0x1db19b9903c5510aa5a866ea643eb021cd12bda0 (Q208)
From Nouns Dev
Individual
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | 0x1db19b9903c5510aa5a866ea643eb021cd12bda0 |
Individual |
Statements
i think NOUNSBR is great, love the energy and the people pushing it forward. but my reasoning stands closely w/ wilsons & krels.
0 references
love the team & applications, im not sure if the best path forward would be the immediate integration of all applications together or the development of the best ones as singular endeavors. i also share some of the concerns made by other nouners. not a clear hell yes and not a clear no. decided to abstain.
0 references
nounish is working on the challenging task of creating high-end content that simplifies and promotes nouns. it comes with a high price tag, but i believe its a worthy cause. its not every day you find a media agency willing to focus entirely on nouns. ive had the chance to collaborate with nounish numerous times and have found the team to be dedicated and enthusiastic about adding value to nouns. while distribution and costs are legitimate concerns, im optimistic that these are areas that will see improvements. my gut feeling is that taking action is more beneficial than remaining passive in this situation. telling nouns stories in a high-quality manner is paramount. i foresee the distribution/viewership issue being resolved as our content library expands & builders do more cool sh*t. given the concerns raised about distribution, i trust nounish will give this matter the attention it deserves.
0 references
voting in favor. klims track record gives assurance about the potential quality of these toys. theyre a unique opportunity for the nouns community. expecting a high-quality outcome given klims skills. the idea of holding a noun in my hand as a tangible toy is exciting. eager to see how this unfolds.
0 references
voting for design A. love how out-of-the-box and original this feels, kudos to the proposers. this is, imo, very memeable and could be referenced along the lines of nouns funds everything from 3000 prescription glasses to children in need to... wet wipes. thank you for taking feedback from the previous proposal and coming back with a better prop.
0 references
in supporting this proposal, my primary consideration is the significant degree of human involvement that it encourages. by human involvement, i refer to the direct, hands-on participation of people in activities related to nouns in the real world. the proposal doesnt just make nouns an abstract concept discussed in digital spaces; it brings nouns to life, providing an immersive, tangible experience for individuals worldwide. i believe that such engagement has a profound impact. the more people can participate in various activities involving nouns, the more they will learn about the project and understand its goals. this level of engagement fosters a deeper connection, turning passive observers into active participants and advocates.
0 references
i believe this proposal is an excellent opportunity to support tigris in their creative journey with nouns. while i find the proposal to be on the expensive side, i see it as an investment in a builder who has the potential to grow, develop new skillsets, and learn from this project. my hope is that tigris will continue to innovate and experiment with nouns in the future, ultimately becoming an even stronger contributor to the community. i believe that in most cases, proposals should be evaluated separately from the builder involved. however, when a builder is directly involved with the proposal, its essential for me to consider how the project could contribute to their growth and development. fostering the development of our current builders is as crucial as attracting individuals with established platforms, audiences, and products. after all, our existing builders and collaborators are the ones who understand the nouns culture and can directly enrich it. in my opinion, investing in the growth of our builders and collaborators holds more long-term value than simply buying our way into high-profile collaborations, such as a mr. beast video.
0 references
lets see what unfolds. while im almost certain this is not the ideal solution for a common ground within the ecosystem, im voting in favor to experiment and observe the results. from the perspective of new voters, there appears to be a genuine need for a better information/onboarding hub for nouns. hopefully, this proposal addresses that issue.
0 references
fun, unique, nounish. excited to see the results.
0 references
just watched nouns vs TL, you should do the same. link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYDPBHrpiyA cant wait to see what this team will bring to this ecosystem. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
things i appreciate: 1. can significantly increase visibility and credibility for Nouns. 2. even if there isnt a direct conversion of ad viewers, i believe the content produced can generate good impact. Things that concern me: none
0 references
while I have a gut feeling that increasing the dynamic quorum may potentially cause more harm than good and could lead to increased divisiveness within the community, i also recognize the importance of exploring the effects of this proposal. assessing its impact could ultimately be beneficial for the DAO as a whole, and it might help us better understand how to refine our governance processes.
0 references
things i appreciate: 1. aims to expand the Nouns Short Shorts initiative, creating more opportunities for talented animators. 2. irl festival event in LA will showcase and celebrate the animators work, further raising awareness about Nouns and creating a more significant impact. 3. scalability and vision of becoming a recurring global phenomenon make it an ambitious and exciting endeavor. things that concern me: 1. none
0 references
Good Aspects: - Increased awareness and engagement with Nouns in the web3 developer community through IRL presence hackathons. - Onboarding international builders and fostering a global community. - Strengthening the Nouns brand by associating it with positive and memorable experiences. - Encouraging developers to build on top of Nouns through the Nouns Prize. - Promoting cultural exchange and diversity by blending local culture with Nouns in each event. - Previous success with three editions of the Nouns Fair, demonstrating the teams experience and commitment. Bad Aspects: - The team will rely on external help for hosting, photo sets, swag, and recording, which may result in varying quality across different events. - Events may be subject to change, and the team will need to adjust accordingly. The past success of the Nouns Fair demonstrates that Mono & Ale are experienced and committed to achieving their goals. Budget seems reasonable considering the scale of the project. The impact of previous Nouns Fairs cant be ignored, having a nouns-powered set on the global events that involve one of the main target demographics seems very worthwhile. best of luck, keep up the good work.
0 references
what i appreciate: - The documentary showcases an inspiring story that aligns with the Nouns values and could potentially resonate with a broader audience. - The proposal aims to collaborate with an established athlete, which could bring more visibility to the Nouns ecosystem. - Upon completion, the documentary will be minted as an Open Edition, with 50% of proceeds going to NounsDAO and 50% to the chosen charity, Life Rolls On. (Intention is great, well see the results) what im concerned about: - I believe Wheelzs compensation structure could be improved by emphasizing his dedication to the project and enthusiasm for its success, rather than focusing solely on his social media following. It would be great to see a compensation model that acknowledges the time and effort he invests and highlights his genuine passion for promoting inclusive sports and inspiring others. - Wouldve liked more detailed information about how the documentary will be specifically promoted or distributed, to have a better idea of the plan. *also wouldve appreciated to see a video from Wheelz himself showing his perspective on the idea. ⌐◨-◨: VOTING FOR
0 references
i like the new implementations, ask seems very reasonable. good luck ⌐◧-◧.
0 references
i think the cost is fair, and it could also lead to new ideas to improve or offer alternatives to the current proposal constraints.
0 references
im interested to see how the ski community receives & interacts with Nouns during this timeframe
0 references
the music on part 1 was so incredibly amazing, really really really loved it. btw, whats does everyone think about POWERED BY NOUNS/⌐◨-◨ instead of FUNDED BY NOUNS DAO? *sent from voter.wtf*
0 references
⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨ *sent from voter.wtf*
0 references
*sent from voter.wtf* *sent from voter.wtf* *sent from voter.wtf* *sent from voter.wtf* *sent from voter.wtf* *sent from voter.wtf* *sent from voter.wtf* *sent from voter.wtf* *sent from voter.wtf* *sent from voter.wtf* *sent from voter.wtf* *sent from voter.wtf* *sent from voter.wtf* *sent from voter.wtf* *sent from voter.wtf* *sent from my heart* *wait what*
0 references
reVoteWithReason from seneca.eth > Nouns is lucky to have Elad & David leading these efforts. Happy to see them come back for another 6 months with us! *sent from voter.wtf*
0 references
I am voting FOR this proposal. The demonstrated success from previous videos speaks for itself to the potential impact this project could have, and its exactly this type of inventive and unexpected utilization that showcases the quirky and compelling nature of Nouns. I am excited to see how this project evolves. *sent from voter.wtf*
0 references
reVoteWithReason from apenoun.eth > voting to show support but feel that 1 week period is too short for people to work out logistics, identify venue/planning, ect. prop house style for irl events (which can require a lot of logistics planning up front) may lead to wasted time for those that dont win, or will have people promising things that they dont have have commitments on to try and secure votes. we have seen this with multiple on-chain props *sent from voter.wtf*
0 references
reVoteWithReason from joelcares.eth > This is a fun way to get a significant amount of legit artists to contribute creatively to Nouns. It would be valuable to present all artists with an optional CC0 release for the commissions, and I would also hope that all pages will be scanned and archived online. On the whole Im excited to see all of the creative work! *sent from voter.wtf*
0 references
reVoteWithReason from jihad.eth > This is a no-brainer. Reputable builder, great idea with lots of upside, and a working MVP that folks are already using, all at a reasonable price! *sent from voter.wtf*
0 references
reVoteWithReason from max-power.eth > cuz its awesome *sent from voter.wtf*
0 references
reVoteWithReason from seneca.eth > The fact that anyone can engage via CC0 makes official collaborations through props all the more special - we should embrace that! Voting yes because it is a simple and fun prop that encourages cross-community pollination. Also, they mentioned NS, which is an underrated signal on the proposers behalf. also, i believe Luka is genuinely excited of whats possible with Nouns, happy to support that excitement. *sent from voter.wtf*
0 references
i am voting based on my conviction that the most successful subcommunities/subdaos are born out of organic growth. from my experience, its proven beneficial to let these communities develop naturally, driven by the passion and initiative of dedicated builders who are nouns-fans. these builders, with their deep understanding and appreciation for the ecosystem, can genuinely engage the community and drive meaningful growth. therefore, i believe that funding should primarily serve to amplify already established interest and activity, rather than incentivizing its initiation. this approach helps ensure the authenticity and long-term sustainability of these subcommunities/subdaos, as they are grounded in genuine enthusiasm and engagement rather than artificial stimulation.
0 references
i appreciate the effort put into this proposal, but i am voting against it because i feel the requested amount is too high for a project that hasnt yet demonstrated a strong product-market fit. although i acknowledge the importance of maintaining and developing archives.wtf, i believe a smaller team and a more modest budget would be a more prudent approach for this work, allowing it to progress incrementally and adapt as needed.
0 references
wiz, i appreciate everything you do. for this prop, it doesnt feel like this is a good replacement to NAC. + i have a similar outlook as the reasoning behind bowers & wilsons votes.
0 references
my reasoning stands closely with what bower and noun40 stated.
0 references
this is really unique and fun imo, but the lack of details on strategy/distribution/marketing makes me vote against. also, would like to see various design mockups options.
0 references
things i appreciate: 1. gamis constant persuit to do things while almost always proliferating nouns 2. deployed as a public good but, the lottery-like system feels a bit too not-nounish for me.
0 references
i honestly like this a lot, but it feels too much like just adding the noggles to call it nounish. i hope the proposers end up, either way, getting this funded somehow; it seems like a fantastic project.
0 references
thanks to the people who put forth this well-thought-out idea. i see nouns as a perfect canvas for turning dreams into reality. imo, with nouns, you can create endless possibilities. if building games is your passion, then build the dream game youve always wanted to play. maybe start small with a basic version of your product, pouring your passion into it. show progress and some degree of PMF. im almost sure youll continue to get funding after an initial MVP prop that generates good results. what does it take to make an awesome game? if there were no limits, how would you go about it? im eagerly waiting for the first nouns-powered game that people cant stop playing. *sent from voter.wtf*
0 references
reVoteWithReason from 0xfc218f > (noun 40 voting via agora proxy) not opposed to sponsoring tennis athletes similar to our esports team but having a hard time supporting the NTF platform. it seems like a token launchpad for tennis players’ future income and, outside of the question of if there will be PMF for the product, this type of financialization doesn’t feel particularly nounish to me and don’t feel the need for nouns to fund its development. thank you to the team for the attention and effort here but voting against. *sent from voter.wtf*
0 references
reVoteWithReason from wilsoncusack.eth > I am excited about funding some kind of Nouns zine, perhaps an annual recap, but not super into funding something covering the whole NFT space. Feels like the kinda thing that could easily be funded via NFT-pre orders, if people are interested. Good luck and thanks for your time! *sent from voter.wtf*
0 references
