Proposal 114 (Q1779)

From Nouns Dev
A Nouns proposal.
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Proposal 114
A Nouns proposal.

    Statements

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    15 July 2022
    0 references
    37
    0 references
    Descriptor V2 Upgrade
    0 references
    137
    0 references
    0
    0 references
    114
    0 references
    I would never wear eyeglasses with a different color on the ear hook, so I am voting yes.
    0 references
    ⌐ⓝ°ⓒ The Noun Square votes on Proposals according to what is decided via a Live Audience Vote on our daily Noun O’ Clock Twitter Spaces. ⌐ⓝ°ⓒ We summarized Proposal 114 for the audience, who were then invited to vote LIVE on our discord. You can see results here: https://discord.com/channels/987238707465691156/991651702841278496/998733482735972433 Thank you to Elad for joining our Spaces to explain this prop and take questions from our audience. They have voted unanimously FOR this initiative. We currently have one Noun Delegated to our Multisig for this Public Voting Experiment. If you would like to Delegate a Noun to us, it will not go to waste! Please use: vote.thenounsquare.eth Builders: If you want to pitch your Nouns Proposal live, please reach out to us on Twitter @noun_o_clock!
    0 references
    we do a little act of pixel perfection
    0 references
    ⌐◨-◨ This seems like a good idea to me. It feels like a one off fix to adjust things that would have been addressed in the beginning if possible.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    15 July 2022
    0 references
    1
    0 references
    0
    0 references
    The proposal introduces a new version of the Nouns Descriptor contract, which includes several improvements. These include cheaper on-chain art deployment, an improved external API for better integration with exter nal contracts, and enhanced descriptor upgradability. The new descriptor separates the artwork, renderer, and facilitator contracts for cost-effective upgrades. This proposal is separate from the 8/8 art additions.
    0 references
    The text does not provide the name of the team or builder that proposes the
    0 references