Proposal 184 (Q1834)
From Nouns Dev
A Nouns proposal.
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Proposal 184 |
A Nouns proposal. |
Statements
55
0 references
184
0 references
185
0 references
Nouns funding ZachXBT
0 references
8 December 2022
0 references
2
0 references
Thank you, your work has helped so many and continues to do so.
0 references
Protect Zach at all costs.
0 references
23
https://postimg.cc/XXxzy5Cm
0 references
No brainer – ZachXBT is a huge value add to the ecosystem
0 references
https://create.zora.co/collections/0xb6e8e1b617a10f0123c9bd57011493754ff6a361
0 references
Voted yes last time, and will vote yes again when this one is canceled.
0 references
I voted yes on the cancelled prop and I’m voting yes again. This is something we were hoping to do through tings.wtf so it’s amazing to see more attention and larger treasury to allocate funds to a public good like this. Very nounish ⌐◨-◨
0 references
11
**Nouncil Vote:** 48 Yes, 3 No, 1 Abstain 4 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **0xFloyd** | *I view this as a crypto public service that benefits our whole industry* **Mach** | *same as before* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *ZachXBT is a machine & does great work for the web3 space* **Benbodhi** | *Zach’s work is a public good that benefits the entire space and hes clearly underfunded. Very nounish to help here.* **.ZllW** | *What Zach is doing is clearly good for the web3 space; a form of public goods that should be recognized. Yes for me.* **BitcoinBob ⌐◨-◨** | *yes* **Mindtoasted** | *Its still the same as what I voted before, from how detailed Zach investigated and revealed several projects in the past this could be a good new insight for Nouns. lately i personally follow some influential twitter people who provide good and bad concrete information in crypto space, in fact we need someone like this so I vote yes* **kerimbonia** | *full support for the work ZachXBT does so its a strong yes from me.* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
0 references
Love this - one thing I wish is we made it more formal with zach Like end some threads with a sponsored by nouns or smth like that His threads get so many views but just funding him doesnt mean we will get the same reach regardless, voting yes ❤ z
0 references
Nouns
0 references
8 December 2022
0 references
Too much ETH for an established member of the ecosystem. Id rather see 10 eth go to 10 new builders.
0 references
Voting against since I had in thr first iteration of the prop. I think the prop lacks a bit of context and explanation of how the donation amount was chosen. Also, not clear if ZachXBT needs the money or is well off enough to not need the 100 ETH.
0 references
100
0 references
0
0 references
100
0 references
1
0 references
The author is resubmitting a proposal to fund ZachXBT, a public good in the crypto ecosystem known for exposing scams, with 100 ETH. The proposal was previously cancelled due to an error on the authors part. The author acknowledges that donations have been controversial within Nouns governance, citing past contentious votes.
0 references
