Proposal 280 (Q100)
From Nouns Dev
A Nouns proposal.
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Proposal 280 |
A Nouns proposal. |
Statements
111
0 references
280
0 references
112
0 references
Name (recently acquired) Noun 687 on NFTR
0 references
28 April 2023
0 references
16
The DAO should help and endorse Nouners who build Nounish things, conditional on passing a vote, naturally. This helps a Nounish builder, demonstrates the value of their adjacent Nounish work and costs nothing tangible and almost nothing overall. We can equivocate and endorse nothing for fake decentralization theorycraft reasons, but if the DAO doesnt have a view on things and stand behind work by Nouners, Nounders, and Noun Family, were not doing our job.
0 references
20
This is the rare nouns prop that doesnt ask for any money, and think its good to encourage a plethora of naming systems. ENS is obviously dominant today but Nouns should encourage and experiment with alternate approaches.
0 references
Agree with Jihad that its not really an endorsement imo - were just vibing and naming a Noun at no cost to the treasury. I think an endorsement would be something like: - mint an OE as a droposal with funds going to NFTR - actually fund NFTR
0 references
if 40 addresses vote on this proposal at this weeks average gas price, it will cost the DAO $600 in gas rebates. There are 10 proposals this week.
0 references
fine to try this out but not endorsing the product
0 references
I dont see this as an endorsement of a product. Its an interesting, fun onchain action, that doesnt limit us from taking other onchain actions in the same vein. Lets do it!
0 references
Ollie (189) and Nollie (542) approve 🛹
0 references
It seems like an interesting way to get attention for the service by naming a noun in the treasury. Concept is cool.
0 references
I appreciate all for and against comments as I think both sides can be simultaneously logically sound. I especially appreciate those that support other Nouners work and Nounish integrations of said work with the DAO.
0 references
18
name it will son q sack
0 references
Perfect timing to name our new Noun. Looking forward to seeing “JellO” become official. Nice work, Digital!
0 references
My thesis as a delegate is: “Nouns has a unique role in the ecosystem as a gathering place around public goods.” To be clear, I absolutely love on-chain experimentation. I love new projects in on-chain naming and on-chain social. Im excited for the way this space is rapidly expanding. This adoption, however, should come bottom-up and not top-down. Nouners naming their Nouns? Great! A proposal for Nouns DAO to name its Noun? Feels like using the DAO for advertising. The attention of voters and delegates is scarce. Gas fees per prop creates a real cost. Time spent analyzing proposals like this takes time away from proposals that encourage Nouns to fund a public good. I love the initiative, but a DAO proposal doesnt feel like the time or the place. Theres nothing about this that should require the buy-in of the full DAO, when individual Nouners naming their Nouns serves the same purpose. Approving this sets a bad precedent of groups that want to use Nouns for advertising. Its easy to say that this prop is fun, but approving it means well get 10 more just like it.
0 references
the dao should be careful endorsing products and this proposed partnership seems very one-sided in favor of NFTR
0 references
21
hmm.. I appreciate jihad & noun 12s view here. but I ultimately feel like props like this arent free. the voter base has to read through, weigh, and vote, which has cognitive & financial costs (gas). so while I appreciate digitaloils work personally, I dont want to encourage the promotion of onchain products through nouns onchain props when it doesnt really serve a need for us. thus, voting against.
0 references
This particular proposal, while obviously harmless, raises some important questions about what kind of proposals the DAO should be soliciting. Though the proposals premise is that the DAO gets to name a Noun, the proposal itself suggests the name. Though the proposals background section should state why this is something Nouns members should support, whats written acts only as an advertisement for NFTR. Though the proposal is free, it of course requires members of the DAO to vote, requiring gas fees. This is not to say that we shouldnt pursue fun proposals, but rather that as a community we should be mindful of the potential for proposals to be used for purposes beyond their stated intentions. In this case, it may be worth considering whether there are alternative ways to engage the community in a fun and lighthearted manner, without compromising the integrity of the governance system.
0 references
42
0 references
Digitaloil
0 references
28 April 2023
0 references
I don’t understand the value prop or business model of NFTR well enough to place a vote on this.
0 references
Reading through the proposal it felt a bit like a promotion for NFTR. I would have appreciated more info on the platform. I agree with a lot of pros and cons given by other voters, but didnt have time to properly form a full opinion myself, so Ill be abstaning.
0 references
one side of me doest find the idea all that compelling - the other side sees that this as just a fun onchain action. no strong feelings either way. best of luck to digitaloil w his project!
0 references
13
0 references
1
0 references
NFTR, the NFT identity registry on Ethereum, has recently acquired a new jellyfish NFT named Noun 687, or JellO. NFTR, founded by Nouner Dig italOil, is like ENS but for NFTs. It will soon launch features such as NFT messaging, NFT banking, and a name marketplace.
0 references
0
0 references
