0x2767edfee9f5ba743511ee4187a596b302b43938 (Q513)
From Nouns Dev
Individual
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | 0x2767edfee9f5ba743511ee4187a596b302b43938 |
Individual |
Statements
I am one who believes Nounish play a key part in the success of the DAO. Most of us agree that the content produced thus far in season one is exceptional. We have a world-class media company capturing and creating our content; you just need to look through Pixel’s client portfolio to understand the calibre of the team we have here. As the distribution of content has been flagged, and I can understand these concerns, I have full faith that the team will assess and address it. Good luck!
0 references
I was on the fence about this prop. It is nothing short of incredible what the Nouns esports team has achieved and I look forward to following their future successes. In the proposal, I would have liked to have seen more detail on other potential revenue streams, sponsorship targets, and goals. I was able to find these answers in the Discord channel. Good luck team! ⌐◧-◧
0 references
Extremely Nounish imo. Opportunity to be part of something special. Creative ROI with donation to a good causes.
0 references
Sincerely appreciate the overwhelming support shown by the dao 🫡 ⌐◧-◧ let’s do this.
0 references
Coming up with creative IRL proliferation like this imo should play an important roll in the dao. A very nounish activation here exploring outside the web3 bubble
0 references
Voting yes for Proposal 307 as I believe it offers a fantastic opportunity to globally celebrate, proliferate, and highlight the Nounish culture that has been built over the last 2 years. Opening it up to a prop house round will enable communities to create their own unique activations, showcasing the talent and passion within our Dao. 🥳
0 references
I support Necfas, Mucho Love and have faith in the team and the valuable work they have already accomplished. However, I do have some concerns here. I believe the price tag is on the higher side for charitable work. Also distribution, the DAO has already voiced concerns in other proposals, highlighting the importance of making the true impact visible. While it is beneficial to hire a full-time media team, I encourage the team to hire and allocate some funds specifically for distribution to ensure the impact reaches a wider audience.
0 references
This partnership would not only introduce the Nouns to a new market but also establish a significant connection between two of the most influential web3 brands. The massive proliferation achieved during Pudgy Penguins previous toy launch demonstrates Luca and the teams expertise in generating exposure and reaching a wide audience. The sheer following and engagement of Pudgy’s socials is the easily the best in the space. Welcoming Luca into our toolkit and being able to access his knowledge and networks could really benefit the Dao and our builders.
0 references
Being deeply engrained in the beverage industry for 20 years I have too many reservations with this prop and how they intend to execute it. I have no doubt a delicious whisky will be produced but I believe there are many missed opportunities here. This feels like the easy route has been taken instead of trying to achieve the potential massive proliferation.
0 references
Struggling to justify the 18eth ask. If the dao feels a new font is needed I’d suggest opening it up to a Prop House round.
0 references
I commend Public Good for its achievements thus far, but I dont believe this is the best use of funds for taking the next step. It appears to be more of paid enthusiasm rather than strategic allocation. There are no mandatory guidelines for the breweries regarding what needs to be brewed; they are encouraged to brew the IPA but not required. There is also no commitment beyond the initial run. The only commitment seems to be the production of 500 cans of beer at a cost of $9 per can, while the actual production cost is no more than $1.5-2. Additionally, the beer is being sold by Narcose at a discounted price of $3.33 per can, resulting in a possible 8x markup on COGs, which is unheard of in the industry. As someone with beverage companies, I would have preferred to see a consolidation of the number of breweries, with a greater allocation of funds to each. Sourcing brewers who specialize in certain styles, funding them for the creation of custom recipes for the Public Good portfolio. Such an approach would result in a world-class CC0 beer range while still achieving expansion.
0 references
I like Nerman. But cost v benefit is off for me here, unfortunately.
0 references
