0x75ee6eb3d8dacf41ee2e5307090b197d3e1cca6e (Q496)
From Nouns Dev
Individual
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | 0x75ee6eb3d8dacf41ee2e5307090b197d3e1cca6e |
Individual |
Statements
22
i am a big fan of aubtoshis having funded her through NSFW, and she is one of the most effective and passionate brand advocates the dao has. however, when i think of the potential gain to the dao of sending a single representative to all of these events at this price (regardless of who that ambassador is and how great they are) that i struggle to see the potential benefit to the dao relative to the cost. what makes it challenging is that many of these events are not our typical venues like conferences or hackathons (coachella, cannes, sxsw, burning man, basel) are international party destinations. nothing against those types of places, but i just dont know how to measure success and if the dao gets the bang for our buck for such a significant capital outlay. i am still a supporter of aubtoshis as the daos most passionate public advocate and would support a reduced schedule with more clearly defined metrics for success
0 references
22
thoughtful proposal from a talented team, however i think that given the size of nouns dao and the fragmented nature of communication that already exists, there wont be much pmf for a dedicated social network site
0 references
22
I appreciate the time and energy that went into this proposal, but unfortunately I do not think this is a product that I or most other DAO members would ever use. I already have too many different emails, discords, telegrams, whatsapps, imessages, etc, etc, and would prefer to reduce the number of messaging surfaces I have, not add more
0 references
22
thoughtful proposal but given its considerable cost i am not convinced the dao will get the bang for our buck required to justify such a large outlay
0 references
19
i am a huge fan of gami and gnars and all the work they have done and will continue to do. however, at 700 ETH i have to vote against this version of the proposal. i think this is an absolute no-brainer yes at a lower expenditure. i would vote in favor of large proposals with generous compensation for the gnars team to execute on them, but for 700 ETH up front i would prefer things were better defined ahead of time. this is in no way a personal rebuke on anyone involved, i am a big fan of the team, and i would lead the charge on supporting v2 of this proposal at a lower funding cost to nouns dao, and would vote yes on big ambitious well compensated projects that were better defined ahead of time
0 references
19
Not opposed to figuring out how to collaborate with Mr Beast or other high profile celebs in a future iteration of this proposal but agree with others that this needs to be fleshed out and reworked
0 references
Very thoughtful proposal but unfortunately I just do not think it serves the DAOs goals
0 references
i think this is a very cool cause and website and the creator is a very nice passionate guy, but i dont think it serves the interests of the DAO
0 references
19
I have been a very outspoken supporter of the Builder tool for some time, and I view it as a potential piece of core infra to scaling the Nouns protocol. However, like many others, my initial reaction was that the 1000 ETH to bootstrap the DAO is a major ask - one that the DAO needs to carefully consider. After discussing this in depth with the team and other Nouners, I am comfortable voting yes on this exciting and ambitious proposal.
0 references
19
I agree with feedback that this proposal could use more detail, but given the teams proven track record, and the relatively low cost, I am comfortable voting in favor.
0 references
19
i am working towards better mechanisms for smaller proposals in the future but until then i would prefer to see this pass
0 references
11
after careful consideration i am going to vote in favor of this. i believe there is value in this being a forcing function for the DAO to explore if/how we can make equity investments. we would not be able to explore this design space otherwise. however, i understand the other side of this, and want to add that i am very much opposed to Nouns becoming just another venture DAO and will not support future proposals that are just venture investments for the sake of returns
0 references
