Proposal 46 (Q1783)
From Nouns Dev
A Nouns proposal.
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Proposal 46 |
A Nouns proposal. |
Statements
65
0 references
25
0 references
Marketplace Pod Proposal
0 references
46
0 references
24 March 2022
0 references
0
0 references
24 March 2022
0 references
3
0 references
50
0 references
2
0 references
50
0 references
6
0 references
The proposal aims to create a Nouns marketplace for original and extension projects. The goal is to facilitate a free marketplace for secondary sales of Nouns and make it easier to disco ver the Nouns ecosystem. The marketplace will have 0% fees, no official endorsement of derivatives, and will be linked from the nouns.wtf header.
0 references
Jacob and blequity
0 references
any chance you’re jacob horne? fellow aussie? am currently working on a nounified Zora auction house template. environment variables for quick nounish deploys. will have one for Gnars at gnar.haus 🤘 hoping to have full version of Zora powered Wordpress plugin out shortly too. big fan of your work! 🙏-https://art.haus/wordpress-nft-plugin
0 references
Any thoughts on putting some percentage of revenue towards nouns party?
It seems that the community is open to the idea of putting some percentage of revenue towards the Nouns party. Jacob mentioned that it would be possible for the marketplace to set a fee that goes to the DAO, and Advection agreed that it would be a cool incentive for more people to invest in derivatives, as the money goes back into the DAO.
0 references
but if you are asking me: i like nouns, what should i buy?
0 references
Hey fam, i got the nr1 rescued Noun. Its is the most minimmalistic Noun i have seen so far and want to propose to re-feed it into the nouns DAO for auction. Is there an option for that? Can I get a share of the auction value?
0 references
how does the addition process work technically? Would like to empower a small group to make these decisions
The addition process for the Nouns DAO marketplace involves selecting a starting set of derivative projects and progressively adding more from there. The challenge lies in deciding which projects to include in the marketplace. One suggestion is to have a simple rule, such as requiring each project to feature at least one Nouns attribute, making the process more objective and potentially automatable. The idea is to create a Nouns-specific marketplace to drive value into the derivatives ecosystem, incentivizing the expansion of the Nouns universe and increasing the value created within it. However, there is a concern about the DAO explicitly promoting or supporting certain derivatives over others, as it could be seen as unfair and dilutive to the value of the original Nouns.
0 references
I imagine collections would be manually greenlit and added to the marketplace, and this marketplace could aggregate their activity from that point on?
Collections would be manually greenlit and added to the marketplace, which would serve as both a promotional hub and a place for Nouners to buy derivative art they like. The marketplace would be a single place for people in the community to see the latest projects with open minting and act as a free secondary market for all Noun derivatives instead of relying on OpenSea. There could be a curatorial aspect where the DAO can vote on what gets featured on the homepage.
0 references
I'm just curious what the support/angle would be for something like this, is it an external marketplace for art to be posted - like could I put my AI Nouns there instead of OpenSea, or would it be more of a hub/feed of the latest additions?
Advection#0001's question was answered by jacob---#5170: it would be both of these things. It would be a single place for people in the community to see the latest projects that have open minting, and be a free secondary market for all noun derivatives instead of relying on OpenSea.
0 references
interesting subject- do any projects w/nounish traits get listed? eg cryptoadz/jims? those collections in final form could not exist w/o nouns..?
0 references
is it a fork of the front end repo of the underlying contracts? this UI looks great.-Wanna send me a DM? I'm working on a broader proposal for a fully featured Nouns Marketplace and this could make a great starting point.
The UI mentioned is a fork of the `create-auction-house` repo, and the user has added some additional variables to .env for quickly spinning up Nounish auction houses of a similar style. They also have the domain `nouni.sh` that might be useful for a Nounish marketplace with multiple target contracts in the environment variables. The user is working on a broader proposal for a fully featured Nouns Marketplace and is open to collaborating with others.
0 references
Not sure if iain from ZORA is here, but props to you ser. appreciate the answers to my countless questions over the recent months. --perhaps we’ve a need for some kind of decentralised, “token curated registry-esque” means of adding nounish projects to a directory and marketplace?--anybody discussed or been working on anything along these lines?
0 references
So - if this marketplace could magically include all Nouns derivatives equally some how - would that alleviate your concerns?
0 references
The whole notion of CC0 is novel, and it will take time to really prove. But this makes so much sense to me. --Nouns is the official genesis of all this, on the blockchain, forever. Even if people make Nouns v2 and fork the DAO and art and succeed wilder than Nouns... it's adding to Nouns. Every time Nouns v2 is mentioned in a news article... Nouns is mentioned by default. Attention goes to Nouns, NFT prices go up. It's cementing them in history. In my mind the worst thing that could happen to Nouns is people forget about it. It loses attention, loses buzz, creators stop building and move to other projects and everything slowly fades away.--Of course I could be wrong about all of this, I'm really just guessing because it's so new. It's a magical world out here and a fun place to be. Happy to be hear having this conversation with errbody!--Now - DAO policy is another situation. I would love to have some clear policy docs about how the DAO interacts with derivatives. There seems to be a common refrain for fairness, so anything the DAO contributes to strives to benefit all derivatives equally. Are there any other guidelines for how to align derivatives with Nouns in a way that builds up everybody?
0 references
true. nouns delegate to the small group?
0 references
Were you thinking its just open to any derivative? And what constitutes a derivative? Whole collection inspired by nouns? What if a collection only had a couple of nfts that had the glasses as a trait? Just something to think about 🙂
0 references
