0xaec4075e4fc8ce829bc4f0cfd5e2fa10dd2b12d1 (Q213)
From Nouns Dev
Individual
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | 0xaec4075e4fc8ce829bc4f0cfd5e2fa10dd2b12d1 |
Individual |
Statements
I believe that setting the quorum at 20% is too high considering the usual voter participation rates; hence, I voted against raising it to this level. My preference lies in risking the possibility of some less impressive proposals being passed, rather than obstructing potentially high-quality proposals, which could occur if a dominant group within the DAO opposes them.
0 references
I appreciate all for and against comments as I think both sides can be simultaneously logically sound. I especially appreciate those that support other Nouners work and Nounish integrations of said work with the DAO.
0 references
Nouns needs a communication plaza. Funding Oni increases capacity of The Jungle to handle current, new, and hopefully other existing Nouners to be the go-to place to advance the DAO.
0 references
Come and listen, friends, to this tale Ill tell, Of a new way to reach consensus thats swell, No more choosing just between black or white, Functional props allow for shades of light. These proposals hold the key, To unlock a new form of democracy, Where opinions can truly be expressed, And progress can be made with greater finesse. Gone is the limited choice that leads us astray, No longer a binary path that holds sway, Functional props usher in a world of grey, And pave the path for a better future today. So let us cast our votes for functional props, And usher in a future that pops, Where diverse opinions can have their say, And chart a new course in every way. For in this world of nuanced shades, We find endless possibility cascades, A place where progress can truly play, And shape a future thats bright and gay.
0 references
Nobody should feel they have to vote against their true opinion due to social pressure. When voting is private, were able to express our opinions and preferences without fear of retaliation. This can lead to a more diverse range of viewpoints being considered and ultimately result in better decision-making for Nouns. Additionally, private voting can also help prevent vote buying and manipulation, ensuring that the outcome of the vote truly reflects the will of the community.
0 references
I checked the numbers and checked again, its was for real, my lottery win! Did a jig and whooped and cheered, nearly deafened everyones ears. My Mothers spirit gave those numbers to me, them in a dream I did truly see; shed always said that she would do it, a promise I just knew that shed stick to it. Mom played lotteries her whole life, with numbers and challenges, her days were rife! When I started playing, shed promised me, if not her she help me win the lottery. For years the numbers did fill my dreams, Moms spirit tried to fulfill her promise it seemed; Id play that lottery religiously, knowing one day, rich Id be. Oh how excited I was to see, the numbers 18, 24, 36, 47, 69, 33. Then my eyes veered to the ticket date; what a letdown, Id bought it a day too late!
0 references
Voting for because its a good prop but would have felt more comfortable if there was a distribution plan. Every content creation prop should include a distribution plan. This should be standard we enforce.
0 references
Nice prop. I also like how there is a clear cost breakdown. Other props should do similar breakdowns that involve market prices, time, rate, etc. Don’t forget to 3d filter my Nounicorn found here: https://nounicorn.nftr.name
0 references
This is more like the way content creation proposals should be structured
0 references
5 and 5 has barely hit the sweet-spot. At this point, going any longer is just too long.
0 references
Amazing work, but ask is big without sufficient breakdown detail. Would love to see another version of this prop with either an ask that goes 2x instead of 10x, or budget detail justifying why 10x is necessary at this point.
0 references
Voting against since I had in thr first iteration of the prop. I think the prop lacks a bit of context and explanation of how the donation amount was chosen. Also, not clear if ZachXBT needs the money or is well off enough to not need the 100 ETH.
0 references
