Proposal 202 (Q1861)
From Nouns Dev
A Nouns proposal.
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Proposal 202 |
A Nouns proposal. |
Statements
9 January 2023
0 references
133
0 references
202
0 references
85
0 references
31
0 references
nouns.eth: set reverse record --- --- Hi hello, --- --- This is a simple proposal to set the reverse record from the treasury to be nouns.eth. By setting this reverse record, anyone will be able to easily send anything to Nouns by simply inputting nouns.eth. --- --- There are over [50 Nounish DAOs]( that are donating a nounders reward to Nouns, and with [Prop 190]( we are now minting onchain. Unless you happen to know the Nouns address by memory it's not obvious. --- --- , it will be increasingly important that the community can easily recognize if something is coming from Nouns or not—setting the reverse record does just that. --- --- I've also added a 1 ETH payment to myself for the idea.
0 references
nouns.eth: set reverse record
0 references
had sticker shock at first but 1 eth is OK considering we want to set precedent to encourage others to identify useful things for the DAO, figure out how to do it and presenting it in a prop thats clear. ideas are valuable and should be compensated for.
0 references
This was a task that was available to do for over a year, and yet no one did it. I personally would have preferred to go with less than 1Ξ. But, I like the originality and the precedent this sets. Do a bit of work, ask for a small payment. More people should do it, and the DAO should continue incentivizing it by voting yes.
0 references
brand awareness enabled by this change worth far more than 1 ETH so the reward is warranted
0 references
Initially was against this, but decided to vote Yes because ultimately its important to send the message that ideas and small tasks are still valuable to the DAO. I think 0.1-0.5 ETH is probably a better range, but I doubt its going to get reproposed after the other proposal so will still vote yes here.
0 references
1 ETH is too high, but 0 is too low. Ultimately, this is a valuable proposal.
0 references
identifying a thing that the dao would actually find very useful + figuring out how to do it + presenting it in a prop that is clear = much more valuable than 1 ETH. we want more of this than less. why not comp on value?
0 references
Idk if this sets a weird precedent or whatever but jacob does so much good for this _movement_ Im happy to give him 1 eth
0 references
People seem to be voting against this because there is an alternative proposal with no reward to Jacob. Time and ideas are valuable, and I dont think Nouns DAO wants a reputation for being miserly. Jacob had the idea, spent time figuring out the transaction, and made a clear proposal with a nice graphic. 1 ETH is a reasonable reward.
0 references
I believe that work, no matter how small should be compensated. Is 1 ETH too high for this work, yes for sure. Id think it worth maybe 0.1-0.2 ETH. However, its within the right ballpark, so believe its worth it to signal our willingness to pay for contribution.
0 references
ideas are valuable and so is execution. pay the man. id like to see more bite-sized improvements like this. and being paid to make them is a good way to invite more.
0 references
12
**Nouncil Vote:** 31 Yes, 30 No, 1 Abstain 8 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **vsvsvs** | *How had this not already been in place -- my first Hell yess* **Josep** | *Amazing idea, Nouns gets lot of transactions and this would be helpfull.* **Brook** | *the provision of 1 Ξ for suggesting an idea sets an interesting precedent. wonder what it means for upcoming props such as prop 194* **lilpizza.eth** | *great idea, but the 1 eth bounty for it seems excessive. I would vote yes without it.* **JoelCares** | *1 ETH feels excessive here.* **pemburux** | *I agree with the idea, but for the value of 1 ETH I cant agree with it yet* **andreitr** | *Love the simplicity and utility of this proposal but voting against it - I am concerned about the precedent 1ETH compensation sets for the future props.* **0xDariush** | *I love to see that but agree with you all, 1 Eth make no sense for a simple transaction and I dont call it an idea to be honest.* *But Im wondering why they didnt set the ENS til now anyway* *I see foundation.nouns.eth 0x37b8e20646d174b00198b7e183dd1f25520c0f60 owns that ENS at the moment.* **kerimbonia** | *im all for compensating nouns contributors for their time and ideas, but a 1eth tip is a bit exaggerated. if there was some breakdown of time spent working on the prop with reference to how others have been compensated in the past for similar ideas or work, i think the tip could be justified.* **JoshuaFisher** | *idea is cool but why the extra 1eth fee haha* **Benbodhi** | *I like the idea and rewarding ideas but feel like 1 eth for it might be a bit high. Especially considering that a second version of this prop went up without the reward.* **Mindtoasted** | *The idea is simple but for 1 eth its kinda hard to agree on this, IMO it just less reasonable* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
0 references
i like the art, but the people said no
0 references
Not against funding or paying for ideas or proposals. Somewhat against the size of the ask vs the size of the idea here and the proposer setting the price for their idea. Think we should come up with better mechanisms for doing this though.
0 references
I hope nobody on Zora or Jacob takes these results personally, they are some of the top builders at Nouns in terms of idea creation and execution
0 references
Voting no on this prop because of the free alternative with proposal 205. This doesnt set a negative precedent since a healthy competitive atmosphere for funding is positive for Nouns and the treasury.
0 references
Nounseth
0 references
9 January 2023
0 references
Abstaining from this vote due to my vote on Prop 205.
0 references
Love the idea and also think rewarding for cool ideas is positive. But 1eth feels a bit steep. Considering theres another prop to do it as well, it makes sense for the DAO to just vote for the other one.
0 references
1
0 references
1
0 references
1
0 references
3
0 references
