0x7d81478ad18ad375e53de6f74f3122f6be3499ca (Q4108)
From Nouns Dev
Individual
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | 0x7d81478ad18ad375e53de6f74f3122f6be3499ca |
Individual |
Statements
* the community is using its tooling * team has hacked on PoCs without asking for funding which is very Nounish * having a third unified client outside of nouns.wtf and nounsagora is +EV thanks for coming back a third time. Lets put this team back to work
0 references
i agree with the sentiment that we should avoid putting proposals on-chain that dont modify on-chain state, and as such, Ill be abstaining from any future proposals that fit this description. however, I strongly believe that Nouns acquired using DAO funds as a form of future compensation shouldnt be utilized for governance until theyve been correctly distributed to their intended recipients.
0 references
the proposed infra offers proper decentralized execution across sub-communities. it is imperative to promote governance and mitigate intermediaries that can be subject to external influence. the ability to engage in trustless governance across subDAOs is the type of innovation id like to see Nouns showcase. i do think there is a chance that trustless participation can increase demand for Nouns, even if by a small margin. ripe and wiz are excellent builders, and i am happy to support this initiative.
0 references
no brainer - esports, particularly with the folks spearheading this prop, has been a remarkable experiment in proliferating the meme.
0 references
I am not entirely sure how this will proliferate the Noun meme, but in the interest of supporting the cc0 photography vertical, particularly one of space exploration, I am curious to see if there can be an audience reached here that would otherwise not reach. Cost is negligible for the bet.
0 references
Excited to see Nouns continue to proliferate eSports. The price to pay here seems negligible for the potential upside.
0 references
I have a tab browser open at all times with Goldys memes to facilitate the proliferation of Nouns, so this is a no-brainer for me.
0 references
We built something similar on nouns.center/ideas, and without network effects, it becomes a ghost yard. I am bearish that novel ideas will come from public forums. Id be glad to be proven wrong here, but I am almost positive YCombinator doesnt do anything internal like this. Quality proposals will come from ultra-skilled, smaller teams (Atrium, Goldy, Danit, Stoopid Buddy, albeit not so small, Prop House, etc.), that have very specific skill sets. Id be much more inclined to further fund work on this proposal if it has moved the needle forward within the Lil Nouns community, where this tool seems to already be in place.
0 references
i am a fan of DigitalOil and would vote yes for them to work on ideas that would benefit the DAO. my opinion remains unchanged though in that i do not believe that functional props will lead to better governance for the DAO at this time.
0 references
while I appreciate the intention behind this proposal, i am not convinced it would significantly move the DAO forward. having a clear and concise ask is important to the proposal process. rather than relying on game theory to skew outcomes, the DAO should vote on a static ask. off-chain discussion might be a better fit for this topic, as social consensus often leads to meaningful results. that being said, i like DigitalOil and am excited to see what other ideas they have for the DAO. i am always happy to vote in favor of proposals that will have a significant impact on the DAO.
0 references
i am not sold on this spreading the Noun meme effectively or that it will contribute to higher demand in daily auctions. with current outflows > inflows, prefer to stay conservative here and vote no.
0 references
Not a bad proposal, but I have concerns about these ephemeral events and their potential impact on daily auction appreciation. Instead, I would like to concentrate on voting for high-value infrastructure and projects with the potential for significant auction growth. The ask is reasonable, but we shouldnt be voting yes just because 10e is a drop in a bucket. The drops will ultimately overflow the bucket.
0 references
feels like minimum nounish proliferation happening here
0 references
appreciate the sentiment here, but 200e for a wellness app seems like an overreach
0 references
Appreciate the intention behind this prop. I am not sold on the value proposition of spending the requested ETH here on an ephemeral piece slated to EOL by July 10. Landing pages should be substantially more affordable, too. The team looks solid, but I am struggling with the short-lived value add here (relative to cost).
0 references
i like the builders on this team and would happily vote for them to build helpful tech for the DAO. i dont think the proposal in this current form moves the DAO forward. there is an expensive tax to build an architecture of this magnitude into production, and the tax is on all of the individual data stores to expose their off-chain data to the consumers of this index. anything on-chain is already composable. centralized data stores such as discourse already have APIs that can be consumed (https://docs.discourse.org). i think distracting builders with this tax right now is -EV, and some might not have the bandwidth to pull it off at all, leaving us with just adding an API on top of data sources that already have APIs whether in the form of HTTP or RPC-JSON on-chain calls. i think we have much bigger problems to tackle and this isnt a blocker for client developers as of today. id love to fund this team to work on something else.
0 references
