Proposal 314 (Q5213)
From Nouns Dev
A Nouns proposal.
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Proposal 314 |
A Nouns proposal. |
Statements
Wilson Cusack has developed a governance client for Nouns called voter.wtf. The platform, which has over 30k lines of code, offers several unique features such as a timeli ne of all votes, side by side FOR and AGAINST votes, the ability for non-delegates to vote, and more.
0 references
19 June 2023
0 references
111
0 references
10
0 references
Retro Fund Voter.wtf
0 references
2
0 references
Wilson cusack
0 references
1
0 references
37
0 references
2
0 references
314
0 references
10
0 references
298
0 references
*maybe sent from voter.wtf*
0 references
*sent from voter.wtf* *sent from voter.wtf* *sent from voter.wtf* *sent from voter.wtf* *sent from voter.wtf* *sent from voter.wtf* *sent from voter.wtf* *sent from voter.wtf* *sent from voter.wtf* *sent from voter.wtf* *sent from voter.wtf* *sent from voter.wtf* *sent from voter.wtf* *sent from voter.wtf* *sent from voter.wtf* *sent from my heart* *wait what*
0 references
I feel obliged to include a reason here.
0 references
*sent from voter.wtf*
0 references
My thesis as a delegate is: “Nouns has a unique role in the ecosystem as a gathering place around public goods.” This is such an easy yes. Voter.wtf is a public good that supports the Nouns community and eventually the broader ecosystem. Would love for Voter.wtf to act as the foundation for standardizing voteWithReason throughout the DAO governance ecosystem. So much potential, glad to support it after such a useful MVP. *sent from voter.wtf*
0 references
Wilsons efforts with voter.wtf are directly responsibly for increasing the culture around voting with reason in Nouns, and leveraging those reasons as the onchain source of truth around how the community views a given proposal. The only reason I would vote no is so he could put up a new prop asking for even more ETH *sent from voter.wtf*
0 references
Would pay another 10 eth if you set the default to Against.... you sneaky spend maxi bugger :) (Bloody thing throwing up an application error so I had to switch to nouns.wtf to vote....so this doubles as a support request)
0 references
minted vwr nft in support. would like to see the dao support also. great work wilson. *sent from voter.wtf*
0 references
16
The pickle is ALWAYS a lie
0 references
Taken from my newsletter - https://paragraph.xyz/@thebower/nouns-dao-active-governance-10 Huge props to Wilson, voter.wtf is an amazing voting suite. Navigation is fast and seamless while presenting the information in a way thats easy to follow. I also support this model of retro funding, it incentivizes experimentation and new creations. *sent from voter.wtf* (wink)
0 references
On behalf of UglyDAO
0 references
Really happy to see Wilson join and build some tools for the DAO. Also want to support this model: - Hack away - Demonstrate some traction - Ask for retro funding Even for bigger props, I believe there can be an initial MVP that follows this path. Big YES to this prop and to Wilsons participation *sent from voter.wtf*
0 references
Im all about cool tools. And the fact that this could set precedent for people building cool things and then asking for some retro, I think is positive. *sent from voter.wtf*
0 references
*sent from voter.wtf*
0 references
Having Wilson join, stick around and contribute as he has is one of the biggest wins for Nouns in recent times.
0 references
Generally my view is that we should have many clients for nouns on every level, because the great game of nouns is to figure out how to use software to coordinate humans towards effective funding public art and software. Love what Wilsons done with voter.wtf for this reason!
0 references
*sent from voter.wtf*
0 references
Support this proposal. I like that this is a tool that (1) has utility to the DAO (cool voter client), (2) introduces new stuff for us to play with (likes, non-Noun voting, and other mechanics make this feel social, which is what voting is all about), (3) is open source ftw. In addition, I think wilsons process of building the thing, launching the thing, and then asking for funding is a very principled thing to have done, and should be encouraged more. I like the idea of retro-funding, because it self selects for execution oriented builders, and by definition youre verifying someones extant contribution as opposed to speculating on their eventual delivery. Totally understand that some props require large funding up front to pursue and want to be supportive of those larger capital investments, but I am much more amenable to voting for a retro fund proposal. PS - I think im the first to vote on this one. Is there a special award or easter egg? Paging wilsoncusack.eth *sent from voter.wtf*
0 references
Thank you for this amazing platform Wilson! *sent from voter.wtf*
0 references
20
(noun40 via agora proxy) love the product (voter.wtf is my go to client these days). retro funding is also very nounish so happy wilson is paving the way here in that regard as well.
0 references
No votes, just want to say Wilson has been an amazing addition to Nouns and this prop is an easy YES. And I ❤️ vwr. *sent from voter.wtf*
0 references
will recuse myself from this one, but he seems like a good guy :) *sent from voter.wtf*
0 references
34
Sent from https://goops.com Nouns Governance Pool
0 references
easy yes, i had also been planning to put up a proposal to retro wilson for his efforts on the site. couple enhancement requests while im here! -default to currently selected prop in the drop down when bringing up the vote menu -clear out reason from previous prop when opening the vote menu on a new proposal
0 references