Proposal 221 (Q1963)
From Nouns Dev
A Nouns proposal.
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Proposal 221 |
A Nouns proposal. |
Statements
86
0 references
154
0 references
14 February 2023
0 references
Increase Voting Delay and Voting Period
0 references
89
0 references
221
0 references
This makes the DAO too slow to function. we dont need that much time...
0 references
16
im not convinced that any meaningful DD will be completed in the extra 4 days. we should aim to spend the minimum amount of nouner time & attention voting on hell yes proposals, vs maximizing time spent staring at mediocre ones. proposal threshold and quorum feel like better parameter adjustments to achieve this
0 references
Delay prior to voting is long enough already imo. The agility of funding is actually a really cool feature of Nouns DAO. Id support a 7 day voting period with a 3 day pre vote delay.
0 references
5 and 5 has barely hit the sweet-spot. At this point, going any longer is just too long.
0 references
I do not think we need a longer voting delay. For voting period, I understand the desire to be able to vote on a single day, but I also find it hard to think well about so many proposals that are concurrently in voting stage. So would prefer to not increase likelihood of overlap.
0 references
Im against further increases to the voting delay as it does not yet seem productive. I will reconsider once theres an improved forum for providing proposal feedback during this period and proposers have the ability to edit based on this feedback.
0 references
28
Will increase participation (voters can reliably pick one day to vote each week and not miss anything), desirable for Noun holders
0 references
Yes, I would like to do my review and voting 1 day a week.
0 references
Important for reducing the pain of unpaid work
0 references
Agree with having one day per week for reading and voting
0 references
Reasonings compiled here: https://cbites.substack.com/p/active-governance-noun-582-1
0 references
12
**Prop 221: Nouncil Votes YES** --- **YES - 29 votes** - a lot of us have multiple jobs to desl with basic life stuff and need more time to read proposals - seems reasonable, i dig it. more time for promotion and awareness - whatever helps voters vote - This should of been in place since day 1 - I think its reasonable - More time to think means better decisions. --- **NO - 22 votes** - Its long enough. - The five days were just added a little bit ago. I think it is too soon to see if that works to change it again. I am not against changing it I just think it is too soon. - i dont see any reasons to extend the delay at the moment. 5/5 works well to me --- **ABSTAIN - 1 vote** - I dont have an opinion or experience to apply to this change, thus abstaining.
0 references
Yes. Allows people to set aside a specific evening each week. For me this is a simple value add that far outweighs the tradeoff of greater time lag - a 5 day period just feels chaotic.
0 references
Increase Voting Delay and Voting Period This is a proposal to: set Voting Delay to 7 days, up from the current 5 days set Voting Period to 7 days, up from the current 5 days This change is intended to facilitate weekly review and voting on pending and active proposals.
0 references
31 January 2023
0 references
0
0 references
1
0 references
0
0 references
3
0 references
The text does not provide information on the name of the team or the builder
0 references
