0xeb13fddfa9b2a4a6e4e7b2d67b6e38c208c41249 (Q395)
From Nouns Dev
Individual
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | 0xeb13fddfa9b2a4a6e4e7b2d67b6e38c208c41249 |
Individual |
Statements
I dont see the market for these being big enough to justify the funding. Would reconsider if a pilot program funded entirely by the team showed demonstrable success and demand across a broad enough audience.
0 references
This is an ambitious project - I like the idea, and the budget seems reasonable. But this sort of thing will require continuous funding, and for large (probably increasing) amounts. I cannot vote For unless there is a model for long term monetization/sustainability (perhaps partially subsidized by the DAO, but there should at least be benchmarks for weaning). It would be a very useful tool, but I fear voting yes will put the DAO on the hook - indefinitely - for several hundred ETH per year to maintain and grow the API. Thats a large expense if theres no plan for self sustainability.
0 references
5000 of each is way too many imo. Would support buying 1000 of each at a much lower ask.
0 references
My concern is that props using functional funding will lead to squishy asks, where the prop really only requires the minimum of the given range, but proposers will unnecessarily include a window above that in an attempt to siphon off more ETH. The existing process of re submission and altering ask sizes is not that bad - I could see this tool being abused and making the process worse in that regard, not better.
0 references
Surely there is a typo here? An ask this size should demonstrate a high level of demand and proliferation from the pilot project first. I also dont like the idea of astroturfing our way to success by buying thin collabs with trendy artists. Feels cheap.
0 references
Although I like this idea and would love to own a physical piece, it feels too one-off. It doesnt meet the proliferation threshold for me.
0 references
I fully support developing this... eventually. But I think its too big an ask in terms of ETH, with the market currently so low. Would consider supporting in the future when market is back up. For now, any big ETH asks should have much better proliferation impact.
0 references
I recognize that the wider world is fully pro-AI, and that my vote will not change or slow down where things are headed, but I think AI should be approached much more cautiously across the board, and only for narrow use cases. Voting my conscience.
0 references
I dont have a good idea of where the Chinese market currently is with NFTs. So I would prefer to see a lower ask and less ambitious proposal for an initial venture like this. Would consider voting yes if traction is demonstrated in a pilot project.
0 references
I am voting no on anything that includes a free noun. Also disheartening to see Instagram influencer category amounting to 90k USD. This should be $0. The proposal is good, but these aspects are a major turn off. Would consider voting yes if resubmitted.
0 references
Voting no on all charitable giving that does not incorporate extremely transparent oversight/accountability. Also would prefer the treasury give 100 ETH two years from now (when its worth 1M USD), than 100 ETH mid-bear market (when its worth 100k).
0 references
Not a knock against the great work done by Gnars, but the ask is way too high imo. Would consider funding for a much smaller amount. Not to beat a dead horse, but I strongly feel that bear market expenditures should scale back quite a bit. 700 ETH will likely be worth 7 mil USD in a couple years - would prefer to conserve as much dry powder as possible during the lean times.
0 references
On the fence for this, but voting yes. The primary reason Im in favor is because the initiative has been very successful so far and I dont feel it would be appropriate to rug. However, 750k a year is not sustainable, and I dont think we need to have a footprint this large in esports. I plan to vote no on any future asks above 250k (preferable in the 150k range), with the hope that the team can be subsidized by additional sponsors to make up the difference.
0 references
This is EXACTLY the kind of thing that we need! Assuming its successful, I would love to see a future prop to kickstart small business owners who apply for screening. Well worth a large investment to get IRL nounish presence in the food industry.
0 references
Interested to see whether this or prop 242 (or neither) gets traction. I think its worth funding both at the moment, then evaluate in a few months time.
0 references
Yes. Allows people to set aside a specific evening each week. For me this is a simple value add that far outweighs the tradeoff of greater time lag - a 5 day period just feels chaotic.
0 references
Voting yes. My main reservation is that alcohol is not necessarily in line with nounish things. However, using NFTs for tokenized ownership is a good proof of principle that will help bring NFTs to the normies. I would also prefer a long term strategy rather than a white-label approach, but this is still a net win imo.
0 references
3D printed fashion feels very Nounish to me, and I love the idea of it. Ask is reasonable imo.
0 references
Voted yes based on the platforms potential for future use and creativity.
0 references
