0x36a5bc205df1ed65c86301022cfc343a6ce546ff (Q444)
From Nouns Dev
Individual
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | 0x36a5bc205df1ed65c86301022cfc343a6ce546ff |
Individual |
Statements
Having someone that does not speak the language and understand local culture fly around to attend events instead of tapping into our local communities seems insane to me. Having several teams that coordinate on best practices could be the way to go.
0 references
Although I really like the group and the cause, Im voting no as there is very little detail on how the money will be spent, who is getting paid and how much. Would welcome the prop again once these details are better described.
0 references
I really like Gami and the work gnars does. But I dont think putting this amount of eth in one single persons hands are the best for the DAO. A smaller ask with (any) detail on how funds will be distributed (who/how/when itll be decided) would be welcomed.
0 references
agree with some comments that distribution should be better outlined in the prop. not 100% against it, but would like to see a bit more detail.
0 references
I like the tool and it has a lot of potential, but as I stated for prop house, compensation is way too high.
0 references
I do love prop house, but were spending ca 2.5 ETH on admin to every 1 ETH to builders. This does not seem like a great ratio. Also, I believe >16 ETH per team members way too high, specially considering all the feedback the community gives on how other contributors should be compensated. Prop House is important, and Id welcome the prop again after discussion.
0 references
Although I like the idea of pods for fund distribution, I cannot vote for this prop as is. - targeting >150k earners seems very narrow-minded to me, excluding a lot of talent - builders will be paid 5 eth/month to then apply to prop house? and get 2 eth? or wait for a bigger prop house for similar funding? There are some issues that should be addressed to make sure best results are achieved.
0 references
I like the prop and the team. But have some issues with it: 1. no discourse, not open to feedback from the community. 2. not clear on payment: 20 eth/month for team “to be paid retroactively based on work completed and builders helped”. How is that measured? How much will the team get paid, who decides, and what is done with the money left over (if any)? 3. no transparency on how the 10 eth for builders will be distributed, how the decision process will be made and if anyone will be able to know about it. 4. the “5 eth of retro funding for what has been done to build this system already” - what is this for exactly? The network? Who is getting paid? Not being scalable is not really an issue for me as I think this can stay at the same size and be helpful. For a prop that talks so much about feedback, I’m surprised none was asked. So I’d welcome this prop again, after it had gathered feedback on these and other issues from the community.
0 references
I agree with other members when they say this money would be better spent on the community, and builders that populate it. would be cool to see him in noggles, but it should also be genuine from his side.
0 references
I believe reformulating how small grants is run would be for the best. A lot of good work has come out of it, but the current scale requires assessing how things have been done, and how can we improve moving forward.
0 references
If nouns is sponsoring, it should be Season 2 with Nouns. If we are the focus of the game, we should be the focus of the marketing as well.
0 references
I think theres just too much important information missing from this proposal.
0 references
agree with fugazi.eth: 182k to continue the development of a discord bot is too much
0 references
We are not overflowing with proposals to justify excluding so many nouners from putting up props.
0 references
Love working with gnars on this. Itll be a great way to proliferate nouns to a completely new set of minds. And do a lot of good on the way.
0 references
Have had to look far and wide for good cc0 audio. The gamification integrating with nouns is super cool. win:win
0 references
Bc every nouner should be able to put up a prop.
0 references
