0xa903c06bf35286f6d1cdad25396748353979a44c (Q222): Difference between revisions
From Nouns Dev
TiagoLubiana (talk | contribs) (Changed an Item) |
TiagoLubiana (talk | contribs) (Changed an Item) |
||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 284 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 284 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 282 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 282 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 280 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 280 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 279 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 279 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 278 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 278 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 277 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 277 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 276 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 276 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 271 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 271 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 269 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 269 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 268 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 268 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 266 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 266 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 263 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 263 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 259 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 259 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 257 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 257 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 256 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 256 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 254 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 254 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 251 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 251 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 249 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 249 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 238 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 238 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 237 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 237 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 236 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 236 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 232 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 232 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 231 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 231 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 228 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 228 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 226 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 226 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 225 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 225 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 224 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 224 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 223 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 223 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 217 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 217 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 215 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 215 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 214 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 214 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 211 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 211 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 209 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 209 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 208 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 208 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 207 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 207 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 206 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 206 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 205 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 205 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 204 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 204 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 201 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 201 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 199 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 199 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 198 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 198 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 197 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 197 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 195 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 195 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 194 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 194 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 193 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 193 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 192 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 192 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 191 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 191 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 190 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 190 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 189 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 189 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 188 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 188 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 187 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 187 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 185 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 185 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 184 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 184 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 183 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 183 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 182 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 182 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 181 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 181 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 180 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 180 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 179 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 179 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 178 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 178 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 176 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 176 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 175 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 175 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 173 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 173 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 172 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 172 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 171 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 171 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 170 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 170 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 169 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 169 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 168 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 168 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 167 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 167 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 166 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 166 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 165 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 165 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 164 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 164 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 163 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 163 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 162 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 162 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 161 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 161 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 159 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 159 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 158 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 158 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 156 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 156 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 155 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 155 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 154 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 154 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 151 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 151 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 150 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 150 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 147 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 147 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 145 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 145 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 144 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 144 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 143 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 143 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 142 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 142 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 141 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 141 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 140 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 140 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 139 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 139 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 138 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 138 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 137 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 137 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 136 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 136 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 133 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 133 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 132 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 132 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 129 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 129 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 128 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 128 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 126 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 126 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 125 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 125 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 124 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 124 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 119 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 119 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 118 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 118 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 117 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 117 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 116 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 116 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 114 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 114 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 113 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 113 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Opposed | |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 283 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 283 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Opposed | |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 274 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 274 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Opposed | |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 270 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 270 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Opposed | |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 248 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 248 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Opposed | |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 221 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 221 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Opposed | |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 203 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 203 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Opposed | |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 200 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 200 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Abstained | |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 272 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 272 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Abstained | |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 222 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 222 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Abstained | |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 216 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 216 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Abstained | |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 202 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 202 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Abstained | |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 196 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 196 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Abstained | |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 186 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 186 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Abstained | |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 146 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 146 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 284 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 284 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 284 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: This is fun! | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 282 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 282 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 282 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: I don’t think we need it at 20%. This barrier doesn’t affect quality of proposals imo. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 280 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 280 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 280 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: It seems like an interesting way to get attention for the service by naming a noun in the treasury. Concept is cool. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 279 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 279 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 279 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Id love to use one of these. Been a tech enthusiast forever and its something Id love to be using and show other people. I hope the marketing plan is solid though. ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 278 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 278 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 278 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 277 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 277 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 277 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: These seem like fun! Would use. ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 276 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 276 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 276 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: I love Arashs work and have been a supporter of his game idea for a long time. Id love to see this experiment play out - we should try games if we can and have the skilled people to achieve it without it being a crazy high budget like many games would be. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 271 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 271 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 271 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: I like the idea of nouns in books. I read to my kids every single day and not a day goes by that I havent wished they were nounish books. I sometimes change words to make them nounish lol. This kind of thing make sense to me. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 269 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 269 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 269 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Lil Bubble is nounish af. Love this prop and his music. ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 268 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 268 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 268 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Seems like a good direction to allow the DAO to control the acquisitions in a more trustless way. If the auto bidder could be controlled by few to the detriment of the DAO, I think we’d have bigger problems. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 266 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 266 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 266 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: This is a mechanical keyboard I would buy. I’m not an avid mk user, but a nouns keyboard would get me to use one for sure. Another quirky item that would get attention. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 263 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 263 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 263 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: The esports crew are continually smashing it. ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 259 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 259 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 259 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 257 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 257 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 257 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐Ξ-Ξ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 256 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 256 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 256 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Extremely nounish ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 254 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 254 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 254 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ 🥪 | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 251 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 251 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 251 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 249 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 249 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 249 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 238 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 238 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 238 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: The range funding is the killer app here imo. Gives proposers with that flexibility the option to potentially get more vote support than a fixed rate. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 237 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 237 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 237 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 236 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 236 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 236 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 232 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 232 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 232 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: This is an interesting prop. I think theres something here in terms of Nouns funding film production. The humanitarian/philanthropy part is cool too. Feels like it could have been funded from multiple sources and Nouns could be a production partner or something rather than funding the whole thing. It doesnt seem to have much support from the DAO, so maybe some iteration would be positive. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 231 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 231 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 231 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 228 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 228 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 228 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Worth a shot for this price! Good value, passionate community. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 226 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 226 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 226 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 225 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 225 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 225 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: I feel like Nouns has an opportunity to start reaching into the music industry here with this. Could be absolutely massive. Music is nounish. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 224 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 224 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 224 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Fun ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 223 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 223 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 223 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: I like HoN. I think its valuable infra for the ecosystem. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 217 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 217 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 217 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ +% | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 215 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 215 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 215 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Super useful tools, rad builders, Nick has been amazing to work with in terms of taking on feedback and suggestions and has tailored a ton of features to our work at The Noun Square. ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 214 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 214 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 214 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Roko, this is nounish af, please summarise my love for this pod and my experiences with the tools I’ve been given, so I can use it as my vote reason. ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 211 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 211 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 211 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Excited to see this come to fruition. While there’s some concern about educating people on DAO structure and crypto in general potentially being unlawful, I think focussing on brand and community has value. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 209 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 209 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 209 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: nounish af ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 208 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 208 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 208 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Would look good on the shelf and is a good talking point. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 207 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 207 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 207 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: We love the sofubi and David’s thoughtful approach to everything. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 206 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 206 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 206 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Nouns OTG is doing fun and amazing work. When people see this IRL, the impact is surely long remembered. We’ve seen this particular builder, Aubtoshi go through the whole process of failed prop houses, then small grants funding, and slowly scaling up to this. The structure of this next year laid out in this depth excites me that anyone is this passionate enough to actually DO THE WORK. We’ve seen some amazing things happen that weren’t even planned due to this style of activation, such as nouns in a shopify web3 ad! Being able to plan a year in advance like this also allows many others to potentially also embolden these activities by adding to the experiences. Planning ahead is everything for this type of initiative and it makes sense to see nouns at all of these events. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 205 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 205 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 205 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: wen nouns.⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 204 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 204 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 204 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: I like this. Feels like it has potential to become a popular swap platform that is constantly promoting nouns and nounish NFTs tastefully. It provides a place to do more secure swaps than sending eachother NFTs, even when theyre cheap. The ability to add what youre looking for or have to offer is also cool, mixing it up with different things in one transaction. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 201 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 201 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 201 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: I think this is a reasonable ask for a valuable tool. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 199 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 199 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 199 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Another interesting distro model for some of the Nouns Vision glasses currently sitting in the treasury. ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 198 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 198 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 198 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: While this is a large ask, I think there is huge value in this proposal. At this point in time, it doesnt look like it will be successful unfortunately, but decided to show my support nonetheless. Maybe this would be more successful when eth prices are higher, who knows? | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 197 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 197 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 197 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 195 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 195 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 195 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: This looks awesome! ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 194 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 194 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 194 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Love that this allows a discussion on a weekly call for any prop. Little bit extra time seems like a smart step to take. ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 193 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 193 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 193 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: This has so much potential, I’m all about it. nounish af ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 192 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 192 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 192 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Big supporter of these guys. Very thoughtful and skilled. Amazing asset to the DAO. ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 191 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 191 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 191 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Love the good this crew has been doing. Would like to see more coverage of it ongoing. Expanding globally makes sense to me. ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 190 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 190 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 190 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: The treasury minting! Love this. nounish af ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 189 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 189 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 189 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: This proposal is of huge value to the DAO and the nounish culture in general. The Gnars community has proven to be very efficient with the treasury and enabling the community with a larger treasury to push these initiatives across every continent. This subDAO is an insanely good model for the pod concept that has been talked so much about in the past few months. This pod has organic inbound flow and aggressive outreach into a subculture that is super hard to penetrate without being culturally relevant, living and breathing this stuff. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 188 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 188 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 188 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: This team has been very receptive to feedback and ideas to help shape this into a platform that is valuable to anyone looking to run contests, especially integrated with Twitter. We use it already at TNS and have begun to implement in Gnars, will implement in Alps DAO and have been discussing its use in Nouncil. Needless to say, there is many many use cases for this. I dont see this as too similar to prop house, its a different capital allocation mechanism, different user experience and targets a wildly popular aspect of being able to grow the community and onboard new artists and builders. I feel like this is complimentary to prop house in the ecosystem. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 187 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 187 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 187 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 185 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 185 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 185 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 184 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 184 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 184 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: I voted yes on the cancelled prop and I’m voting yes again. This is something we were hoping to do through tings.wtf so it’s amazing to see more attention and larger treasury to allocate funds to a public good like this. Very nounish ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 183 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 183 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 183 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Prop House the power house. Amazing piece of infrastructure that I support continued work on. ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 182 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 182 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 182 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Love the existing ones and think these have the power to land in the faces of people that aren’t already in the space if they’re staples in all the apps that use them. ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 181 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 181 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 181 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: This model has proven to be positive on a smaller scale and Im excited to see how it goes with much larger rewards. This has the potential to get the attention of many outside of the Nouns bubble and maybe even some existing popular YouTubers will participate. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 180 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 180 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 180 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Absolute power team! Prop was well thought out and put together and Im excited to see the results! | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 179 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 179 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 179 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Super interesting and seems fun! Looking forward to seeing if this has some reach beyond the existing Nouns bubble. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 178 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 178 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 178 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Im a supporter of experimenting with different ways of distributing the treasury. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 176 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 176 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 176 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: I absolutely love this! There’s so much amazing nounish content out there and having a place like this to view it all is epic. ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 175 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 175 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 175 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: There is immense value in this proposal. The amount of people looking for help with creating/editing proposals is huge and the ecosystem will benefit from a skilled crew stewarding them. I personally haven’t had the time to help all the people that ask. So it will be great to have a place to send them. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 173 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 173 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 173 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: These boats look amazing on the water and what better place than New York? Very nounish and among plenty of potential new Nouners I’m sure. ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 172 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 172 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 172 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: I think this is a great step in reducing the conversion friction related to proposals needing fiat or stables to cover costs. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 171 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 171 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 171 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: I’ve been talking about pods like this for months. Great team to handle this one and look forward to seeing all of the amazing things funded via this setup. ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 170 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 170 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 170 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: The NNS is an amazing endeavour in identity and has been bootstrapped with very little so far. This is the kind of thing that has visual impact and appeal that I feel is very suitable for the nouniverse and beyond. Let’s see where this can go! .⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 169 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 169 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 169 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: This makes more sense than refunding to the multisig who didnt initially pay for the transaction in the first place. Love your work ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 168 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 168 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 168 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: I love the idea of nouns somehow being involved with this channel and I hope there is iteration to the proposal to find something that the DAO is more supportive of. In the format it is now, something doesnt feel right about the approach. Though it is creative. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 167 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 167 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 167 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: This is a large sum to seed a sub dao with. But I think it could lead to substantial bids to help grow the treasury in a meaningful way and potentially fund some amazing work into the future. The fact that’s it’s a treasury seed and not compensation for such an immense task is testament to the team’s nounishness imo ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 166 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 166 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 166 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: A whole lot of proliferation and cultural relevance, executed by professionals. Looks like it’s going to be a lot of fun! nounish af ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 165 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 165 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 165 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: This crew makes amazing visuals! I’d love to see them making more nounish videos ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 164 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 164 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 164 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Nouns have been underrepresented in Australia so far and this initiative will help. ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 163 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 163 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 163 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: No nouncil does it better! This is a group of governance focused, nounish humans. The value delivered and available to newcomers to the scene is immensely underrated. And I’m here for it. ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 162 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 162 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 162 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Positive outcomes for the previous events and looks like a solid plan for this one. NSFW was confident to fund this ahead of the onchain proposal which says a lot. ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 161 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 161 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 161 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Makes sense to do this ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 159 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 159 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 159 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: I think owning a single Noun should allow the ability to submit a proposal, for now at least. I like until Noun #1000 and think that’s a good time to revisit this. ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 158 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 158 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 158 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: While I have concerns about the focus of this prop, I think the team could iterate and achieve some solid proliferation goals with the funding to focus and grow. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 156 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 156 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 156 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Top notch work from this crew and exciting to be a part of something so cool! I think it’s great for the nounish ecosystem and the world as a whole. ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 155 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 155 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 155 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: CDT does amazing work and I’m happy to see continuation here ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 154 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 154 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 154 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Love the work from this team and would like to see continuation. Agora could be a catalyst for much more participation in governance and I’m here for it. ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 151 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 151 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 151 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: It’s good to have a discretionary service like this. I think there’s a lot of value in it. I’d like to see more of this in domain specific niches too. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 150 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 150 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 150 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: I think getting verified (but anon) nouner discussion going is important. ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 147 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 147 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 147 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Awarding winners and team is something that I don’t think was expected, so this is a nice way to reward them and sets some precedent as to how much the art is worth to the DAO. I personally found Nouns DAO in my search for onchain SVG smart contracts, I saw the art and daily auctions that will run forever (provided someone settles) and I was hooked. The governance over treasury is amazing obviously, but there’s a lot to be said for the value of the iconic art. ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 145 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 145 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 145 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 144 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 144 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 144 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: This will be helpful for many nouns extensions and will surely be a factor in proliferation across Twitter with more automated tweets. ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 143 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 143 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 143 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: This team is insanely good at what they do and Nouns DAO will benefit immensely from Goldy making his studio and team into a full time Nounish machine. The quality of everything I’ve seen come from Nounish is so good and it’s really digestible content for people that may not be familiar with Nouns or the space at all. The perfect proliferation media toolkit. I’m excited to see all the productions that will come to fruition! ⌐◨-◨ Nounish AF ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 142 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 142 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 142 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ I’m a big fan of what the Brazil crew are doing and this opportunity to educate kids in the country that has the 2nd most active NFT users in the world makes a lot of sense. This prop covers so much for the price and involves skating heavyweight Bob Burnquist. Plus it’s a DAO to DAO proposal, initially run as a community vote using snapshot and then submitted onchain on behalf of the community. ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 141 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 141 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 141 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ I’m a big fan of Klim’s toys and noggles. Seems like he’s in a position to create really high quality pieces that are amazing conversation starters. I get the feeling that they will have mass appeal beyond the nouns bubble too, which is good for proliferation into other cultures. These could be an iconic stable physical that will be enjoyed by all ages for a long time to come. Love to see it ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 140 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 140 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 140 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ Prop House has been an amazing platform and I’m all about further experimentation in this direction. ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 139 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 139 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 139 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ Sonic branding is huge and is something I feel will add immense value to the DAO. This will allow creators of many mediums and networks to create and use sounds made with the CC0 assets that will create a nounish vibe when you hear them. The consistency across media will surely provide a recognisable sound profile that will benefit the ecosystem. I already know of a lot of media and creators that will be able to leverage this out of the gate. ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 138 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 138 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 138 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ I like this concept and think it’s not a huge ask to get nouns in front of a lot of people. Additionally, it seems like they could/might purchase nouns as part of the prize pool. A single noun purchase is good ROI from a monetary standpoint. That with the addition of how many more eyes will see nouns, makes it a positive feeling for me. I’d like to see longer term nouns integration with the show and more games as well. ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 137 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 137 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 137 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ I love that this proposal has grown through the ranks of prop house and is becoming something bigger. We like making kids happy. That’s nounish af. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 136 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 136 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 136 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ While it seems somewhat corporate-ey slapping a sponsorship on events, I still think its a target crowd that benefits the DAO to have the ⌐◨-◨ imprinted in their minds. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 133 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 133 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 133 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ I think pods like this will become an important proliferation tool to enable a wider community. If not now, I’m sure it will become a reality in the future. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 132 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 132 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 132 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 129 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 129 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 129 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 128 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 128 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 128 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐ⓝ°ⓒ We vibe at The Noun Square ⌐◨-◨ 💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛 💛💛💛❤️❤️❤️❤️💛❤️❤️❤️❤️💛 💛❤️❤️❤️🤍🖤❤️❤️❤️🤍🖤❤️💛 💛❤️💛❤️🤍🖤❤️💛❤️🤍🖤❤️💛 💛💛💛❤️❤️❤️❤️💛❤️❤️❤️❤️💛 💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛 | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 126 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 126 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 126 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Nounish af ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 125 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 125 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 125 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: We like ⌐◨-◨ art! Congrats to all the talented people who had art selected for this round 🙌 💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛 💛💛💛❤️❤️❤️❤️💛❤️❤️❤️❤️💛 💛❤️❤️❤️🤍🖤❤️❤️❤️🤍🖤❤️💛 💛❤️💛❤️🤍🖤❤️💛❤️🤍🖤❤️💛 💛💛💛❤️❤️❤️❤️💛❤️❤️❤️❤️💛 💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛 | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 124 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 124 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 124 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ The success of the client front end round was immense imo. Love this idea and look forward to seeing what this amazing swarm of talented nounish builders can achieve. 💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛 💛💛💛❤️❤️❤️❤️💛❤️❤️❤️❤️💛 💛❤️❤️❤️🤍🖤❤️❤️❤️🤍🖤❤️💛 💛❤️💛❤️🤍🖤❤️💛❤️🤍🖤❤️💛 💛💛💛❤️❤️❤️❤️💛❤️❤️❤️❤️💛 💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛 | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 119 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 119 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 119 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ Killing it as always, gg ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 118 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 118 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 118 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ Nounish AF Huge supporter of this initiative. Well thought out and I’m sure it will be well received. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 117 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 117 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 117 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ Seems like a good way to get a lot of eyes on the nouns branding. An audience of tech enthusiasts that don’t necessarily know much about NFTs or NounsDAO feels like a good initiative for proliferation to me. ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 116 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 116 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 116 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ We like the nounish comics ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 114 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 114 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 114 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ This seems like a good idea to me. It feels like a one off fix to adjust things that would have been addressed in the beginning if possible. | |||||||
| Property / Supported | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 113 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 113 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
| Property / Supported: Proposal 113 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ Great way to make more digestible entry points to NounsDAO. Looking forward to seeing this. | |||||||
| Property / Opposed | |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 283 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 283 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 283 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: I like some of these designs and the concept, but at this point with clothing brand experiments, I feel like using the brand shouldnt necessarily require funding up front from Nouns. Using the brand is free to do and offers an existing community/market. I do think there could be some great funded clothing brands, but still to see an outcome that feels right to fund. | |||||||
| Property / Opposed | |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 274 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 274 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 274 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: I like the idea of Oni being an onboarder of sorts, but not of that initiative being the discord in the current format. I think this would falsely legitimise a single discord server as the officially supported server for nouns which I dont think is a good direction. | |||||||
| Property / Opposed | |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 270 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 270 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 270 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Really love what this is but feels like the cost to build could be lowered and it would still be amazing. | |||||||
| Property / Opposed | |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 248 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 248 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 248 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: https://youtu.be/eBt8v97j8HE ⌐N-O | |||||||
| Property / Opposed | |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 221 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 221 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 221 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Delay prior to voting is long enough already imo. The agility of funding is actually a really cool feature of Nouns DAO. Id support a 7 day voting period with a 3 day pre vote delay. | |||||||
| Property / Opposed | |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 203 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 203 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 203 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Id like to see this as a nouniverse platform rather than just nouners, I think thered be a larger userbase and it would be more valuable then. | |||||||
| Property / Opposed | |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 200 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 200 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Opposed: Proposal 200 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: I love the concept and the tech. But I’m not sure how valuable it is to the DAO right now. I think only a small subset of nouners would utilise it and it possibly wouldn’t have much proliferation effect. | |||||||
| Property / Abstained | |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 272 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 272 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 272 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: This one is difficult for me. I love the concept but also am wary of giving access to the nouns namespace. I think we could always change it later if we found it didnt make sense. But I also see power in the ENS being independent of the DAO. | |||||||
| Property / Abstained | |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 222 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 222 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 222 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: I find the tech super interesting but I dont feel like its a good fit for Nouns. | |||||||
| Property / Abstained | |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 216 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 216 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 216 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: This is a difficult vote for me. I love the team and would love to see some work done with cool tech. But one of the coolest things about nouns from the beginning for me was the transparency in voting. It’s the first governance system I was even drawn to participating in and I have to say a big part has to be due to the transparency. I’m going to stay out of this one for now. | |||||||
| Property / Abstained | |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 202 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 202 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 202 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Love the idea and also think rewarding for cool ideas is positive. But 1eth feels a bit steep. Considering theres another prop to do it as well, it makes sense for the DAO to just vote for the other one. | |||||||
| Property / Abstained | |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 196 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 196 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 196 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: This is not something I personally would use, but see there could be benefit. Not feeling right for me right now though. | |||||||
| Property / Abstained | |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 186 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 186 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 186 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: I will abstain on this version of the proposal. It looks like it will be iterated upon and resubmitted. | |||||||
| Property / Abstained | |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 146 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 146 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Abstained: Proposal 146 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: I’m abstaining on this one. The prop team put in a lot of work to try and come up with a solution here but I’m on the fence as to whether we should set precedent on funding participation. | |||||||
Revision as of 22:49, 14 July 2023
Individual
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | 0xa903c06bf35286f6d1cdad25396748353979a44c |
Individual |
Statements
I don’t think we need it at 20%. This barrier doesn’t affect quality of proposals imo.
0 references
It seems like an interesting way to get attention for the service by naming a noun in the treasury. Concept is cool.
0 references
Id love to use one of these. Been a tech enthusiast forever and its something Id love to be using and show other people. I hope the marketing plan is solid though. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
I love Arashs work and have been a supporter of his game idea for a long time. Id love to see this experiment play out - we should try games if we can and have the skilled people to achieve it without it being a crazy high budget like many games would be.
0 references
I like the idea of nouns in books. I read to my kids every single day and not a day goes by that I havent wished they were nounish books. I sometimes change words to make them nounish lol. This kind of thing make sense to me.
0 references
Lil Bubble is nounish af. Love this prop and his music. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
Seems like a good direction to allow the DAO to control the acquisitions in a more trustless way. If the auto bidder could be controlled by few to the detriment of the DAO, I think we’d have bigger problems.
0 references
This is a mechanical keyboard I would buy. I’m not an avid mk user, but a nouns keyboard would get me to use one for sure. Another quirky item that would get attention.
0 references
The esports crew are continually smashing it. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
The range funding is the killer app here imo. Gives proposers with that flexibility the option to potentially get more vote support than a fixed rate.
0 references
This is an interesting prop. I think theres something here in terms of Nouns funding film production. The humanitarian/philanthropy part is cool too. Feels like it could have been funded from multiple sources and Nouns could be a production partner or something rather than funding the whole thing. It doesnt seem to have much support from the DAO, so maybe some iteration would be positive.
0 references
Worth a shot for this price! Good value, passionate community.
0 references
I feel like Nouns has an opportunity to start reaching into the music industry here with this. Could be absolutely massive. Music is nounish.
0 references
I like HoN. I think its valuable infra for the ecosystem.
0 references
Super useful tools, rad builders, Nick has been amazing to work with in terms of taking on feedback and suggestions and has tailored a ton of features to our work at The Noun Square. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
Roko, this is nounish af, please summarise my love for this pod and my experiences with the tools I’ve been given, so I can use it as my vote reason. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
Excited to see this come to fruition. While there’s some concern about educating people on DAO structure and crypto in general potentially being unlawful, I think focussing on brand and community has value.
0 references
Would look good on the shelf and is a good talking point.
0 references
We love the sofubi and David’s thoughtful approach to everything.
0 references
Nouns OTG is doing fun and amazing work. When people see this IRL, the impact is surely long remembered. We’ve seen this particular builder, Aubtoshi go through the whole process of failed prop houses, then small grants funding, and slowly scaling up to this. The structure of this next year laid out in this depth excites me that anyone is this passionate enough to actually DO THE WORK. We’ve seen some amazing things happen that weren’t even planned due to this style of activation, such as nouns in a shopify web3 ad! Being able to plan a year in advance like this also allows many others to potentially also embolden these activities by adding to the experiences. Planning ahead is everything for this type of initiative and it makes sense to see nouns at all of these events.
0 references
I like this. Feels like it has potential to become a popular swap platform that is constantly promoting nouns and nounish NFTs tastefully. It provides a place to do more secure swaps than sending eachother NFTs, even when theyre cheap. The ability to add what youre looking for or have to offer is also cool, mixing it up with different things in one transaction.
0 references
I think this is a reasonable ask for a valuable tool.
0 references
Another interesting distro model for some of the Nouns Vision glasses currently sitting in the treasury. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
While this is a large ask, I think there is huge value in this proposal. At this point in time, it doesnt look like it will be successful unfortunately, but decided to show my support nonetheless. Maybe this would be more successful when eth prices are higher, who knows?
0 references
Love that this allows a discussion on a weekly call for any prop. Little bit extra time seems like a smart step to take. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
This has so much potential, I’m all about it. nounish af ⌐◨-◨
0 references
Big supporter of these guys. Very thoughtful and skilled. Amazing asset to the DAO. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
Love the good this crew has been doing. Would like to see more coverage of it ongoing. Expanding globally makes sense to me. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
The treasury minting! Love this. nounish af ⌐◨-◨
0 references
This proposal is of huge value to the DAO and the nounish culture in general. The Gnars community has proven to be very efficient with the treasury and enabling the community with a larger treasury to push these initiatives across every continent. This subDAO is an insanely good model for the pod concept that has been talked so much about in the past few months. This pod has organic inbound flow and aggressive outreach into a subculture that is super hard to penetrate without being culturally relevant, living and breathing this stuff.
0 references
This team has been very receptive to feedback and ideas to help shape this into a platform that is valuable to anyone looking to run contests, especially integrated with Twitter. We use it already at TNS and have begun to implement in Gnars, will implement in Alps DAO and have been discussing its use in Nouncil. Needless to say, there is many many use cases for this. I dont see this as too similar to prop house, its a different capital allocation mechanism, different user experience and targets a wildly popular aspect of being able to grow the community and onboard new artists and builders. I feel like this is complimentary to prop house in the ecosystem.
0 references
I voted yes on the cancelled prop and I’m voting yes again. This is something we were hoping to do through tings.wtf so it’s amazing to see more attention and larger treasury to allocate funds to a public good like this. Very nounish ⌐◨-◨
0 references
Prop House the power house. Amazing piece of infrastructure that I support continued work on. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
Love the existing ones and think these have the power to land in the faces of people that aren’t already in the space if they’re staples in all the apps that use them. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
This model has proven to be positive on a smaller scale and Im excited to see how it goes with much larger rewards. This has the potential to get the attention of many outside of the Nouns bubble and maybe even some existing popular YouTubers will participate.
0 references
Absolute power team! Prop was well thought out and put together and Im excited to see the results!
0 references
Super interesting and seems fun! Looking forward to seeing if this has some reach beyond the existing Nouns bubble.
0 references
Im a supporter of experimenting with different ways of distributing the treasury.
0 references
I absolutely love this! There’s so much amazing nounish content out there and having a place like this to view it all is epic. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
There is immense value in this proposal. The amount of people looking for help with creating/editing proposals is huge and the ecosystem will benefit from a skilled crew stewarding them. I personally haven’t had the time to help all the people that ask. So it will be great to have a place to send them.
0 references
These boats look amazing on the water and what better place than New York? Very nounish and among plenty of potential new Nouners I’m sure. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
I think this is a great step in reducing the conversion friction related to proposals needing fiat or stables to cover costs.
0 references
I’ve been talking about pods like this for months. Great team to handle this one and look forward to seeing all of the amazing things funded via this setup. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
The NNS is an amazing endeavour in identity and has been bootstrapped with very little so far. This is the kind of thing that has visual impact and appeal that I feel is very suitable for the nouniverse and beyond. Let’s see where this can go! .⌐◨-◨
0 references
This makes more sense than refunding to the multisig who didnt initially pay for the transaction in the first place. Love your work ⌐◨-◨
0 references
I love the idea of nouns somehow being involved with this channel and I hope there is iteration to the proposal to find something that the DAO is more supportive of. In the format it is now, something doesnt feel right about the approach. Though it is creative.
0 references
This is a large sum to seed a sub dao with. But I think it could lead to substantial bids to help grow the treasury in a meaningful way and potentially fund some amazing work into the future. The fact that’s it’s a treasury seed and not compensation for such an immense task is testament to the team’s nounishness imo ⌐◨-◨
0 references
A whole lot of proliferation and cultural relevance, executed by professionals. Looks like it’s going to be a lot of fun! nounish af ⌐◨-◨
0 references
This crew makes amazing visuals! I’d love to see them making more nounish videos ⌐◨-◨
0 references
Nouns have been underrepresented in Australia so far and this initiative will help. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
No nouncil does it better! This is a group of governance focused, nounish humans. The value delivered and available to newcomers to the scene is immensely underrated. And I’m here for it. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
Positive outcomes for the previous events and looks like a solid plan for this one. NSFW was confident to fund this ahead of the onchain proposal which says a lot. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
I think owning a single Noun should allow the ability to submit a proposal, for now at least. I like until Noun #1000 and think that’s a good time to revisit this. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
While I have concerns about the focus of this prop, I think the team could iterate and achieve some solid proliferation goals with the funding to focus and grow.
0 references
Top notch work from this crew and exciting to be a part of something so cool! I think it’s great for the nounish ecosystem and the world as a whole. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
CDT does amazing work and I’m happy to see continuation here ⌐◨-◨
0 references
Love the work from this team and would like to see continuation. Agora could be a catalyst for much more participation in governance and I’m here for it. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
It’s good to have a discretionary service like this. I think there’s a lot of value in it. I’d like to see more of this in domain specific niches too.
0 references
I think getting verified (but anon) nouner discussion going is important. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
Awarding winners and team is something that I don’t think was expected, so this is a nice way to reward them and sets some precedent as to how much the art is worth to the DAO. I personally found Nouns DAO in my search for onchain SVG smart contracts, I saw the art and daily auctions that will run forever (provided someone settles) and I was hooked. The governance over treasury is amazing obviously, but there’s a lot to be said for the value of the iconic art. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
This will be helpful for many nouns extensions and will surely be a factor in proliferation across Twitter with more automated tweets. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
This team is insanely good at what they do and Nouns DAO will benefit immensely from Goldy making his studio and team into a full time Nounish machine. The quality of everything I’ve seen come from Nounish is so good and it’s really digestible content for people that may not be familiar with Nouns or the space at all. The perfect proliferation media toolkit. I’m excited to see all the productions that will come to fruition! ⌐◨-◨ Nounish AF ⌐◨-◨
0 references
⌐◨-◨ I’m a big fan of what the Brazil crew are doing and this opportunity to educate kids in the country that has the 2nd most active NFT users in the world makes a lot of sense. This prop covers so much for the price and involves skating heavyweight Bob Burnquist. Plus it’s a DAO to DAO proposal, initially run as a community vote using snapshot and then submitted onchain on behalf of the community. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
⌐◨-◨ I’m a big fan of Klim’s toys and noggles. Seems like he’s in a position to create really high quality pieces that are amazing conversation starters. I get the feeling that they will have mass appeal beyond the nouns bubble too, which is good for proliferation into other cultures. These could be an iconic stable physical that will be enjoyed by all ages for a long time to come. Love to see it ⌐◨-◨
0 references
⌐◨-◨ Prop House has been an amazing platform and I’m all about further experimentation in this direction. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
⌐◨-◨ Sonic branding is huge and is something I feel will add immense value to the DAO. This will allow creators of many mediums and networks to create and use sounds made with the CC0 assets that will create a nounish vibe when you hear them. The consistency across media will surely provide a recognisable sound profile that will benefit the ecosystem. I already know of a lot of media and creators that will be able to leverage this out of the gate. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
⌐◨-◨ I like this concept and think it’s not a huge ask to get nouns in front of a lot of people. Additionally, it seems like they could/might purchase nouns as part of the prize pool. A single noun purchase is good ROI from a monetary standpoint. That with the addition of how many more eyes will see nouns, makes it a positive feeling for me. I’d like to see longer term nouns integration with the show and more games as well. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
⌐◨-◨ I love that this proposal has grown through the ranks of prop house and is becoming something bigger. We like making kids happy. That’s nounish af.
0 references
⌐◨-◨ While it seems somewhat corporate-ey slapping a sponsorship on events, I still think its a target crowd that benefits the DAO to have the ⌐◨-◨ imprinted in their minds.
0 references
⌐◨-◨ I think pods like this will become an important proliferation tool to enable a wider community. If not now, I’m sure it will become a reality in the future.
0 references
⌐ⓝ°ⓒ We vibe at The Noun Square ⌐◨-◨ 💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛 💛💛💛❤️❤️❤️❤️💛❤️❤️❤️❤️💛 💛❤️❤️❤️🤍🖤❤️❤️❤️🤍🖤❤️💛 💛❤️💛❤️🤍🖤❤️💛❤️🤍🖤❤️💛 💛💛💛❤️❤️❤️❤️💛❤️❤️❤️❤️💛 💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛
0 references
We like ⌐◨-◨ art! Congrats to all the talented people who had art selected for this round 🙌 💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛 💛💛💛❤️❤️❤️❤️💛❤️❤️❤️❤️💛 💛❤️❤️❤️🤍🖤❤️❤️❤️🤍🖤❤️💛 💛❤️💛❤️🤍🖤❤️💛❤️🤍🖤❤️💛 💛💛💛❤️❤️❤️❤️💛❤️❤️❤️❤️💛 💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛
0 references
⌐◨-◨ The success of the client front end round was immense imo. Love this idea and look forward to seeing what this amazing swarm of talented nounish builders can achieve. 💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛 💛💛💛❤️❤️❤️❤️💛❤️❤️❤️❤️💛 💛❤️❤️❤️🤍🖤❤️❤️❤️🤍🖤❤️💛 💛❤️💛❤️🤍🖤❤️💛❤️🤍🖤❤️💛 💛💛💛❤️❤️❤️❤️💛❤️❤️❤️❤️💛 💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛
0 references
⌐◨-◨ Nounish AF Huge supporter of this initiative. Well thought out and I’m sure it will be well received.
0 references
⌐◨-◨ Seems like a good way to get a lot of eyes on the nouns branding. An audience of tech enthusiasts that don’t necessarily know much about NFTs or NounsDAO feels like a good initiative for proliferation to me. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
⌐◨-◨ This seems like a good idea to me. It feels like a one off fix to adjust things that would have been addressed in the beginning if possible.
0 references
⌐◨-◨ Great way to make more digestible entry points to NounsDAO. Looking forward to seeing this.
0 references
I like some of these designs and the concept, but at this point with clothing brand experiments, I feel like using the brand shouldnt necessarily require funding up front from Nouns. Using the brand is free to do and offers an existing community/market. I do think there could be some great funded clothing brands, but still to see an outcome that feels right to fund.
0 references
I like the idea of Oni being an onboarder of sorts, but not of that initiative being the discord in the current format. I think this would falsely legitimise a single discord server as the officially supported server for nouns which I dont think is a good direction.
0 references
Really love what this is but feels like the cost to build could be lowered and it would still be amazing.
0 references
Delay prior to voting is long enough already imo. The agility of funding is actually a really cool feature of Nouns DAO. Id support a 7 day voting period with a 3 day pre vote delay.
0 references
Id like to see this as a nouniverse platform rather than just nouners, I think thered be a larger userbase and it would be more valuable then.
0 references
I love the concept and the tech. But I’m not sure how valuable it is to the DAO right now. I think only a small subset of nouners would utilise it and it possibly wouldn’t have much proliferation effect.
0 references
This one is difficult for me. I love the concept but also am wary of giving access to the nouns namespace. I think we could always change it later if we found it didnt make sense. But I also see power in the ENS being independent of the DAO.
0 references
I find the tech super interesting but I dont feel like its a good fit for Nouns.
0 references
This is a difficult vote for me. I love the team and would love to see some work done with cool tech. But one of the coolest things about nouns from the beginning for me was the transparency in voting. It’s the first governance system I was even drawn to participating in and I have to say a big part has to be due to the transparency. I’m going to stay out of this one for now.
0 references
Love the idea and also think rewarding for cool ideas is positive. But 1eth feels a bit steep. Considering theres another prop to do it as well, it makes sense for the DAO to just vote for the other one.
0 references
This is not something I personally would use, but see there could be benefit. Not feeling right for me right now though.
0 references
I will abstain on this version of the proposal. It looks like it will be iterated upon and resubmitted.
0 references
I’m abstaining on this one. The prop team put in a lot of work to try and come up with a solution here but I’m on the fence as to whether we should set precedent on funding participation.
0 references
