0xba2b9804fbffa8f1a8f7dc8dd600e21268bef09f (Q448)
From Nouns Dev
Individual
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | 0xba2b9804fbffa8f1a8f7dc8dd600e21268bef09f |
Individual |
Statements
A nouns font that we can use across the ecosystem makes a lot of sense. Echoing what other voters have mentioned - I dont think the work is quite there yet but Marco has already stated the following: these are not final letterforms, that is what the proposal is for, there is a lot of work to be done for this to become a production typeface. My vote FOR is a vote of confidence in Marco to continue to get delve into Nouns culture to find just the right vibe for the font.
0 references
“Rewrite this in a lengthy nounish way: A very wholesome proposal!” “An extraordinarily heartwarming and sincere proposition that is imbued with a profound sense of positivity and goodwill. This proposal, in its essence, is a testament to the genuine intentions of the proposer, reflecting a deep-seated desire to contribute to the betterment of the situation or relationship. It is an offer that not only encapsulates the proposers earnestness but also their commitment to fostering a nurturing and beneficial environment for all parties involved.”
0 references
A country that subsidizes the Uber ride to the voting booth is a country I want to be part of.
0 references
nounish has done an incredible job at making sense of all that happens within the Nouns ecosystem (no easy task) and producing world class content out of it. The videos have helped in many ways beyond views and clicks that are hard to put a number on: - as building blocks for other content - as explainer videos for potential brand partnerships - getting would-be builders excited about joining Nouns That said, I do see why others nouners would vote AGAINST - the content is great but impact isn’t on par to quality. My vote FOR is two fold: 1. To continue to support the incredible content machine that is nounish 2. A vote of confidence in goldy, 142 and co to iterate their way to a better distribution strategy
0 references
Love the video & song. “I am strongly FOR this prop”
0 references
I appreciate Klim’s dedication. Looking forward to buying a few of these!
0 references
A thoughtful token to be given out during events. nothing more nounish than handing out wet wipes at crypto events. fun project, solid plan, great product - i am strongly FOR this I vote for design A
0 references
Nouns succeds when we have 1000x folks like Tigris
0 references
+1 on wilson’s unique unlock. v nounish prop, easy FOR
0 references
not a fan of heyanoun so far but a big fan of the team ⌐◨-◨
0 references
Props to HON team for coming back a third time. While l do look forward to the proposed deliverables, I mostly want HON to continue to improve its core UX. Either way, thanks for the persistence and best of luck!
0 references
agree that this is the sort of thing the treasury should focus more on - bringing nouns to the _people_. good luck and stay nounish! ⌐◨-◨
0 references
love what the ai team has been able to accomplish so far. really keen on seeing how the playground evolves - particularly in making it much more user friendly and integrating it with other tooling to make the act of making nouns memes & content 10x better than anything else out there.
0 references
Voting FOR: - Pushing the meme into new communities in this manner is what nouns is uniquely suited for. - Prop is well thought out and has reasonable ask for what is proposed My only concern was not knowing first-hand who the leads are and whether or not they’d be able to execute. After talking w other nouners who have spoken to leads first-hand, I feel comfortable in giving it a shot. That said, I suggest that the leads hold open calls to win over nouners confidence! Make us proud 74 & Karl!
0 references
- For nouns dao props, the intangibles (authenticity & culture) have considerably more weight than in your usual org. - Aub deeply understand the culture, is v nounish and is genuine in her work. - Second order effects of having some like that ^ vs a more systematized, “sophisticated” and more efficient team at w/e event add more weight to the FOR side. - Lastly, costs and strategy: while i agree that these 2 vectors could be improved, I think of the premium being paid as the cost of (hopefully) attracting/signaling more folks to compete for the pot. Fwiw: we’ve seen this happen already with other “roles” within the dao. So i’m voting FOR while encouraging her to be more nounish about her approach (events selected, activations, etc).
0 references
one side of me doest find the idea all that compelling - the other side sees that this as just a fun onchain action. no strong feelings either way. best of luck to digitaloil w his project!
0 references
the ux flow requires substantial attention (quorum, twice (!)) from nouners w/o any incentive to do so. lowering said quorum defeats the purpose. from experience, its close to impossible to get a meaningful % of nouners to pay attention (understandably so) without there being 6+ figures on the line. im not sure this will get any real traction without rethinking the mechanism entirely. good luck!
0 references
the main mechanics of the dao, particularly nouner-facing ones, should stick to the KISS principle as much as possible. functional funding would greatly reduce clarity on what we are voting for as the outcome wouldnt be known until finalizing the vote. all that said, i think it is an interesting experiment and would like to see it out in the wild as a stand alone mechanism for pods/sub-communities/etc to play with - not for the main dao.
0 references
While I appreciate the team’s efforts here (I love the UI!), several trusted technical folks have raised flags regarding issues with audits and clarity as to what’s being proposed and what has been implemented. For those reasons, I have to vote against.
0 references
Traditional social media marketing is boring. I’d rather vote for authentic ideas from the Chinese community. Thanks for the prop!
0 references
Run of the mill NFTs conferences don’t seem all that interesting. Would encourage the team to find more nounish ways to meme the meme. Thank you for the submission!
0 references
prop/designs dont feel all that exciting. ty though to necfas for putting this up!
0 references
I appreciate Oni’s intentions but I am against “official” discords in any capacity.
0 references
Against setting precedent on the DAO choosing favorites in spaces where only one can be chosen
0 references
There are good arguments for and against both sides but given what is to be most affected is the culture + brand of Nouns, I have to side w being more conservative and therefore vote against.
0 references
