0xd25973a3df7d2341ddea48303a3e6addec6184bf (Q404)
From Nouns Dev
Individual
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | 0xd25973a3df7d2341ddea48303a3e6addec6184bf |
Individual |
Statements
18
six hundred tokens id rather pay wilsons rent for life
0 references
18
This is a nearly $50,000 ask... In their words: is partly to compensate for the lack of those future revenue streams We are paying them $50,000 to make up for the money they cant make? Did all these for voters actually read the first two chapters?
0 references
18
I think I would buy a mechanical keyboard from mechanical keyboard dao But I find it distasteful when proposers say hey pay for the costs for us to make mechanical keyboards and well then give nouns holders the rights to pay cost for mechanical keyboards Kinda like double dipping into our treasury then our wallets directly Would prefer if this was like nouns holders get a free one or smth nice like that
0 references
18
- the dao has already spent 555ETH on these e sports initiatives. That is over $1M. This feels like it will be a never ending ask on the treasury. I cant confidently say this has driven over $1M of marketing/goodwill/nounish/buying. - this one is now for for another seven hundred and ninety five thousand united states dollars - I like e sports but I dont feel like nouns needs to basically own and pay for the entire team - IMO owning a team means getting income from the team (ticket sales, prize winnings, etc.) - We are paying for wellness coaches and regular coaches and more - I want this to exist in a form where nouns is the lead sponsor of a team for like $100k per year and the team goes and gets other smaller sponsors to cover all their costs
0 references
17
Although I love the work being done here, this is the 5th ask for funds for this 3d printed fashion project and I feel that its delivered and we need to stop sinking more and more money into it Weve already spent well over $200,000 here and from the memecoin era we know these time square billboards are not long lasting marketing
0 references
my brothers this says $150,000 to buy ze comics and stick em in a warehouse lets let real people buy these things if they want them, better for proliferation 😛
0 references
Dont think its reasonable to pay $30k for a ig post if this is a good cause The influencer seems to care about this cause as well and the influencing should be goodwill as we make this happen together
0 references
28
Really like gnars and everything theyre doing but this large of an ask in one swing feels too high for comfort - Budget section of proposal feels too sparse on details. Who is being paid and how much? How fast is the ETH going to be used? How much would each event cost? can we know the events and whatnot upfront? - Personally I dont like the idea of giving people ETH to buy 2 nouns. I had to spend 30+E to get mine, others much more. I could write a proposal saying Ill do x y z marketing give me a free noun, but that would be unfair. Nouns arent a cheap NFT, 30E is like a full years salary for many in the US. - Gnars has daily auctions which give them ETH, they still have over 70E in their treasury to use (which is great given the 60ish we funded them with in the past). I feel gnars could be self sufficient and this proposal is asking for a large amount simply because it can. - With 3360 Gnars in circ, giving gnars dao 700E would 10x the book value of a gnar when a noun trades at half. I know many in our DAO think this metric doesnt matter, its just a point worth keeping in mind for those that do care.
0 references
28
On this prop: Weve spent so much on prop house that we should be all in there and hope to get a major W from its existence long term. Our community is already quite fragmented, I dont want to see our creators also become confused on where / how they should be proposing. Additionally: we are currently in a state where nouns sell for half of book value and proposals are asking for far too much funding I am for a spending freeze until we can sort out communication with all parties, better capital controls, and solve the dilution problem
0 references
27
we are currently in a state where nouns sell for half of book value and proposals are asking for far too much funding in the last two weeks something like $3M usd has been requested from the DAO Although not particularly against this proposal, I am for a spending freeze until we can sort out communication with all parties, better capital controls, and solve the dilution problem Love the animation work but am just voting no on 99% of stuff until that happens If this does fail, please do come back once us as holders have gotten our shit together and can spend with confidence
0 references
- I love the UI and do want to see this exist but dont think the setup is fair - Other DAOs pay 10E for the exact same team to set this up for them (ie. see their rug radio proposal) - Our DAO is basically paying $200k+ USD / y / person salaries to build this out, yet the business itself is funded by VCs already and is building a very similar product? - Would like to see the team propose again with something more similar to their rug radio prop. Im cool with just being a user of their main product, we dont need to spend millions to have the nouns brand on it.
0 references
21
using this space to recognize the irony that nerman will announce in discord that I dont want to pay them this well
0 references
18
The first Barney the Dinosaur was a seemingly harmless character. However, the third Barney was brought to court in 1997, for sexual harrasment of a minor. He was found guilty in February of 1998, and served 5 years. He is now a registered sex offender in the state of Mississippi, Louisiana and Georgia.
0 references
Nounish dev building nounish things - hopefully having funding methods like this save the dao money in the long term nounishly positive
0 references
28
Doesnt cost us anything so why not try it 😃 Would love for this to result in showing creators that by working w our brand they can make more money and that ideally lowers the costs of future creations Although in the future if we are to spend $200k on art and then want to sell it, we should keep a bigger take as weve paid significant amounts for the OG piece.
0 references
