0x13eef4ef8fca471f242ab0f8f49a3db6017ada33 (Q227): Difference between revisions
From Nouns Dev
TiagoLubiana (talk | contribs) (Changed an Item) |
TiagoLubiana (talk | contribs) (Changed an Item) |
||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 226 / rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 226 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
Property / Opposed | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 315 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 315 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Opposed | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 312 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 312 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 316 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 316 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 314 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 314 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 314 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: *maybe sent from voter.wtf* | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 313 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 313 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 311 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 311 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 303 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 303 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 302 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 302 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 301 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 301 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 321 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 321 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 320 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 320 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 319 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 319 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 326 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 326 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
|
Latest revision as of 23:46, 17 July 2023
Individual
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | 0x13eef4ef8fca471f242ab0f8f49a3db6017ada33 |
Individual |
Statements
love efforts like this however, as it stands there are too many loose ends and inconsistencies in the prop for me to support. looking forward to a future submission that incorporates feedback given
0 references
games are hard. id rather see if you can come up with something fun that the community can rally behind.
0 references
I dont doubt JDs ability to execute or his extensive network, however this prop is vague and the order of operations are off. Thanks for spending the time to submit this, I look forward to a proposal with more actionable items in the future.
0 references
theres an opportunity to get even weirder here to break out of the noise. flamethrower or burnt hair next please
0 references
I cannot support this prop in good faith without applying the same amount of rigor that all others are subject to. I could be convinced to vote for this effort if a solid distribution plan was put in place (something that is expected of all products incubated by the community). Don’t let my opinion, or the opinion of others, serve as a reason for not participating in the future. Putting your work on display - for all to judge - requires a lot more vulnerability than most are willing to admit. Sometimes a little bit of tweaking can lead to an outcome that all parties can get behind and maybe that is whats required here. Looking forward to reading more of your work and seeing the rest of the scribbles in your economist notebook come to life
0 references
i really like this prop but in many ways agree with 40. would like to see the proposers derisk the prop where possible. the team appears competent but the long manufacturing cycle time is concerning to me
0 references