0x021edd67d43b365a6401a5ee704aa6f264f3f4e4 (Q2772)
From Nouns Dev
Individual
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | 0x021edd67d43b365a6401a5ee704aa6f264f3f4e4 |
Individual |
Statements
Im excited about this experiment. In general I would love to see extra clarity, effort, and details on how props which have large visual marketing componants will address art direction and design. I think the bar here should be raised a bit. Either a proven design team attached or great mock ups would make a big difference. I have been assured directly by the team on this prop that they will be prioritisng this and that a design team will be engaged and budget is earmarked for this specifically. Good luck to them!
0 references
more time means potential to increase voter turnout, more thoughtful voting, more potential for feedback and production discussion. yes please
0 references
an experiment worth running, excited and hopeful to see what comes from it
0 references
it appears CDT has been continuing to bring great value to the DAO and we should keep this good thing going
0 references
> This doesnt have to mean that every year we neccesarily reward the community for contributions to any other noundry upgrades this way (if we set expectations/rewards ahead of time especially, it should be much cleaner next time), but this past year it was an all-in group effort where a lot of value was created by many of the artists who ultimately didnt make it into the final collection. If we’re retroactively rewarding the winners and committee (without rules ahead of time) it feels fair and honest to also share some of that with the a wider set of contributors to the process. The downside feels limited, and curious to see how these funds get shared around. Hopefully with very limited GIVES per coordinape participants, this is going to reward the top contributors as judged by the community. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
echoing sentiments from both Noun 12 and Noun 40
0 references
TL;DR High in novelty, but to low impact (limited proliferation) Even though I appreciate the enthusiasm, effort, ingenuity, and novelty of this proposal and proposer, and I love to see the experimentation of the DAO being able to vote on distribution of phsysical goods, I am against this particular implamentation. Putting aside the fact that all Nouners can afford to buy these glasses, and there is plenty of supply still available, handing out any of these glasses to Noun holders is possibly the lowest leverage opportunity for their distribution. Prop 185 was a much more thoughtful approach and I assume it will be much more impactful. I would prefer we hold our supply and execute on highest impact opportunities with focus on proliferation or brand building by association.
0 references
we need to fund more meaningful (or at the very least novel) ways to increase awareness about Nouns. If we ask for attention, what are we giving in return? What meaning are we impressing on people? Without considering these things and just contiuning to be around we will fail to make the kind of impact we want. Not a huge harm, but were sending the wrong signal to builders about what we need. Additionally this prop is lacking crucial details about what imagery actually appears and how. I think if the DAO ever funds image based advertising again it should either include mockups or proofs that both give clarity of what were getting, and to instill confidence that the team can represent the brand in a high quality manner (unless perhaps the builder/artist has such an awesome reputation that).
0 references
