0xc3fdadbae46798cd8762185a09c5b672a7aa36bb (Q504)
From Nouns Dev
Individual
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | 0xc3fdadbae46798cd8762185a09c5b672a7aa36bb |
Individual |
Statements
Very excited about proliferating Nouns to the Chinese market. Its a big untapped opportunity. That said, for a proposal of this size from a group with not a lot of previous track record in small grants / prop house, I would have preferred seeing a community multisig & stream just as a matter of process.
0 references
I believe that work, no matter how small should be compensated. Is 1 ETH too high for this work, yes for sure. Id think it worth maybe 0.1-0.2 ETH. However, its within the right ballpark, so believe its worth it to signal our willingness to pay for contribution.
0 references
Given the new proposal velocity lately, more time would be helpful!
0 references
Great to see these assets being put to use by various Nounish communities
0 references
One of the most exciting things to come out of Nouns. Easy Yes.
0 references
Love the process experimentation. Very excited to see what kind of results we can achieve with this.
0 references
Nouns builder is one of the most ambitious projects to come out of Nouns, and one of our best shots at proliferating the meme far beyond its reach today. Already, Purple DAO has proliferated the Nounish meme to a new community focused on an entirely different mission, and I expect many more of these to come. 1000 ETH is without a doubt a big ask, but if anything, the size makes more more excited than not – especially given the fact that its used to fund the Builders DAO vs retro-paying the Zora team. As Nouns DAO gets bigger, we must also scale up the size of our bets in order to keep having meaningful impact relative to our size– and I can think of no better team than Zora to carry out such an initiative.
0 references
Nouncil has been an incredibly positive force for the DAO – rallying builders and giving them a voice in governance. More please!!
0 references
Very excited about this prop. Lakshman and his team are strong builders working on a foundational technology that, if successful, could be integrated widely even by clients like Agora
0 references
Generally excited to generous fund endeavors that have brought meaningful value to the DAO. Retro funding ftw
0 references
Im excited to fund ambitious proposals from proven builders. Look forward to the impact that a full video production studio would bring!
0 references
On one hand, I worry that we dont have a distribution plan for this many toys, and therefore question the impact. On the other hand, Klim has demonstrated a lot of tenacity as a builder and the ask is reasonable enough that its worth taking a bet to see what happens, especially since many members of the DAO have already given this feedback around distribution, so itll top of mind as he executes.
0 references
Strongly support more experimentation with Prop House, especially for larger amounts of ETH.
0 references
Generally my view is that we should have many clients for nouns on every level, because the great game of nouns is to figure out how to use software to coordinate humans towards effective funding public art and software. Love what Wilsons done with voter.wtf for this reason!
0 references
While I appreciate Nounsprotectors investigation, I dont view this prop as a governance attack at all. Exposure to stETH is a real risk to the DAO and imo worth us funding investigations into mitigations – Cozy being one such possibilities. I do have some general questions around the exact approach we should take to this risk though: 1) Are we taking on any *additional* risk with stETH given how much Lido already underpins ethereum? 2) If we think there is marginal risk, how does insurance compare to diversification or reducing our exposure to any staked ETH? Regardless, I think this prop is a reasonable exploration and worth funding given its relatively low risk. Even just getting an Optimism proxy itself is worth the price of admission on this one!
0 references
I generally support using some of the lil nouns in our treasury to help the lils! We have not demonstrated any intent to use or sell them, so to the extent where they can help lils proliferate the meme. id be all for it! However, totally severing the relationship with Nouns doesnt seem like the right way to do this.
0 references
Salvino elegantly summarized my thinking around this. Gnars is one of the best projects to come out of Nouns, and Id love to continue supporting it. However, this current proposal is asking for a very large sum of funding without the commensurate level of transparency on how the funds will be spent. Would support new series of props from Gnars that request less funding for a shorter period of time each, with more budget transparency. (without necessarily diminishing the overall ETH/month in sum)
0 references
I love the work, but generally am wary of funding props mostly focused on building, with not solid plan for distribution. Would be down to vote for another version with a more fleshed out adoption plan
0 references
I generally like the idea and the execution quality of these. My main concern is whether getting 50 more is the priority vs finding specific people and nouns to make them for, one at a time. Seems like the usage discrepancy between the most popular and least popular filters are rather large, so its not clear to me that increasing the quantity is the highest priority right now. Id be excited to vote for a new version of this prop that combined the creation of these filters with the sourcing of specific people & occasions to use them
0 references
I love Dom and what hes done with NNS, and strongly believe he deserves more than 2ETH in retro funding for his efforts over the last several months. However, I am against this prop as it stands currently because I do not believe it is the most effective way of proliferating the meme via namespace. Getting adoption of en ENS fork is going to be VERY difficult outside of noonish communities – especially given many wallets like Coinbase already have their own ens subdomain. Id be much more excited to see a version of NNS that is built on top of ENS, either through a subdomain or via the acquisition of a TLD from ENS – spreading the meme organically probably faster. In addition, we might see fragmentation for builders and users: there is currently one reverse resolution name per address, with this version of NNS theres two
0 references
I love the effort here, but worry that the way its written could lead to a lot of lack of clarity down the line when it comes to disbursing the funds. If Mr Beast puts some noggles on a wall, would it count? Seems like we might want a plan for a spend of this magnitude
0 references
I love the work and concept the studio is bringing here, but voted a no because I dont see a plan for getting this video seen. Id change my vote if the team is able to come back with a plan for generating views. Unlike BAYC, or any centralized project, we have no in house marketing team that can effectively make use of the content, so by default that responsibility falls on the proposing team.
0 references
Although I generally support reducing friction for builders, I dont believe that temporarily lowering the quorum is the correct approach. If nouns proliferate well and maintain the current price, well run into the exact same problem later. Although well-intentioned, this only kicks the can down the road, where we should be looking for alternative solutions like autonomous proposals à la Compound / Uniswap.
0 references
Although Im very excited to fund builders on the expectation of (or based on the history of) great impact, Im generally more weary of funding effort as an end goal in itself.
0 references
I know too little about the business of whisky to be able to make an informed vote here. Best of luck to the proposer!
0 references
I dont understand enough about esports to make a decision on an ask of this magnitude. In theory not opposed to it, but would like other nouners more familiar with this area to chime in.
0 references
Generally, we believe that getting better at governance is imperative for Nouns DAO, so welcome and support all builders working in this space! To wit, were coordinating with HON to host a debate to bring more discussion to their prop. However, given that Agora shares some overlap with HON, we are refraining from directly commenting on this prop and are voting abstain onchain, so as to not bias the DAOs decision.
0 references
Abstaining to avoid any potential conflicts of interest, as Martin is also a part time paid contributor to Agora, and because Im moderating the Agora Townhall debate on this proposal.
0 references
Abstaining due to being a member of UglyDAO who is not working on this specific prop. This is not saying prop builders should avoid voting on their own props, just personally want to steer 100% clear of any potential conflicts of interest in this specific instance
0 references
Abstaining because I do not understand enough about the historical context of the NAC to make an informed decision here.
0 references
