0x5606b493c51316a9e65c9b2a00bbf7ff92515a3e (Q390)
From Nouns Dev
Individual
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | 0x5606b493c51316a9e65c9b2a00bbf7ff92515a3e |
Individual |
Statements
29
I dont think that OPTIONAL branding is enough of a tie-in with Nouns, would support a version of this proposal with deeper synergies. non-optional branding at minimum
0 references
29
agree with Scott Lewis re: political statements
0 references
29
will consider voting for a version of this proposal with better economics. Agree fully with noun12 here
0 references
29
I largely agree with Wilson. Would rather set a precedent that a much larger percentage of droposal revenue should go Nouns, even if it means funding the work ourselves.
0 references
23
I think this project is clever and wish it success. But I fail to see why it should be launched via DAO proposal, especially without a share of open edition proceeds going to the treasury.
0 references
26
The DAO already paid to own 7k copies per issue that we can choose to distribute, that is a sufficient amount of demand subsidy imo. If we were getting wholesale cost that might sway things a little bit.
0 references
26
Thanks for the proposal! It would be very useful to have DAO-owned and managed vaults. That said, the catch up fees proposed are too high, and the specific strategies are not great r/r. Would welcome a resubmission of this proposal in the future.
0 references
25
I do NOT support a complete speeding freeze, but just happen to think that the redundancy with prop house makes this proposal not worth allocating resources to
0 references
25
not happy with current value accrual to nounsdao. Other DAOs are happy customers of prop house without bankrolling the operation.
0 references
29
I really like the artmatr technology and there is probably a smaller scope collaboration with them that I would support, but this is too ambitious and not targeted enough
0 references
fine to try this out but not endorsing the product
0 references
29
I think this is worth trying, stream should be cancelled if this does not bring in new people and increase participation
0 references
24
Increasing maximum quorum should increase the percentage of successful proposals that are hell yes initiatives. Why fund marginal controversial proposals when there are plenty of great ones passing nearly unanimously?
0 references
19
Nouns will succeed if A+ people make A+ proposals below market rate because their are strong synergies generated by working together
0 references
25
think this proposal is a good example of what can be delivered with a small amount of funding. Other proposers should take note. Excited to see results and hopefully re-use the 3d assets developed here in future work
0 references
26
no strong opinion on this proposal. Voting NO to increase quorum. If people have conviction on this then it should easily pass even with higher quorum.
0 references
