Proposal 246 (Q121)
From Nouns Dev
A Nouns proposal.
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Proposal 246 |
A Nouns proposal. |
Statements
87
0 references
Nouns Proposal Tracker
0 references
246
0 references
25
0 references
2
0 references
1 March 2023
0 references
Deployer
0 references
Full reasoning on my newsletter: https://cbites.substack.com/p/active-governance-noun-582-3
0 references
1 March 2023
0 references
0
0 references
3
0 references
33
0 references
33
0 references
1
0 references
The Nouns Proposal Tracker is a proposed solution to track the status of funded proposals by Nouns. Currently, its challenging to determine the status of these proposals, which could be comp leted, in progress, or rugged.
0 references
Reposting from Twitter: Although I’m all for accountability and transparency at the DAO, I’m not sure it’s a technical issue but more of a cultural/people issue… what would compel proposers to use this tool if it were available? We already have other mediums for updates…
There needs to be a tool for easy communication between funded proposers and DAO members, and the DAO should suggest that proposers update if they are funded. The proposal owner should have guidelines on how to update the DAO and where to post updates. By including a UI layer in the same place where proposals are raised, it implies that teams are expected to share status and outcomes. Incentivizing status updates could be considered after rollout if updates are not being shared.
0 references
Thanks Juan, will copy my response here as well. I think it is in part technical. There's no central place for proposal owners to update the DAO and we don't suggest that they do. 1) There needs to be a tool for easy communication between funded proposers and DAO members and 2) the DAO needs to suggest that proposers update if they are funded.--Here is my response from Twitter as well--> I think the DAO should suggest that builders give updates if they are funded. This is not an unreasonable request. This suggestion could be made during the proposal flow. Not a definitive rule, but a suggestion that conveys the message We have this tool and you should use it because we love updates and enjoy seeing your progress. I'm not aware of any suggestions of how a proposal owner might update the DAO, or actions they should take after they are funded. --> Without a central discord, Noun communication is fragmented. How does a proposal owner know where to post updates? There should be guidelines around accountability once funded and we should provide a place for builders to give updates to the DAO.
There needs to be a tool for easy communication between funded proposers and DAO members, and the DAO should suggest that proposers provide updates if they are funded. This suggestion could be made during the proposal flow. There should be guidelines around accountability once funded, and a place should be provided for builders to give updates to the DAO.
0 references
What are thoughts around incentivizing people to submit updates? What if there were something like a multi-sig module where you could only pay yourself from the multi-sig if you submitted some sort of update? --1. nouns funds proposal to multi-sig with update/accountability module enabled-2. person does some work, decides to pay themselves-3. person submits updates, which unlocks ability to pay themselves--There wouldn't need to be any sort of approval mechanism. Of course that could be added, but even having something where you are encouraged to submit a note about why you are paying yourself with updates along the way could be interesting, and would maybe provide the incentive layer. --Then, if people were interested, there could be a lightweight UI that aggregates these updates with the payment receipts so there is a central place to viewing payment requests as a response to completing work.--Just a thought.
There is currently no specific system in place for incentivizing people to submit updates. However, the idea of a multi-sig module where proposers can only pay themselves after submitting updates has been suggested. This could potentially encourage more transparency and accountability. The conversation also highlights the importance of having a central place for proposal owners to update the DAO and suggests that guidelines should be provided for better communication between funded proposers and DAO members.
0 references
