Proposal 191 (Q1823)

From Nouns Dev
A Nouns proposal.
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Proposal 191
A Nouns proposal.

    Statements

    0 references
    0 references
    81
    0 references
    Nouns Love v1.0 / Mucho Love v1.25
    0 references
    16 December 2022
    0 references
    191
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    101
    0 references
    38
    0 references
    In support of a Social Good arm to Nouns that oversees / partners with some of the charity proposals. Social good content can do exceptionally well on Socials with the right video and production team.
    0 references
    I dont quite know if the nouns virtuous cycle works with scaling charitable giving (unlike building public goods that remain). there feels a bit too little discussion / accountability about the impact the past funding has had for the nouns brand building (beyond the social good it has done, which to be clear I appreciate but we cant infinitely fund all social goods).
    0 references
    Love the good this crew has been doing. Would like to see more coverage of it ongoing. Expanding globally makes sense to me. ⌐◨-◨
    0 references
    **Nouncil Vote:** 30 Yes, 11 No, 1 Abstain 6 Nouncillors abstained from the decision **YES WINS** --- **Vote Reasons & Discussion** --- **0xapril** | *Really love what mucho loved did. I think its great idea to expand what they did to world wide.* **heyjeff.eth** | *mucho love is bringing real change by directly interacting with people, that is very powerful* **Benbodhi** | *Nouns being recognised/learnt about it in this context is powerful. Nouns are good.* *⌐◨-◨* **Wattsy** | *This project seems to straddle both the overly ambitious context, as well as being hard to follow past the marketing in terms of truly actionable and measurable results.* **byhardy** | *Love having a charity arm of Nouns & I really really love the content arm. Social good content has huge potential. But retrofunding should be better explained to include past funding sources & why theyre being retrofunded. Also would like more transparency in how $$$ is being spent & on who? What are their roles? Why is the price of activations what it is (albeit reasonable)? Just need more answers here.* **Mindtoasted** | *IMO, Its a huge amount of request, with all the funding budget details for a 4 month time extension, it also proven that the previous proposal was running great, but Im not sure to vote yes for this amount of request so I vote no.* **Mach** | *Too much personnel pay to production usage. 50-50 is too much.* **RyanMac ⌐◨-◨** | *self explanatory* --- For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil
    0 references
    Although I really like the group and the cause, Im voting no as there is very little detail on how the money will be spent, who is getting paid and how much. Would welcome the prop again once these details are better described.
    0 references
    To be candid I couldnt figure out what this proposal was aiming to build - while Im a fan of nounish charitable efforts, for me I wasnt sure what Nouns Love *was* after reading this proposal - especially given the high amount of folks working on this for many months outlined in the proposal. So I was not ready to vote yes here.
    0 references
    Id prefer this budget be broken down by activation rather than by role. Doing so (assuming its reasonable) would get a yes from me.
    0 references
    https://twitter.com/niftynaut/status/1604877475363794944
    0 references
    Voting no on all charitable giving that does not incorporate extremely transparent oversight/accountability. Also would prefer the treasury give 100 ETH two years from now (when its worth 1M USD), than 100 ETH mid-bear market (when its worth 100k).
    0 references
    Im confused by this prop, lot of the expense is retro funding. But there had been funding previously to run other activities by this group. I am not sure this props outcomes are worth the cost, mostly as is.
    0 references
    16 December 2022
    0 references
    What is the TLDL of people voting No?
    Some people voting No have not provided concrete reasons or feedback. One suggestion was to scale down the proposal and fund it in tranches, such as funding the next 3 months and then reassessing if things are going well. This approach might make it easier for the proposal to pass.
    0 references
    159
    0 references
    32
    0 references
    191
    0 references
    67
    0 references
    Mucho loves team
    0 references
    Mucho Love and Nouns Love are social impact platforms that aim to expand their reach through content creation and storytelling. Mucho Love follows a see good, do good format and has been operating for six months. Nouns Love plans to use content from social impact, public goods, and charitable efforts to expand its reach.
    0 references
    6
    0 references