Proposal 167 (Q1836)
From Nouns Dev
A Nouns proposal.
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Proposal 167 |
A Nouns proposal. |
Statements
Nouns Builder Protocol
0 references
74
0 references
143
0 references
1 November 2022
0 references
108
0 references
167
0 references
1000 ETH is too high, especially upfront in one tranche and when Zora has its own treasury. Would reconsider if tranched into milestones/deliverables and lower aggregate ETH amounts. Tool is wonderful.
0 references
We are big fans of Builder and Zora, but we would love to see some traction or more details on how they would deploy the capital (criteria, vetting, etc). We would encourage the team to provide more details and/or lower their initial ask with the intention to return for a larger ask once there is demonstrable traction in the market.
0 references
We are big fans of Builder and Zora, but we would love to see some traction first or more details on how they would deploy the capital (criteria, vetting, etc). We would encourage the team to provide more details and/or lower their initial ask with the intention to return for a larger ask once there is demonstrable traction in the market.
0 references
1000 ETH is too high. Love the product, but Prop House could have been utilized to build this tool several times over for that amount. A lot of talented builders would have jumped at the opportunity to build this for far less. Zora has raised at least $50MM and is now requesting that Nouns bootstrap the treasury of a DAO that may or may not see any traction. Assuming Zora will control Builder DAO for awhile. What will the funds be used for? Will there be a vote by builder DAO to reimburse Zora? Unfortunately there are too many questions for me to vote yes on such a big ask.
0 references
Plenty of forks exist, this tool is only to bring the lowest effort forks into being. This will bring little to no new builders. Prop house is MUCH higher ROI. Generally speaking, we could do much more with $1.5M. Further, Zora got $50M to build tooling - why do they need a one-off payment of $1.5M from nouns? This is a disservice to both their investors and their business. They should seeking subscriptions for their tools, not more one-off vc-style funding.
0 references
11
Im voting NO on virtually all proposals (with high ETH asks) for the foreseeable future. Lets spend our time and our resources on prop house, thats where we can get the best bang for our buck.
0 references
52
devcarrot: I recommend we vote No on this proposal because Nouns Builder is early in its lifecycle and I havent seen much firm information on the charter or direction for Nouns Builder DAO in regards to what its treasury should be used for aside from generalize-able Nounish tooling. At the same time, the new Nouns Builder DAO would have a risk of fund extraction. Even though a veto power exists, this power comes with a coordination cost if secured correctly. Having a large imbalance between the auction proceeds and the DAOs treasury early on in the process feels dangerous to me. Id be amenable if this were a smaller initial seed, the NounsDAO were to follow on by amplifying proposals/prop-house rounds/grant pools/etc. after the Nouns Builder DAO is formed, or the NounsDAO were to purchase Nouns Builder DAO votes during the auction. 9999: Thanks to Zora for effort and dedication to building with Nouns. I’m voting against because I feel this proposal and Builder DAO itself need refinements before an ask of this size. My concerns are these: If this tool truly needs to be a DAO the market will signal as such using the auction price of its governing NFTs. Just like all other Nounish DAOs, Builder should grow its community and treasury from natural demand and develop its ecosystem with people who understand its vision. If the tool is not meant to be a DAO, then with no proven track-record, the ask for 1000ETH to jump-start demand is overkill. All other large scale, long-term projects/pods have started small and demonstrated demand before asking for outsized funding (See [Prop House Protocol: Public Infrastructure by Nouns DAO](https://discourse.nouns.wtf/t/prop-house-protocol-public-infrastructure-by-nouns-dao/1594) as cited in this proposal). Builder currently has no metrics to match the size of this ask. The Zora team should decide which approach to take. If the former, it doesn’t make sense to come to Nouns DAO for a treasury injection. If the latter, the project should first gather momentum before an ask of this size can be considered a hell yes. Thanks again.
0 references
applying the nouns model directly is silly
0 references
too big of an investment into something with unknown PMF
0 references
Seeding Builder DAO with 1000 ETH does not feel maximally nounish to me. I believe that Builder DAO should use their own tool, launch their own DAO, and raise the funds via their own daily auction. Have more faith in the tool, the protocol, etc., and lead by example. Presumably, every other DAO that launches with this tool will attempt to raise the majority of their capital via the auctions just as the OG Nouns DAO has done. So it seems odd to me that the DAO governing the tool is circumventing the mechanic their own tool provides to raise the majority of their capital. Even something like Auction #1 going to Nouns DAO for 1000 ETH sits better with me than just sending the 1000 ETH over. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
14
24 yes, 25 No, 3 Abstain ___ **SuperTightWoody** ONE THOUSAND ETH....BRO We could buy a country **Mach** id prefer to start with a smaller seed if anything to see viability and how it evolves it is pretty exciting to think about the potential of this **profwerder** BIG ASK --- but tremendous what has been created and its a set tool that will exist forever. Is it a crazy amount of $? yeah but I think this is an insane value. I changed my vote to NO but its truly just because of the ask. If we can get this prop revised to a better place, Ill be a yes again. Best scenario would be funding distributed over time and/or tied to milestones. **Sidenoun** I think the ask is of a significant amount. I’m clearly not alone in thinking so. As a developer, I’m very appreciative of the work that goes into any project, let alone one that has this type of deliverable. The ZORA team are of course a team that I’d vote for. However, that said and with some of the comments on the Nouncil call regarding the hefty request. I think, it’d make some sense to potentially gradually retrospectively reward as we see the success of the protocol roll out to more DAO’s. I can’t cite who made the comment regarding marketing, but I feel that’s probably something that this prop is missing in terms of information. Not just for Nouns, but for those opting to use it. **systemdm.⌐◨-◨** I think this is an amazing Change the world kind of thing!!! ✊🏻✊🏻✊🏻 **andrewladdusaw** Im shocked at how confident I feel in this 1000 ETH ask. Jacob is a thought leader in the entire space. Zora is one of the premier orgs in the space. They are already heavily invested with 20 Nouns of their own. They have already delivered the product on their own dime. PLUS, this is not a retro reward, its funding a DAO with the goal of furthering the incredible work thats already been done. Im trying not to speak in hyperbole here, but I think this has the potential to be a really special thing, not just for Nouns, but the future of crypto. Im still not 100% on where I land on this. All my previous comments still stand on my belief in the tool and the team. I still think its going to be game changer. I originally told them I thought a huge retro should be offered for a free tool, but that amount in my mind was like 250. When you factor the audit costs they referenced as well, Id be closer to 350-400. Admittedly, I h
0 references
I like the builder and the potential for more external proliferation, but this is a no for me in its current form. Yes, its a lot of money but the overall structure of the proposal is vague and not exciting on paper. I think a proposal this large (if it has the votes internally or not) should help with making the community understand what they are doing and why its exciting. There are numerous ways to do this via videos, spaces, interviews or AMA in a Discord etc. The other thing I would have liked to see is a smaller ask up front with benchmarks and timeline for additional funding periods. This is going to pass and I am actually excited to see the potential outward proliferation here, would like to see others in the community excited as well via a communicative proposal layout with community engagement ❤️ #Ugly
0 references
Im not convinced that we should be making a binary decision on this. Nor am I convinced that they need all 1000 ETH right away to bootstrap the DAO. My biggest concern with this proposal is that its all or nothing. this is a common issue with Nouns proposals. I would much prefer a more milestone-based approach when proposals are being written. I know thats not built into the system right now, but perhaps proposals asking for a large amount can be split up into several smaller ones.
0 references
This is one of the highest leverage props being worked on right now. Yes, the ETH outlay *is* high for us, but sincerely believe this idea is a bet worth making and this team is the one to bet on to do it. The success case: This product spawns thousands of *high-quality* nounish DAOs. Each success will further cement nouns as the OG, which is recognized for inventing a new form factor for collective action. The failure case: we spend ~15 days of treasury sales Zora is making a huge bet on Nouns — and I can’t tell you how thrilled I am to see such a high-caliber team bet on nouns the way they have. Resounding yes
0 references
23
As many people have expressed in their vote reasons and discussions in Nouncil and on The Noun Square this week, the 1000ETH ask DOES initially feel high, and has made many (myself included) think twice about supporting the proposal in its current form. However, I think what Noun40 said in his reason sums up where I have landed, in framing this as a “very ambitious rather than a greedy proposal. As he points out, the ETH will not be earmarked for retroactive development, but rather paid forward to the new DAO to drive new nounish proliferation. So, while I would have preferred a smaller ask or a stream for risk management reasons, I do think Zora has proven their alignment (by purchasing 20 Nouns and building free infra for the DAO) and I think we should take a chance and afford them this ambitious mandate to match and magnify the impact of Prop House on the ecosystem. Over the past week, I have heard of at least 6-7 people anecdotally in my circles with plans to use the builder imminently for various projects and I think it can play a really important role as a 1-click-align-with-nouns tool, especially when paired with Prop House mandates and strategic builder funding going forward. I also want to say that I think the future success of the DAO depends greatly on allocating funds to a bigger number of trusted groups, who can do more targeted allocation than the DAO as a whole can do with on-chain proposals alone. This is what makes flexible pools like NSFW important. Its what makes Prop House so damn effective. Its what makes The Noun Square contests and challenges so Ev+. And so likewise, I think (hope) that having a talented, ambitious and fully-aligned team like Zora allocating capital to an even broader pool of builders alongside the above initiatives will hopefully help bring nounish proliferation to the next level. For that reason, Im voting YES with my delegated votes.
0 references
19
I have been a very outspoken supporter of the Builder tool for some time, and I view it as a potential piece of core infra to scaling the Nouns protocol. However, like many others, my initial reaction was that the 1000 ETH to bootstrap the DAO is a major ask - one that the DAO needs to carefully consider. After discussing this in depth with the team and other Nouners, I am comfortable voting yes on this exciting and ambitious proposal.
0 references
Unlocking this tool for communities/builders without a technical background is a huge value add for help Nouns proliferate the meme as well as the DAO mechanisms we know and love. Im excited to look back on this a year/years from now and see what the most successful/prominent new communities that have spawned from this tool that may have been unable to do so without it.
0 references
<insert noun40_reason.txt>
0 references
Hesitant YES as we shouldnt be funding 1000 ETH proposals without more validation of the idea. We could have done this one in 2-3 installments. Decided to vote YES because the Zora team holds >20 Nouns and is a respectable member of the community.
0 references
I disagree with takes that 1000 ETH is some outlandish / greedy move by Zora. This is a free open source protocol they are committing to building that would directly help proliferate nouns. They have put in 4 months of their product development time already + 100 ETH to the code audit and are NOT asking to be retroactively compensated for their dev costs but rather for a commensurate commitment from us to help fund an endowment of this public good. The funding will go to further build and proliferate the protocol. They are financially aligned with nouns by owning 20 nouns themselves. This is a fair, well-aligned, ambitiously nounish situation, and I wholeheartedly vote FOR.
0 references
What Noun40 said. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRbfFDB8I0g
0 references
This is a large sum to seed a sub dao with. But I think it could lead to substantial bids to help grow the treasury in a meaningful way and potentially fund some amazing work into the future. The fact that’s it’s a treasury seed and not compensation for such an immense task is testament to the team’s nounishness imo ⌐◨-◨
0 references
Buildooors 🤝 Sharks Excited to see what BuilderDAO develops to help make it easier and more fun to build on Nouns. So much room for activities!
0 references
Nouns builder is one of the most ambitious projects to come out of Nouns, and one of our best shots at proliferating the meme far beyond its reach today. Already, Purple DAO has proliferated the Nounish meme to a new community focused on an entirely different mission, and I expect many more of these to come. 1000 ETH is without a doubt a big ask, but if anything, the size makes more more excited than not – especially given the fact that its used to fund the Builders DAO vs retro-paying the Zora team. As Nouns DAO gets bigger, we must also scale up the size of our bets in order to keep having meaningful impact relative to our size– and I can think of no better team than Zora to carry out such an initiative.
0 references
this is a big ask which obviously comes with a big risk. but im optimistic on where Nouns Builder and the projects that come out of it will lead us, and on the builders that will be creating exciting, new tools through prop house & builder dao.
0 references
Nouns Builder is an ambitious multidisciplinary effort that will allow a variety of communities to experiment with nounish models. This is a great way to both proliferate the meme and test new DAO parameters in production. Although the funding requested is large, it is commensurate with the work involved and the plan for allocating funds is well-reasoned. The world is a better place with more nounish DAOs.
0 references
Zora and nounsdao
0 references
1 November 2022
0 references
Definitely one of the more existential proposals so far. I love the development of open source, scalable infrastructure. Ive had a couple of issues with the website but think theyll get sorted out easily. It begs the question for Nouners: what should the revenue model of these third parties be? Can people expect to build open source stuff and be compensated by Nouns, or will these third-party platforms expect to monetize thru subscriptions/ads/etc? Weve had some of the same questions at Collective/House of Nouns.
0 references
4
0 references
0
0 references
1,000
0 references
1,000
0 references
The Nouns Builder Protocol is a tool developed by Zora and NounsDAO that allows anyone to create their own Nouns DAO with any art, auction cadence, and flexible DAOs. The tool is designe d to enable communities to progressively emerge and actively participate in their brand and community evolution.
0 references
2
0 references
This Week:-1. Formation of a council of representatives from each DAO is discussed.-2. A proposed Ops Working Group is responsible for managing and paying ops service providers.-3. The Builder Nouncil is clarified as being different from the Operational Working Group.-4. A draft proposal to update admin authorization is mentioned.-5. Tension arises between users, with calls for more constructive and respectful communication.
0 references
This Week:-1. Builder DAO has 78 total members.-2. 40 members voted within the last 30 days.-3. There are 173 total tokens.-4. The treasury holds 713.09 ETH ($1,318,919).-5. No active proposals are present.-6. Auctions for Builders #172 to #179 have started and settled, with winning bids ranging from 0.11Ξ to 0.22Ξ.
0 references
This week:-1. Users discuss Builder DAO, Nouns Builder, and Noggles.-2. Profwerder welcomes new members and directs them to resources for getting started.-3. Roko answers questions about Builder DAO, its purpose, and Profwerder's involvement.-4. Users inquire about Noggles and where to get physical noggles.
0 references
This week:-1. The chat discusses the need for a solution to high gas fees in BuilderDAO, with L2 being a top priority.-2. Options include moving all of Nouns Builder to L2 or focusing on auctions and governance.-3. Profwerder emphasizes the importance of L2 for voting and putting proposals on chain.-4. A hack week is planned for June 19th, with a proposal to focus on L2.-5. Zaak mentions ongoing discussions with Base, Arbi, Starknet, and ZK to explore L2 options.-6. Jarmen suggests reaching out to Yitong from Agora for insights on working with Optimism.
0 references
This week:-1. Participants discuss a new project involving AI and robotics.-2. The need for a diverse team with skills in AI, robotics, and software development is highlighted.-3. Potential challenges include funding, competition, and the need for a strong business plan.-4. The group agrees to meet again to further discuss the project and gather more information.
0 references
This week:-1. Profwerder encourages users to add events to a Google Calendar for DAOs.-2. The group discusses name options for their organization, Bouncil and Builder Guild.-3. The importance of a code of conduct is agreed upon, with the Builder Council potentially leading it.-4. BillZ shares updates on Warpcast and Alphacaster, with Taifa.eth expressing interest in collaboration.-5. Meeting times are discussed to accommodate different time zones.-6. Profwerder suggests removing the announcement channel.-7. Zaak mentions Apecoin DAO's governance process.
0 references
This Week:-1. Billzh.eth voted YES with 2 votes.-2. Auctions for Builders #183-186 occurred, with winning bids between 0.11Ξ and 0.14Ξ.-3. Builder DAO had 78 members, with 40 voting within 30 days.-4. The treasury held 713.21 ETH.-5. A new proposal was made for FarCon 2023 Sponsorship.
0 references
This week:-1. Auction for Builder #186 is underway, with previous auctions for Builders #185, #184, and #183.-2. Oni seeks to increase community representation in NCD discord and requests two members to act as Community Liaisons.-3. The chat discusses the meaning of DAO and Nounish DAO, which utilizes NounsDAO protocol mechanics.-4. The treasury holds 713.21 ETH ($1,290,275) with 78 total members and 40 active voters.
0 references
This week:-1. John reports backend is almost complete and frontend is 50% done for the project.-2. The team agrees to meet on Friday to discuss remaining tasks and set a deadline.-3. The need for a marketing plan is discussed, and the marketing team will be involved in the next meeting.-4. Chat participants discuss a new project involving AI and blockchain, considering benefits and challenges.-5. They agree to further explore the idea and reconvene in a week to discuss progress.
0 references
This week:-1. Profwerder develops a bot to share fun facts and images from DAOs created on Nouns Builder and requests users to share their DAO information.-2. Salmanneedsajob and Zameeser discuss bidding on tokens and their interest in NFTs with DAO access.-3. BillZ offers to add Nounish DAOs to Alphacaster and mentions a proposal notification rollout for all DAOs in the coming months.-4. Profwerder announces the chosen name for their DAO as Builder Guild and plans to set up a vote for it.
0 references
This week:-1. Builder #193 auction started with a 0.0001Ξ bid from wables.eth.-2. Builder #192 auction settled with a winning bid of 0.11Ξ by 0x86B69.-3. Builder #191 auction settled with a winning bid of 0.43Ξ by thethriller.eth.-4. Builder #189 auction settled with a winning bid of 0.11Ξ by matascup.eth.-5. Builder #188 auction settled with a winning bid of 0.17Ξ by corbin.eth.-6. Builder #187 auction settled with a winning bid of 0.1Ξ by thenounishprof.eth.-7. Builder #186 auction settled with a winning bid of 0.1Ξ by thenounishprof.eth.-8. Builder #114 bought by 0xd7687 for 0.13 ETH in a secondary sale.-9. Builder #111 bought by benbodhi.eth for 0.12 ETH in a secondary sale.-10. Builder #117 bought by an unknown buyer in a secondary sale.
0 references
This Week:-1. An anonymous new DAO member is congratulated.-2. BuilderDAO auctions are announced.-3. Members discuss celebrating Bitcoin Pizza Day and share BuilderDAO fun facts.-4. TheThriller accidentally overbids on an NFT and seeks help from the community.-5. OL inquires about customizing the front-end of DAOs.-6. Profwerder confirms the possibility of embedding auction and governance pieces into different sites.
0 references
This week:-1. Zameeser and Profwerder discuss learning new skills in the web3/NFT space and Zameeser's recent art project.-2. They talk about the mission statement for Builder DAO, aiming to provide low barrier to entry web3 solutions.-3. Profwerder shares an example of a customized bot and plans to discuss vision, mission, and values further.-4. Portion Club, a community of artists, is responsible for projects like Lawbsters and Music on Chain.-5. Zameeser shares their journey as a digital artist and the support they've received from the community.-6. Profwerder sets up builderguild.eth and requests fun facts and images from DAOs created on Nouns Builder for a bot.
0 references
This week:-1. Auctions for Builders #194, #195, #196, and #197 occurred with winning bids between 0.13Ξ and 0.17Ξ.-2. Builder #193's auction started with bids ranging from 0.0001Ξ to 0.1Ξ.-3. Builder #192's auction concluded with a winning bid of 0.11Ξ.
0 references
This week:-1. BuilderDAO generative art features various symbols, colors, and backgrounds.-2. Builder tokens have 15 different background colors and Nouns Builder logo color options.-3. Five smart contracts are used for each DAO built on Nouns Builder: NFT, Auction House, Governor, Treasury, and Metadata.-4. The BuilderDAO community actively discusses auctions, proposals, and developments in the space.
0 references
This week:-1. Deebee.eth and others voted YES on proposals.-2. Bowlingseed.eth bought Builders #146, #186, and #189 for 0.2 ETH and 0.19 ETH.-3. Builder #199 auction settled with a winning bid of 0.21Ξ by scottrepreneur.eth.-4. Voting started for Seed Funding for Refraction Creative Grants Community Fund and Prop House Open Dev Round proposals.-5. Auctions for Builders #202-206 took place, with winning bids ranging from 0.1Ξ to 0.3Ξ.-6. Several proposals passed, including Seed Funding for Refraction Creative Grants Community Fund and Prop House Open Dev Round.
0 references
This week:-1. Nouns Builder logo features 15 different colors and is at the center of each Builder token.-2. Five smart contracts for each DAO built on Nouns Builder: NFT, Auction House, Governor, Treasury, and Metadata.-3. Builder token 0 is owned by @ourZORA, and the founding wallet receives every 10th token as a founder reward.-4. Nine quadrants for each builder token, with the center quadrant including the logo.-5. Builder #1 is owned by @nounsdao, with a 5% token reward going to the Nouns DAO treasury.-6. The BuilderDAO community actively discusses opportunities, updates, and auctions.
0 references
This Week:-1. The chat explores running the DAO seeding initiative when Nouns Builder is on L2 and using Snapshot for soft consensus.-2. Members emphasize the need for consistency in terminology and accessible governance documents.-3. A culture survey is being conducted within the community.-4. There's a discussion about increasing DAO tools on Farcater and getting more holders on the platform.-5. Two new votes are open, but participants are advised to wait until after an upcoming chat before voting.
0 references
This week:-1. Guild members discuss creating a commemorative open edition for Dev Open Round.-2. Feedback is sought on a draft of the ops working group.-3. Consideration of using snapshot for soft consensus.-4. Discussion on the Builder Guild governance document.-5. Zameeser requests more questionnaire responses for effective analysis.-6. Salman fills out the survey despite not being a Builder member.
0 references
This week:-1. Members discuss admin access on BuilderDAO.-2. They consider changing the percentage of tokens needed to submit a proposal.-3. The process of submitting on-chain proposals is discussed.-4. New members are welcomed to the community.-5. A survey related to identifying the community's culture is discussed.
0 references
This week:-1. Builder #216: Highest bid 0.15Ξ by studiodad.eth-2. Builder #215: Won by malcolmlevy.eth at 0.11Ξ-3. Builder #214: Won by thenounishprof.eth at 0.1Ξ-4. Builder #213: Won by cast.seanhart.eth at 0.25Ξ-5. Builder #212: Won by studiodad.eth at 0.15Ξ-6. Proposal passed: BuilderDAO communications by thenounishprof.eth-7. Proposal passed: Neokry Residency 3-month Extension by zaak.eth
0 references
This week:-1. Generative art and smart contracts for Builder tokens discussed.-2. Auctions for Builders #212-216 announced.-3. Community talks about transferring admin controls and DAO governance.-4. Upcoming FarCon event mentioned.-5. BuilderDAO Fun Facts shared, including 9 quadrants for each token, weekly Twitter Space, and retro funding by NounsDAO.-6. Farcaster on-chain notifications for Builder discussed.
0 references
This week:-1. Builder #219 received bids from hot.neokry.eth, satori.lol, and eusoujp.eth.-2. Builder #218's auction was settled with a winning bid of 0.25Ξ by gorilly.eth.-3. Voting started on Builder Guild and Operations Working Group proposals, with multiple users voting YES.-4. Auctions for Builder #222 to #225 took place, with winning bids ranging from 0.15Ξ to 0.22Ξ.-5. A proposal by lilac.eth to establish an Operations Working Group passed.-6. Builder #214 was sold in a secondary sale for 0.2 ETH.
0 references
This week:-1. Profwer discusses the availability of a mint all button and purchasing one of each item.-2. Users talk about Nouns shorts from a film festival and BuilderDAO tokens.-3. BuilderDAO fun facts are shared, including generative art, background colors, and token ownership.-4. An onboarding/AMA session is mentioned.-5. A Builder Guild/BuilderDAO combo meeting is discussed.
0 references
This week:-1. Members discuss archiving a channel and moving most conversations to Farcaster.-2. A Builder Guild meeting is announced to start in voice chat.-3. Eldefije shares their experience in governance payload development and verification, suggesting a safety committee.-4. Profwer addresses issues with safes/multisigs and introduces a new Builder Channel for BuilderDAO members.
0 references
This week:-1. Profwer received birthday wishes from chat members.-2. Pattihause asked Profwer to check DMs about Shaz starting a meeting.-3. Jord inquired about a meeting link.-4. Zameeser requested more questionnaire responses for an analysis.-5. Zaak talked about welcoming new members and creating a commemorative open edition for Dev Open Round.
0 references
This Week:-1. Profwer experiences issues with a public channel and considers recreating it.-2. JP seeks token artwork assets in .svg files.-3. Profwer announces their availability on Discord for questions.-4. 0xsat shares a proposal tracking notion from prop 57 and asks for feedback.-5. Mal_l joins the builder-dao-private chat.-6. Jord sets up a local environment for a DAO-related project.-7. Zak_krev explains the queuing process for proposals after voting, allowing a 48-hour veto window before execution.
0 references
This week:-1. Auctions for Builders #231, #232, #233, and #234 took place with winning bids ranging from 0.1Ξ to 0.14Ξ.-2. Users voted for and against proposals, with Proposal 0xbfe850a01ef8a7cd16b269bbba8e8efaff366b79fa052dd716e51d6cc5d4e767 passing.-3. Builder Protocol Contract Control was transferred from Zora to BuilderDAO by zora.eth.
0 references
This week:-1. BuilderDAO has 5 smart contracts: NFT, Auction House, Governor, Treasury, and Metadata.-2. Generative art for BuilderDAO includes 37 symbols, a center logo in 15 colors, and 15 background colors.-3. Auctions for Builders #231-#234 are underway.-4. Builder #1 is owned by @nounsdao, with a 5% token reward going to the Nouns DAO treasury.-5. Nouns Builder was retro funded by @Nounsdao prop 167.-6. The community discusses funding existing or new Nouns Builder DAOs and collaborating on future ideas.
0 references
This Week:-1. Participants discuss a proposal for media creation and forming strategic relationships.-2. Importance of organic placement and potential impact of sponsorship are highlighted.-3. Carly from Overpriced Jpegs plans to join a BuilderBox Twitter space to discuss the proposal.-4. Concerns about the trend of unanimous votes on proposals and the need for diverse opinions are expressed.-5. Participants acknowledge the potential benefits of reaching web3 builders and attracting top talent to the DAO.
27 June 2023
0 references
This week:-1. The chatlog discusses the lack of DAO-related gifs on platforms like Discord and the opportunity for Builder DAO to create such content.-2. Suggestions are made to increase the vote delay to 2 days and the voting period to 5 days within the DAO.-3. A proposal is discussed to extend a community resident's term for 3 more months.-4. The successful passing of an OPJ proposal is mentioned, along with the need for more mainstream attention for the broader nouns ecosystem and its projects.
0 references
This Week:-1. A proposal for a 3-month extension for a community resident by thenounishprof.eth was passed in the BotFrens community.-2. Several auctions for Builders were held, with winning bids ranging from 0.11Ξ to 0.18Ξ.-3. The winners of the auctions included gov.jord.eth, zameesco.eth, and hot.neokry.eth.-4. The community engaged in voting, with members like billzh.eth, lilac.eth, and hot.neokry.eth participating.
0 references
This week:-1. kd0 seeks help for a recurring transaction issue in their transaction queue.-2. Tom from Dawn Wallet introduces Dawn Vote, a feature for voting on DAO votes and snapshots from a phone, and requests feedback.-3. BotFrens shares fun facts about BuilderDAO and announces auctions for Builder #242 and #239.-4. Jord from DAO Masons discusses the potential of moving to L2s and the need for DAO contracts to upgrade.-5. Profwer confirms Noun40 as the current delegate and acknowledges shared information about DAO legal entities.-6. Aryashah introduces a proprietary algorithm developed by Dr. Sharmila Selvi and seeks sponsorship for a wallet based on this algorithm.
0 references
This week:-1. A proposal with a $0.30 cent transaction fee is discussed.-2. Users express excitement about L2 support and the launch of OP-based DAOs.-3. The impressive cadence of new feature releases and potential for an amazing DAO infrastructure toolset is discussed.-4. A document outlining a proposal is mentioned, with a request for guidance on how to officially start the Prop talk or vote.-5. There is a discussion about tax deductions for non-profits.-6. The first video of proposal 26 is released.
0 references
This Week:-1. Several auctions for Builders numbered 242 to 251 were held.-2. The winning bids ranged from 0.1Ξ to 0.18Ξ.-3. The winners of the auctions were thenounishprof.eth, billzh.eth, zamees.eth, neroone.eth, and boilerrat.eth.-4. The auction for Builder #251 had just started.
0 references
This Week:-1. BotFrens, a bot in the group chat, provides updates and fun facts about BuilderDAO.-2. The bot announces the start of auctions for various Builder tokens.-3. Information about the generative art and smart contracts involved in the creation of these tokens is shared.-4. @BuilderBoxShow, a weekly Twitter Space discussing all things related to Nouns Builder, is promoted.-5. Members of the chat, including jay3584, valcohol, Jord | DAO Masons, profwer, zaak1, mes, 0xsat, ccare, kd0, neo, and tomwa, engage in casual conversation, ask questions, and share ideas.
0 references
The group discussed the possibility of a new project involving a smart mirror. They considered using Raspberry Pi and a two-way mirror, with a focus on displaying useful information like weather, calendar, and news. They also discussed potential challenges, such as finding a suitable mirror and coding the software. They agreed to research more and reconvene later to discuss further.
0 references
Zameeser and Profwerder discuss the excitement of learning new skills in the web3/NFT space, with Zameeser mentioning their recent art project involving toad eyes. They also touch on the mission statement for Builder DAO, aiming to provide low barrier to entry web3 solutions for various community members. Profwerder shares an example of a customized bot they set up and mentions discussing vision, mission, and values further in an upcoming chat.
0 references
Deebee.eth and others voted YES on proposals. Bowlingseed.eth bought Builders #146, #186, and #189 for 0.2 ETH and 0.19 ETH. Auction for Builder #199 settled with a winning bid of 0.21Ξ by scottrepreneur.eth. Seed Funding for Refraction Creative Grants Community Fund and Prop House Open Dev Round proposals started voting.
0 references
Builder #219 received bids from hot.neokry.eth (0.22Ξ), satori.lol (0.2Ξ), and eusoujp.eth (0.15Ξ). An auction for Builder #219 started, and Builder #218's auction was settled with a winning bid of 0.25Ξ by gorilly.eth. Voting on Proposal 0x15c548013665c481227a2f7d7f991142974ce16c4d814c05cc1b074887ec7fe9 (Builder Guild) and Proposal 0xc7ee6d8377584135e85401e63471719561ceb6cdb91ee48c330b051a41c18a8b (Operations Working Group) started, with multiple users voting YES. Auction reminders were sent for 10, 30, and 60 minutes.
0 references
This Month:-1. Formation of a council of representatives from each DAO is discussed.-2. A proposed Ops Working Group is responsible for managing and paying ops service providers.-3. The Builder Nouncil is clarified as being different from the Operational Working Group.-4. A draft proposal to update admin authorization is mentioned.-5. Tension arises between users, with calls for more constructive and respectful communication.-6. Vote is live for a new proposal.-7. Shaz shares updates on UNA transition, USD access, bookkeeper, and information collection.-8. Two proposals are open for voting, ending soon.-9. Some members experience unknown tags in channels.-10. A new proposal is open for voting.-11. Shaz plans to publish onchain in the next 48 hours.
0 references
This Month:-1. Alsara2k releases an artpack with various layers and 3D-rendered elements and works on converting the 3D asset library for use in Nouns Builder.-2. Neokry offers to help with testing and code review, and suggests rendering 3D elements as PNGs for use in Nouns Builder.-3. Profwerder announces a BotFrens demo at the BuilderDAO meeting and provides support for proposal and contract-related issues within the community.
0 references
This Month:-1. yiwengao encounters a memory leak issue and finds a temporary workaround by increasing allocated memory to 8GB.-2. Neokry investigates the issue and plans to look into it further.-3. derekgtaylor reports issues with the add transaction and submit proposal buttons not working.-4. yiwengao makes a pull request to enable crowdfunds for nouns builder auctions and seeks feedback from the builder dao team.-5. Neokry identifies a frontend bug related to delegating Purple tokens on nouns.build and promises a fix as soon as possible.
0 references
This Month:-1. Auctions for Builders #172 to #202 occurred, with winning bids ranging from 0.1Ξ to 0.43Ξ.-2. Builder DAO had 78 members, with 40 voting within 30 days.-3. The treasury held 713.21 ETH.-4. Voting on proposals started for Seed Funding for Refraction Creative Grants Community Fund and Prop House Open Dev Round.-5. A new proposal was made for FarCon 2023 Sponsorship.
0 references
This Month:-1. BuilderDAO generative art features various symbols, colors, and backgrounds, with 15 different background colors and Nouns Builder logo color options.-2. Five smart contracts are used for each DAO built on Nouns Builder: NFT, Auction House, Governor, Treasury, and Metadata.-3. The BuilderDAO community actively discusses auctions, proposals, and developments in the space, including celebrating Bitcoin Pizza Day and sharing BuilderDAO fun facts.-4. The treasury holds 713.21 ETH ($1,290,275) with 78 total members and 40 active voters.-5. Profwerder suggests updating the FAQ and About sections on the site, and requests adding links to Discord and Twitter in the About section of all builder DAOs.
0 references
This Month:-1. The chat discusses the need for a solution to high gas fees in BuilderDAO, with L2 being a top priority and options including moving all of Nouns Builder to L2 or focusing on auctions and governance.-2. A hack week is planned for June 19th, with a proposal to focus on L2, and ongoing discussions with Base, Arbi, Starknet, and ZK to explore L2 options.-3. Zaak announces final call for offchain comments on Neokry's Residency Extension draft proposal and shares progress on L2 deployment and timeline update.-4. Profile pages go live on Nouns Builder, with more features to follow, and Zaak encourages more Builder token holders to join Farcaster.
0 references
This Month:-1. Zameeser and Profwerder discuss learning new skills in the web3/NFT space and the mission statement for Builder DAO, aiming to provide low barrier to entry web3 solutions.-2. Profwerder develops a bot to share fun facts and images from DAOs created on Nouns Builder and announces the chosen name for their DAO as Builder Guild.-3. The group discusses name options for their organization, Bouncil and Builder Guild, and the importance of a code of conduct.-4. BillZ shares updates on Warpcast and Alphacaster, with Taifa.eth expressing interest in collaboration.-5. Main goal is to finalize Vision/Mission, Values, and Builder Guild governance document, and the search for one more signer with technical/dev experience for multisig fund distribution.
0 references
This Month:-1. Profwerder initiates discussion, shares notes, and suggests streaming Builder Dao panel into Discord for virtual participation.-2. Derekgtaylor expresses interest in onchain idea and aims to make builders proud.-3. Profwerder announces reaching quorum, processes first vote of Builder Guild, and suggests creating a tutorial for multisig voting.-4. ThaSwami supports the proposal and suggests adding a budget breakdown.-5. Profwerder reminds members to vote on prop guidelines and shares additional discussion links.
0 references
This Month:-1. Profwer experiences issues with a public channel and considers recreating it.-2. 0xsat shares a proposal tracking notion from prop 57 and asks for feedback.-3. Zak_krev explains the queuing process for proposals after voting, allowing a 48-hour veto window before execution.-4. Members discuss admin access on BuilderDAO and consider changing the percentage of tokens needed to submit a proposal.-5. The process of submitting on-chain proposals is discussed.-6. A survey related to identifying the community's culture is discussed.-7. Profwer discusses the potential for non-profit/public good DAOs to be built on Nouns Builder.-8. Profwer announces a thread for discussion on increasing the vote delay and voting time.-9. Profwer announces the Builder Guild monthly meeting and shares a link for tickets for those in LA.-10. Profwer reminds the group about the remaining time to vote on active proposals.-11. Profwer informs the group about changes to the chat, including the removal and archiving of certain channels.-12. Jord from DAO Masons expresses interest in building things in the infinite round and mentions the Farcaster integration.-13. Profwer announces that the Builder Guild monthly meeting is live in Voice general and encourages all
0 references
This Month:-1. Auctions for Builders #231, #232, #233, #234, #222 to #225, #202-206, and #238 to #236 took place with winning bids ranging from 0.1Ξ to 0.3Ξ.-2. Builder Protocol Contract Control was transferred from Zora to BuilderDAO by zora.eth.-3. Voting started on Builder Guild and Operations Working Group proposals, with multiple users voting YES.-4. A proposal by lilac.eth to establish an Operations Working Group passed.-5. Builder #214 was sold in a secondary sale for 0.2 ETH.-6. Proposals passed included BuilderDAO communications by thenounishprof.eth, Neokry Residency 3-month Extension by zaak.eth, Seed Funding for Refraction Creative Grants Community Fund, and Prop House Open Dev Round.-7. Builder #199 auction settled with a winning bid of 0.21Ξ by scottrepreneur.eth.-8. Bowlingseed.eth bought Builders #146, #186, and #189 for 0.2 ETH and 0.19 ETH.
0 references
This Month:-1. BuilderDAO has 5 smart contracts: NFT, Auction House, Governor, Treasury, and Metadata.-2. Generative art for BuilderDAO includes 37 symbols, a center logo in 15 colors, and 15 background colors.-3. Auctions for various Builders are underway, including Builders #231-#234 and #212-216.-4. Builder #1 is owned by @nounsdao, with a 5% token reward going to the Nouns DAO treasury.-5. The community discusses funding existing or new Nouns Builder DAOs and collaborating on future ideas.-6. Users talk about Nouns shorts from a film festival and BuilderDAO tokens.-7. An onboarding/AMA session and a Builder Guild/BuilderDAO combo meeting are mentioned.-8. Community talks about transferring admin controls and DAO governance.-9. Upcoming FarCon event and Farcaster on-chain notifications for Builder are discussed.-10. Profwer thanks visitors for attending BuilderBox spaces and encourages them to learn more about DAO legal entities.-11. Profwer confirms that Noun40 is the current delegate and suggests that the prop incubator in Nouncil would be a good first step for Bigshotk's project.-12. Aryashah introduces
0 references
This Month:-1. Members discuss archiving a channel and moving most conversations to Farcaster.-2. A Builder Guild meeting is announced to start in voice chat.-3. Eldefije shares their experience in governance payload development and verification, suggesting a safety committee.-4. Profwer addresses issues with safes/multisigs and introduces a new Builder Channel for BuilderDAO members.-5. Profwer announces that a BuilderDAO communication channel similar to the Purple channel on Warpcast will be created soon.-6. Zaak mentions that onchain notifications for Builder are now live on Farcaster and offers invites.-7. Salmanneedsajob alerts Headline NFT holders of questionable active proposals and encourages them to vote.-8. Zaak thanks the community for their input and feedback and announces that a proposal is now live.-9. Valcoholics announces a Builder milestone: now over 200 tokens are needed to propose.-10. Profwerder shares his concern about the token ask, suggesting that tokens should be used for onboarding purposes and residents should choose whether or not to bid with eth they've been paid.-11. Zaak calls for final comments on Neokry's Residency Extension draft proposal before putting it onchain.-12. Valcoholics suggests
0 references
This Month:-1. Participants discuss a proposal for media creation and forming strategic relationships, highlighting the importance of organic placement and potential impact of sponsorship.-2. Concerns about the trend of unanimous votes on proposals are expressed, emphasizing the need for diverse opinions.-3. The potential benefits of reaching web3 builders and attracting top talent to the DAO are acknowledged.-4. Discussions about increasing the vote delay to 2 days and the voting time to 5 days are brought up.-5. Profwer proposes to extend their residency for 3 more months, mentioning their involvement in the Ops Working Group.-6. Several proposals are announced, including the Builder IP Transfer Proposal, the Builder Guild, and the establishment of an Operations Working Group.-7. A decision is made to consolidate channels for ideas and proposals.
0 references
This Month:-1. Guild members discuss creating a commemorative open edition for Dev Open Round.-2. Feedback is sought on a draft of the ops working group.-3. Consideration of using snapshot for soft consensus.-4. Discussion on the Builder Guild governance document.-5. The chat explores running the DAO seeding initiative when Nouns Builder is on L2.-6. Members emphasize the need for consistency in terminology and accessible governance documents.-7. A culture survey is being conducted within the community.-8. There's a discussion about increasing DAO tools on Farcater and getting more holders on the platform.-9. Profwer announces the start of the Builder Guild monthly call, inviting Builder Guild, BuilderDAO, and others to join.-10. Profwer announces a new vote and introduces two new tokens, 228 and 229, and mentions that 227 is still up for auction.-11. Zak_krev asks if he can submit funding proposals for projects that aren't fully DAO's yet, specifically his QMoDA project.-12. Valcohol confirms that independent contributors have received funding through proposals before.
0 references
This Month:-1. Profwer requests for votes on the Quorum vote and announces several new votes, emphasizing the importance of community participation in decision-making.-2. Profwer proposes to extend his residency for 3 more months, expressing his discomfort in extending beyond that due to the ever-changing nature of the DAO.-3. Profwer mentions his involvement in the Ops Working Group, which includes a built-in .5 eth/mo for additional effort, indicating his commitment to the group's operations.-4. Profwer expresses the need to get more voters, highlighting the importance of community engagement in the DAO's processes.-5. Profwer acknowledges Carly's participation and shares the recording of the missed BuilderBox, promoting transparency and inclusivity in the community.-6. Profwer announces his availability on discord voice chat for any questions, offering direct communication and support to the community.-7. Profwerder encourages discussions and shares additional notes and discussion links, fostering open communication and collaboration within the community.
0 references
