0x13eef4ef8fca471f242ab0f8f49a3db6017ada33 (Q227): Difference between revisions

From Nouns Dev
(‎Changed an Item)
(‎Changed an Item)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 291 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 291 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 286 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 286 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 282 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 282 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 276 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 276 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 273 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 273 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 202 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 202 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 277 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 277 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 274 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 274 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 250 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 250 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 236 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 236 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 226 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 226 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 214 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 214 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 154 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 154 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 271 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 271 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 266 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 266 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 291 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 291 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 291 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: love efforts like this however, as it stands there are too many loose ends and inconsistencies in the prop for me to support. looking forward to a future submission that incorporates feedback given
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 286 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 286 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 286 / qualifier
 
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 282 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 282 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 282 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6edBSbs21E
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 276 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 276 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 276 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: games are hard. id rather see if you can come up with something fun that the community can rally behind.
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 273 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 273 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 273 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: I dont doubt JDs ability to execute or his extensive network, however this prop is vague and the order of operations are off. Thanks for spending the time to submit this, I look forward to a proposal with more actionable items in the future.
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 202 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 202 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 202 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: i like the art, but the people said no
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 315 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 315 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 312 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 312 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 277 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 277 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 277 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: theres an opportunity to get even weirder here to break out of the noise. flamethrower or burnt hair next please
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 274 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 274 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 274 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: the continental hotel
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 250 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 250 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 250 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: hyped on this, should be interesting
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 236 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 236 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 236 / qualifier
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 214 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 214 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 214 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: How else would I make cool Nouns art?
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 154 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 154 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 154 / qualifier
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 316 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 316 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 314 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 314 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 314 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: *maybe sent from voter.wtf*
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 313 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 313 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 311 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 311 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 303 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 303 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 302 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 302 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 301 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 301 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 321 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 321 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 320 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 320 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 319 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 319 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 326 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 326 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Proposed
 
Property / Proposed: Proposal 229 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Proposed
 
Property / Proposed: Proposal 268 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Proposed
 
Property / Proposed: Proposal 272 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 271 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 271 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 271 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: I cannot support this prop in good faith without applying the same amount of rigor that all others are subject to. I could be convinced to vote for this effort if a solid distribution plan was put in place (something that is expected of all products incubated by the community). Don’t let my opinion, or the opinion of others, serve as a reason for not participating in the future. Putting your work on display - for all to judge - requires a lot more vulnerability than most are willing to admit. Sometimes a little bit of tweaking can lead to an outcome that all parties can get behind and maybe that is whats required here. Looking forward to reading more of your work and seeing the rest of the scribbles in your economist notebook come to life
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 266 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 266 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 266 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: i really like this prop but in many ways agree with 40. would like to see the proposers derisk the prop where possible. the team appears competent but the long manufacturing cycle time is concerning to me

Latest revision as of 23:46, 17 July 2023

Individual
Language Label Description Also known as
English
0x13eef4ef8fca471f242ab0f8f49a3db6017ada33
Individual

    Statements

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    love efforts like this however, as it stands there are too many loose ends and inconsistencies in the prop for me to support. looking forward to a future submission that incorporates feedback given
    0 references
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6edBSbs21E
    0 references
    games are hard. id rather see if you can come up with something fun that the community can rally behind.
    0 references
    I dont doubt JDs ability to execute or his extensive network, however this prop is vague and the order of operations are off. Thanks for spending the time to submit this, I look forward to a proposal with more actionable items in the future.
    0 references
    i like the art, but the people said no
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    theres an opportunity to get even weirder here to break out of the noise. flamethrower or burnt hair next please
    0 references
    the continental hotel
    0 references
    hyped on this, should be interesting
    0 references
    0 references
    How else would I make cool Nouns art?
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    *maybe sent from voter.wtf*
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    I cannot support this prop in good faith without applying the same amount of rigor that all others are subject to. I could be convinced to vote for this effort if a solid distribution plan was put in place (something that is expected of all products incubated by the community). Don’t let my opinion, or the opinion of others, serve as a reason for not participating in the future. Putting your work on display - for all to judge - requires a lot more vulnerability than most are willing to admit. Sometimes a little bit of tweaking can lead to an outcome that all parties can get behind and maybe that is whats required here. Looking forward to reading more of your work and seeing the rest of the scribbles in your economist notebook come to life
    0 references
    i really like this prop but in many ways agree with 40. would like to see the proposers derisk the prop where possible. the team appears competent but the long manufacturing cycle time is concerning to me
    0 references