0x91dccaa260cc4616e1a6e6b693db7207c5e42937 (Q202): Difference between revisions

From Nouns Dev
(‎Changed an Item)
(‎Changed an Item)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 296 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 296 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 291 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 291 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 286 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 286 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 284 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 284 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 279 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 279 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 278 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 278 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 277 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 277 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 271 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 271 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 265 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 265 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 263 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 263 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 254 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 254 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 250 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 250 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 249 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 249 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 226 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 226 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 215 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 215 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 211 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 211 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 197 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 197 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 195 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 195 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 193 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 193 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 189 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 189 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 179 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 179 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 167 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 167 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 164 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 164 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 4
Amount4
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 161 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 161 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 4
Amount4
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 159 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 159 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 4
Amount4
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 155 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 155 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 4
Amount4
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 142 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 142 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 4
Amount4
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 139 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 139 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 129 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 129 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 128 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 128 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 113 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 113 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 109 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 109 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 108 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 108 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 99 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 99 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 87 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 87 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 85 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 85 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 77 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 77 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 75 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 75 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 67 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 67 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 64 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 64 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 63 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 63 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 61 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 61 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 276 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 276 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 270 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 270 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 266 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 266 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 255 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 255 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 241 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 241 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 204 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 204 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 203 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 203 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 196 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 196 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 170 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 170 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 178 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 178 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
 
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 121 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 121 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 57 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 57 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 296 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 296 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 296 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: nounish
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 291 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 291 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 291 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: i am for more flexible payment options but support taking more time + audits based on soli & cos feedback
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 286 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 286 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 286 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: love to see v2 props going back onchain incorporating feedback. proposers seem uniquely positioned to execute on their vision and the additional focus on marketing & distribution provides high conviction in getting the nouns brand+art in the eyes/hands of a ton of new people
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 284 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 284 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 284 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: nounish
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 279 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 279 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 279 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: +1 to 40s, ccarellas, and salvinos comments discussed on weekly Q&A call ensuring nouns IP representation beyond optional phone variant and team was receptive
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 278 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 278 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 278 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: agree with the points made in the why section of the proposal, also agree with willpapper that reaching out to gitcoin ahead of time might have provided additional marketing/PR opportunities (perhaps retro opp will be available if prop is successful)
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 277 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 277 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 277 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: feels a little expensive but more importantly feels very nounish
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 271 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 271 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 271 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: excited to see new artists bringing their talents (and new mediums) into the ecosystem
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 265 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 265 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 265 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: i hope the team will come back with a bit more details on the design & distribution side to increase confidence in this experiment
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 263 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 263 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 263 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: while this is a large ask, nouns esports has executed at a high level making a major impact in the gaming community in a short period of time. im optimistic that well be able to find additional on-brand sponsors to help subsidize the ongoing costs of running the team ahead of future proposals
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 254 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 254 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 254 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: hella nounish
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 250 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 250 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 250 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: nounish
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 249 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 249 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 249 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: hella nounish
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 215 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 215 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 215 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: i dont think influencer raffles & giveaways are nounish but am hoping to see other activations/initiatives scale up with these tools
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 211 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 211 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 211 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ambitious prop with a lot of moving parts but large opportunity in an untapped market, spoke with the team and feel good about taking the risk for potential outsized returns
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 197 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 197 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 197 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: nounish
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 195 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 195 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 195 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: no mention of converting funds to USDC upon transfer, just something for team to consider
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 193 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 193 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 193 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: public goods x proliferation = bucketsss ⌐◨-◨ strong support for building this type of marketing infrastructure that will be around for years to come
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 189 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 189 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 189 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: i fw the vision
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 179 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 179 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 179 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: tapping into the deeper art scene which could pay unknown dividends down the line
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 167 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 167 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 167 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: <insert noun40_reason.txt>
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 164 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 164 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 4
Amount4
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 164 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: hope the team is being comped for their time!
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 161 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 161 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 4
Amount4
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 161 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ez clap
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 159 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 159 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 4
Amount4
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 159 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: can always vote to adjust again if things really start bussin
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 155 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 155 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 4
Amount4
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 155 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: we like the cdt
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 142 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 142 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 4
Amount4
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 142 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: skateparks = discord servers
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 139 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 139 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 139 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: we like the woody
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 129 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 129 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 129 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: cultural injection
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 128 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 128 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 128 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: we like the noun square
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 113 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 113 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 113 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: could be big
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 109 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 109 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 109 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: looking forward to seeing this one come to life
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 108 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 108 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 108 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: support public goods
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 99 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 99 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 99 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: fiveoceans has made a number of creative contributions to the community, happy to see one their projects on-chain. reading through the cost breakdown, i didnt see any sort of compensation for project management/oversight. if this proposal passes, i would support small grants funding to provide compensation for fiveoceans or whoever is coordinating this effort
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 87 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 87 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 87 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: excited to see more compelling interpretation projects!
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 85 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 85 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 85 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: what 40 said
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 77 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 77 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 77 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: this could be big
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 75 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 75 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 75 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: mad happy for this collab (✿´‿`)
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 67 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 67 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 67 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: we like the nouncil. excited to see what comes out of this proposal
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 64 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 64 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 64 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: curated short video content feels like an area of opportunity this prop empowers dedicated community members to create CC0 video of proposals that might not otherwise generate such content
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 63 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 63 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 63 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: wag has contributed an immense amount of time and brainpower towards ensuring the dao is maximally nounish. i support this pilot and am excited to see the nouncillors engaged as well.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 61 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 61 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 61 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: best to approve this so we can keep a close eye on him, this new-found fame is going to his head
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 316 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 316 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 311 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 311 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 310 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 310 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 310 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: encouraging to see early views and a goal on sustainability, this is also something that would benefit from future proposals focused on marketing/content-distribution into other platforms/regions
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 307 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 307 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 307 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: voting to show support but feel that 1 week period is too short for people to work out logistics, identify venue/planning, ect. prop house style for irl events (which can require a lot of logistics planning up front) may lead to wasted time for those that dont win, or will have people promising things that they dont have have commitments on to try and secure votes. we have seen this with multiple on-chain props
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 306 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 306 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 306 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: excited about the potential network effects of tapping into the sdcc creative network *sent from voter.wtf*
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 304 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 304 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 303 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 303 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 302 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 302 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 301 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 301 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 301 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: ++ joels comments
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 308 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 308 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 308 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: nounish prop from a passionate community
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 323 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 323 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 320 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 320 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 320 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: im with 40 *sent from voter.wtf*
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 319 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 319 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 319 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: valuable addition to nounish discords
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 326 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 326 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 326 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: nounish
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 325 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 325 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 276 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 276 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 276 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: appreciate the efforts from this team but dont have high conviction in ROI/success on the proposal in current state it is already hard enough to build a fun & compelling gameplay loop without integrating an educational aspect and this product would be competing with best in class for products for users entertainment time some concerns with monetization plans, in-game currency / microtransaction strategies are not detailed and if done wrong can provide a poor experience for new users first exposure to nouns coming in via paid ads. pay to play power ups can impact competitive integrity and i dont expect users to pay for anything that only enhances the single player experience. gamers have specific expectations + high quality bar in mind when a product offers a Battle Pass and having new game modes behind a pay wall doesnt seem appropriate for a new ip/indie product trying to break into the space no mention of AI, is it AI available in multiplayer? without reaching critical mass in multiple regions I would assume that there wont be a constant stream of players to fill out 40 person matches
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 270 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 270 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 270 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: current engagement #s doesnt seem to indicate product market fit (yet), may need a smaller/scaled down prop or additional engagement on current site to justify
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 266 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 266 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 266 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: i like the idea of this proposal but concerned around the costs/DAO ROI and demand for this # of nounish keyboards @ the high end designer price point, also unsure about the DAO aspect
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 255 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 255 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 255 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: large ask while the primary use case(s) dont feel particularly compelling/applicable to nouns
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 241 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 241 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 241 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: general distro is cool but unsure about leveraging binary yes/no votes as a way to scale prop compensation
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 204 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 204 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 204 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: not enough demand for nouns OTC atm, sudoswap works great and I anticipate anyone in the near future looking to buy OTC will already be connecting with the community on twitter or discord
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 203 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 203 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 203 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: i dont see PMF at this time
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 196 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 196 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 196 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: while not specifically labeled gambling it feels close enough that I imagine that being a turn off for voters, also a large ask to build a nouns white label branded version of something that appears to already be getting built -- may need to come back with a smaller/more specific ask that really entices the nouns community
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 170 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 170 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 170 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: i support the NNS initiative and feel we should compensate for the work up until this point, but I would like to see a bigger focus on proliferation/marketing plans for NNS as opposed to integrations and updating website
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 315 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 315 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 315 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: would potentially support a more direct partnership with players, but unsure of desire/PMF for platform and large investment *sent from voter.wtf*
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 314 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 314 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 314 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: easy yes, i had also been planning to put up a proposal to retro wilson for his efforts on the site. couple enhancement requests while im here! -default to currently selected prop in the drop down when bringing up the vote menu -clear out reason from previous prop when opening the vote menu on a new proposal
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 313 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 313 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 313 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: we have 26 mil in steth, if we are concerned with a 50 cent depeg we should consider diversifying the treasury as opposed to insuring only 1 mil (which decays to 500k after a year) -- it might make sense to consider insuring a larger % / the entire position if there was proof of liquidity. i would likely support a separate prop for optimism/L2 governance as this opens up some exciting possibilities *sent from voter.wtf*
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 312 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 312 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 312 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: this looks like an exciting project, but it doesnt feel practical for nouns to fully fund an initiative that covers the entire NFT space while also having 100% of the mint proceeds going back to the team *sent from voter.wtf*
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 299 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 299 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 178 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 178 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 178 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: core issue is talented builders with nouns on their radar, but this prop is targeting people new to the ecosystem? I also dont think the process to ask for money is difficult without connections to the ecosystem -- if an idea/prop is truly compelling it will get the attention of the DAO (ex: salvino lux glasses) not very scalable, we cant afford to pay more and more people $6400 USD/month just to think about nouns part time -- and if we are going to start paying select people to think about nouns, should we be paying new builders to force them to care about nouns vs proven and passionate community members? should gami or i be getting paid to think about future nouns props? appreciate the focus on transparency, but with this being yet another discord in the nouns ecosystem it is a tough ask to join another server just to keep up to date with a single proposal
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 121 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 121 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 121 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: appreciate the creativity Sam has injected into the space and look forward to what he and/or Jason do next
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 57 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 57 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 57 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: excited to see these come to life but i do not support committing a noun upon delivery of glasses. DAO should evaluate the proposal as a whole after everything has been executed to determine if a noun is justified
Property / Proposed
 
Property / Proposed: Proposal 303 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 23:49, 17 July 2023

Individual
Language Label Description Also known as
English
0x91dccaa260cc4616e1a6e6b693db7207c5e42937
Individual

    Statements

    instance of
    Individual
    0 references
    Supported
    Proposal 295
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 290
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 274
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 272
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 269
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 268
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 261
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 259
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 257
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 256
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 253
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 251
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 242
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 237
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 236
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 233
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 231
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 229
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 228
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 227
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 224
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 221
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 218
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 217
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 214
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 209
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 207
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 206
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 205
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 201
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 199
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 198
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 194
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 190
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 182
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 181
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 180
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 177
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 174
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 173
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 172
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 171
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 169
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 166
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 162
    Vote Weight
    4
    0 references
    Proposal 154
    Vote Weight
    4
    0 references
    Proposal 152
    Vote Weight
    4
    0 references
    Proposal 143
    Vote Weight
    4
    0 references
    Proposal 141
    Vote Weight
    4
    0 references
    Proposal 140
    Vote Weight
    4
    0 references
    Proposal 137
    Vote Weight
    2
    0 references
    Proposal 135
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 132
    Vote Weight
    2
    0 references
    Proposal 127
    Vote Weight
    2
    0 references
    Proposal 126
    Vote Weight
    2
    0 references
    Proposal 125
    Vote Weight
    2
    0 references
    Proposal 124
    Vote Weight
    2
    0 references
    Proposal 119
    Vote Weight
    2
    0 references
    Proposal 118
    Vote Weight
    2
    0 references
    Proposal 116
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 114
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 112
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 111
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 105
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 103
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 102
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 101
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 100
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 97
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 95
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 91
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 84
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 83
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 82
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 74
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 73
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 72
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 71
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 65
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 58
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 56
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 54
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 51
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 48
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 47
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 46
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 45
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 44
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 43
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 42
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 41
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 40
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 38
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 37
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 35
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 33
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 30
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 29
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 28
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 26
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 23
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 296
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    nounish
    0 references
    Proposal 291
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    i am for more flexible payment options but support taking more time + audits based on soli & cos feedback
    0 references
    Proposal 286
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    love to see v2 props going back onchain incorporating feedback. proposers seem uniquely positioned to execute on their vision and the additional focus on marketing & distribution provides high conviction in getting the nouns brand+art in the eyes/hands of a ton of new people
    0 references
    Proposal 284
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    nounish
    0 references
    Proposal 279
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    +1 to 40s, ccarellas, and salvinos comments discussed on weekly Q&A call ensuring nouns IP representation beyond optional phone variant and team was receptive
    0 references
    Proposal 278
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    agree with the points made in the why section of the proposal, also agree with willpapper that reaching out to gitcoin ahead of time might have provided additional marketing/PR opportunities (perhaps retro opp will be available if prop is successful)
    0 references
    Proposal 277
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    feels a little expensive but more importantly feels very nounish
    0 references
    Proposal 271
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    excited to see new artists bringing their talents (and new mediums) into the ecosystem
    0 references
    Proposal 265
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    i hope the team will come back with a bit more details on the design & distribution side to increase confidence in this experiment
    0 references
    Proposal 263
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    while this is a large ask, nouns esports has executed at a high level making a major impact in the gaming community in a short period of time. im optimistic that well be able to find additional on-brand sponsors to help subsidize the ongoing costs of running the team ahead of future proposals
    0 references
    Proposal 254
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    hella nounish
    0 references
    Proposal 250
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    nounish
    0 references
    Proposal 249
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    hella nounish
    0 references
    Proposal 215
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    i dont think influencer raffles & giveaways are nounish but am hoping to see other activations/initiatives scale up with these tools
    0 references
    Proposal 211
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    ambitious prop with a lot of moving parts but large opportunity in an untapped market, spoke with the team and feel good about taking the risk for potential outsized returns
    0 references
    Proposal 197
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    nounish
    0 references
    Proposal 195
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    no mention of converting funds to USDC upon transfer, just something for team to consider
    0 references
    Proposal 193
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    public goods x proliferation = bucketsss ⌐◨-◨ strong support for building this type of marketing infrastructure that will be around for years to come
    0 references
    Proposal 189
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    i fw the vision
    0 references
    Proposal 179
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    tapping into the deeper art scene which could pay unknown dividends down the line
    0 references
    Proposal 167
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    <insert noun40_reason.txt>
    0 references
    Proposal 164
    Vote Weight
    4
    Vote Reason
    hope the team is being comped for their time!
    0 references
    Proposal 161
    Vote Weight
    4
    Vote Reason
    ez clap
    0 references
    Proposal 159
    Vote Weight
    4
    Vote Reason
    can always vote to adjust again if things really start bussin
    0 references
    Proposal 155
    Vote Weight
    4
    Vote Reason
    we like the cdt
    0 references
    Proposal 142
    Vote Weight
    4
    Vote Reason
    skateparks = discord servers
    0 references
    Proposal 139
    Vote Weight
    2
    Vote Reason
    we like the woody
    0 references
    Proposal 129
    Vote Weight
    2
    Vote Reason
    cultural injection
    0 references
    Proposal 128
    Vote Weight
    2
    Vote Reason
    we like the noun square
    0 references
    Proposal 113
    Vote Weight
    1
    Vote Reason
    could be big
    0 references
    Proposal 109
    Vote Weight
    1
    Vote Reason
    looking forward to seeing this one come to life
    0 references
    Proposal 108
    Vote Weight
    1
    Vote Reason
    support public goods
    0 references
    Proposal 99
    Vote Weight
    1
    Vote Reason
    fiveoceans has made a number of creative contributions to the community, happy to see one their projects on-chain. reading through the cost breakdown, i didnt see any sort of compensation for project management/oversight. if this proposal passes, i would support small grants funding to provide compensation for fiveoceans or whoever is coordinating this effort
    0 references
    Proposal 87
    Vote Weight
    1
    Vote Reason
    excited to see more compelling interpretation projects!
    0 references
    Proposal 85
    Vote Weight
    1
    Vote Reason
    what 40 said
    0 references
    Proposal 77
    Vote Weight
    1
    Vote Reason
    this could be big
    0 references
    Proposal 75
    Vote Weight
    1
    Vote Reason
    mad happy for this collab (✿´‿`)
    0 references
    Proposal 67
    Vote Weight
    1
    Vote Reason
    we like the nouncil. excited to see what comes out of this proposal
    0 references
    Proposal 64
    Vote Weight
    1
    Vote Reason
    curated short video content feels like an area of opportunity this prop empowers dedicated community members to create CC0 video of proposals that might not otherwise generate such content
    0 references
    Proposal 63
    Vote Weight
    1
    Vote Reason
    wag has contributed an immense amount of time and brainpower towards ensuring the dao is maximally nounish. i support this pilot and am excited to see the nouncillors engaged as well.
    0 references
    Proposal 61
    Vote Weight
    1
    Vote Reason
    best to approve this so we can keep a close eye on him, this new-found fame is going to his head
    0 references
    Proposal 316
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 311
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 310
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    encouraging to see early views and a goal on sustainability, this is also something that would benefit from future proposals focused on marketing/content-distribution into other platforms/regions
    0 references
    Proposal 307
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    voting to show support but feel that 1 week period is too short for people to work out logistics, identify venue/planning, ect. prop house style for irl events (which can require a lot of logistics planning up front) may lead to wasted time for those that dont win, or will have people promising things that they dont have have commitments on to try and secure votes. we have seen this with multiple on-chain props
    0 references
    Proposal 306
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    excited about the potential network effects of tapping into the sdcc creative network *sent from voter.wtf*
    0 references
    Proposal 304
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 303
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 302
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 301
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    ++ joels comments
    0 references
    Proposal 308
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    nounish prop from a passionate community
    0 references
    Proposal 323
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 320
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    im with 40 *sent from voter.wtf*
    0 references
    Proposal 319
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    valuable addition to nounish discords
    0 references
    Proposal 326
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    nounish
    0 references
    Proposal 325
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Opposed
    Proposal 282
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 262
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 260
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 248
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 232
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 225
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 223
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 222
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 210
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 202
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 200
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 188
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 187
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 158
    Vote Weight
    4
    0 references
    Proposal 157
    Vote Weight
    4
    0 references
    Proposal 138
    Vote Weight
    2
    0 references
    Proposal 134
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 133
    Vote Weight
    2
    0 references
    Proposal 120
    Vote Weight
    2
    0 references
    Proposal 89
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 81
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 55
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 24
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 276
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    appreciate the efforts from this team but dont have high conviction in ROI/success on the proposal in current state it is already hard enough to build a fun & compelling gameplay loop without integrating an educational aspect and this product would be competing with best in class for products for users entertainment time some concerns with monetization plans, in-game currency / microtransaction strategies are not detailed and if done wrong can provide a poor experience for new users first exposure to nouns coming in via paid ads. pay to play power ups can impact competitive integrity and i dont expect users to pay for anything that only enhances the single player experience. gamers have specific expectations + high quality bar in mind when a product offers a Battle Pass and having new game modes behind a pay wall doesnt seem appropriate for a new ip/indie product trying to break into the space no mention of AI, is it AI available in multiplayer? without reaching critical mass in multiple regions I would assume that there wont be a constant stream of players to fill out 40 person matches
    0 references
    Proposal 270
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    current engagement #s doesnt seem to indicate product market fit (yet), may need a smaller/scaled down prop or additional engagement on current site to justify
    0 references
    Proposal 266
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    i like the idea of this proposal but concerned around the costs/DAO ROI and demand for this # of nounish keyboards @ the high end designer price point, also unsure about the DAO aspect
    0 references
    Proposal 255
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    large ask while the primary use case(s) dont feel particularly compelling/applicable to nouns
    0 references
    Proposal 241
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    general distro is cool but unsure about leveraging binary yes/no votes as a way to scale prop compensation
    0 references
    Proposal 204
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    not enough demand for nouns OTC atm, sudoswap works great and I anticipate anyone in the near future looking to buy OTC will already be connecting with the community on twitter or discord
    0 references
    Proposal 203
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    i dont see PMF at this time
    0 references
    Proposal 196
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    while not specifically labeled gambling it feels close enough that I imagine that being a turn off for voters, also a large ask to build a nouns white label branded version of something that appears to already be getting built -- may need to come back with a smaller/more specific ask that really entices the nouns community
    0 references
    Proposal 170
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    i support the NNS initiative and feel we should compensate for the work up until this point, but I would like to see a bigger focus on proliferation/marketing plans for NNS as opposed to integrations and updating website
    0 references
    Proposal 315
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    would potentially support a more direct partnership with players, but unsure of desire/PMF for platform and large investment *sent from voter.wtf*
    0 references
    Proposal 314
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    easy yes, i had also been planning to put up a proposal to retro wilson for his efforts on the site. couple enhancement requests while im here! -default to currently selected prop in the drop down when bringing up the vote menu -clear out reason from previous prop when opening the vote menu on a new proposal
    0 references
    Proposal 313
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    we have 26 mil in steth, if we are concerned with a 50 cent depeg we should consider diversifying the treasury as opposed to insuring only 1 mil (which decays to 500k after a year) -- it might make sense to consider insuring a larger % / the entire position if there was proof of liquidity. i would likely support a separate prop for optimism/L2 governance as this opens up some exciting possibilities *sent from voter.wtf*
    0 references
    Proposal 312
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    this looks like an exciting project, but it doesnt feel practical for nouns to fully fund an initiative that covers the entire NFT space while also having 100% of the mint proceeds going back to the team *sent from voter.wtf*
    0 references
    Proposal 299
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Abstained
    Proposal 238
    Vote Weight
    3
    0 references
    Proposal 107
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 86
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 52
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 49
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 178
    Vote Weight
    3
    Vote Reason
    core issue is talented builders with nouns on their radar, but this prop is targeting people new to the ecosystem? I also dont think the process to ask for money is difficult without connections to the ecosystem -- if an idea/prop is truly compelling it will get the attention of the DAO (ex: salvino lux glasses) not very scalable, we cant afford to pay more and more people $6400 USD/month just to think about nouns part time -- and if we are going to start paying select people to think about nouns, should we be paying new builders to force them to care about nouns vs proven and passionate community members? should gami or i be getting paid to think about future nouns props? appreciate the focus on transparency, but with this being yet another discord in the nouns ecosystem it is a tough ask to join another server just to keep up to date with a single proposal
    0 references
    Proposal 121
    Vote Weight
    2
    Vote Reason
    appreciate the creativity Sam has injected into the space and look forward to what he and/or Jason do next
    0 references
    Proposal 57
    Vote Weight
    1
    Vote Reason
    excited to see these come to life but i do not support committing a noun upon delivery of glasses. DAO should evaluate the proposal as a whole after everything has been executed to determine if a noun is justified
    0 references
    Proposed
    Proposal 127
    0 references
    Proposal 132
    0 references
    Proposal 274
    0 references
    Proposal 290
    0 references
    Proposal 40
    0 references
    Proposal 53
    0 references
    Proposal 74
    0 references
    Proposal 97
    0 references
    Proposal 303
    0 references
     
    Retrieved from "https://nounsdev.wikibase.cloud/w/index.php?title=Item:Q202&oldid=9756"