. John Grishams most recent book sold 500,000 copies. Hard pass.*
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 270 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 270 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 270 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 21 VOTES** **fiveoceans_dev** | *i like what the team accomplished. i feel that archives.wtf could be a great way to unboard new builders by goving them access to see everything that was build.* *i hope the team woild put more efforts to keep the site updated.* *also, I would loke the team to consider adding a feature.i think it would be great to add a page where all content is shown without any categories with pagination* **AGAINST - 19 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *Thats a lot of money for not a lot of benefit* **Benbodhi** | *Love the concept, love Voadz, but I think the budget for this is a bit high and could be achieved for less without it being so low that its not viable.*
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 268 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 268 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 268 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 22 VOTES** **byhardy** | *ez yes, has been useful for lils. also, not a bad idea to snag a Noun to hold in the treasury.* **AGAINST - 6 VOTES** **profwerder** | *I’d be in favor of this when the need was there. Doesn’t make sense until we have a specifc builder waiting on a noun especially since they may want something specific (aka basketball).*
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 266 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 266 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 266 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 17 VOTES** **Sasquatch** | *click clack* **AGAINST - 26 VOTES** **byhardy** | *Too expensive for proliferation return. Cool idea though.* **Akva** | *The math doesnt check out for the DAO* **Classic_Craig** | *keyboard not cool tho*
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 265 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 265 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 265 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 25 VOTES** **Sasquatch** | *DAO wet wipes: Decentralizing cleanliness, one swipe at a time!* **Akva** | *Many say Nouns should be weird or that we have to keep the Nouns weird. There you go.* *Are you not entertained, anon?* *⌐◨-◨* **byhardy** | *imo wipes were an odd choice. that said, definitely think this is an experiment worth trying, especially at cost. also really appreciate the directness of the proposal. these folks seem like they know what theyre doing. lets run it.* **AGAINST - 25 VOTES** **JackWyldes** | *I want to like this as a fan of wet wipes but for some reason it feels like a troll* **Benbodhi** | *Concept seems loke it could be a good idea. But id rather see the branding on wet wipes for kids rather than at events. I personally don’t associate good vibes with places offering wet wipes in this format and think it may not be great for nouns. Baby wipes though, has some value I think.*
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 262 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 262 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 262 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 20 VOTES** **Benbodhi** | *Good time and place to show this off. ⌐◨-◨* **!𝚡𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚜** | *If you can do it for less, go for it! I want to see this go down one way or another.* **AGAINST - 25 VOTES** **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *I can get the same billboard at the same locations with professional videographers for almost half the price* **Akva** | *This is a waste of money. It is time to the DAO to be reasonable.* **byhardy** | *pretty simple. love danit. love the 3d fashion collection. dont support nft nyc. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯* **maty** | *Diminishing returns for USD spent after all the publicity the collection has already received.* **EltonPenguin** | *Only tourists go to Times Square* **Classic_Craig** | *too busy during these conference weeks, billboard isnt effective for unknown brands. vanity only*
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 261 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 261 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 261 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 16 VOTES** **AGAINST - 21 VOTES** **profwerder** | *Well first of all, it’s not quorum so let’s stop using that word. It’s threshold or dynamic yes.* *And also just NO. This is clearly part of a larger strategy to slow spending which would stall proliferation. No need to adjust the threshold at this time.* **Benbodhi** | *I think its already at a pretty good spot for contentious props for now.* **EltonPenguin** | *Seems important*
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 258 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 258 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 258 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 16 VOTES** **byhardy** | *10 ETH seems cheap to nounpill this many creators that are already in web3 and (probably) familiar with Nouns. Not to mention the audience that will come to the event.* **AGAINST - 22 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *W3BSTOCK has under 4k followers and is getting very low engagement on their tweets. There are much better ways to spend 10 ETH.* **Josep** | *I don’t think it’s worth to spend $20000 in this event. Mainly I don’t think the integration with Nouns brand is good enough*
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 256 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 256 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 256 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 27 VOTES** **Bigshot Klim** | *Great prop with lots of positive vibes and exposure as well as opportunities to add some IRL activations for nouns* **nonodynamo** | *With a safety first caveat.* **Benbodhi** | *extremely nounish ⌐◨-◨* **AGAINST - 22 VOTES** **heyjeff.eth** | *the idea in a vacuum seems really cool. I’m really not sure how much value this would bring to the DAO just by slapping some Noggles on the event - it just seems like a sponsorship with little upside for the cost* **Bloomz** | *Cool idea but way to large of an ask for what is being accomplished IMO. Would be cool to see done on a small fraction of the proposed budget.*
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 255 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 255 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 255 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 21 VOTES** **Classic_Craig** | *this feels like a potential on ramp experience for folks* **AGAINST - 26 VOTES** **nonodynamo** | *This seems like a centralized notification system to me.* **Sasquatch** | *Please come back with another proposal. Poolsuite is amazing!*
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 250 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 250 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 250 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 23** **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *awesome work so far* **byhardy** | *Big idea, would love to see Nouns lead the way here.* **AGAINST - 23** **profwerder** | *too many issues lingering with HeyAnoun to fund another anon thing and need hadnt been demonstrated. also we have teams that will be funded to do research on private voting —enough in that area right now (voted no on that too)*
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 242 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 242 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 9
Amount9
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 242 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Vote threshold not met, Nouncil votes abstain. **FOR - 27 VOTES** **Josep** | *Seems to high 5ETH a month per dev, a 3.5ETH a month seems more reasonable* **RobotFishGirl** | *Open source and a WAY reduced ask for one of my most used tools. Wish the media budget was still there, but still an easy yes. Hope the podcast/youtube videos can be funded through another avenue if this gets passed.* **Benbodhi** | *Open Source ⌐◨-◨ This heavily revised prop is of value to the whole ecosystem.* **Sasquatch** | *this prop has been neutered enough. clearly the team wants to make this happen!* **NO - 20 VOTES** **ABSTAIN - 3 VOTES**
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 240 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 240 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 9
Amount9
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 240 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Vote threshold not met. **FOR - 27 VOTES** **nonodynamo** | *I think data analysis is important to understand what worked and what did not.* **Pizza 🍕** | *solid value prop* **Josep** | *I think the ask is too high, a reduction on the payment per month. A 40% reduction on the ask would be great.* **NO - 16 VOTES** **ABSTAIN - 2 VOTES**
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 238 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 238 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 10
Amount10
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 238 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Vote threshold not met. **FOR - 34 VOTES** **pxlmnml** | *innovative price discovery* **profwerder** | *Great way to put the NFTs in the treasury to work!* **byhardy** | *Sounds like this can be implemented, so Im in full support. More than reasonable cost.* **NO - 4 VOTES** **ABSTAIN - 2 VOTE**
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 233 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 233 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 233 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Vote Threshold not met. **FOR - 15 VOTES** **AGAINST - 14 VOTES** **ABSTAIN - 13 VOTES**
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 232 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 232 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 232 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: No options met the Vote Threshold. --- **FOR - 19 VOTES** --- **Bigshot Klim** | *active engaged builder with an amazing catalog of work and IRL engagement. I think that if properly positioned and promoted NOUNs would get some incredible value and visibility* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *This could be a very effective opportunity if done right* **Benbodhi** | *Probably worth exploring for this budget. Potential for Nouns DAO to be recognised as being involved in film making feels good.* --- **AGAINST - 23 VOTES** --- --- **ABSTAIN - 2 VOTES** ---
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 229 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 229 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 229 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Nouncils current Vote Threshold requires an option to have 35 or more votes to win. In this poll the Vote Threshold was not met and Nouncil therefore votes Abstain. **YES - 31 votes** - we are the federation! - federation ⌐◨-◨ **NO - 10 votes** **ABSTAIN - 1 votes**
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 86 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 86 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 10
Amount10
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 86 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Ultimately, Nouncil was not able to reach a consensus on this Prop so we are voting to Abstain. After the majority vote to Abstain (16), all other votes cast were against (12.) Overall, in discussions, we felt that there are too many unknowns/unclear items WRT the case. Even if the Plaintiffs motivations could be politically motivated, it seems PT may have indeed broken some lottery and/or banking laws in NY, or at least, it is far from a sure thing that they didnt. Moreover, it was mentioned that this should probably have been a planned-for eventuality for such a protocol (to be sued by the State) and Nouncil worries about the precedent of deploying Nouns treasury to fund this kind of predictable legal battle (hat tip Wag.) On top of the above, this was also not a small ask (which might have found broader support.) We wish PoolTogether the best with this case, but we couldnt vote to support this Proposal at this time.
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 60 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 60 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 60 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: 🙏 Nouncil Abstains 🙏
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 308 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 308 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 308 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 14 VOTES** **akva556** | *Nounish!* **mamaxargs** | *Love it! Similar to Short Shorts, I think, which was awesome!* **AGAINST - 20 VOTES** **eltonpenguin** | *A lot of money for an online film festival. The grand prize winner from last year had just 400 YouTube views: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55Usfk_vdss* **marxistmillionaire** | *Would love to see an IRL-event instead. And a plan how to get high quality submissions ( which is an issue for every festival). * **byhardy** | *Question the quality of submissions that this will yield. Dont feel the ideas in the proposal quite cover these concerns, despite improvements from last year.* **ABSTAINS - 9 VOTES**
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 320 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 320 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 320 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 16 VOTES** **AGAINST - 7 VOTES** **eltonpenguin** | *Interesting idea, but its unclear why we should build this* **profwerder** | *As much as I love the idea of this swap, I’m not comfortable voting yes without a review & check by the verbs.* **ABSTAINS - 18 VOTES**
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 48 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 48 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 5
Amount5
Unit1
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 283 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 283 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 283 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **AGAINST - 35 VOTES** **byhardy** | *Not in support of funding more Nouns merch at this stage. Well thought out proposal — nice job Necfas, but just not a demand here imo. I also dont think demand will be created with some photoshoots, a 14k following IG account (love their feed tho), and a lookbook.* **.Wide Eye ⌐◨-◨** | *Daily essential is a competitive market with players like Uniqlo, Everlane etc. I do not think the strategy the team plans to implement would generate demand/achieve self-sustainability. Furthermore, the design seems more of streetwear than essential and thats another market on its own which anchor heavy on culture/lifestyle. I do not think Nouns have form a culture outside of its bubble/crypto nor its a lifestyle yet, thus am not confident to support this idea.* **EltonPenguin** | *Way too much money for us not to have an ownership stake in the business* **FOR - 6 VOTES** **systemdm.⌐◨-◨** | *I know Leblanc Studios work.. Necfas + Leblanc Studios?… 😄 This will surely be amazing!!*
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 248 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 248 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 248 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **AGAINST - 53 VOTES** **Akva** | *Bad prop.* *Intelligent rage quit is coming by Elad and David. Wait anon ⌐◨-◨* **pxlmnml** | *come on* **Benbodhi** | *That’s a no from me dawg. This feels like the opposite of nounish to me. Plus the contract has a hard coded book value which is weird. Only benefits people who want to arb the book value of nouns and managed to purchase their nouns below 41 eth.* *This is not nounish building imo.* **Pizza** | *Putting this through seems like it would be terrible for the culture which is already shaky currently. For this reason, im out.* **andrewladdusaw** | *Ragequit already exists in many forms, such as opensea or blur* **Josep** | *I do not feel qualified to give a decision on this proposal. It is not my area of expertise, it seems to me the most important decision that has been taken so far in Nouns DAO and, therefore, I believe that a better structured debate should be held in order to take the best possible steps for the DAO.* **FOR - 5 VOTES** **ABSTAIN - 4 VOTES**
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 227 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 227 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 227 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Prop 227: Nouncil Votes NO** **NO - 29 votes** - Once again —staking all in one pool is risky. Other options (eg rocket pool are bring explored. We should wait for that option. - I believe we already locked enough fund There. **YES - 15 votes** - I am in favor of making Nouns Treasury bigger by staking - Yieldddddddd! **ABSTAIN - 1 votes** - I do not fully grock this.
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 222 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 222 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 222 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Prop 222: Nouncil Votes NO** --- **NO - 24 votes** - The catch-up payment on the yield earned before fees at 2% is way too high **YES - 13 votes** - absolute yes. sustainability rocks! - I think its right, its ETH that we can use to increase the return on our treasury **ABSTAIN - 3 votes** - I personally have no expertise in this field, therefor abstaining --- (15 Nouncillors abstained from this decision.)
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 211 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 211 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 211 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Prop 211: NO WINS** 18 Yes, 22 No, 3 Abstain 11 Nouncillors abstained from the decision --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Mach** | *I think id vote for the nouns chair only a couple other things with a resounding yes. But a lot of the things seem minimal impact for high cost* **Classic_Craig** | *i love irl proliferation when organized and intentional. This appears to be both.* **Bigshot Klim** | *While i think China is one of the most important markets for nouns I would love to see more indication of the builders capabilities to deliver the desired outcomes and would love to see a smaller prop ask before voting yes on the full req* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *Great idea for growth in china* **Benbodhi** | *Excited to see the creative ways to proliferate with this prop.* **Josep** | *I think they should redo the proposal to show how they work and break the budget into 3-4 proposals.* **Mindtoasted** | *Voting yes on this because the Culture of Nounish ☕* **byhardy** | *Just barely leaning no. Its a big sticker price, would like to see it scaled down and then return with some results & something bigger. Theres no time crunch here, so can be resubmitted.* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 210 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 210 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 210 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Prop 210: NO WINS** 18 Yes, 22 No, 3 Abstain 9 Nouncillors abstained from the decision --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **lilpizza.eth** | *Nouns is not using these tokens and doesnt seem to currently have plans to participate in Lil Nouns governance. This would be a huge benefit for Lil Nouns as it would allow the DAO to be more self-sustaining by rewarding contributors with these tokens.* **Classic_Craig** | *Im fond of Lil Nouns and if this allows them to do giveaways and other building things, Im for it!* **vsvsvs** | *This is the beginning of something dangerous...* **Mach** | *sure if thats what they want* **.ZllW ⌐◨-◨** | *A complete sever of r/s between Lil Nouns and Nouns is not ideal; would like to see a re-proposal where Lil Nouns request for 10% of the Lil Nouns currently in Nouns Treasury to help fund/reward Lil builders instead* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *After reading the prop 210 discord channel in the Jungle & feedback from Nouners: this looks like death by suicide for lil nouns with the DAO* **0xDariush** | *Nouns should keep increasing their lils during the time and also start using their vote powers to help lils to move better.* **Mindtoasted** | *I vote no in this, I just dont find a good reason for this.* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 204 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 204 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 204 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Nouncil Vote:** 20 Yes, 33 No, 5 Abstain 4 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **NO WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **wiz** | *if were going to be funding tech I think it should be entirely oss and public infrastructure* **Classic_Craig** | *i really like the idea of being able to swap Nounish derivatives throughout the nouniverse in an easy manner. In terms of custom dev, 29 ETH is also very fair for this type of work. I look forward to being able to swap nounish nfts to engage in more nouns communities!* **pin.pusher** | *I dont think there would be a huge demand for this. From looking over the activity on a few secondary markets over the last 6 months, there has only been 27 sales total between OS, LooksRare, and X2Y2. Most Nouns holders seem to be more interested in building within the community, utilizing their governance voting, or delegating their Noun(s) to another community member who is interested in doing either of those tasks* **Josep** | *I dont think Nouns is a collection that has a lot of secondary sales activity, they are +30ETH NFTs and ,therefore, I doubt the transaction gas is relevant.* **byhardy** | *Not a big enough demand for this.* **Brook** | *I don’t see this being important enough to fund.* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *atomic0.com is awesome & makes trading/swapping super easy* **0xDariush** | *nouns are not for flippers in general, i dont believe owners care about fees! maybe in 5 years with more nouns in the ecosystem they care!* **nonodynamo** | *I think trading is social and viral. I like this.* **Benbodhi** | *I like this, I think it has potential to enable safer swaps among the community for free, while also reaching outside of nouns ecosystem and introducing nouns to other token holders that might land on this exchange.* **Mach** | *just doesnt seem like something worth 35k. The technical difficult to execute this isnt worth it especially with so many viable alternatives existing already.* **kerimbonia** | *i think the proposal looks good, the ask is reasonable and i like the utility of having a zero-fee nft-nft exchange for nouns and nouns sub daos.* **Mindtoasted** | *Love the idea for this, I dont know if it could be a great way to trade NFTs at zero cost. I still cant find what the impact might be for Nouns, I dont feel quite Nounish on this, IMO I think this is a pretty big request that
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 203 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 203 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 12
Amount12
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 203 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **Nouncil Vote:** 7 Yes, 46 No, 1 Abstain 6 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **NO WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Josep** | *I don’t think it’s necessary to pay 29ETH to integrate Nouns into a service like this. The should ask for less ETH* **Brook** | *lessons from dissolution of Nouns discord and failure of prop 200:* *- no re-skins; encourage native solutions to native problems are encouraged* *- established forms of communication such as Twitter, Farcaster, and DIscord suffice. hence voters dont see a reason to invest in another one. atleast for now* **.ZllW ⌐◨-◨** | *Dont really see a demand for this tool* **pemburux** | *Agreed you all, with 29 ETH for the current state we can promote Nouns even more* **byhardy** | *Cool concept, not sure it would get used or if there is a fit here. Dont love proposals that dont support wider Nounish ecosystem of non-holders. To this end, the prop feels a bit tone deaf. The prop does not even mention delegates, but the prop is from a delegate themselves?* *I do think both skiff and this prop are on the right track, but they should adapt to accomodate other builders in the Nouns ecosystem (and delegates) who dont own a Noun yet.* **andreitr** | *Voting against this because it does not benefit the broader Nounish community nor does it help proliferate the Noun meme.* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *great resource for nounders to always stay connected & up to date on the ecosystem* **0xDariush** | *targeting only nouns holders is not nounish enough.* *We have 340 holders atm and at this early stage even if 30% of them gonna use it its going to be like a small gathering.* **BENJAMIN LATSKO ⌐◧-◧** | *cute but no. nouners dont even buy nouns tshirts* **Benbodhi** | *Id like to see this as a nouniverse platform rather than just nouners, I think thered be a larger userbase and it would be more valuable then.* **Mach** | *not a fan of the presented concept. Maybe a better proof of concept could sway me in future, but the project is potentially dead on arrival. Nouns risks spreading itself too thin over hundreds of communities, websites, and forums to continue funding more* **Mindtoasted** | *I want to vote no on this, why? indeed there are many useful features in this proposal, do not forget to also see how punksclub runs. I think if it can only be used by nouners thats great, but it could be eve
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 167 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 167 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 14
Amount14
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 167 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: 24 yes, 25 No, 3 Abstain ___ **SuperTightWoody** ONE THOUSAND ETH....BRO We could buy a country **Mach** id prefer to start with a smaller seed if anything to see viability and how it evolves it is pretty exciting to think about the potential of this **profwerder** BIG ASK --- but tremendous what has been created and its a set tool that will exist forever. Is it a crazy amount of $? yeah but I think this is an insane value. I changed my vote to NO but its truly just because of the ask. If we can get this prop revised to a better place, Ill be a yes again. Best scenario would be funding distributed over time and/or tied to milestones. **Sidenoun** I think the ask is of a significant amount. I’m clearly not alone in thinking so. As a developer, I’m very appreciative of the work that goes into any project, let alone one that has this type of deliverable. The ZORA team are of course a team that I’d vote for. However, that said and with some of the comments on the Nouncil call regarding the hefty request. I think, it’d make some sense to potentially gradually retrospectively reward as we see the success of the protocol roll out to more DAO’s. I can’t cite who made the comment regarding marketing, but I feel that’s probably something that this prop is missing in terms of information. Not just for Nouns, but for those opting to use it. **systemdm.⌐◨-◨** I think this is an amazing Change the world kind of thing!!! ✊🏻✊🏻✊🏻 **andrewladdusaw** Im shocked at how confident I feel in this 1000 ETH ask. Jacob is a thought leader in the entire space. Zora is one of the premier orgs in the space. They are already heavily invested with 20 Nouns of their own. They have already delivered the product on their own dime. PLUS, this is not a retro reward, its funding a DAO with the goal of furthering the incredible work thats already been done. Im trying not to speak in hyperbole here, but I think this has the potential to be a really special thing, not just for Nouns, but the future of crypto. Im still not 100% on where I land on this. All my previous comments still stand on my belief in the tool and the team. I still think its going to be game changer. I originally told them I thought a huge retro should be offered for a free tool, but that amount in my mind was like 250. When you factor the audit costs they referenced as well, Id be closer to 350-400. Admittedly, I h
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 159 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 159 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 15
Amount15
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 159 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨: Nouncil votes No (22 Yes, 35 No, 5 Abstain) Discussion from Nouncil Discord https://discord.gg/nouncil **JoshuaFisher** I’m fine with this but also Like the barrier being 2 because it is a self selecting benefit in terms of how much time do they spend in the community. If you can’t get 2 Nouns then maybe not ready to go on-chain imho. **JoelCares** A 1 Noun threshold to submit proposals for the first 1000 Nouns feel reasonable to me. **andreitr** The existing threshold is a feature that reduces noise. **fiveoceans_dev** I also, agree to keep the threshold growing. It will make smaller stake holders to work together and in turn help coordinate against potential malicious activities by individual big stake holders **kerimbonia** Also in agreement that lowering the threshold will introduce more noise and with all the changes going on in the nouns ecosystem im not sure this is the best time for it. **mintface.eth** I lean towards a single Noun so that proposals get seen and evaluated. 2 Nouns min creates a three party negotiation to take something on-chain. Two parties are then seen to endorse or at a min be associated with proposer. The idea of acquire a Noun and propose is cool. **CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧** i think that the current system is healthy and not needing a change **samellis ⌐◨-◨** Drop the threshold, good ideas will rise, especially with the changes of gas reimbursement and the more than likely time extension, why put an additional “pay to play” barrier. Let folks come in with their ideas. **Benbodhi** Only just over a year until it would increase again. The barrier to entry to buy a noun is significant and the ability to submit a prop after purchasing a noun is something I feel should be possible. I know delegation and sponsorship is a thing, but I’m thinking of lone actors. Not sure it makes a huge difference in prop quality. **Toady_Hawk** I agree with reducing to one noun threshold. We don’t have a proposal spam problem yet (which is why this feature was baked in) so I think it makes sense to lower it to encourage more participation. Last time this was proposed (with a long time period attached that muddied the waters) it was all the brand new Nouners voting yes, which I think was telling. Keep in mind if spam ever became a problem, another proposal could easily raise the threshold again. **lil bk** all in favor of reducing the threshold
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 158 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 158 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 15
Amount15
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 158 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ (24 Yes, 31 No, 8 Abstain) **samellis ⌐◨-◨** I liked the quality of the Nouns News, both in content and quality, and the new stuff with a larger team and price, less so. I also am not sure if 1M is that great on TikTok, with their creator fund when you hit 1M views you can make $20-$40, if the platform puts that low a price of value on those views why would we spend so much? **profwerder ⌐◨-◨ FloriNouns** Unfortunately this is a no from me. I just don’t think the feedback was incorporated and the ask is too high But I love nouns News and hope they continue!
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 157 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 157 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 15
Amount15
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 157 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ Result: Against (8 Yes, 41 No, 8 Abstain) RobotFishGirl.eth.⌐◨-◨ I really like this in principle- I remember discussing this with Max on twitter a few weeks ago. That said, the prop needs to be WAAAAAAAAAY more thought out and clear about the impact, locations, billboard design, etc. before Id feel comfortable saying yes. Its not a great look to have the discourse post be more comprehensive than the actual on chain prop. That said, I pass these digital bus stops every day and theyre very definitely a worthwhile investment based on my own lived experience; the prop needs to be fixed though profwerder ⌐◨-◨ FloriNouns Would make more sense to do this when there’s a conference like NFT.NYC. Notes from Nouncil calls: - The prop lacks details and seems a bit vague. - This seems so top of funnel that we cant measure success at the core product level. - If there was a product focussed call to action it would be an easy yes. Anchoring to consumer goods like Nouns Coffee for example could have a much higher impact.
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 134 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 134 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 14
Amount14
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 134 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 127 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 127 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 13
Amount13
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 127 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: This vote ended up being fairly contentious in Nouncil, with the final tally ending 18 FOR - 27 AGAINST (7 ABSTAIN). Most of the discussion on the Nouncil weekly call centered around feelings that the proposed garments did not look Nounish, or that the Nounish streetwear category was currently crowded with props such as Madhappy and Nouns Brand already in production. Overall, Im struggling with the nounishness of this project. Im a no for now, was one comment from our Nouncil Discussion Thread. It seems like a duplicative effort, was another. The generous 15:85 rev split isn’t enough to make up for the lack of Nounish brand experience. Proponents of the project liked the novel NFT ownership verification, and the Nounish apparel mockups that were released maybe just a little too late to sway the vote (after the team spoke on The Noun Square last night and dropped into Nouncil to show Nounish mockups and clarify some things, a flood of YES votes did come in, but ultimately not enough to win the vote.) Example comments on the Discussion thread after the TNS appearance and new mockups: Having been sceptical, Ive been really impressed by Dopamine on NoC. I think its taken a while to articulate the scope of the vision, and why its nounish: Community, web3 native, proof of work, tech innovation (and it will be fully noggle branded). Im a yes. And: I am as well. I feel like the concerns have been addressed and this could be a good experiment with digital/physical merch in a new way. If the team does choose to iterate and reapply, it would be good to make sure those Nounish prototypes are front and center.
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 122 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 122 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 10
Amount10
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 122 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 81 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 81 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 8
Amount8
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 81 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Nouncil <3 Lil Nouns We prefer Prop 82 with a sale price based on FMV.
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 74 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 74 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 74 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: On Nouncil call, we had a fruitful discussion about this proposal and overall some Nouncillors familiar with the sport indicated that it felt like a big investment to make in the sport when perhaps more exposure could be gotten, even within this sport, by sponsoring events etc, rather than an entire team/season. The concern was also voiced that the DAO owning the cars could be a cost/liability after the season (storage, etc.) Overall, we like the energy and the proposal was well written, but the majority voted No this time. We really like Don and his energy and hope he will stick around and build more within Nouns. Kudos to him for seeking lots of discussion on Discourse and holding open calls in the discord to take feedback. We should encourage this kind of builder to stick around. Dom, please build something Nounish, even if its small, so that we can invite you to join Nouncil!
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 57 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 57 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 57 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: In general Nouncil was supportive of this proposal. But, for some Nouncillors, the extra Noun felt like too big an ask. This kind of reward would make more sense as a retroactive prize provided after the project is wildly successful.
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 55 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 55 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 55 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: The committee tasked with doing the work in this proposal was not consulted about the work being done in this proposal and has not agreed to do this work in this proposal and this dilemma encouraged us to vote no.
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 306 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 306 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 306 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 18 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *Great way to hit the creative community with the Nouns message* **AGAINST - 28 VOTES** **Bigshot Klim** | *We already have Nouns comics at the convention. The booth space was part of the prop so adding more How will this be distributed? Will there be an On The Ground team engaging with people and would those people really care about NFTs at a busy convention next to Optimus prime. I dont think that this is a good place to spend money until we get some data and collector feedback about the comic book performance.* **ABSTAINS - 4 VOTES**
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 301 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 301 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 301 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 8 VOTES** **AGAINST - 40 VOTES** **ABSTAINS - 5 VOTES** **CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧** | *props that only benefit noun holders are not the way* **marxistmillionaire** | *Great art, but I dont like the exclusiveness and I think 1001 Nouns are too much...* **andrewladdusaw** | *Too big and too expensive. * **Bigshot Klim** | *Too much friction about exclusivity and too many pieces. Great tech but the ask is too big * **EltonPenguin** | *Yikes!*
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 322 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 322 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 7
Amount7
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 322 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: **FOR - 13 VOTES** **Kwik** | *Korea is an important market and I support any and all proliferation efforts there.* **benbodhi** | *This team has delivered amazing stuff with things they’ve previously been involved with. Happy to see more.* **toady_hawk** | *So much to love here— Duckhead, Jhee and Five are all awesome Nouns contributors in their own rights already, and I trust them to deliver something really cool here to broaden our fan base in Korea* **byhardy** | *Cool experiment, would like to see it on a smaller scale first, but going to vote on the prop we have in front of us.* **AGAINST - 26 VOTES** **ABSTAINS - 4 VOTES**
Property / Proposed
 
Property / Proposed: Proposal 100 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Proposed
 
Property / Proposed: Proposal 121 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Proposed
 
Property / Proposed: Proposal 136 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Proposed
 
Property / Proposed: Proposal 139 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Proposed
 
Property / Proposed: Proposal 141 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Proposed
 
Property / Proposed: Proposal 144 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Proposed
 
Property / Proposed: Proposal 158 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Proposed
 
Property / Proposed: Proposal 163 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Proposed
 
Property / Proposed: Proposal 176 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Proposed
 
Property / Proposed: Proposal 179 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Proposed
 
Property / Proposed: Proposal 187 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Proposed
 
Property / Proposed: Proposal 201 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Proposed
 
Property / Proposed: Proposal 208 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Proposed
 
Property / Proposed: Proposal 66 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Proposed
 
Property / Proposed: Proposal 67 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Proposed
 
Property / Proposed: Proposal 77 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Proposed
 
Property / Proposed: Proposal 91 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Proposed
 
Property / Proposed: Proposal 318 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 23:51, 17 July 2023

Individual
Language Label Description Also known as
English
0xcc2688350d29623e2a0844cc8885f9050f0f6ed5
Individual

    Statements

    instance of
    Individual
    0 references
    Supported
    Proposal 106
    Vote Weight
    12
    0 references
    Proposal 52
    Vote Weight
    7
    0 references
    Proposal 51
    Vote Weight
    7
    0 references
    Proposal 49
    Vote Weight
    5
    0 references
    Proposal 47
    Vote Weight
    5
    0 references
    Proposal 46
    Vote Weight
    5
    0 references
    Proposal 45
    Vote Weight
    5
    0 references
    Proposal 44
    Vote Weight
    5
    0 references
    Proposal 43
    Vote Weight
    4
    0 references
    Proposal 42
    Vote Weight
    2
    0 references
    Proposal 41
    Vote Weight
    2
    0 references
    Proposal 297
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 24 VOTES** **AGAINST - 10 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *Some of these ideas are useful, some are not. Consider resubmitting with the specific initiatives called out in different funding requests.* **ABSTAINS - 5 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 296
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 40 VOTES** **byhardy** | *Lots of Nounish folks on this. For such a global effort, cost seems reasonable. Worth a shot. Would like to see more details on proliferation / onboarding / growth / general nounishness if returning for more funding. But as a trial run, I think this makes sense. Good to see the rails already in place.* **Bigshot Klim** | *wholesome and nounish activity can be repeated at any event to build a broader community. Super NOUNIsh * **EltonPenguin** | *Its a tad pricy, but still voting for it.* **AGAINST - 4 VOTES** **ABSTAINS - 3 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 289
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 38 VOTES** **Bigshot Klim** | *This is an absolute HELL YES * **profwerder** | *Nounish is the core marketing infrastructure for Nouns. Their content has been amazing!* **CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧** | *anyone who votes against this based on numbers and cost has no idea how content is made or how brands grow...your newbie is showing...cost of views does not include cost to produce the content...how do you not understand that?* *nounish is the best thing to happen to nouns and we are lucky to have people willing to dedicate their professional lives and reputations making content for nouns. 100% yes* **AGAINST - 14 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *Our last $969,000 that we paid nounish got us 3M views. Thats a CPM of $323. For reference, Google search ads average CPM is $38.40. This means we paid roughly 10x a pretty average CPM for this exposure.* *The budget is way too high and, from what their track record shows, the impact just isnt there.*
    0 references
    Proposal 288
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 44 VOTES** **Bigshot Klim** | *this is a fantastic way to recap and celebrate what we have all been working on. funds go back to the dao and to fund more fun.* **AGAINST - 6 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *Mint price too high*
    0 references
    Proposal 287
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 41 VOTES** **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *I’ve been watching BigShot in the DAO for about a year now: he’s received tons of feedback from the community during that time. He’s made some good adjustments & taken the feedback seriously—it’s a YES for me now* **AGAINST - 5 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *$125k ask divided by 6,000 figurines = $21 for each 3 figurine. 🤨 Oh, but then we sell them for $9 wholesale, so were only losing $12 on each sale. Run from this proposal.* **.Wide Eye ⌐◨-◨** | *1. Would love to see indication of existing retail boutique willing to take in this toys as inventory for sale, we could we sitting on a inventory of 6000 toys (unsold). 2. Wish that marketing campaign for said toys could be clearer. 3. A smaller size run would be more appropriate if this is a proof-of-concept. 4. If sold, a portion of the profit will be used to developed series 2 - Why not reinvest 100% of the profit to develop series 2 given demand? It is unclear what the other portion of the profit will be used for, more details on this would be appreciated.*
    0 references
    Proposal 285
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 40 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *It works out to roughly $3/attendee. Not bad.* **CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧** | *⌐◨-◨🇧🇷⌐◨-◨* **AGAINST - 6 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 282
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 35 VOTES** **profwerder** | *Glad to see this readjustment of THRESHOLD back to 15%. There was no need to increase in the first place. * **AGAINST - 5 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 269
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 34 VOTES** **Benbodhi** | *🎼🎶🎵🎹🎸🥁🎤🤘* **dot** | *🤘* **Sasquatch** | *:pepe_jam:* **AGAINST - 5 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 263
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 43 VOTES** **Benbodhi** | *This crew just keep crushing.* ⌐◨-◨ **byhardy** | *Huge momentum in a vertical that continues to expand, and is tangential to Nouns (tech). Big supporter of esports pod.* **Josep** | *I like the integration and I think it’s a good way to proliferate the meme* **AGAINST - 9 VOTES** **Classic_Craig** | *expensive for niche* **EltonPenguin** | *Waaaay too much money for uncertain benefits*
    0 references
    Proposal 260
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 33 VOTES** **Benbodhi** | *⌐◨-◨* **AGAINST - 10 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *Seems silly*
    0 references
    Proposal 259
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 40 VOTES** **Benbodhi** | *⌐◨-◨* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *JOEL = AUTOMATIC YES* **profwerder** | *LOVE this!! There were so many amazing submissions —would love to see us maximize this opportunity!* **byhardy** | *easy yes. sick team. cant wait to see what gets made here.* **AGAINST - 2 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 257
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 40 VOTES** **Classic_Craig** | *Yes, yes, yes. Proliferate to the gigabrains, please.* **EltonPenguin** | *Good to raise awareness of Nouns **Josep** | *The work of Mono and Ale has been excellent during their implication with the DAO. Really looking forward to see what they can do with this Nouns Fair* **AGAINST - 4 VOTES** **nonodynamo** | *I do not think there is enough time or enough products to do this well.*
    0 references
    Proposal 254
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 41 VOTES** **Coral Orca** | *delinouns?* **Classic_Craig** | *Yes! Yes! this is the way!!!! long lasting prolonged proliferation as long as the food is good* **Bigshot Klim** | *this is a worthwhile experiment and something many have talked about doing. this will also open up opportunities for other builders to engage with art, design, product and proliferating. a repeatable model* **byhardy** | *Love this so much. Awesome team. Best of luck!!* **systemdm.⌐◨-◨** | *Love this. Purchased Nounscafe.eth for developing a similar idea.. 🤞🏻😄* **profwerder** | *Perfect location to experiment with a Nouns restaurant! Already a successful location & team.* **AGAINST - 4 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 253
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 38 VOTES** **heyjeff.eth** | *hack = win* **byhardy** | *loved this idea from the first time martin posted it on Twitter. hes been grinding on it. absolutely huge idea that can bring a ton of positive attention to the ecosystem. win for everyone imo. cant wait!* **nonodynamo** | *Seems like it just a lot of prop houses in one week. I am not sure it will get the best ideas because it is so much all at once. Or the right attention to the ideas.* **AGAINST - 9 VOTES** **Classic_Craig** | *Would like to see Marketing added*
    0 references
    Proposal 251
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 44 VOTES** **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *This will be great to continue to move forward on as the last one was so successful!* **profwerder** | *Give Danit all the eth she wants! shes killing it!!! LFG* **Bigshot Klim** | *Danit has been doing some amazing work and her presentation in paris was one of the highliughts of the show. Lets do this again IN NY* **Classic_Craig** | *previous successes, i like the marketing visibility* **AGAINST - 10 VOTES** **byhardy** | *I am strongly in support of Danit, love the clothes and the content, but I am voting no because I do not support NFT NYC (the main conference). Would like to see $$ spent on presence a more authentic NFT related satellite event (or events) during the week.*
    0 references
    Proposal 249
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 36 VOTES** **Wide Eye ⌐◨-◨** | *For the culture* **Sasquatch** | *culture* **Benbodhi** | *1 ⌐◨-◨, every block, forever* *♾️ ⌐◨-◨* **Akva** | *⌐◨-◨* **AGAINST - 16 VOTES** **Josep** | *It seems to me to be a poor proposal, with little data on how the 30 ETH can impact on growing Nouns and offers no way to analyse how successful the proposal is.** **ABSTAIN - 3 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 245
    Vote Weight
    9
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 46 VOTES** **Toady_Hawk** | *YES* **RobotFishGirl** | *The only problem with the short was that it was short. This solves that problem. Im already hyped about this movie and the prop hasnt even passed yet!* **Benbodhi** | *Would love to see more from this team.* **Akva** | *Track record is the way, yes for me* **profwerder** | *The first short by this team was amazing! The level of detail and integration of nounish fun but in a way that it still accessible and enjoyable by normies is exactly what we need more of!* **Bigshot Klim** | *this team is doing great work and i look forward to seeing what they come up with next* **AGAINST - 5 VOTES** **Josep** | *I dont see a clear vision of how they want to successfully distribute this film, I also miss that they provide tools to know what is the real conversion of the film in new members for the DAO.* **byhardy** | *I love the idea of a Nouns movie. but I cant support this until I see more plans laid out about what happens once the movie is made, specifically marketing and how it returns $$ to the DAO. to me, droposals for portions of the film are just not enough to return funds to the DAO at such a high cost.* **ABSTAIN - 5 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 244
    Vote Weight
    9
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 40 VOTES** **Pizza** | *An amazing tool that would greatly help the rest of the Nounish ecosystem.* **Josep** | *Prop Lot has shown to be a good tool during the time it has been active, I would like to continue to see how it evolves and contributes to Nouns growth.* **Sasquatch** | *brian the goat* **NO - 10 VOTES** **ABSTAIN - 5 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 241
    Vote Weight
    9
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 44 VOTES** **RobotFishGirl** | *DigitalOil is a brilliant builder and I believe the tools outlined in this prop will be a valuable add- its why I also said yes to the first prop. The changes made in v2 have only reaffirmed that belief and choice.* **NO - 3 VOTES** **ABSTAIN - 7 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 237
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 55 VOTES** **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *Would be fun to mint this animated video. At such a low price I feel it can get a couple hundred sales and be beneficial to the nouns dos and the creator of the video.* **Benbodhi** | *nounish af ⌐◨-◨* **wiz** | *amazing work would love to mint through the dao* **NO - 2 VOTES** **ABSTAIN - 1 VOTE**
    0 references
    Proposal 236
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 59 VOTES** **Bigshot Klim** | *can not wait to see this* **Toady_Hawk** | *Hell yes.* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *Another cool animated video to mint. Seems to be a cool new meta and modern day movie premiers on the blockchain!* **Benbodhi** | *nounish af ⌐◨-◨* **wiz** | *wiz 🤝 wiz* **Josep** | *I think its a good way to commemorate a very nounish project, completely in favor.*
    0 references
    Proposal 231
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    --- **FOR - 44 VOTES** --- **pin.pusher** | ⌐🖼-🖼 **systemdm.⌐◨-◨** | *Love this.. Art is everything!!* **Classic_Craig** | *feels cheap for a curated gallery and exposure for nounish art on a legacy platform* **byhardy** | *awesome experiment that puts nouns in front of more artists + art supporters. low cost. easy win. big yes.* **Bigshot Klim** | *a great way to expose the Ecosystem to a broader NFT audience* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *Nouns Collab with Nifty Gateway would be really great if done right!* **Benbodhi** | *art is nounish* ⌐◨-◨ *This is a thoughtful and effective way to integrate with nifty and showcase some rad artists. Potential to pay for itself built in is awesome too.* **Josep** | *I believe it is a well-structured collaboration that can create value for Nouns.* **Mindtoasted** | *Nounish Art is powerful.* --- **AGAINST - 7 VOTES** --- **0xDariush** | *Im also an artist and curator ! it make no sense to pay this musch for a curation!* *if the artists are good and they believe in themselves they join the projects and rely on sales. it doesnt matter if its nounish or not.* *an Open call for artists will do all of this for free.* --- **ABSTAIN - 3 VOTES** --- **greta_gremplin** | *I will abstain, because im one of the people that will benefit with this proposal. But if i wasnt, i would vote Yes!*
    0 references
    Proposal 228
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    **Prop 228: Nouncil Votes YES** **YES - 38 votes** - LOVE small proliferation. - Japan is Nounish AF and this is a very commited and passionate team - lfg japan - Good value to further nouns awareness in Japan. **NO - 10 votes** **ABSTAIN - 2 votes**
    0 references
    Proposal 225
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    **Prop 225: Nouncil Votes YES** **YES - 31 votes** - Need a “hell yes!” option Nerman cuz issa vibe! Excited to see this next phase especially the work with Save the Music! - Big yes - 👐 - seems a bit risky for the cost but who could say no to ghostface killah - I think this is very Nounish - LOVE this. MORE music. - music is nounish and so is this team witha proven record of continuous commitment to nounish excellence - rich vein for proliferation + woody is smashing it - My life up until this point was always about trying to make it somewhere with music and if this can help give people more opportunity then I want to support it **NO - 15 votes** - It seems to me that there are ways to more adequately dissipate these funds, I dont think it is worth anywhere near what is being asked. - I support Noun Sounds and Woodys efforts. Having this music arm of Nouns is awesome. And I love LOVE the playlist idea - has some viral components. But I would like to see more budget aimed at on onboarding indie/web3-focused musicians rather than the big $$ budget on a Ghostface collab. Would support with a simple shift of that budget to more Prop House rounds & marketing those rounds. - It’s a huge red flag you’re asking for 250eth from the DAO & won’t even answer questions in the discord Nouners are asking. Paying “artists & influencers” is as inauthentic as it gets in web3
    0 references
    Proposal 224
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    **Prop 224: Nouncil Votes YES** **YES - 21 votes** - we like art - If marketed right, this can return much of the $$ to the DAO (via auction increase bc the art is included for 7 days). At worst, its a cool experiment with an awesome group, which seems worth the go. - we need more fun explorao like this - Fun ⌐◨-◨ - Might be worth the experiment to see if the nouns sell for more. **NO - 20 votes** - It seems to me that there are ways to more adequately dissipate these funds, I dont think it is worth anywhere near what is being asked. - I love art, but I dont think this proliferates much for the DAO. **ABSTAIN - 2 votes**
    0 references
    Proposal 223
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    **Prop 223: Nouncil Votes YES** --- **YES - 33 votes** - I use HON everyday for the show and I love the direction that they want to take it. I believe there is a need for a central discussion point for those who want to participate in the DAO but dont have time to go to multiple sites digging for conversation and prop information. - yes BUT! can you implement the key elements of the nouns creative direction? Fonts, color scale, etc. I feel like for phase 2 this would be grand!! - but please change that hideous header - HON is excellent - I think it is appropriate, House of Nouns has shown to be of great help to the DAO. **NO - 13 votes** - I am likely in the minority, but Im not a big fan of these unique clients that need to be used, but perhaps I just need to be educated on it all. I do not think a unique dashboard is the difference. - The cost is way too high **ABSTAIN - 3 votes** --- (7 Nouncillors abstained from this decision.)
    0 references
    Proposal 221
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    **Prop 221: Nouncil Votes YES** --- **YES - 29 votes** - a lot of us have multiple jobs to desl with basic life stuff and need more time to read proposals - seems reasonable, i dig it. more time for promotion and awareness - whatever helps voters vote - This should of been in place since day 1 - I think its reasonable - More time to think means better decisions. --- **NO - 22 votes** - Its long enough. - The five days were just added a little bit ago. I think it is too soon to see if that works to change it again. I am not against changing it I just think it is too soon. - i dont see any reasons to extend the delay at the moment. 5/5 works well to me --- **ABSTAIN - 1 vote** - I dont have an opinion or experience to apply to this change, thus abstaining.
    0 references
    Proposal 218
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    **Prop 218: YES WINS** 58 Yes, 8 No, 0 Abstain 5 Nouncillors abstained from the decision --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Mach** | *seems nounish, thats enough for me* **ChrisCoCreated** | *Hell yer, Swami and Ben are passionate about the mountains and nouns, and with Swamis roll are uniquely placed to do something significant with the resort, and create a template, as well as a load of great content. wen Europe! ;)* **Benbodhi** | *⌐◨-◨* **profwerder** | *I hate snow but I love this prop and this team! Would love to see a nounish resort come to life!* **byhardy** | *very nounish* **Classic_Craig** | *I love irl proliferation and if this exists for years at a resort that gets guests constantly, it very likely can resonate with enough people to bring awareness and value back to the DAO.* **0xapril** | *Its absolute yes from me. Always love irl proliferation and alps dao vision is 100℅ nounish.* **BENJAMIN LATSKO ⌐◧-◧** | *i think it doesnt make sense to drive attention to nouns. drove attention to gnars dao or another extension / nouns brand that is fostering a community around the same purpose and obsession. if you’re already considering launching your own DAO - what’s your positioning? i love the naming but think there needs to be more thought in positioning, community obsession and communication. driving people from a ski resort to nounsDAO doesn’t make sense. great opportunity. concept needs focus and refinement.* **Bigshot Klim** | *This is a great opportunity to curate an immersive group experience with an enetire resort being transformed sounds epic and this team has been on this for a while* **0xDariush** | *I like this prop, i believes the fund is reasonable for this scale and time line, also Rebranding a place which is already running! going to be a good case study for long term activities in same scale.* *plus to that, i believe lots of investors and many travelers and tourists usually go to ski! so i guess proliferation in places like this is a wise move.* **!𝚡𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚜** | *So excited!* **Coral Orca** | *I like IRL stuff and the team is nounish* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 217
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    **Prop 217: YES WINS** 39 Yes, 11 No, 3 Abstain 16 Nouncillors abstained from the decision --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Mach** | *I dont see why not* **Josep** | *Its a way to get some return on an ETH that otherwise will stay in the treasury without moving, sounds good to me.* **Classic_Craig** | *After Don educated me on the difference between decentralized staking and CeFi, I think earning yield on funds in the DAO is an amazing play toward sustainability beyond just auction revenue!* **pemburux** | *Defi summer 🎉* **profwerder** | *Im not against staking but it seems unwise to put an additional 5000eth in the same pool. Would like to see more discussion around this.* **lilpizza.eth** | *no brainer move* **Mindtoasted** | *I believe in stake, i vote yes on this* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 216
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    **Prop 216: YES WINS** 24 Yes, 15 No, 2 Abstain 14 Nouncillors abstained from the decision --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Bigshot Klim** | *i think that we owe some levle of honesty and feedback to the people that sownd their valuable time and energy dreaming up theiur peops a s putting them on chain. having a random toaster ir amcrocodile press no on hour dream without a reason is a good way tondrive away future builders* **profwerder** | *We already have some big issue with Hey Anoun -- including legal concerns -- so before we get into more anonymous ways to libel people, maybe we pass it by the Foundations legal team? Just a thought. This may do more harm than good and goes against transparency so maybe more thought and discussion is needed before we fund this much eth.* **Classic_Craig** | *I find this very interesting and would love to dive deeper and have solutions that allow for private voting.* **Josep** | *It seems to me that private voting is something important in order to improve governance, I agree with the proposal.* **byhardy** | *Excited to see what people come up with here!* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 215
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    **Prop 215: YES WINS** 37 Yes, 7 No, 0 Abstain 9 Nouncillors abstained from the decision --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **JoshuaFisher** | *been working woth this team and love the passion, pivots, derermination and skills. we need these tools!* **Classic_Craig** | *At first glance, i loved the idea, but after more thought, this will glut up the already terrible nft twitter feed with people shilling links to win eth. this is not the way. good idea, but not the execution that proliferates. this, imo, puts things deeper into the echo chamber.* **Mach** | *skeptical but willing to see if it works* **Benbodhi** | *Very helpful platform ⌐◨-◨* **Josep** | *I think it can be very beneficial considering the large number of draws in Nouns. For me it is worth to dedicate 50ETH.* **byhardy** | *Awesome roadmap for the $. Easy yes.* **Mindtoasted** | *I would like to say yes on this, as a freelance artist I feel that Nouns Contest on twitter is giving a large impact to some people who work around digital art, a place where anyone who had an interest in art could also growth the community by their own Nounish idea in each contest they participate.* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 214
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    **Prop 214: YES WINS** 46 Yes, 7 No, 1 Abstain 8 Nouncillors abstained from the decision --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **bk** | *honk diddly* **Classic_Craig** | *The marketing aspect of the proposal is very weak and does not instill confidence that this investment will ever yield return. I love the website and how easy it is to generate noggles artwork, but cant wrap my head around the impact it will have when other AI software has the same abilities already.* **Sasquatch** | *bribe our ai overlords before its too late* **JoshuaFisher** | *let the Pod run, tools are awesome and powerful* **Akva** | *honk diddly* **Benbodhi** | *Been loving this. Lots of interesting use cases and growing arsenal of tooling. ⌐◨-◨* **kerimbonia** | *ai is the future and the ai team has done nothing but deliver knowledge, nounish content creation tools, awesomeness and the future to the nouns community week after week... absolute no-brainer yes!* **Josep** | *The work you have already created is great, I want to continue to see what you are able to do to optimize the DAOs mission.* **byhardy** | *beep boop. Nouns should continue to build on the cutting edge of tech, and this team seems very committed to making it happen. Love the expanded marketing/grants budget as well.* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *More Ai & more Honk please* **JackWyldes** | *Shep and da boys are great- while it is an expensive prop I think they have already shown that theyve been putting in the work* **Mindtoasted** | *It is real that NounsAi Pod has become one of the remarkable journey in understanding the growth of AI around the space, curious what could happen next. I voted yes on this.* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 209
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    **Prop 209: YES WINS** 37 Yes, 5 No, 2 Abstain 7 Nouncillors abstained from the decision --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **ilpizza.eth** | *❤️* **Classic_Craig** | *This feels the most nounish of the props Ive seen lately, by the doing good/positivity interpretation of the phrase. People helping people is worthy of funding. If they get enough right for this reasonable ask, they can begin generating donations, sell merch, etc. to self sustain like other non-profits.* **Bigshot Klim** | *One of the most NOUNIsh projects and groups in our ecosystem Definite yes!* **Mach** | *much better revised version that addressed concerns* **mikegood** | *Love to see public goods like this!* **0xapril** | *mucho love has been doing amazing things. Its easy yes from me!* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *more much love please* **Mindtoasted** | *Reflects a good sub culture and very Nounish, even though the number of requests is quite large I vote yes on this, hopefully everything flows in the right direction and still encourages a lot more anythin Nounish.* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *There has been excellent proliferion and organization from Mucho Love it should continue growing* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 208
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    **Nouncil Vote:** 29 Yes, 16 No, 2 Abstain 12 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Classic_Craig** | *While I love the depth and detail in the proposal, I believe the impact this will have is minimal. It is like VC funding a whisky brand that has very limited marketing potential, imo.* **Bigshot Klim** | *I love the passion and commitment of this team and the long game will be worth the wait* **Josep** | *The liquor sector is a sector with many brands that have been #1 for centuries. This makes them slow and not receiving technology in the right way.* *Nouns can leverage the technological and creative talent of the community to cause a major disruption in the sector.* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *Take my money* **0xDariush** | *Im a whiskey guy, its a professional proposal and i can trust it , or at least i like to give the chance to try their best. proliferation through daily products are super nounish imo* **Mindtoasted** | *Have seen this prop since the beginning and seems this could bring some different outcome that related with regards to embrace wishkey or any other booze which can be managed leaning towards web3, I would like to vote yes on this.* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 207
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    **Nouncil Vote:** 51 Yes, 5 No, 2 Abstain 2 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *David Horvaths business acumen is next level. The deliverables on this prop & ask is plenty reasonable for someone of his creative stature* **Classic_Craig** | *Ive been torn on the toy/animated front for nouns, since the average person doesn’t have a frame of reference and wont know whay theyre looking at. Im more inclined to back Seth Green’s company for things like this. 😝* **JoshuaFisher** | *when this train reaches its destination the celebration is going to be unreal! ⌐◨-◨* **Josep** | *I believe in the vision in David and it seems to me that Korea has enough potential that it makes sense to invest $200,000 in trying to open up that market.* **Bigshot Klim** | *I hve worked with David for years and have had the opportunity to travel with him to Japan and Korea to see and understand his vision and I think that what he is doing with the Nouns is unique and brilliant . I can not wait to see where he takes the Project in the next year* **kerimbonia** | *if the goal of nouns is to proliferate then david horvaths track record combined with what he did with the ugly dolls brand working all of 2023 to breaking nouns into the japanese and asian markets = hell yes from me!* **Mindtoasted** | *I am curious about the outcome of this Nounish plan, especially from David who have experienced around this field. Its clear that he has a unique perspective and approach. I voted yes on this.* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 206
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    **Nouncil Vote:** 41 Yes, 17 No, 1 Abstain 5 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **byhardy** | *i love aubtoshi and what OTG has done. but the budget is too high based on past results.* **Classic_Craig** | *I love what NounsOTG is doing irl and on social. with a robust 2023 outline, I believe it can be one of the top visibility gainers of the next few years!* **JackWyldes** | *I like the idea behind this proposal but I dont think there is enough to show from the original 6 months content wise to provide me with the confidence in everything they plan to do. I strongly believe in OTG proliferation and content creation so I am a little conflicted.* **BENJAMIN LATSKO ⌐◧-◧** | *not scalable. recommended an alternative prop: craft an IRL activation playbook* **JoshuaFisher** | *couldnt imagine not giving this team the tools request to keep going* **Josep** | *I think an iteration of the proposal should be made, the proposal could be divided by quarters.* **Benbodhi** | *nounish af ⌐◨-◨* **nonodynamo** | *I think that it is important to have an in-person presence at events. The impact is not just in the secondary media after the fact it is at the event itself. Nouns On The Ground give a connection to the community as a whole.* **Blu ⌐◨-◨** | *Nouns OTG is about building friendships & connecting us all 💙 we need that.* **Mach** | *cost is too high with little deliverables, no quantification of impact, majority non impact events. No concrete goals to propel nouns forward.* **pin.pusher** | *Aubtoshi is the best but don’t tell her - Toady Hawk from OTG Discord* **profwerder** | *There is an extensive amount of organization for events and event travel. We do need a go to person who can not only carry out events but as a contact for other IRL opportunities that might present itself. Decentralization is a feature and a bug. Sometimes we need those ambassadors who can help bring others in while proliferating and Aubtoshi does this extremely well. This should not prohibit other approaches but this type of outreach is vital at this early stage of the DAO.* **kerimbonia** | *Yes Yes Yes... a nouns presence at all of the events proposed with a nouns community member that has showed nothing but passion for proliferating nouns is a no-brainer yes from me. the budget is definitely in line with the ambi
    0 references
    Proposal 205
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    **Nouncil Vote:** 47 Yes, 5 No, 1 Abstain 9 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Brook** | *would have voted AGAINST on Prop 202 had I known this would happen.* **0xDariush** | *they removed the eth from the prop and problem solved, so YES* **Classic_Craig** | *this makes sense as an easy solution for sending and receiving.* **Josep** | *I believe it will be beneficial for the DAO to have a recognizable ENS.* **Benbodhi** | *Wen nouns.⌐◨-◨* **kerimbonia** | *well, now that you put it like that how can we say no?* **lilpizza.eth** | *Easy yes since there is no 1 eth ask included.* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 202
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    **Nouncil Vote:** 31 Yes, 30 No, 1 Abstain 8 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **vsvsvs** | *How had this not already been in place -- my first Hell yess* **Josep** | *Amazing idea, Nouns gets lot of transactions and this would be helpfull.* **Brook** | *the provision of 1 Ξ for suggesting an idea sets an interesting precedent. wonder what it means for upcoming props such as prop 194* **lilpizza.eth** | *great idea, but the 1 eth bounty for it seems excessive. I would vote yes without it.* **JoelCares** | *1 ETH feels excessive here.* **pemburux** | *I agree with the idea, but for the value of 1 ETH I cant agree with it yet* **andreitr** | *Love the simplicity and utility of this proposal but voting against it - I am concerned about the precedent 1ETH compensation sets for the future props.* **0xDariush** | *I love to see that but agree with you all, 1 Eth make no sense for a simple transaction and I dont call it an idea to be honest.* *But Im wondering why they didnt set the ENS til now anyway* *I see foundation.nouns.eth 0x37b8e20646d174b00198b7e183dd1f25520c0f60 owns that ENS at the moment.* **kerimbonia** | *im all for compensating nouns contributors for their time and ideas, but a 1eth tip is a bit exaggerated. if there was some breakdown of time spent working on the prop with reference to how others have been compensated in the past for similar ideas or work, i think the tip could be justified.* **JoshuaFisher** | *idea is cool but why the extra 1eth fee haha* **Benbodhi** | *I like the idea and rewarding ideas but feel like 1 eth for it might be a bit high. Especially considering that a second version of this prop went up without the reward.* **Mindtoasted** | *The idea is simple but for 1 eth its kinda hard to agree on this, IMO it just less reasonable* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 201
    Vote Weight
    11
    Vote Reason
    **Nouncil Vote:** 47 Yes, 5 No, 1 Abstain 6 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Bigshot Klim** | *This will be a fun tool for people coming in that may be able to create simple games or animated content* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *great way to proliferate, I play world Wide Web game a lot and have first hand seen how exposure in this metaverse generates sales and awareness of the collection while people talking in text chats and point people to where to discover more about nounse* **0xapril** | *This proposal is well explained and the product seems very nounish with the reasonable ask. I vote 100℅ yes for this.* **bradq** | *Kerembonia has been exemplary in his handling of feedback and ideas through the Nouncil incubator of this prop. Prop is pitched at the right cost for the DAO and high value--beyond gaming. Content creators will benefit as well. And he clearly has the chops to do it. Hell yes.* **Mach** | *While I think this could end up as wasted money, the potential behind could lead to bigger value in the future if the assets are adopted and integrated* **Josep** | *I think it is an interesting proposal with an adequate funding requirement considering that it can facilitate the entry of more members interested in Web 3.0 to Nouns DAO.* **Benbodhi** | *Valuable resource that people can use in many ways!* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *the deliverables & sprite sheets for integration into worldwidewebb3 is a hell yeah from me* **systemdm.⌐◨-◨** | *Love this . Think many will find it very useful and inspiring!!* **Mindtoasted** | *Im sticking with my first vote on this prop, IMO webb is one of the most interesting world that I ever found in the world of MMO/etc and with this maybe could grow the Nounish culture on someway, I voted yes on this. **JoshuaFisher** | *Fun!* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 200
    Vote Weight
    11
    Vote Reason
    **Nouncil Vote:** 35 Yes, 20 No, 1 Abstain 8 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **lilpizza.eth** | *Amazing utility. Really into this idea.* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *Nouns having a delgated email address per owner to use for on-chain activity is a great idea* **ChrisCoCreated** | *anything that helps people flex their noun adds value* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *would be a great way to communicate with one another and like everyone business it would be cool for nouns to have there own 😃* **bradq** | *This seems like an interesting idea but Im not convinced there is need for it. And I think Nouners only is too narrow a focus. This idea for a couple hundred active Nouners max, and probably far less doesnt seem to make sense. Appreciate the builders and effort, though.* **Mach** | *Novel idea but dont think the use case is that widespread that its something that should be funded like this. Limited scope and small chance for adoption* **Josep** | *I do not think it is the best way to add value to the DAO to allocate this amount of resources to a service that I doubt will become the primary form of communication in Nouns DAO, which is why I am against funding this project.* **Blu ⌐◨-◨** | *So looking at this, Skiff still run their own servers but messages are encrypted so they don’t have access which could be an issue. If skiff gets shut down though then emails don’t work. Wish something like this could merge with handshake to make it truly decentralized. That being said I voted for it to see what they come up with since it’s a great idea.* **Benbodhi** | *I love the concept and tech but feel like it wont get a lot of use, especially with the limited subset of users that are interested noun holders. It also seems har to evaluate the work involved. Looks like the build is a token gated claim for custom domain and frontend interface for claim, which if this is the full development requirement, seems like its possibly overpriced.* *Unfortunately I have to vote no on this proposal as it is.* **Mindtoasted** | *Love the idea, an exclusive email address. I think the request is quite big in my opinion, but still curious about what will happen if this idea goes on chain. I would like to vote yes on this.* **0xDariush** | *i dont see any demands for this in the ecosystem, at least at the moment. or maybe Im not
    0 references
    Proposal 199
    Vote Weight
    11
    Vote Reason
    **Nouncil Vote:** 51 Yes, 2 No, 2 Abstain 8 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **lilpizza.eth** | *This looks like a fun initiative!* **Satori** | *Easy yes in my opinion. Awesome to see a relatively new Nouner have an idea, build it while taking in feedback and collaborating with community members, and get it put on chain so quickly.* **Akva** | *simple and effective: yes* **Bigshot Klim** | *these are really nice and it would be great to have more of them out there in the wild* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *Shades for the boys* **modrovsky** | *⌐◨-◨* **Josep** | *This facilitates the creation of nounish content by networks as well as being a nice gesture to some of the members who have decided to support the DAOs mission through the purchase of one or more Nouns.* **Art Is My Weapon** | *Proliferation.* **0xDariush** | *I mean why not!* *But they can get it easily if they want!* **kerimbonia** | *distribute some nouns glasses to some nouns holders, seems like the right thing to do... so yes* **.ZllW ⌐◨-◨** | *A no brainer imo, Nouns holder should receive these Nouns Vision* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *nice little reward* **Benbodhi** | *⌐◨-◨* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 198
    Vote Weight
    11
    Vote Reason
    **Nouncil Vote:** 30 Yes, 13 No, 4 Abstain 14 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Mach** | *Saw this proposal from conception to on-chain and happy to support it. This could have huge implications for nouns and a one of the first major events where nouns is put in front of a non-native audience and explained in clarity.* **Bigshot Klim** | *Lots of great opportunities for proliferation and discovery for a whole new audience on a global scale* **Coral Orca** | *esport is the way* **Josep** | *I dont have a deep knowledge of the esports sector, I will spend more time investigating the possibilities it offers for new proposals. In this case I abstain as my lack of knowledge about this industry makes it impossible for me to vote for the option that is in the DAOs best interest.* **metamonk** | *E-sports is a great niche to build a presence in. Nouns E-sports has done a fantastic job so far in proliferating Nouns in the space.* **Mindtoasted** | *This is very Nounish, hell yes from me, I love dota since I was in highschool, created a lot of interesting moments every quite period of time until now.* **andreitr** | *This looks legit but I am completely ignorant when it comes to anything Esports. Going to sit this one out (abstain) and educate myself on the space.* **Voadz** | *I love Dota. Huge potential & exposure for Nouns. Legit 💯* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 197
    Vote Weight
    11
    Vote Reason
    **Nouncil Vote:** 34 Yes, 8 No 14 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧** | *This is a very interesting prop. Touching on product design, event planning, community building, in Paris none the less. A true intersection of art, culture and tech. That is 100% Nounish.* *It is interesting to read back through the first two props on the Roadmap. Very cool to see the project laid out in stages, solidify itself and steadily work to this point. DAO support of the project completion cycle is fundamentally important. That does not mean with out discussion.* *Including the 30 NFT Paris event tickets is smart and hopefully will line up with other nounish things going on. I think it will be a key event for Nouns in Europe. People have been talking about it for months. This project can begin to solidify nouns as a fashion incubator. The press opportunities are tremendous. The on-boarding is tremendous. Paris is one of the best locations to potentially on-board affluent buyers who would be capable of joining the DAO.* *Event planning is very time intensive and requires major planning and organization. Nothing is cheap. Nouns should grasp the opportunities that are presenting themselves to engage with focused and excited audiences.* *Curious what the next steps could be after the event, but I think the artist and team is motivated and will be equip with excellent assets and display materials for on-going proliferation.* *CHEFFO = YES* **andreitr** | *For me this is a no brainer. I love Danits work and this prop is Nounish AF. I also love how innovative (experimental?) this is. Strong YES for me.* **Coral Orca** | *danit is nounish* **kerimbonia** | *the ask is a high but i feel like the product looks great and the potential exposure/upside of a nouns x fashion in paris show is worth the risk. good luck* **.ZllW ⌐◨-◨** | *Given Danit who has been delivering per milestones since prop #26 & 41, would love to see this materialized with prop #197.* **Josep** | *I believe this is a highly innovative proposal that aligns with the DAO. I have seen the work that has already been done and what is intended to be done in the coming months and I think it is a great way to target DAO funds.* **Mindtoasted** | *I voted yes for this, this is very nounish!* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 195
    Vote Weight
    11
    Vote Reason
    **Nouncil Vote:** 47 Yes, 7 No, 1 Abstain 3 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **byhardy** | *low cost, love the trial format, cool creator, easy yes. interesting to see if this inspires future first asks.* **CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧** | *I really like the art and the style of story telling. The short pilot was endearing and very nounish.* *I cant speak to the cost completely, but we are starting to see other animated, multi-minute videos for under 10 eth...or under 5. We have seen animation for much more. It seems like we are in the range here, although the range is large. I am not experienced enough in animation pricing to say more here.* *As far as on chain, I think that it is an experiment. But ultimately there should be ways to fund new builders in this range without on-chain voting, especially as the DAO grows. Its not the builders fault, or anyones, it is just an opportunity to continue to define the funding mechanisms or create new ones.* *CHEFFO = YES* **Mach** | *Great cost for what would get out of this* **Benbodhi** | *Reasonable ask for what could be a great thing!* **Josep** | *I think that the attention we will receive for the animation is not worth the 20ETH that is being asked for.* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *we already have people working on 3D nouns & the metaverse* **Akva** | *I love this* **JoelCares** | *Amazing animation, reasonable costs. Hell ya. Looking forward to seeing the finished product.* **kerimbonia** | *given the production quality, proven outreach and plans to release cc0 assets, this is an absolute no-brainer yes!* **bradq** | *100%. Teaser is fantastic. I like the cv of the team--esp. Pixar chops. If they get the script right, 20 ETH is a steal and might give us one of our best videos. Also on Nouncil call they said all assets cc0! Available to build off of.* **byhardy** | *Low cost. Cool creator. The trailed on Twitter is really cool. Im in.* **.ZllW ⌐◨-◨** | *Low cost, great intro vid, creator 3D print guy have nice track record (formerly with Pixar, Netflix & HBO)* **0xapril** | *Easy yes. The intro video is amazing!* **0xDariush** | *good team, good content, i just think the price could be less, if they go viral , its worthy* **Mindtoasted** | *its cool to have them taking part in this, already know some of the artists from twitter and they have different uniq
    0 references
    Proposal 194
    Vote Weight
    11
    Vote Reason
    **Nouncil Vote Results: YES wins** 45 Yes, 4 No, 3 Abstain 4 Nouncillors abstained from the decision --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Benbodhi** | *more time to chat about props prior to voting and this is a reasonable length imo* ⌐◨-◨ **Josep** | *I believe that extending the decision period on proposals can help to make better decisions that lead to a better allocation of funds.* **Wattsy** | *In general, more time is better for getting the right people involved.* **Mach** | *Doesnt hurt* **Mindtoasted** | *<3 this idea* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *Some proposals take swift action: doubling the wait time to activate a propsal helps nobody* **JoelCares** | *The way this prop is written... it flows so smoothly... pure poetry. I dont even know what it says, I just support it. Plain and simple.* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 193
    Vote Weight
    11
    Vote Reason
    **Nouncil Vote:** 45 Yes, 5 No, 1 Abstain 2 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Sasquatch** | *Looks amazing* **Benbodhi** | *Love this and been a supporter since the ideas started flowing.* ⌐◨-◨ **Josep** | *Having Victor continue his journey as a Nouns builder is very interesting. In his previous proposals he has proven to deliver on his proposals, I think we should support his cause.* **Wattsy** | *I dont know enough about sports and their community impact to make a fair decision here.* **profwerder** | *Excited for this initiative from a proliferation and social good perspective!* **Mach** | *I like the idea, think marketing could be saved a little but something permanent in LA could be big.* **Mindtoasted** | *From how they applied Kintsugi embellishes an objects on the basketball court they once repaired, that is the thing, can bring up many possibilities that come from those who are active in the world of basketball, Its a huge amount of request. I voted yes for this and if this goes on chain, hope there will be lots of Nounish culture growing in many direction.* **Coral Orca** | *its nounish and a good cause* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *it’s worth trying out this model with Victor & if all goes well bringing it to scale across the country would be unreal* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 192
    Vote Weight
    11
    Vote Reason
    **Nouncil Vote:** 37 Yes, 5 No, 2 Abstain 6 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Benbodhi** | *Thoughtful and skilful giga brains.* ⌐◨-◨ **Wattsy** | *These are not industry standard salaries, they are much higher.* **Mach** | *Voting yes, but will be looking at the work done. I do not think that 450,000 per year in work has been done so far. Expect big contributions over the next 6 months.* **Mindtoasted** | *I proudly vote yes on this, the previous proposal went smoothly. A concrete team with a vision.* **Coral Orca** | *we like the verbs* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *No brainer* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 191
    Vote Weight
    11
    Vote Reason
    **Nouncil Vote:** 30 Yes, 11 No, 1 Abstain 6 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **0xapril** | *Really love what mucho loved did. I think its great idea to expand what they did to world wide.* **heyjeff.eth** | *mucho love is bringing real change by directly interacting with people, that is very powerful* **Benbodhi** | *Nouns being recognised/learnt about it in this context is powerful. Nouns are good.* *⌐◨-◨* **Wattsy** | *This project seems to straddle both the overly ambitious context, as well as being hard to follow past the marketing in terms of truly actionable and measurable results.* **byhardy** | *Love having a charity arm of Nouns & I really really love the content arm. Social good content has huge potential. But retrofunding should be better explained to include past funding sources & why theyre being retrofunded. Also would like more transparency in how $$$ is being spent & on who? What are their roles? Why is the price of activations what it is (albeit reasonable)? Just need more answers here.* **Mindtoasted** | *IMO, Its a huge amount of request, with all the funding budget details for a 4 month time extension, it also proven that the previous proposal was running great, but Im not sure to vote yes for this amount of request so I vote no.* **Mach** | *Too much personnel pay to production usage. 50-50 is too much.* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *self explanatory* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 189
    Vote Weight
    11
    Vote Reason
    **Nouncil Vote:** 44 Yes, 10 No, 1 Abstain 3 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Benbodhi** | *nounish af Gnars is a power pod of proliferation and is spreading the culture far and wide in the best way possible imo. ⌐◨-◨* **.ZllW ⌐◨-◨** | *Sub-DAO have proven to proliferate and expand nouns branding. (Lil Nouns, Gnar, FoodNouns,etc) No doubt a large ask, but Gnar led by Gami have been providing impactful proliferation around Nouns; thus trust that Gnar team would put this 694E to good use in crossing the chasm and scaling what they are doing* **Josep** | *I think other ways to finance the project over time should be explored, I dont see a plan to be reasonably self-sustainable over time. I believe that Gnars brings a lot to the image of Nouns DAO and for this reason I would like to see the proposal revisited by reducing the capital required over the time period, setting goals and creating a strategy to make Gnars profitable.* **Akva** | *As part of GnarsDAO core team, I abstain from voting on this proposal even though I really want to see it succeed* **Mach** | *Love how gnars is spreading the culture and using money efficiently to build a brand/the nouns brand* **systemdm.⌐◨-◨** | *Definetly Yes… In my opinion this kind of activations and proliferation and social impact is exactly what its all about….* **Sasquatch** | *easy yes* *the inspiration for a lot of work done at Nouns* *let our best builders have a clear runway for takeoff* **JoshuaFisher** | *you had me a gnello* **andreitr** | *Love Gnars and what they are doing. Lets keep the momentum going.* **Satori** | *Gnars are paving the way for subDAOs in many areas and I think it would be hugely beneficial for Nouns in the long run to facilitate their growth.* **JoelCares** | *keep on shreddin* **pemburux** | *Great initiative, great proliferation, and big yes from me* **Mindtoasted** | *This is a huge amount of request, but from a long term perspective, IMHO it can continue to push something that covers a wide range of things related to sports and athletes, especially for the Nouns itself, which has never been separated from anything highlighted before. I vote yes for this* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *Gami has done a great job previously with the grant he was give and theres no doubt he will so ever bigger and greater things wit
    0 references
    Proposal 188
    Vote Weight
    11
    Vote Reason
    **Nouncil Vote:** 34 Yes, 8 No, 2 Abstain 6 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Coral Orca** | *i like it* **marxistmillionaire** | *Nice to see this prop on-chain! The first Creator Contests were held for SharkDAO, so I witnessed the whole process from the very beginning. Solid team, very useful tool. Its a clear YES for me!* **andreitr** | *Love the UI and product direction. Solid prop, imho. @nick , lmk if you guys need any help with Twitter integration.* **Benbodhi** | *This platform has been a joy to use and reduces admin of running contests efficiently by a LOT. The team are receptive to changes and additions and I have had the pleasure of helping shape the direction and features for the last couple of months. We use it at TNS and have the ability to use this across a number of other communities/projects/DAOs that Im involved in.* ⌐◨-◨ **Coral Orca** | *sounds interesting and usefull* **Josep** | *I have been looking at your project and have been able to see the involvement of the team and functionality of your project for the DAO. I want to see what you are able to do in the future.* **JoshuaFisher** | *app has been great to use and very helpful* **byhardy** | *Bad timing here with the recent large funding of Prop House. Im of the belief that products with similar end goals should collaborate to benefit everyone, not divide attention.* **kerimbonia** | *even though im not 100% clear on the question of overlap with prop house and some of the push back on this proposal, im voting yes for the team on this one.* **wiznav** | *I think this overlaps too much with prop house* **Satori** | *This is a hugely beneficial tool for contests hosted on social media and I think this could co-exist or even be integrated into Prop House one day.* **pemburux** | *Its bad timing for this funding, actually we need more proliferation and less tooling* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 187
    Vote Weight
    11
    Vote Reason
    **Nouncil Vote:** 45 Yes, 8 No, 0 Abstain 8 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Coral Orca** | *i like it* **Josep** | *I think these animations can be used in many ways to proliferate DAO Nouns, I like the idea and I trust the background of the builders.* **profwerder** | *I love this because I see it as creating base assets for builders to create with. This can really open options and make it easier for builders. As well as just a fun touch point/game to introduce nouns to normies.* **Mach** | *seems more like a prophouse project* **JoelCares** | *love the animations* **pemburux** | *I agree with this proposal, the animations created can later be used for other projects because they are CC0* **Benbodhi** | ** ⌐◨-◨ *for the culture* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *Love this interchangeable animations of nouns!* **lilpizza.eth** | *This seems like a big win for NounsDAO. I imagine a lot of people would utilize this API for animations as a public good. Im also a firm believer that gaming will be a great use-case for NFTs in the future and this is something NounsDAO needs to focus more heavily on for proliferation.* **Satori** | *Id like to see creative assets like this more widely available for creators. Also think we need more fun ways for people to use their Nouns and games like this may be a worthwhile experiment.* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 185
    Vote Weight
    11
    Vote Reason
    **Nouncil Vote:** 52 Yes, 2 No, 0 Abstain 3 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **baba | 1579** | *This Prop is a YES for me, but also wish Lils had been included 😦* **CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧** | *yeah i wish FOODNOUNS was included in this too but we will take the build and do a lil something @Al409 😋 ...* *CHEFFO = YES* **Sasquatch** | *would love to see this prop done again with a different set of sub-communities* **Art Is My Weapon** | *Proliferation.* **modrovsky** | *⌐◨-◨* **Mach** | *all for, lets get the noggles out** **JoelCares** | *Love seeing these Noggles go to good use. I would have preferred an open call for noggle recipients, but I do see these communities using the noggles well.* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *Definitely need more noggles IRL* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *The Nouns Vision glasses to these 3 groups is a no brainer* **Benbodhi** | *⌐◨-◨* **.ZllW** | *Although wish that other sub-community were also included, example lil nouns, nounsbrazail, nounsinsg, etc. Overall good initiatives to have those nouns vision sitting in NounsDAO treasury being put to good use. Yes for me.* **BitcoinBob ⌐◨-◨** | *Yes* **Sasquatch** | *need to get these noggles out in the world proliferatin* **kerimbonia** | *in terms of proliferation and extending nouns visibility beyond the nft space, this proposal is a no-brainer.* **Mindtoasted** | *Yes from me its also great to see the other Nounish sub-communities included, hope this creates a nice outlook on each people who receive the sunglasses* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 184
    Vote Weight
    11
    Vote Reason
    **Nouncil Vote:** 48 Yes, 3 No, 1 Abstain 4 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **0xFloyd** | *I view this as a crypto public service that benefits our whole industry* **Mach** | *same as before* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *ZachXBT is a machine & does great work for the web3 space* **Benbodhi** | *Zach’s work is a public good that benefits the entire space and hes clearly underfunded. Very nounish to help here.* **.ZllW** | *What Zach is doing is clearly good for the web3 space; a form of public goods that should be recognized. Yes for me.* **BitcoinBob ⌐◨-◨** | *yes* **Mindtoasted** | *Its still the same as what I voted before, from how detailed Zach investigated and revealed several projects in the past this could be a good new insight for Nouns. lately i personally follow some influential twitter people who provide good and bad concrete information in crypto space, in fact we need someone like this so I vote yes* **kerimbonia** | *full support for the work ZachXBT does so its a strong yes from me.* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 183
    Vote Weight
    11
    Vote Reason
    **Nouncil Vote:** 49 Yes, 1 No, 0 Abstain 3 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **samellis ⌐◨-◨** | *more prop house please* **Benbodhi** | *Prop House is a powerful tool and I support the continuation of it.* **andreitr** | *hell yes* **JoelCares** | *Prop House is significantly useful Nounish architecture. Easy yes here. Let these smart people continue to build!* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *No brainer yes, prop house has been working great and will keep doing so long as it keeps getting funded and ran by the people currently in charge* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *Excited to start the Tiny Dinos 1st prophouse round in the coming weeks. Huge fan of the protocal* **BitcoinBob ⌐◨-◨** | *yes* **Mindtoasted** | *Tight team, proven impact, I vote yes.* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 182
    Vote Weight
    11
    Vote Reason
    **Nouncil Vote:** 38 Yes, 6 No, 1 Abstain 7 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **profwerder** | *Love this. BUT I WANT A FLAMINGO OR I’M VOTING NO! 🦩🦩🦩🦩🦩* *(jk already voted yes)* **SuperTightWoody** | *This is a no brainer for me- the use we all get out of these filters is priceless and Coral is the bestest :)* **Bigshot Klim** | *big yes for this. The builder has been doing great work and has proven to make high quality content. AR filets are high value assets for proliferation and we need more of these* **.ZllW** | *Love the filter, strong proof of work, nounish and will live on the internet forever 2x Nounish!* **Benbodhi** | *These filters have the potential to reach outside the Nouns bubble and theyre fun to use. Also helpful for people looking to retain some anonymity online with video calls and live streams.* **JoelCares** | *Love these. Super useful and set the stage for lots of future marketing endeavours with them. Price is reasonable, OG Nouns builder. Lets do it.* **fiveoceans_dev** | *I love these ar filters. it makes sense to me to fund more filters* **Mach** | *love the AR filters, they do great in the esports realm, happy to support more* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *The more the better! These filters being all across multiple social platforms will be really good for new people to discover!* **kerimbonia** | *AR is the future and I see great value in having as many nouns filters ready to go asap. coral orca, being one of the creators behind 3d nouns, gets my support as well knowing that he is a solid community member with a proven track record of delivering high quality nounish content.* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *We’ve used Corals Orcas Snap Camera heads for video content for The Noun Square through Riverside & they’re a great resource* **Mindtoasted** | *So Nounish and used by many people including me! I vote totally yes on this!* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 181
    Vote Weight
    11
    Vote Reason
    **Nouncil Vote:** 35 Yes, 7 No, 2 Abstain 4 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Bigshot Klim** | *I think this will be a very interesting experiment, especialy once there is more awareness and engagement after the Rose Bowl parade. I am for all of this prop.* **CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧** | *I think @samellis ⌐◨-◨ summed it up on this one 👏 . My only thing would maybe bring the minimum view up a little, but that might be ambitious to start.* *Content is king. If anyone saw the screens from Beyond Basel and other exhibits..it is clear that content wins. We need young creative talent to keep Nouns and all related projects relevant.* *The Prop House element is excellent and a great use of that tech.* *CHEFFO = YES* **Mach** | *Low criteria with too high a reward. Poorly incentivizes growth and could potentially reward insane viewership $s* **profwerder** | *This prop is a bit confusing tbh but there are some good team members here so I ultimately came to a yes after chatting with a zebra. I recommend the team create some clarity around the process so participants are clear on expectations and create some AMA sessions to answer questions. You may also want to jump on some spaces to talk about it & answer questions.* **kerimbonia** | *i am interested in seeing how the mechanics of this proposal plays out as there is a lot to be learned in terms of attracting high caliber teams to the nouns ecosystem and getting the most impactful nouns content out of it. good luck!* **Benbodhi** | *This model has proven positive on a smaller scale, will be interesting to see how it goes with such large rewards.* **andreitr** | *Always yes for more content.* **fiveoceans_dev** | *A very well written proposal! I like the idea and already can see that it will bring a lot of attention from creators. I feel that it will be a successful proliferation campaign!* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *I feel like the reward at the end for participation in this will be a really cool incentive for people to create compelling nouns content for the next few months* **Mindtoasted** | *This could give a huge boost to the underrated video creator teams out there, can also continue to encourage the production of more Nounish videos in a wider scope. If this goes smoothly there is a possibility that Nounish hype content will explode in some way. I vot
    0 references
    Proposal 180
    Vote Weight
    11
    Vote Reason
    **Nouncil Vote:** 50 Yes, 5 No, 1 Abstain 2 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **heyjeff.eth** | *looks super dope - just voted yes* **CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧** | *This looks great. Again we are starting to see props where groups of OG nounish builders are using the established vibes and channels to start to bring in other talent...in a creatively managed way. This is one of the future styles of onboarding that needs to be experimented with and doubled down on now.* *One of the best ways to proliferate will be to create lore. Lore allows for creative growth, story telling and IRL experience marketing.* *The prop also does a good job of fund allocation/re-allocation. The budget is correct and relatively speaking could drive engagement on a much higher level than other items in this range.* *The team is pro and will do a great job of finding and working with talent. Incorporating Prop House is also a good way to open the build and utilize and promote one of the strongest tools in the eco. CHEFFO = YES* **!xargs** | *no brainer. love it.* **fiveoceans_dev** | *I love proposals that have creative elements and focused on interaction with community. This proposal will definitely create a lot of positive vibes.* **Bigshot Klim** | *more proliferation like this gets more eyeballs* **kerimbonia** | *i like the short story format as it encourages the creation of high quality, funny content with a clear punchline. only the best of the best can survive this 15 second format and that sets the bar high, which is a good thing... solid team gets my support as well.* **Mach** | *Like the idea, and believe there is always more room for media production* **profwerder** | *I love this talented crew and can’t wait to see how this goes!* **BENJAMIN LATSKO ⌐◧-◧** | *BIG YES* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *Great group of nouncilers coming together for new short story content! Cant wait to see all the new animations coming out of this prop* **JoshuaFisher** | *Narrative Nouns for the win!* **Mindtoasted** | *Shorts is something that people mostly consume on many platforms now, every shorts memes will have a distinct taste, so i vote yes on this and i hope every shorts that come from this are Nounish* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 179
    Vote Weight
    11
    Vote Reason
    **Prop 179 Nouncil Vote Results** 41 Yes, 9 No, 0 Abstain 4 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧:** *this builder is fascinating and also has done a great job of making videos and explaining the idea. we need to be a space for conceptual art...also the community being able to participate in scripting and concepts is fun and nounish...I also like that the budget includes promotion.* *CHEFFO = YES* **!xargs:** *We would meme the sh@t out of it. hahaha! big fun.* **Joel Cares:** *The videos make me laugh, the characters with noggles look great, love Marcs performance history, lets do it!* **kerimbonia:** *i love the concept. i love the art. i love the vibe. its outside of the nounish box and think there is something important to be discovered with this proposal when it comes to nounish conceptual art more on the absurd side of things. its well thought out with a budget for marketing which is super important for this style of show.* **Mach:** *love the direction and from a quality outside member. Excited to see the production* **BENJAMIN LATSKO ⌐◧-◧:** *Im working with the team to further develop their marketing efforts and produce BTS content* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨:** *Voting yes here because this creator looks to have a lot of previous experience creating cool and engaging video content and it would be really cool to see more Nouns videos by him! =)* **Mindtoasted:** *Unique details, concepts and goals from a concrete background team could create a new unique spark in the spread of Nounish videos. Curious about the behind-the-scenes stages and more of the people behind this, big yes from me as a big fan of video production concept* **JoshuaFisher:** *These videos are extremely Nounish* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 178
    Vote Weight
    11
    Vote Reason
    **Nouncil Vote Results** 31 Yes, 13 No, 0 Abstain 5 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons** --- **andrewladdusaw** *Seems like a no-brainer. Great team, great mission, overhead far below the norm for capital allocation in the rest of the community. Easy yes for me.* **profwerder** *Agree —great team and seems like a good trial run but I think the team should have included more comp for themselves. This is going to be more work than you may realize. Love the experiment!* **Bigshot Klim** *no brainer for me too* **CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧** *this prop is good. it will attract high level talent with a clear on-boarding and application process. the numbers are clear and proportional, the team comps are correct. cant wait to see what is built. CHEFFO = YES* **shad_0** *it’s a lovely idea!* **fiveoceans_dev** *I vote for this proposal because I believe there should be competition for best allocation of treasury. The team is nounish and I trust that they will do a good job.* **Bigshot Klim** *We need more ways to keep new builders engaged and learn as they go in this space* **Joel Cares** *Fully support experiments in on-boarding new builders.* **Mach** *seems like something that could be done and reward retroactive funding instead of active comp* **BENJAMIN LATSKO ⌐◧-◧** *I think its a fun experiment. But not convinced its something sustainable and scalable. I also dont see how it will actually benefit the flywheel dynamics* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** *Looks like a great way to bring in new established creatives into the nouns ecosystem!* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 177
    Vote Weight
    11
    Vote Reason
    --- **Nouncil Vote Results** --- 43 Yes, 12 No, 3 Abstain 3 Nouncillors abstained from the decision --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Benbodhi** *ZachXBT does amazing work and has a solid crypto audience. Probably wise to help fund him for the benefit of the space and some cross promo to his audience.* **JoshuaFisher** *supporting good works is Nounish* **profwerder** *This needs more work & development. What are the deliverables? How does this proliferate the meme? Why not support 0xquit or foobar? Why him? I don’t think that has been explained in this prop OR any support for this particular person’s qualifications. Not fully against this but thats a lot of eth on a vague prop.* **Sasquatch** *zachxbt goat* **Don** *Zach is a the crypto communitys version of super heroes! Easy yes.* **Brook** *- i wish there was more clarity in the proposal - what sort of precedent does it set for others like zach? for example, do nouners up and fund another person who is doing something similar? - it would be nice to hear back from zach about this proposal. his last tweet was on Nov 29, 2022 - it wasnt about this proposal. - what was the rationale behind determining the amount? ^^^ all things that should be thought about as we move forward funding Public Goods / Persons.* **Mach** *zach does great work, will love to continue supporting it* **ThaSwami** *Not enough information provided that clearly defines the use of funds* **JoelCares** *Hell ya - would be proud to support Zachs work.* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** *ZachXBT is the Michael Jordan of uncovering crypto grifers & scammers. I’ve followed his work for a long time & he works off donations. About 3 months ago he almost quit bc he was making zero revenue & mentally taxed. The space needs more ZachXBTs bc we have so many bad actors right under our noses. This is a 100% yes vote on my end: hopefully this helps him add more players to his roster* **Mindtoasted** *This is quite a big amount, but from how detailed Zach investigated and exposed several projects in the past this could be a good new insight for Nouns. Lately I personally follow several influential Twitter figures who provide concrete information both good and bad in the crypto space, in fact we need people like this so I vote yes.* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** *Looking through Twitter I see a lot of examples of Zach exposing a lot of bad actors in the
    0 references
    Proposal 176
    Vote Weight
    11
    Vote Reason
    Results: How should Nouncil vote: 43 YES, 1 NO, 2 ABSTAIN 3 Nouncillors abstained from the decision. --- Discussion from Nouncil Discord --- --- (https://discord.gg/nouncil) --- CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧ The Archive is important and will hold so much beautiful art and stories. Joel Cares This prop feels necessary and I would be excited to browse through all of this art regularly. Oh - and the website is great, but Id also love if the Notion DB was publically viewable, so I could sort and query and explore right from that. heyjeff.eth I love this idea overall - i think its needed in the ecosystem. Bigshot Klim I love this idea and the interface is sweet
    0 references
    Proposal 175
    Vote Weight
    11
    Vote Reason
    Nouncil is overall in favor of 175. Nouncillors voted 34 YES, 7 NO, and 2 ABSTAIN (using the new anonymous Discord voting powered by Nerman Bot.) Some excerpts from the discussion thread: There should be multiple options for builders to choose as partners for their props. These things are our babies and we want them to be handled by people who share same values and care. If we dont have these options I think that we will drive away many ... the only people that have interacted with my requests for help there are the same people putting this prop together so I am all in to support this prop which I think will help so many -Klim I have voted yes because I see this as a pilot and a building block for growth. The team includes some of the smartest, strongest communicators and most well meaning people in the ecosystem. I trust the intentions, durability and consistency of the team. -Cheffo Prop discussion is a very valuable service that people in Nouncil have been providing without any clear reward in sight, and the people in this prop have all been actively providing prop feedback without compensation for months. -Joel This (reads) like a request to allocate 10 ETH with an overhead of 65 ETH to fund the team, which is roughly ~90% overhead -Juan
    0 references
    Proposal 174
    Vote Weight
    11
    Vote Reason
    Nouncil Vote Results: YES - 57 NO - 0 ABSTAIN - 0 Discussion from Nouncil Discord (https://discord.gg/nouncil) marxistmillionaire I really enjoy your newsletters and summaries, maty. Really helpful for people who aren‘t able to follow everything themselves. byhardy Very reasonable ask for such a great tool & Nounish builder. That notion is a behemoth. Excited to see the data become prettier — the notion can only go so far. Also love the Newsletter! profwerder Such an easy yes! Great work maty!! metamonk this is much needed. great prop
    0 references
    Proposal 173
    Vote Weight
    11
    Vote Reason
    Vote Results: 64 YES, 6 NO, 4 ABSTAIN - DISCUSSION HIGHLIGHTS - andrewladdusaw Oh, for a life at sea... Wattsy | Nouns Game Engine (NGE) Really organized proposal. And as a former sailor, Im biased. ChrisCoCreated Plenary to like about this I’m a yes. One question comes to mind, what happens if the weather is terrible? andreitr I love this. Good job on the prop, fiveoceans_dev marxistmillionaire I‘m a big fan of your nounish sailing campaigns. They create awesome imagery. I think it would be important to get a bunch of journalists and reporters on board. This campaign has the potential to get lots of people interested into Nouns imo. But only, if we get some media coverage. Bigshot Klim I think with proper documentation like drone footage around the Statue of Liberty and the lower Manhattan would be epic. If you can engage a new york club perhaps doing something with the sails at fleet week would be possible too --- For more Nounish proposal discussions join our discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 172
    Vote Weight
    11
    Vote Reason
    Nouncils Vote Results: 62 YES, 3 NO, 3 ABSTAIN Discussions from Nouncil Discord: Al409 this is fantastic Joel Cares This will be a useful tool for many builders. Noice. andreitr agree, solid utility motiondesign.eth What’s the issue with distributing in eth? Brook Very important utility. An useful way to support builders outside of crypto. But as a crypto-native protocol, shouldn’t nouns leverage ETH more than USDC? Being ETH-exclusive is more than just the currency, it opens up doors to onboard others into crypto. To balance both helping builders and being crypto-native, I think a threshold (if more than x Ξ is requested, convert to USD) could be in place Join the Nouncil Discord for some of the best Proposal discussion happening in the ecosystem: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 171
    Vote Weight
    11
    Vote Reason
    “There is a valid need for Nouns programs to provide funding in this range, and the team is a solid group of Nounish Folk. My only concern is that the admin costs are 40% of the ask. I support this prop but hope that in future iterations, as the group scales, they can improve on the ratio of admin costs to allocated ETH.” - Joel Cares “Love this idea as its an existing grey area that Ive encountered myself at nounfrica,where we have a prop but no definite place to apply for funding. Agree with Joel Cares about the admin costs needing improvements. Otherwise a good prop.” - Don “I like the prop! My personal concern are the different areas it’s supporting - pretty much anything from software/tech to art and marketing. I think especially for a pod it makes sense to choose a specific industry, product or product category and not just go after everything - aka a niche.” - Benjamin Latsko “I support this fully, as is. A tremendous amount of admin time is a simple reality if what Juan just said is to become a reality. All team members have delivered above and beyond consistently.” - !xargs “As a prop builder this is so relatable, being stuck in a awkward stage of mid tier ask aiming to scale up gradually. Fully support DCS pod.” - .ZllW
    0 references
    Proposal 170
    Vote Weight
    11
    Vote Reason
    Nouncil is voting FOR this proposal after an internal poll saw 53 YES, 10 NO and 11 ABSTAIN votes. Some excerpts from Nouncil discussion: This is super exciting! very well written/thought out Al409 Yes - a wonderful way to proliferate. Interesting to gamify naming systems, too, by reserving 0-669 to Nouners. Almost synonymous with the value of early number ENS’s. -Brook As one of the very first projects to integrate the NNS initial code into a front end, FOODNOUNS loves NNS. The high level concept is a no brainer. We will all benefit from an exponential and creative growth of NNS. -Cheffo Love this initiative -Boanez I think nns is fun, i like seeing it in the auctions, but i feel like at the end of the day, its still just a gimmick. -Maty Join the Nouncil Discord for some of the best Proposal discussion happening in the ecosystem: https://discord.gg/s9aGsAzzM2
    0 references
    Proposal 169
    Vote Weight
    11
    Vote Reason
    Results: 54 Yes, 1 Abstain **Sidenoun** with more DAO’s and multisigs, this I feel will add that extra motivation for people to vote. As a Nouncil signer, this will definitely help **JoelCares** With Gnosis Safe transactions it makes sense to refund the gas directly to the person who paid it rather than sending the refund to the safe. I agree with this change.
    0 references
    Proposal 166
    Vote Weight
    14
    Vote Reason
    62 Yes, 3 No, 6 Abstain XIN I almost exclusively vote no on all props for physical advertising campaigns. I think afk/irl advertising with merch etc doesn’t actually make anyone interested in a project. Especially at events that are filled with advertisements and tons of companies i domt think it makes sense for the huge amounts of money required. I think the money is always spent better on either digital art or software since they can reach everyone with no costs and doesnt produce things like tshirts that get very small use and then thrown away I think afk/irl stuff should be very limited and done when they have a strong value and are innovative in some way or help people in some way (like the glasses donated to children) Juan ⌐◨-◨ a bit confused as to what content & efforts Stoopid Buddy is doing vs OTG, arent we already shooting tons of footage? Also, it seems to me that the big media draw is going to be the parade float, not the t-shirts and stickers thrown out along the route. andrewladdusaw Interesting take. My first thought was no as well until I saw the numbers of items and people that plan to get out. Im actually for this now because if were already in on the float and the documentary, why wouldnt we want to attempt to maximize as much as possible? I do like where your head is at with it though. profwerder This is a big YES for me! This isn’t just about an event—-this is TONS of content that will be used for YEARS to come! We should seek out every way to bolster this opportunity and maximize it. For the amount of FREE advertising this event will get Nouns, this is a small ask. JoshuaFisher we’re shooting a 1M documentary of this event so we should def make the most of it Would be awesome if someone put up a really robust digital campaign for this too When it comes to Nouns, at this stage, I’m always thinking Yes AND systemdm.⌐◨-◨ Big YES for me as well.. I disagree with the idea that IRL events and merch are not effective. I dont think there is a better way of onboarding Humanity, new people on to Nouns and web3 in general. Online only is like preaching to the choir. I think this is an amazing idea for a hitsoric family oriented event enjoyed by millions, not just in the US BTW. I would watch every year with my family as a child in Santo Domingo.
    0 references
    Proposal 165
    Vote Weight
    14
    Vote Reason
    “Voting yes here but think :30 and :60 is a huge difference in time.” - Joshua Fisher “I’d love to see two experiments. This one for an explainer and another 100ETH to retro 100 video creators with 1ETH to make their best Nouns video and 10 ETH to a team to decide which 100 get the reward. I just think that the latter would win out by far in proliferation. That’s why I’m against 150k explainer videos. It’s a real struggle for me.” - Andrew Laddusaw “I love the work and concept the studio is bringing here, but voted a no because I dont see a plan for getting this video seen. Id change my vote if the team is able to come back with a plan for generating views. Unlike BAYC, or any centralized project, we have no in house marketing team that can effectively make use of the content, so by default that responsibility falls on the head of the proposing team.” - Yitong “Top talent on this team, would love to see more nounish content from them!” - Benbodhi
    0 references
    Proposal 164
    Vote Weight
    14
    Vote Reason
    Love the DAO x DAO collaboration with Gnars also sponsoring, love the proposals focus on clearly describing the exact proliferation plans, love the people involved. Easy yes.
    0 references
    Proposal 163
    Vote Weight
    15
    Vote Reason
    Nouncil has proved to be a solid ground for proposal discussion and the initiatives within have been a powerful method of proliferation.
    0 references
    Proposal 162
    Vote Weight
    15
    Vote Reason
    Votes: (44 Y, 2 N, 0 A) This group has done excellent work in prior events and we support their continued efforts.
    0 references
    Proposal 161
    Vote Weight
    15
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨ Nouncil votes FOR Prop 161. (64 Yes, 2 No, 1 Abstain) **Discussion from Nouncil Discord:** https://discord.gg/nouncil **JoelCares** Strong yes from me. I would like to increase both of these values further, but am ok with this in the interim. Voting Delay + Voting Period needs to be at least 7 days combined in order to guarantee each prop will be discussed on various subdao weekly meetings.
    0 references
    Proposal 156
    Vote Weight
    14
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨ This work is fascinating and Nouncil voted strongly in favour. This is a talented group building foundational things for Nouns. We look forward to your continued work and seeing more Nounish videos generated by AI.
    0 references
    Proposal 155
    Vote Weight
    17
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨ Nouncil supports CDT with a a deafening roar of support and an overwhelming 69 yes votes. CDTs work must continue. In conclusion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZYJ_6Xo4-E
    0 references
    Proposal 154
    Vote Weight
    14
    Vote Reason
    Nouncil has voted in favour of Agora Continuation. Initially there was less support on the first iteration of the proposal, but after a few rounds of iteration, the support from Nouncil has grown to an overwhelming majority (57 FOR / 2 Against / 0 Abstain). The potential for increased participation in governance is a clear benefit and empowering people to showcase their desire to be a delegate with incentives on the way is an interesting approach.
    0 references
    Proposal 152
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨ **Results** YES wins with 98% support **Reasons** Great prop. Very important to improve the protocol - @akva#0001 great to see the nuts and bolts side on things - @metamonk#0001 This looks excellent. I hope we can implement most if not all into FOODNOUNS. Thats a Yes for me dog! - @CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧#2859 Very happy to see development on the Nouns DAO protocol. Gas Refunds for voting is an obvious win, same with the bug fixes. Im curious about how Dynamic Quorum will play out - which proposals will get rejected because of the change, and how we will configure the parameters in the future. Interesting change nonetheless! - @JoelCares#5898
    0 references
    Proposal 151
    Vote Weight
    15
    Vote Reason
    Nouncil has voted YES unanimously to refill NSFW. A lot of prop builders got their start via NSFW funding and the potential for impact is large. Some Nouncillors posed the question who makes up the rest of the NSFW team with Noun22? during Nouncil calls - this was the only real feedback.
    0 references
    Proposal 150
    Vote Weight
    15
    Vote Reason
    Nouncil is voting FOR this proposal with a majority vote of 56 for, 5 against, 4 abstains and 0 abstaining from the vote altogether. There was some concern from a few members about how this might affect the DAO when people can comment anonymously. But theres overwhelming support to see this proposal go forward and consensus is that it will be positive.
    0 references
    Proposal 147
    Vote Weight
    15
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨ 🙏 Yes wins. (28 yes, 2 no, 25 abstain) ~~ marxistmillionaire ~~ It doesnt feel right to me that some of the curators are also among the winners. I sometimes work as a curator in real life and such overlaps are not accepted there for obvious reasons. Even if the curators dont choose the winners. ~~ fiveoceans_dev ~~ I think everyone will agree if competition for winning trait will be 100 eth. Currently, compensation is 132 for 11 winning traits. We literally spending lots of time to cut 12 eth per trait to 9 eth per trait, roughly. I think it is not such a big difference…. It’s better to pass this prop on focus on future props ~~ samellis ~~ I think all traits should be awarded the same.
    0 references
    Proposal 146
    Vote Weight
    15
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨ 🙏 Yes wins. (50 yes, 1 no, 7 abstain, 1 x) ~~ ThaSwami ~~ I think its great to reward everyone who submitted traits, but Coordinape voting might be overkill. Im of the view that anyone who took the time to contribute some art should get rewarded, irrespective of how many they submitted, quality of work or who they interacted with. Im in favour of a simple pro-rata of ETH amongst the number of artists. We could setup clearer guidelines for rewards next season ~~ JoelCares ~~ Personally think this would be fun, help build community across the broad group of participants, and give the community a voice in evaluating quality. The current structure (3 GIVE tokens) would not be rewarding general participation, it would be rewarding the runner up work valued most by the community.
    0 references
    Proposal 145
    Vote Weight
    15
    Vote Reason
    Nouncil Results: Yes: 94% No: 0% Abstain: 6% Bring Nouns to the people ⌐◨-◨ 🙏
    0 references
    Proposal 144
    Vote Weight
    15
    Vote Reason
    Nouncil Results: Yes: 64% No: 8% Abstain: 28% This will allow one click for any subDAO as well, so well instantly have a multitude of other nounish bots giving Twitter updates on auctions and other activities. Thats the main benefit for me. I think its going to be a proliferation monster for the price. - andrewladdusaw they also have a good record making these bots - fiveoceans_dev
    0 references
    Proposal 143
    Vote Weight
    14
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨ reading ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ reading ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ reading ⌐◨-◨ Yep, looks nounish.
    0 references
    Proposal 142
    Vote Weight
    14
    Vote Reason
    Nouncil has voted almost unanimously FOR this proposal. The ask is low for high impact with a few aspects including educating kids about the DAO and onboarding them to crypto in general in a country where NFT usage is 2nd highest in the world. The DAO to DAO proposal pipeline is also a really interesting approach to funding things that extension communities support but cant necessarily fund directly and have the ability to submit an on chain proposal at Nouns DAO.
    0 references
    Proposal 141
    Vote Weight
    14
    Vote Reason
    I’ve been waiting for this. I have faith in Klim! Good luck, Klim. love the enthusiasm and hard work. overall, getting a lot of vibe rooting for this.... toys are cool, nounish toys--even cooler! ^ Some of the feedback from the Nouncil Votes Chat. Nouncil voted almost unanimously to support Klims proposal and put it on chain, and then 48-1-2 in favor of a YES vote here. We believe in Klims vision and his value as a Nouncillor and a builder, and we cant wait to see these toys in production. ⌐◨-◨
    0 references
    Proposal 140
    Vote Weight
    14
    Vote Reason
    Without Prop House, Nouncil would be, like, 5 builders, instead of 100 strong. Nouncil <3 Prop House
    0 references
    Proposal 139
    Vote Weight
    14
    Vote Reason
    Big giant yes. Awesome video. Nouns garage band! Love love loveeeee this project and idea!!! This is great on so many levels, presentation is spoot on and the concept is excellent Nothing but positivity about this proposal can be found anywhere in Nouncil channels. Woody has been a fixture in nouncil and in nouns for the past 7+ months has brought so much joy with his musical and production skills (Nouncil theme song, Woodys Soundboard, etc.) A soundscape / sonic aesthetic is important for any brand and nobody had tried to do one for nouns yet, so it feels like a no-brainer to give the Grammy-nominated noun-pilled a producer to blow our minds. Nouncil voted 55-0-0 unanimously in support of this proposal and this builder.
    0 references
    Proposal 138
    Vote Weight
    14
    Vote Reason
    During the weekly nouncil call, it felt like most were initially against the proposal. Through discussions, the point was made that the ask is fairly small by on-chain prop standards, and the potential reach could be outsized considering the parties involved, and for that reason a fair number of nouncillors changed their votes to yes. It was nonetheless still a contentious vote, with only 21 YES, 12 NO and a whopping 17 undecided Abstentions. Because we calculate our Nouncil quorum including Abstentions, we are voting FOR this prop and we hope it will bring thousands of new eyeballs to nouns.
    0 references
    Proposal 137
    Vote Weight
    14
    Vote Reason
    We need to not only extend but also multiply this action, said Nouncillor Klim in Nouncil Votes Chat, and clearly Nouncil agreed, Voting unanimously FOR with 54 votes. Necfas and co, keep on proliferating nouns with public goods in the DR (and hopefully beyond!)
    0 references
    Proposal 136
    Vote Weight
    14
    Vote Reason
    Nouncil voted to put this proposal on chain on behalf of Brennen (who delegates his tokens to Nouncil.) During discussions on the weekly call with the proposer, Nouncillors liked the idea of having a conference to shape to Nouns vision over time, and the idea of proliferating the Noggles meme directly to people interested in web 3 seemed like a worthy pursuit. Ultimately, Nouncil voted 29-2-12 in favor of this proposal.
    0 references
    Proposal 135
    Vote Weight
    14
    Vote Reason
    Nouncil was impressed by the effort and detail that went into this proposal. Many also expressed excitement around the repository of assets that will be made available as part of the deal. It was mentioned that during his appearance on Noun O Clock at The Noun Square, Blu and his partner seemed genuinely passionate about Nouns and excited to work on this project in collaboration. Some raised questions about whether the production costs might be high, but ultimately most Nouncillors felt it will be worth the investment, both for the exposure that could come from the production itself and from the assets that will be created for free future use.
    0 references
    Proposal 133
    Vote Weight
    14
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨ SharkDAO have been great contributors to the Nouns ecosystem and Nouncillors recognise this with a unanimous vote FOR this proposal. We hope to see them enabled to make more impact through this initiative.
    0 references
    Proposal 132
    Vote Weight
    14
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨
    0 references
    Proposal 130
    Vote Weight
    14
    Vote Reason
    Nouncil has voted in favor of The Nouns Almanac 2nd Edition. There was discussion around props like this aiming to become self sufficient, knowing there would be plans for further editions. The cost has been brought up by Nouners as being too much as well.
    0 references
    Proposal 129
    Vote Weight
    14
    Vote Reason
    #nouncil-votes results: 22 Yes, 21 No, 6 Abstain
    0 references
    Proposal 128
    Vote Weight
    13
    Vote Reason
    Nouncil voted unanimously in favor of this proposal, with 51 YES, 0 NO, 8 ABSTENTIONS, 2 BAN EMOJIS, 4 MANGIA HAND EMOJIS, 3 100 EMOJIS and a GOOD LUCK CLOVER for good measure. Some Nouncillor comments from the Discord discussion thread: This is a cost of 3 days of noun auctions. There is no question about the ROI, easy yes vote I vote yes for a dream NounOClock team! too much handsomeness not to co-sign ⌐◨-◨
    0 references
    Proposal 126
    Vote Weight
    13
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨
    0 references
    Proposal 125
    Vote Weight
    13
    Vote Reason
    With 51 yes votes, 18 thumbs up, 2 wows, 38 vibes, 6 mandancings, and 373 corn reacts, Nouncil has boldy declared its support for this controversial proposal. We like Nouns, we like art, we like the number 8, we like birthdays, couches, hangers, grease. Cant go wrong on this one. ⌐◨-◨ 🙏
    0 references
    Proposal 124
    Vote Weight
    10
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨
    0 references
    Proposal 123
    Vote Weight
    10
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨
    0 references
    Proposal 121
    Vote Weight
    10
    Vote Reason
    Nouncil has voted 41-0-3 in favor of this proposal. Sam spoke on our weekly call and gave an outline of his teams project. He argued that top tier animation talent will not leave secure employment for a short term gig, so if the DAO wants something truly amazing to be produced here, a sufficiently scaled project is required to attract them. We know Sam to be a consistent builder in the space and a talented illustrator and so even though this Proposal ask is quite large, overall we support his efforts to try and make something really special here that could truly raise the profile of the Nouns brand tremendously if executed properly. If this Proposal fails, we hope Sam and team will find another way to iterate, reframe, and try again.
    0 references
    Proposal 120
    Vote Weight
    10
    Vote Reason
    Unfortunately there was a bit of contention among nouncil members. While wellness is a good focus that is seemingly nounish, this prop feels to some like it is not nounish enough and the previous experience mentioned is not in the current app market.
    0 references
    Proposal 119
    Vote Weight
    10
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨ Nouncil likes the Esports pod! Continued proliferation in an impactful way. Keep up the good work. gg ⌐◨-◨
    0 references
    Proposal 118
    Vote Weight
    10
    Vote Reason
    Nouncil has voted almost unanimously (50-1-1) in favor of this initiative. A comment from the discussion thread: At broad level, am leaning in to props in emerging economies... because grants go further there, and opportunity is larger due to sheer population density. -Mintfaced On the Nouncil call, Nouncillors expressed an affinity for and trust in B, and general excitement to see how much proliferation this pod can achieve in Brazil.
    0 references
    Proposal 116
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨ Nouncil has voted unanimously in support of this proposal. We like the nounish comics and look forward to seeing how this progresses.
    0 references
    Proposal 114
    Vote Weight
    10
    Vote Reason
    https://tenor.com/3zDN.gif
    0 references
    Proposal 113
    Vote Weight
    10
    Vote Reason
    This will be a good way to introduce Nouns to ordinary folk.
    0 references
    Proposal 112
    Vote Weight
    10
    Vote Reason
    Unanimous support from Nouncil for this Proposal. The previous trial was a resounding success and we are as excited as everyone to see how much more Proliferation this team can kickstart with another round of funding.
    0 references
    Proposal 111
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨ Noun22 has been an amazing Nounish ambassador! The effects of his work will be long experienced by the people he supports and the wider ecosystem. There was a unanimous YES vote from Nouncil! We like Noun22! 🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨 🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨 🟨🟥🟥🟥⬜️⬛️🟥🟥🟥⬜️⬛️🟥🟨 🟨🟥🟨🟥⬜️⬛️🟥🟨🟥⬜️⬛️🟥🟨 🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨 🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨
    0 references
    Proposal 110
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨ The Nouncil has voted in favour of prop 110 with with a huge majority consensus. Aubtoshi, also a Nouncillor, absolutely crushed this mission the first time around and is an amazing nounish ambassador with involvement in multiple endeavours including: Nouns on the Ground The Nouncil The Noun Square at ⌐ⓝ°ⓒ ⌐◨-◨ This support is reflected in our discussions and voting as Nouncil. There are so many opportunities for unexpected positive results with this prop execution and we’re excited to see the next phase. ⌐◨-◨ Nouners! The Nouncil votes using delegated Nouns. If you like the work of The Nouncil and would like to delegate your votes, please consider delegating your nouns to nouncil.eth. ⌐◨-◨
    0 references
    Proposal 109
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨ The Nouncil has voted in favour of prop 109 as majority consensus is supportive of the mission. We like the cut and sew.
    0 references
    Proposal 108
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨
    0 references
    Proposal 105
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨
    0 references
    Proposal 104
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨
    0 references
    Proposal 103
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨
    0 references
    Proposal 102
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨
    0 references
    Proposal 101
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    One Noun Square, every day, forever. 🙏
    0 references
    Proposal 100
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨ 🍻
    0 references
    Proposal 99
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨ 💨⛵
    0 references
    Proposal 98
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨
    0 references
    Proposal 97
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    Premium OpenSauce baked beans 🙏
    0 references
    Proposal 95
    Vote Weight
    13
    Vote Reason
    Nouncil was impressed by the sheer amount of proliferation included in this Proposal for such a relatively low ask. Well done B, we cant wait to see the results! One suggestion was made to potentially engage a photographer to capture professional images of the initiatives for social media and marketing purposes (perhaps this could be funded by Small Grants if it requires additional funding.)
    0 references
    Proposal 94
    Vote Weight
    13
    Vote Reason
    This was one of our most contentious votes to date, with 17 Y, 15 N and 5 Abstentions. Overall feedback was that the project is a great idea but maybe lacked overt Nounishness. Project proposers dropped into Nouncil channel to discuss, and argued that CC0 image repositories are inherently Nounish, and this ultimately swayed enough support for a Yes Result. Ser Noadz made a suggestion of tying in some kind of Nounish art contest to make the connection more overt, we hope to see something like this integrated during execution.
    0 references
    Proposal 92
    Vote Weight
    13
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨
    0 references
    Proposal 91
    Vote Weight
    13
    Vote Reason
    r-[ g ]-[ g ]
    0 references
    Proposal 90
    Vote Weight
    13
    Vote Reason
    GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT GOAT
    0 references
    Proposal 89
    Vote Weight
    13
    Vote Reason
    we support noggles on wall 🙏 _|___|___|___|___|___| ___|___|___|___|___|__ _|___⌐◨-◨___|___|___| ___|___|___|___|___|__ _|___|___|___|___|___| ___|___|___|___⌐◨-◨__ _|___|___|___|___|___| ___⌐◨-◨___|___|___|__ _|___|___|___|___|___| ___|___|___|___|___|__
    0 references
    Proposal 87
    Vote Weight
    10
    Vote Reason
    Looking forward to seeing these posters, such a solid roster of artists. ⌐◨-◨🙏
    0 references
    Proposal 85
    Vote Weight
    10
    Vote Reason
    Dutch Impressionist Vincent Van Gogh once famously wrote: Great things are done by a series of small things brought together. Its amazing that he was able to predict Nouns Small Grants more than 130 years ago. Keep up the great work Small Grants Team!
    0 references
    Proposal 84
    Vote Weight
    10
    Vote Reason
    We overall support this team. They did a great job on their last similar project. Nouns coffee is something that has been talked about a lot and this is the first serious effort to make it happen. We trust the product and branding will be high quality, so for these reasons we are voting Yes. One piece of feedback that did come up during Nouncillor discussion was that we would like to see Proposals (especially those with relatively substantial asks) go up on Discourse for at least a couple days for discussion and feedback before going on chain. This way Nouncil (and the broader Nouns community) has time to ask clarifying questions about budget, success metrics, etc. We are voting YES here in spite of this not having been done in this case, but would encourage future Proposers to consider this route when possible. By the way, we also welcome Proposers to Post their ideas in Nouncil for feedback, or ask to have it added to our weekly call Agenda.
    0 references
    Proposal 83
    Vote Weight
    8
    Vote Reason
    Brandons Nounish art is really special, and the world needs to see more of it. wen Nouncillor Brandon? https://tenor.com/bSR8O.gif
    0 references
    Proposal 82
    Vote Weight
    8
    Vote Reason
    As a representative council of mostly Nounish extension projects, Nouncil thinks Proposal 82 is a more responsible precedent to set in this regard. There are many ways that Nounish projects may (and do) give back to the DAO and pay the spirit of CC0 forward, and we think Nouns should be careful not to unduly reward certain types of contributions over others. Goes without saying, we love Nouncillor Dot and his Lil Nouns, and are excited to see all his success since launch. We are also excited to see an historic DAO-DAO Noun purchase if this Proposal is successful!
    0 references
    Proposal 77
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    Even if we had never heard of this Joel guy before (Who is he? Does he really Care?), this proposal would have impressed Nouncil. First, Joel successfully sought funding for an MVP, and delivered. Then, he wrote a very detailed execution plan for an expanded scope, posted it to Discourse, and then hustled for feedback from Nouners and Nouncillors alike. The final on-chain proposal is front-loaded with an easily digested paragraph outlining Deliverables, Timeline, Budget, and then the detailed proposal that follows explains exactly what the DAO will be getting for its ETH. We are looking forward to all the challenges Nerman Bot will be able to help solve within Nouns DAO discord (including several applications for Nouncil), as well as the other websites and bots that Joel’s team will build to help proliferate the meme. Nouncil is proud to have sponsored this Proposal (our first, after our own) and we wish Joel luck with the vote, and hopefully soon, with building out all these awesome tools for Nouns.
    0 references
    Proposal 75
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    This was probably our most contentious YES vote to date (final tally was 20 votes for, 10 against, 6 abstentions.) Overall, I think the common theme from our discussions on Nouncil call this week was that MadHappy is a great brand, and this potentially represents a great opportunity for Nouns to get positive exposure in the streetwear community. Also, we overall acknowledge that established artists and brands can be afforded a certain baseline of trust to execute on ideas. However, having said that, many Nouncillors expressed concern at the fact that the Proposal included no mockups or design plans, and no Development Phases tied to Milestones. We would like to see, even from established brands, at least some basic mockups to determine whether the designs will be desirable, and/or Nounish. And some Phase Breakdowns, maybe with a design consultation Phase to start, would have made this Proposal more amenable to more Nouncillors (we think.) Were voting FOR, and excited to see the result, but hopefully this feedback is taken to heart by future proposers so that good ideas dont lose votes due to a lack of detail in their on-chain Proposal.
    0 references
    Proposal 73
    Vote Weight
    6
    Vote Reason
    We thought this Proposal was far from stupid, buddy. The team is a veritable league of legends, and we are looking forward to dancing with you all at the Rose Parade to celebrate (suggested dances to learn in preparation: The Robot, The Chicken Dance.) In all seriousness, this is a great opportunity for the proliferation of Nouns, and we appreciated how detailed and structured the Proposal was, with Phases that are tied to percentages of the ask. Would recommend future proposers structure similarly, for bigger asks especially, to help voters better understand the process and breakdown of costs.
    0 references
    Proposal 72
    Vote Weight
    6
    Vote Reason
    Klim is a valued enthusiastic member of the Nouns community (and Nouncil!) with lots of great ideas, and he is devoting a great deal of energy and resources to Nounish initiatives like this one. The DAO needs creatives like him to stick around and BUIDL, and we think he should be given the opportunity here to have his team focus on this project, consulting and iterating until a consensus can be reached on final aesthetic for the toys before production. Klim pls include Nouncil toga as one of the bodies and also Joel head thank you. Sincerely, Nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 71
    Vote Weight
    6
    Vote Reason
    Nouncil wants to support this Prop because Leo is a great contributor to the DAO, Dean is an excellent artist, and we like the fact that all raw footage will be returned to the DAO to be used in marketing. A few Nouncil members did vote against or abstained with the feedback that perhaps the scope of the documentary could have been more broadly about Nouns, or about a more varied selection of extension projects / artists rather than just one. Good luck to Leo and team!
    0 references
    Proposal 70
    Vote Weight
    6
    Vote Reason
    We like the Sharks. And for that reason, were IN.
    0 references
    Proposal 69
    Vote Weight
    6
    Vote Reason
    Nouncil halten es für wichtig, Initiativen zu unterstützen, die unserem Projekt helfen, ein breiteres internationales Publikum zu erreichen. Das passt auf die Rechnung.
    0 references
    Proposal 68
    Vote Weight
    6
    Vote Reason
    ESports are big already and that audience is only growing, seems a great opportunity for Nouns to increase reach within the gaming community.
    0 references
    Proposal 67
    Vote Weight
    6
    Vote Reason
    nouncil <3 nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 65
    Vote Weight
    6
    Vote Reason
    We read through the proposal, considered it a bit, and in doing so, developed a favorable consensus, which birthed an obligation of supportive votes. ⌐◨-◨
    0 references
    Proposal 64
    Vote Weight
    6
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨-◨-◨-◨-◨
    0 references
    Proposal 63
    Vote Weight
    5
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨ ❄
    0 references
    Proposal 62
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    Nouncil <3 Prop House
    0 references
    Proposal 61
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    CDT bullied us into doing this
    0 references
    Proposal 58
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    Time is precious.
    0 references
    Proposal 56
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    nouncil supports fun
    0 references
    Proposal 54
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    We read this one, and you know, thought it was pretty good.
    0 references
    Proposal 53
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    we liked it
    0 references
    Proposal 318
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 28 VOTES** **benbodhi** | *This approach to games for the nouniverse is really powerful imo. I do believe we should be funding games and I think this model is a great way to do it.* **eltonpenguin** | *Would prefer to see more synergies between these games (e.g. reusing assets, building a common framework, etc.), but overall supportive.* **profwerder** | *This is a new direction for Nouns but I think it will drive attention from the brand side. The games are fun and addicting! And Kwik clearly knows the gaming industry and has his pulse on web3 developments in the industry.* **AGAINST - 14 VOTES** **bigshotklim** | *@kwik knows what he is doing and I think he is a solid candidate to make nouns gaming a reality* **ABSTAINS - 2 VOTES**```
    0 references
    Proposal 317
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 31 VOTES** **profwerder** | *Cant wait to see the next chapter!* **robotfishgirl** | *After seeing whats been done so far, this feels like a no brainer. Instant yes.* **benbodhi** | *I love the quality of work from this team! I think wed be crazy to not continue to fund this into a full length film, or even a series.* **bigshotklim** | *the work and enthusiasm for the process has been great and I think that it is worth funding again and again* **AGAINST - 9 VOTES** **eltonpenguin** | *The first movie got just 14,000 views. This is not successful. If we got the same for v2, thatd be a CPM of nearly $27k. For reference, a good CPM is like $1.50, 4 orders of magnitude less than we paid. Strong vote against.* **ABSTAINS - 1 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 316
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 33 VOTES** **benbodhi** | *contract ⌐◨-◨ { function proliferate() public { while (true) { ⌐◨-◨ } } }* **guiriba** | *Perfect glasses for IRL proliferation ⌐◨-◨* **eltonpenguin** | *This should likely be a recurring funding that gets greenlit each year* **AGAINST - 3 VOTES** **ABSTAINS - 4 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 315
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 27 VOTES** **AGAINST - 4 VOTES** **ABSTAINS - 6 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 311
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    For - Wins **FOR - 27 VOTES** **AGAINST - 9 VOTES** **eltonpenguin** | *Unclear what the impact is of this spend* **ABSTAINS - 4 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 310
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    For - Wins **FOR - 37 VOTES** **fiveoceans** | *Awesome* **thaswami** | *Arash has created some great content in the past and continues to create amazing videos without remuneration. Love these nursery rhyme videos. Would like to see more detail around marketing and promotion, but overall think this is a great prop* **eltonpenguin** | *In favor of doing this, however more work has to be put into marketing. Some of this creators former efforts have views measured in the hundreds, probably mostly Nouns DAO people. We need to reach children with this, so please dont just post & forget.* **robotfishgirl** | *Arashs animations are incredible, and the kids youtube potential is HUGE. These might already be among the most-viewed nouns videos on the internet and hes not even funded yet. Easy yes.* **AGAINST - 3 VOTES** **ABSTAINS - 2 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 307
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 41 VOTES** **guiriba** | *Will be awesome celebrate this moment, nice idea!* **AGAINST - 5 VOTES** **eltonpenguin** | *The Discord link for the requestors has --THREE-- members. This is far too untested to send a check for 50 ETH. https://discord.gg/uPJam9t3ej* **ABSTAINS - 2 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 304
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 39 VOTES** **AGAINST - 4 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *Not enough direct benefit for Nouns* **ABSTAINS - 5 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 303
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 28 VOTES** **fiveoceans_dev** | *I love proposals to rebuild nounish places for people. If this trend continues we can rebuild entire cities! * **pin.pusher** | *Will always vote for skatepark revamps. Especially if its Nouns x TSP🤘🛹⌐◨-◨* **Bigshot Klim** | *Skateboarding is nounish and this is a good use of funds that creates good vibes, awareness and connections. * **AGAINST - 13 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *Nouns is being asked to disproportionately fund the park for the benefit received. Tony Hawks NGO should shoulder more of it. The current plan has under 5% of the total budget dedicated to Nouns. * **byhardy** | *Very very Nounish. But would like to see Gnars involved in some way. No for now.* **ABSTAINS - 7 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 302
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 40 VOTES** **DonJon** | *No brainer* **AGAINST - 0 VOTES** **ABSTAINS - 9 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 300
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 34 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *Seems reasonable, next time please include the expected attendance for the event* **AGAINST - 9 VOTES** **CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧** | *lack of focus* **ABSTAINS - 11 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 323
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 40 VOTES** **Kwik** | *Beer is good!* **eltonpenguin** | *I support this but would like to see more done to build their Twitter following in Brazil (196 followers) - https://twitter.com/PublicGoodBeer* **benbodhi** | *Cheers to growth.* **toady_hawk** | *🍻* **akva556** | *lets fucking beer ⌐🍺-🍺* **AGAINST - 4 VOTES** **ABSTAINS - 3 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 321
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 36 VOTES** **benbodhi** | *Love this tool! The voting power board is epic and goes above and beyond the voting power spreadsheet generator I made available on nftcsv.tools (I was not funded so no expectations to be met there). I love the diverse range of tooling being built at reasonable prices to the DAO recently and hope to see the trend continue and more open source tooling created for DAOs in general.* **eltonpenguin** | *Voting transparency is important (this is Elton Penguin btw)* **robotfishgirl** | *martins work is consistently awesome. Dont know how much Ill personally use this tool but it looks absolutely fantastic, for the cost its a no-brainer* **toady_hawk** | *Very useful tool, very passionate builder.* **AGAINST - 3 VOTES** **ABSTAINS - 3 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 319
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 39 VOTES** **benbodhi** | *Nerman is a valuable resource! ⌐◨-◨* **jackwyldes** | *Thats gonna be a hell yeah from be brother* **AGAINST - 3 VOTES** **fiveoceans** | *I think Nerman is a useful tool that keeps all discords synchronized with Nouns.wtf events. However, I believe the proposal would be much better if the names of full stuff dev would have been included. I guess Nouns values is in transparency and favoring builders. In the current form of the proposals, I feel like we do not know the devs and if they get the fair pay check. Of course, Joel is the trusted member of the community but I feel that the proposal sets a not good example for future builders who study proposals before submitting their own.* **eltonpenguin** | *93 ETH for a Discord bot that could be built with off-the-shelf MEE6 bot config seems very sus.* **ABSTAINS - 1 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 328
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 37 VOTES** **AGAINST - 4 VOTES** **eltonpenguin** | *I prefer 327* **supertightwoody** | *Need more clarity in this proposal. Im not sure how/why everyone is voting yes for this when its extremely unclear what the tx and final deliverables are.* **ABSTAINS - 6 VOTES** *sent from voter.wtf*
    0 references
    Proposal 326
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 38 VOTES** **benbodhi** | *Ambitious proposal and the growth trajectory is exciting when you look at the steps taken by this crew from the beginning. I still like the idea of nouns as team compensation too, when the team is likely to continue participating in the community ⌐◨-◨* **eltonpenguin** | *I like compensation long-term builders with Nouns, as it aligns incentives.* **byhardy** | *Muchooooo love. No doubt this team will make every dollar of this proposal worth it. Big yes.* **bigshotklim** | *Mucho love for mucho love* **AGAINST - 10 VOTES** **ABSTAINS - 4 VOTES** *sent from voter.wtf*
    0 references
    Proposal 325
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 49 VOTES** **benbodhi** | (•v•) ( •v•)> ⌐◨-◨ (⌐◨v◨) **akva556** | *pudgy pudgy* **bigshotklim** | *met this crew i. person and this is a good fit.* **AGAINST - 3 VOTES** **eltonpenguin** | *I love Pudgy Penguins and Luca Netz but this benefits them way more than it benefits us. The mechanics are unclear, as is the benefit. It seems like the proposal capitalizes most on the Pudgy Penguin brand without being specific about the execution.* **ABSTAINS - 1 VOTES** *sent from voter.wtf*
    0 references
    Abstained
    Proposal 107
    Vote Weight
    12
    0 references
    Proposal 295
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 25 VOTES** **byhardy** | *Brazil loves Nouns. Worth it.* **AGAINST - 10 VOTES** **ABSTAINS - 7 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 286
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 32 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *I went into reading this proposal pretty skeptical, but I dig it. Its small (~$30k), time-bounded (1mo) and performance based (team only makes money if it sells). Plus I like that one of the founders works in this space as a pharmacist.* **metamonk** | *Design (A) by SkipperLee* **.Wide Eye ⌐◨-◨** | *Thanks for the re-submission. Design (A) by SkipperLee* **AGAINST - 11 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 284
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 30 VOTES** **profwerder** | *PizzaDAO is nounish, supporting small businesses is nounish, free pizza is nounish. AND also…keep Nouns weird.* **.Wide Eye ⌐◨-◨** | *Pizza* **Bigshot Klim** | *having been to one of these events I am a HELL YES and bullish AF on pizza and FUNding FUN* **JoshuaFisher** | *🎶 hi nice to meet ya, i like pizza 🎶* **AGAINST - 10 VOTES** **Benjamin ⌐◨-◨** | *With these type of stunts, we should at least aim for (guinness) world records* **EltonPenguin** | *Surely we must have better things to do with $42,000* **byhardy** | *I dont think cobranding & ideation around the cobranding is strong enough to support subsidizing PizzaDAOs costs.*
    0 references
    Proposal 274
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 23 VOTES** **Bigshot Klim** | *Oni has been a great point of contact fro all nounish things. This is a great idea* **DonJon** | *We love the Oni ⌐◨-◨!* **profwerder** | *Although I have concerns, I do believe it’s worth the effort to shift the tone & culture of the aptly named Jungle.* **Classic_Craig** | *1000% yes. we need this* **AGAINST - 19 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *62E a year to run a Discord server? Yikes!*
    0 references
    Proposal 272
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 19 VOTES** **Classic_Craig** | *get that shmoney* **AGAINST - 16 VOTES** **.Wide Eye ⌐◨-◨** | *Am FOR of returning ETH AGAINST the use to nouns ENS*
    0 references
    Proposal 271
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 22 VOTES** **fiveoceans_dev** | *All novels, books, journals would last centuries which makes them good proliferation mediums* **byhardy** | *Nounish storytellers = v good* **.Wide Eye ⌐◨-◨** | *We need more storytelling content (vid, book etc) to showcase what Nouns is about.* **CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧** | *primary layers ⌐◨-◨* **AGAINST - 13 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *The author is asking for waaaaay too much. A typical first-time author gets a $7,500 advance and 10% of royalties. These types of novels sell for around $10, which means hed have to sell over 40,000 copies to make 25 ETH. John Grishams most recent book sold 500,000 copies. Hard pass.*
    0 references
    Proposal 270
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 21 VOTES** **fiveoceans_dev** | *i like what the team accomplished. i feel that archives.wtf could be a great way to unboard new builders by goving them access to see everything that was build.* *i hope the team woild put more efforts to keep the site updated.* *also, I would loke the team to consider adding a feature.i think it would be great to add a page where all content is shown without any categories with pagination* **AGAINST - 19 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *Thats a lot of money for not a lot of benefit* **Benbodhi** | *Love the concept, love Voadz, but I think the budget for this is a bit high and could be achieved for less without it being so low that its not viable.*
    0 references
    Proposal 268
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 22 VOTES** **byhardy** | *ez yes, has been useful for lils. also, not a bad idea to snag a Noun to hold in the treasury.* **AGAINST - 6 VOTES** **profwerder** | *I’d be in favor of this when the need was there. Doesn’t make sense until we have a specifc builder waiting on a noun especially since they may want something specific (aka basketball).*
    0 references
    Proposal 266
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 17 VOTES** **Sasquatch** | *click clack* **AGAINST - 26 VOTES** **byhardy** | *Too expensive for proliferation return. Cool idea though.* **Akva** | *The math doesnt check out for the DAO* **Classic_Craig** | *keyboard not cool tho*
    0 references
    Proposal 265
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 25 VOTES** **Sasquatch** | *DAO wet wipes: Decentralizing cleanliness, one swipe at a time!* **Akva** | *Many say Nouns should be weird or that we have to keep the Nouns weird. There you go.* *Are you not entertained, anon?* *⌐◨-◨* **byhardy** | *imo wipes were an odd choice. that said, definitely think this is an experiment worth trying, especially at cost. also really appreciate the directness of the proposal. these folks seem like they know what theyre doing. lets run it.* **AGAINST - 25 VOTES** **JackWyldes** | *I want to like this as a fan of wet wipes but for some reason it feels like a troll* **Benbodhi** | *Concept seems loke it could be a good idea. But id rather see the branding on wet wipes for kids rather than at events. I personally don’t associate good vibes with places offering wet wipes in this format and think it may not be great for nouns. Baby wipes though, has some value I think.*
    0 references
    Proposal 262
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 20 VOTES** **Benbodhi** | *Good time and place to show this off. ⌐◨-◨* **!𝚡𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚜** | *If you can do it for less, go for it! I want to see this go down one way or another.* **AGAINST - 25 VOTES** **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *I can get the same billboard at the same locations with professional videographers for almost half the price* **Akva** | *This is a waste of money. It is time to the DAO to be reasonable.* **byhardy** | *pretty simple. love danit. love the 3d fashion collection. dont support nft nyc. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯* **maty** | *Diminishing returns for USD spent after all the publicity the collection has already received.* **EltonPenguin** | *Only tourists go to Times Square* **Classic_Craig** | *too busy during these conference weeks, billboard isnt effective for unknown brands. vanity only*
    0 references
    Proposal 261
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 16 VOTES** **AGAINST - 21 VOTES** **profwerder** | *Well first of all, it’s not quorum so let’s stop using that word. It’s threshold or dynamic yes.* *And also just NO. This is clearly part of a larger strategy to slow spending which would stall proliferation. No need to adjust the threshold at this time.* **Benbodhi** | *I think its already at a pretty good spot for contentious props for now.* **EltonPenguin** | *Seems important*
    0 references
    Proposal 258
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 16 VOTES** **byhardy** | *10 ETH seems cheap to nounpill this many creators that are already in web3 and (probably) familiar with Nouns. Not to mention the audience that will come to the event.* **AGAINST - 22 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *W3BSTOCK has under 4k followers and is getting very low engagement on their tweets. There are much better ways to spend 10 ETH.* **Josep** | *I don’t think it’s worth to spend $20000 in this event. Mainly I don’t think the integration with Nouns brand is good enough*
    0 references
    Proposal 256
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 27 VOTES** **Bigshot Klim** | *Great prop with lots of positive vibes and exposure as well as opportunities to add some IRL activations for nouns* **nonodynamo** | *With a safety first caveat.* **Benbodhi** | *extremely nounish ⌐◨-◨* **AGAINST - 22 VOTES** **heyjeff.eth** | *the idea in a vacuum seems really cool. I’m really not sure how much value this would bring to the DAO just by slapping some Noggles on the event - it just seems like a sponsorship with little upside for the cost* **Bloomz** | *Cool idea but way to large of an ask for what is being accomplished IMO. Would be cool to see done on a small fraction of the proposed budget.*
    0 references
    Proposal 255
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 21 VOTES** **Classic_Craig** | *this feels like a potential on ramp experience for folks* **AGAINST - 26 VOTES** **nonodynamo** | *This seems like a centralized notification system to me.* **Sasquatch** | *Please come back with another proposal. Poolsuite is amazing!*
    0 references
    Proposal 250
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 23** **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *awesome work so far* **byhardy** | *Big idea, would love to see Nouns lead the way here.* **AGAINST - 23** **profwerder** | *too many issues lingering with HeyAnoun to fund another anon thing and need hadnt been demonstrated. also we have teams that will be funded to do research on private voting —enough in that area right now (voted no on that too)*
    0 references
    Proposal 242
    Vote Weight
    9
    Vote Reason
    Vote threshold not met, Nouncil votes abstain. **FOR - 27 VOTES** **Josep** | *Seems to high 5ETH a month per dev, a 3.5ETH a month seems more reasonable* **RobotFishGirl** | *Open source and a WAY reduced ask for one of my most used tools. Wish the media budget was still there, but still an easy yes. Hope the podcast/youtube videos can be funded through another avenue if this gets passed.* **Benbodhi** | *Open Source ⌐◨-◨ This heavily revised prop is of value to the whole ecosystem.* **Sasquatch** | *this prop has been neutered enough. clearly the team wants to make this happen!* **NO - 20 VOTES** **ABSTAIN - 3 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 240
    Vote Weight
    9
    Vote Reason
    Vote threshold not met. **FOR - 27 VOTES** **nonodynamo** | *I think data analysis is important to understand what worked and what did not.* **Pizza 🍕** | *solid value prop* **Josep** | *I think the ask is too high, a reduction on the payment per month. A 40% reduction on the ask would be great.* **NO - 16 VOTES** **ABSTAIN - 2 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 238
    Vote Weight
    10
    Vote Reason
    Vote threshold not met. **FOR - 34 VOTES** **pxlmnml** | *innovative price discovery* **profwerder** | *Great way to put the NFTs in the treasury to work!* **byhardy** | *Sounds like this can be implemented, so Im in full support. More than reasonable cost.* **NO - 4 VOTES** **ABSTAIN - 2 VOTE**
    0 references
    Proposal 233
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    Vote Threshold not met. **FOR - 15 VOTES** **AGAINST - 14 VOTES** **ABSTAIN - 13 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 232
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    No options met the Vote Threshold. --- **FOR - 19 VOTES** --- **Bigshot Klim** | *active engaged builder with an amazing catalog of work and IRL engagement. I think that if properly positioned and promoted NOUNs would get some incredible value and visibility* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *This could be a very effective opportunity if done right* **Benbodhi** | *Probably worth exploring for this budget. Potential for Nouns DAO to be recognised as being involved in film making feels good.* --- **AGAINST - 23 VOTES** --- --- **ABSTAIN - 2 VOTES** ---
    0 references
    Proposal 229
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    Nouncils current Vote Threshold requires an option to have 35 or more votes to win. In this poll the Vote Threshold was not met and Nouncil therefore votes Abstain. **YES - 31 votes** - we are the federation! - federation ⌐◨-◨ **NO - 10 votes** **ABSTAIN - 1 votes**
    0 references
    Proposal 86
    Vote Weight
    10
    Vote Reason
    Ultimately, Nouncil was not able to reach a consensus on this Prop so we are voting to Abstain. After the majority vote to Abstain (16), all other votes cast were against (12.) Overall, in discussions, we felt that there are too many unknowns/unclear items WRT the case. Even if the Plaintiffs motivations could be politically motivated, it seems PT may have indeed broken some lottery and/or banking laws in NY, or at least, it is far from a sure thing that they didnt. Moreover, it was mentioned that this should probably have been a planned-for eventuality for such a protocol (to be sued by the State) and Nouncil worries about the precedent of deploying Nouns treasury to fund this kind of predictable legal battle (hat tip Wag.) On top of the above, this was also not a small ask (which might have found broader support.) We wish PoolTogether the best with this case, but we couldnt vote to support this Proposal at this time.
    0 references
    Proposal 60
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    🙏 Nouncil Abstains 🙏
    0 references
    Proposal 308
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 14 VOTES** **akva556** | *Nounish!* **mamaxargs** | *Love it! Similar to Short Shorts, I think, which was awesome!* **AGAINST - 20 VOTES** **eltonpenguin** | *A lot of money for an online film festival. The grand prize winner from last year had just 400 YouTube views: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55Usfk_vdss* **marxistmillionaire** | *Would love to see an IRL-event instead. And a plan how to get high quality submissions ( which is an issue for every festival). * **byhardy** | *Question the quality of submissions that this will yield. Dont feel the ideas in the proposal quite cover these concerns, despite improvements from last year.* **ABSTAINS - 9 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 320
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 16 VOTES** **AGAINST - 7 VOTES** **eltonpenguin** | *Interesting idea, but its unclear why we should build this* **profwerder** | *As much as I love the idea of this swap, I’m not comfortable voting yes without a review & check by the verbs.* **ABSTAINS - 18 VOTES**
    0 references
    Opposed
    Proposal 48
    Vote Weight
    5
    0 references
    Proposal 283
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **AGAINST - 35 VOTES** **byhardy** | *Not in support of funding more Nouns merch at this stage. Well thought out proposal — nice job Necfas, but just not a demand here imo. I also dont think demand will be created with some photoshoots, a 14k following IG account (love their feed tho), and a lookbook.* **.Wide Eye ⌐◨-◨** | *Daily essential is a competitive market with players like Uniqlo, Everlane etc. I do not think the strategy the team plans to implement would generate demand/achieve self-sustainability. Furthermore, the design seems more of streetwear than essential and thats another market on its own which anchor heavy on culture/lifestyle. I do not think Nouns have form a culture outside of its bubble/crypto nor its a lifestyle yet, thus am not confident to support this idea.* **EltonPenguin** | *Way too much money for us not to have an ownership stake in the business* **FOR - 6 VOTES** **systemdm.⌐◨-◨** | *I know Leblanc Studios work.. Necfas + Leblanc Studios?… 😄 This will surely be amazing!!*
    0 references
    Proposal 248
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **AGAINST - 53 VOTES** **Akva** | *Bad prop.* *Intelligent rage quit is coming by Elad and David. Wait anon ⌐◨-◨* **pxlmnml** | *come on* **Benbodhi** | *That’s a no from me dawg. This feels like the opposite of nounish to me. Plus the contract has a hard coded book value which is weird. Only benefits people who want to arb the book value of nouns and managed to purchase their nouns below 41 eth.* *This is not nounish building imo.* **Pizza** | *Putting this through seems like it would be terrible for the culture which is already shaky currently. For this reason, im out.* **andrewladdusaw** | *Ragequit already exists in many forms, such as opensea or blur* **Josep** | *I do not feel qualified to give a decision on this proposal. It is not my area of expertise, it seems to me the most important decision that has been taken so far in Nouns DAO and, therefore, I believe that a better structured debate should be held in order to take the best possible steps for the DAO.* **FOR - 5 VOTES** **ABSTAIN - 4 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 227
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    **Prop 227: Nouncil Votes NO** **NO - 29 votes** - Once again —staking all in one pool is risky. Other options (eg rocket pool are bring explored. We should wait for that option. - I believe we already locked enough fund There. **YES - 15 votes** - I am in favor of making Nouns Treasury bigger by staking - Yieldddddddd! **ABSTAIN - 1 votes** - I do not fully grock this.
    0 references
    Proposal 222
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    **Prop 222: Nouncil Votes NO** --- **NO - 24 votes** - The catch-up payment on the yield earned before fees at 2% is way too high **YES - 13 votes** - absolute yes. sustainability rocks! - I think its right, its ETH that we can use to increase the return on our treasury **ABSTAIN - 3 votes** - I personally have no expertise in this field, therefor abstaining --- (15 Nouncillors abstained from this decision.)
    0 references
    Proposal 211
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    **Prop 211: NO WINS** 18 Yes, 22 No, 3 Abstain 11 Nouncillors abstained from the decision --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Mach** | *I think id vote for the nouns chair only a couple other things with a resounding yes. But a lot of the things seem minimal impact for high cost* **Classic_Craig** | *i love irl proliferation when organized and intentional. This appears to be both.* **Bigshot Klim** | *While i think China is one of the most important markets for nouns I would love to see more indication of the builders capabilities to deliver the desired outcomes and would love to see a smaller prop ask before voting yes on the full req* **Graphic.⌐◨-◨** | *Great idea for growth in china* **Benbodhi** | *Excited to see the creative ways to proliferate with this prop.* **Josep** | *I think they should redo the proposal to show how they work and break the budget into 3-4 proposals.* **Mindtoasted** | *Voting yes on this because the Culture of Nounish ☕* **byhardy** | *Just barely leaning no. Its a big sticker price, would like to see it scaled down and then return with some results & something bigger. Theres no time crunch here, so can be resubmitted.* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 210
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    **Prop 210: NO WINS** 18 Yes, 22 No, 3 Abstain 9 Nouncillors abstained from the decision --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **lilpizza.eth** | *Nouns is not using these tokens and doesnt seem to currently have plans to participate in Lil Nouns governance. This would be a huge benefit for Lil Nouns as it would allow the DAO to be more self-sustaining by rewarding contributors with these tokens.* **Classic_Craig** | *Im fond of Lil Nouns and if this allows them to do giveaways and other building things, Im for it!* **vsvsvs** | *This is the beginning of something dangerous...* **Mach** | *sure if thats what they want* **.ZllW ⌐◨-◨** | *A complete sever of r/s between Lil Nouns and Nouns is not ideal; would like to see a re-proposal where Lil Nouns request for 10% of the Lil Nouns currently in Nouns Treasury to help fund/reward Lil builders instead* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *After reading the prop 210 discord channel in the Jungle & feedback from Nouners: this looks like death by suicide for lil nouns with the DAO* **0xDariush** | *Nouns should keep increasing their lils during the time and also start using their vote powers to help lils to move better.* **Mindtoasted** | *I vote no in this, I just dont find a good reason for this.* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Proposal 204
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    **Nouncil Vote:** 20 Yes, 33 No, 5 Abstain 4 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **NO WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **wiz** | *if were going to be funding tech I think it should be entirely oss and public infrastructure* **Classic_Craig** | *i really like the idea of being able to swap Nounish derivatives throughout the nouniverse in an easy manner. In terms of custom dev, 29 ETH is also very fair for this type of work. I look forward to being able to swap nounish nfts to engage in more nouns communities!* **pin.pusher** | *I dont think there would be a huge demand for this. From looking over the activity on a few secondary markets over the last 6 months, there has only been 27 sales total between OS, LooksRare, and X2Y2. Most Nouns holders seem to be more interested in building within the community, utilizing their governance voting, or delegating their Noun(s) to another community member who is interested in doing either of those tasks* **Josep** | *I dont think Nouns is a collection that has a lot of secondary sales activity, they are +30ETH NFTs and ,therefore, I doubt the transaction gas is relevant.* **byhardy** | *Not a big enough demand for this.* **Brook** | *I don’t see this being important enough to fund.* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *atomic0.com is awesome & makes trading/swapping super easy* **0xDariush** | *nouns are not for flippers in general, i dont believe owners care about fees! maybe in 5 years with more nouns in the ecosystem they care!* **nonodynamo** | *I think trading is social and viral. I like this.* **Benbodhi** | *I like this, I think it has potential to enable safer swaps among the community for free, while also reaching outside of nouns ecosystem and introducing nouns to other token holders that might land on this exchange.* **Mach** | *just doesnt seem like something worth 35k. The technical difficult to execute this isnt worth it especially with so many viable alternatives existing already.* **kerimbonia** | *i think the proposal looks good, the ask is reasonable and i like the utility of having a zero-fee nft-nft exchange for nouns and nouns sub daos.* **Mindtoasted** | *Love the idea for this, I dont know if it could be a great way to trade NFTs at zero cost. I still cant find what the impact might be for Nouns, I dont feel quite Nounish on this, IMO I think this is a pretty big request that
    0 references
    Proposal 203
    Vote Weight
    12
    Vote Reason
    **Nouncil Vote:** 7 Yes, 46 No, 1 Abstain 6 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **NO WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **Josep** | *I don’t think it’s necessary to pay 29ETH to integrate Nouns into a service like this. The should ask for less ETH* **Brook** | *lessons from dissolution of Nouns discord and failure of prop 200:* *- no re-skins; encourage native solutions to native problems are encouraged* *- established forms of communication such as Twitter, Farcaster, and DIscord suffice. hence voters dont see a reason to invest in another one. atleast for now* **.ZllW ⌐◨-◨** | *Dont really see a demand for this tool* **pemburux** | *Agreed you all, with 29 ETH for the current state we can promote Nouns even more* **byhardy** | *Cool concept, not sure it would get used or if there is a fit here. Dont love proposals that dont support wider Nounish ecosystem of non-holders. To this end, the prop feels a bit tone deaf. The prop does not even mention delegates, but the prop is from a delegate themselves?* *I do think both skiff and this prop are on the right track, but they should adapt to accomodate other builders in the Nouns ecosystem (and delegates) who dont own a Noun yet.* **andreitr** | *Voting against this because it does not benefit the broader Nounish community nor does it help proliferate the Noun meme.* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *great resource for nounders to always stay connected & up to date on the ecosystem* **0xDariush** | *targeting only nouns holders is not nounish enough.* *We have 340 holders atm and at this early stage even if 30% of them gonna use it its going to be like a small gathering.* **BENJAMIN LATSKO ⌐◧-◧** | *cute but no. nouners dont even buy nouns tshirts* **Benbodhi** | *Id like to see this as a nouniverse platform rather than just nouners, I think thered be a larger userbase and it would be more valuable then.* **Mach** | *not a fan of the presented concept. Maybe a better proof of concept could sway me in future, but the project is potentially dead on arrival. Nouns risks spreading itself too thin over hundreds of communities, websites, and forums to continue funding more* **Mindtoasted** | *I want to vote no on this, why? indeed there are many useful features in this proposal, do not forget to also see how punksclub runs. I think if it can only be used by nouners thats great, but it could be eve
    0 references
    Proposal 167
    Vote Weight
    14
    Vote Reason
    24 yes, 25 No, 3 Abstain ___ **SuperTightWoody** ONE THOUSAND ETH....BRO We could buy a country **Mach** id prefer to start with a smaller seed if anything to see viability and how it evolves it is pretty exciting to think about the potential of this **profwerder** BIG ASK --- but tremendous what has been created and its a set tool that will exist forever. Is it a crazy amount of $? yeah but I think this is an insane value. I changed my vote to NO but its truly just because of the ask. If we can get this prop revised to a better place, Ill be a yes again. Best scenario would be funding distributed over time and/or tied to milestones. **Sidenoun** I think the ask is of a significant amount. I’m clearly not alone in thinking so. As a developer, I’m very appreciative of the work that goes into any project, let alone one that has this type of deliverable. The ZORA team are of course a team that I’d vote for. However, that said and with some of the comments on the Nouncil call regarding the hefty request. I think, it’d make some sense to potentially gradually retrospectively reward as we see the success of the protocol roll out to more DAO’s. I can’t cite who made the comment regarding marketing, but I feel that’s probably something that this prop is missing in terms of information. Not just for Nouns, but for those opting to use it. **systemdm.⌐◨-◨** I think this is an amazing Change the world kind of thing!!! ✊🏻✊🏻✊🏻 **andrewladdusaw** Im shocked at how confident I feel in this 1000 ETH ask. Jacob is a thought leader in the entire space. Zora is one of the premier orgs in the space. They are already heavily invested with 20 Nouns of their own. They have already delivered the product on their own dime. PLUS, this is not a retro reward, its funding a DAO with the goal of furthering the incredible work thats already been done. Im trying not to speak in hyperbole here, but I think this has the potential to be a really special thing, not just for Nouns, but the future of crypto. Im still not 100% on where I land on this. All my previous comments still stand on my belief in the tool and the team. I still think its going to be game changer. I originally told them I thought a huge retro should be offered for a free tool, but that amount in my mind was like 250. When you factor the audit costs they referenced as well, Id be closer to 350-400. Admittedly, I h
    0 references
    Proposal 159
    Vote Weight
    15
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨: Nouncil votes No (22 Yes, 35 No, 5 Abstain) Discussion from Nouncil Discord https://discord.gg/nouncil **JoshuaFisher** I’m fine with this but also Like the barrier being 2 because it is a self selecting benefit in terms of how much time do they spend in the community. If you can’t get 2 Nouns then maybe not ready to go on-chain imho. **JoelCares** A 1 Noun threshold to submit proposals for the first 1000 Nouns feel reasonable to me. **andreitr** The existing threshold is a feature that reduces noise. **fiveoceans_dev** I also, agree to keep the threshold growing. It will make smaller stake holders to work together and in turn help coordinate against potential malicious activities by individual big stake holders **kerimbonia** Also in agreement that lowering the threshold will introduce more noise and with all the changes going on in the nouns ecosystem im not sure this is the best time for it. **mintface.eth** I lean towards a single Noun so that proposals get seen and evaluated. 2 Nouns min creates a three party negotiation to take something on-chain. Two parties are then seen to endorse or at a min be associated with proposer. The idea of acquire a Noun and propose is cool. **CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧** i think that the current system is healthy and not needing a change **samellis ⌐◨-◨** Drop the threshold, good ideas will rise, especially with the changes of gas reimbursement and the more than likely time extension, why put an additional “pay to play” barrier. Let folks come in with their ideas. **Benbodhi** Only just over a year until it would increase again. The barrier to entry to buy a noun is significant and the ability to submit a prop after purchasing a noun is something I feel should be possible. I know delegation and sponsorship is a thing, but I’m thinking of lone actors. Not sure it makes a huge difference in prop quality. **Toady_Hawk** I agree with reducing to one noun threshold. We don’t have a proposal spam problem yet (which is why this feature was baked in) so I think it makes sense to lower it to encourage more participation. Last time this was proposed (with a long time period attached that muddied the waters) it was all the brand new Nouners voting yes, which I think was telling. Keep in mind if spam ever became a problem, another proposal could easily raise the threshold again. **lil bk** all in favor of reducing the threshold
    0 references
    Proposal 158
    Vote Weight
    15
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨ (24 Yes, 31 No, 8 Abstain) **samellis ⌐◨-◨** I liked the quality of the Nouns News, both in content and quality, and the new stuff with a larger team and price, less so. I also am not sure if 1M is that great on TikTok, with their creator fund when you hit 1M views you can make $20-$40, if the platform puts that low a price of value on those views why would we spend so much? **profwerder ⌐◨-◨ FloriNouns** Unfortunately this is a no from me. I just don’t think the feedback was incorporated and the ask is too high But I love nouns News and hope they continue!
    0 references
    Proposal 157
    Vote Weight
    15
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨ Result: Against (8 Yes, 41 No, 8 Abstain) RobotFishGirl.eth.⌐◨-◨ I really like this in principle- I remember discussing this with Max on twitter a few weeks ago. That said, the prop needs to be WAAAAAAAAAY more thought out and clear about the impact, locations, billboard design, etc. before Id feel comfortable saying yes. Its not a great look to have the discourse post be more comprehensive than the actual on chain prop. That said, I pass these digital bus stops every day and theyre very definitely a worthwhile investment based on my own lived experience; the prop needs to be fixed though profwerder ⌐◨-◨ FloriNouns Would make more sense to do this when there’s a conference like NFT.NYC. Notes from Nouncil calls: - The prop lacks details and seems a bit vague. - This seems so top of funnel that we cant measure success at the core product level. - If there was a product focussed call to action it would be an easy yes. Anchoring to consumer goods like Nouns Coffee for example could have a much higher impact.
    0 references
    Proposal 134
    Vote Weight
    14
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨
    0 references
    Proposal 127
    Vote Weight
    13
    Vote Reason
    This vote ended up being fairly contentious in Nouncil, with the final tally ending 18 FOR - 27 AGAINST (7 ABSTAIN). Most of the discussion on the Nouncil weekly call centered around feelings that the proposed garments did not look Nounish, or that the Nounish streetwear category was currently crowded with props such as Madhappy and Nouns Brand already in production. Overall, Im struggling with the nounishness of this project. Im a no for now, was one comment from our Nouncil Discussion Thread. It seems like a duplicative effort, was another. The generous 15:85 rev split isn’t enough to make up for the lack of Nounish brand experience. Proponents of the project liked the novel NFT ownership verification, and the Nounish apparel mockups that were released maybe just a little too late to sway the vote (after the team spoke on The Noun Square last night and dropped into Nouncil to show Nounish mockups and clarify some things, a flood of YES votes did come in, but ultimately not enough to win the vote.) Example comments on the Discussion thread after the TNS appearance and new mockups: Having been sceptical, Ive been really impressed by Dopamine on NoC. I think its taken a while to articulate the scope of the vision, and why its nounish: Community, web3 native, proof of work, tech innovation (and it will be fully noggle branded). Im a yes. And: I am as well. I feel like the concerns have been addressed and this could be a good experiment with digital/physical merch in a new way. If the team does choose to iterate and reapply, it would be good to make sure those Nounish prototypes are front and center.
    0 references
    Proposal 122
    Vote Weight
    10
    Vote Reason
    ⌐◨-◨
    0 references
    Proposal 81
    Vote Weight
    8
    Vote Reason
    Nouncil <3 Lil Nouns We prefer Prop 82 with a sale price based on FMV.
    0 references
    Proposal 74
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    On Nouncil call, we had a fruitful discussion about this proposal and overall some Nouncillors familiar with the sport indicated that it felt like a big investment to make in the sport when perhaps more exposure could be gotten, even within this sport, by sponsoring events etc, rather than an entire team/season. The concern was also voiced that the DAO owning the cars could be a cost/liability after the season (storage, etc.) Overall, we like the energy and the proposal was well written, but the majority voted No this time. We really like Don and his energy and hope he will stick around and build more within Nouns. Kudos to him for seeking lots of discussion on Discourse and holding open calls in the discord to take feedback. We should encourage this kind of builder to stick around. Dom, please build something Nounish, even if its small, so that we can invite you to join Nouncil!
    0 references
    Proposal 57
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    In general Nouncil was supportive of this proposal. But, for some Nouncillors, the extra Noun felt like too big an ask. This kind of reward would make more sense as a retroactive prize provided after the project is wildly successful.
    0 references
    Proposal 55
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    The committee tasked with doing the work in this proposal was not consulted about the work being done in this proposal and has not agreed to do this work in this proposal and this dilemma encouraged us to vote no.
    0 references
    Proposal 306
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 18 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *Great way to hit the creative community with the Nouns message* **AGAINST - 28 VOTES** **Bigshot Klim** | *We already have Nouns comics at the convention. The booth space was part of the prop so adding more How will this be distributed? Will there be an On The Ground team engaging with people and would those people really care about NFTs at a busy convention next to Optimus prime. I dont think that this is a good place to spend money until we get some data and collector feedback about the comic book performance.* **ABSTAINS - 4 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposal 301
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 8 VOTES** **AGAINST - 40 VOTES** **ABSTAINS - 5 VOTES** **CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧** | *props that only benefit noun holders are not the way* **marxistmillionaire** | *Great art, but I dont like the exclusiveness and I think 1001 Nouns are too much...* **andrewladdusaw** | *Too big and too expensive. * **Bigshot Klim** | *Too much friction about exclusivity and too many pieces. Great tech but the ask is too big * **EltonPenguin** | *Yikes!*
    0 references
    Proposal 322
    Vote Weight
    7
    Vote Reason
    **FOR - 13 VOTES** **Kwik** | *Korea is an important market and I support any and all proliferation efforts there.* **benbodhi** | *This team has delivered amazing stuff with things they’ve previously been involved with. Happy to see more.* **toady_hawk** | *So much to love here— Duckhead, Jhee and Five are all awesome Nouns contributors in their own rights already, and I trust them to deliver something really cool here to broaden our fan base in Korea* **byhardy** | *Cool experiment, would like to see it on a smaller scale first, but going to vote on the prop we have in front of us.* **AGAINST - 26 VOTES** **ABSTAINS - 4 VOTES**
    0 references
    Proposed
    Proposal 100
    0 references
    Proposal 121
    0 references
    Proposal 136
    0 references
    Proposal 139
    0 references
    Proposal 141
    0 references
    Proposal 144
    0 references
    Proposal 158
    0 references
    Proposal 163
    0 references
    Proposal 176
    0 references
    Proposal 179
    0 references
    Proposal 187
    0 references
    Proposal 201
    0 references
    Proposal 208
    0 references
    Proposal 66
    0 references
    Proposal 67
    0 references
    Proposal 77
    0 references
    Proposal 91
    0 references
    Proposal 318
    0 references
     
    Retrieved from "https://nounsdev.wikibase.cloud/w/index.php?title=Item:Q491&oldid=9787"