0x281ec184e704ce57570614c33b3477ec7ff07243 (Q207): Difference between revisions
From Nouns Dev
TiagoLubiana (talk | contribs) (Created a new Item) |
TiagoLubiana (talk | contribs) (Changed an Item) |
||||||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 292 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 292 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 289 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 289 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 288 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 288 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 287 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 287 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 259 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 259 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 257 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 257 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 297 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 297 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 297 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: I really enjoy archives.wtf and have sent the link out many times. Am I the only one who has actually used this site? Its great! Theres an overwhelming amount of Nouns art on here and communicates a broad sense of Nouns and Nounish aesthetic. Its currently my 2nd favorite reference to send artists for research, second only to the actual Nouns DAO playground. If Nouns is going to last forever, shouldnt we be archiving everything? I would be happy to fund this as is, but it doesnt look like it will pass. In the next iteration of this prop I would like to see the following: 1. A continued focus on CC0. The art is all interesting, mostly for skimming though. I can actually use the CC0 content! I can put it in videos, art, put it on a shirt. The more this focuses on CC0 media the more it enables and encourages viral permissionless growth of Nouns. 2. The Nouns DAO on-chain proposals section needs to be fleshed out more, and could also be a serious justification for this project. Each funded DAO proposal should have a ton of meta-media. Behind the scenes shots, interviews with the proposer, images from the on-chain prop, screenshots and screen recordings of anything digital. Currently most props have 1-4 images and it doesnt feel comprehensive. Work with the prop submitters and teams to really get a thorough pile of media from them. 3. Better top-level organization of content. I dont really understand the difference between NOUNS SPECIAL and NOUNS WORLD and NOUNS on the front page - it should be way more intuitive. Each item on the front page needs to be essential and obvious. 4. This prop is probably too focused on the design and tech. It looks beautiful, and the arweave uploader is cool, but I think the focus really needs to be on usability, figuring out exactly what needs this fulfills, and on the content itself. I know on-chain rejections are challenging, but I encourage this team to workshop the proposal one more time and submit again. There is high quality work being done here and I would like to see it continued. | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 296 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 296 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 296 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: the Nouns Running Club has made remarkable strides What a gem of a proposal. First and foremost I love the focus on defining what you want Nouns to mean. The culture, values, and general vibe. Positivity, health, organic local community growth. This all feels very wholesome and I like the effort here. I chuckled at the R in FRENS: Refrain from promoting your project or business. Lol. You already have existing clubs, youre already running. Thousands of cumulative KM run is an excellent success metric. Adding some Nounish swag makes a lot of sense to me. To Noun 12s point - I think an interesting path forward is for these running clubs to remain self-sustaining groups that continue to exist regardless of Nouns funding. That means not depending on Nouns funding for general operations, instead just focusing DAO bucks specifically on Nouns proliferation. Something to think about when starting new groups. These clubs are much more valuable to us if they arent temporary and plan to exist with or without further funding. My main request: more cell phone running videos! More Noggle-y running montages! | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 286 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 286 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 286 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Nouns. An infinite work of moisturizing art. Fragrance free - for delicate skin. This is a funny, thoughtful prop. A pharmacy / retail tag team with extensive wet wipe experience. I appreciate the proposers attention to costs. Everything here is very reasonable, the unit costs, design and marketing costs, and the fact that they only get paid if they sell all of the items. These would continue to be on the market with no additional costs to the DAO. On a simple level - easy, affordable merch for IRL activations. This feels like an entry point to a larger strategy and Im excited to see where these efforts lead. I hope they continue to engage with designers on future projects, I dont know if Im ever really willing to compromise on design quality. I hope they take their profits and reinvest into developing their own proliferation flywheel with this, contributing to future growth alongside Nouns DAO. On a tangent. I wonder if low-cost high-volume items is good for developing the brand, or if we should be targeting boutique high end products. But the ask is so reasonable here, and this carries the potential of becoming a self-sustaining Nouns proliferating flywheel. I say we let them wipe. | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 284 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 284 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 284 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: This sounds like a lot of fun. $26/pizza feels expensive for buying in bulk, but supporting independent pizzerias sits nicely with me. throwing a global pizza party is a good team-building exercise for Spaceship Earth! | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 282 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 282 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 282 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: There is an inherent risk to passing proposals in a DAO. Passed proposals signify action. ETH is spent, configurations altered. Something could break. Someone could rug the treasury. Fundamentally, I understand why we would give extra weight to Against votes. When a proposal is rejected, nothing happens. We are safe. Dynamic quorums original intention was to defend against DAO attacks which target voter apathy. Was Prop 269 an attack? The more we talk about dynamic quorum parameters the more it just feels fiddly to me, like were micromanaging the DAOs actual decisions. Everyone was watching Prop 271 because the outcome could be determined by a single vote. I find myself yearning for simplicity. Life is more exciting on the other side of the threshold. I think were looking at technical solutions for what is ultimately a social issue of consensus. If we want to spend less, or more, or fund more art, or less art, or more blockchain public goods, I think the path forward is communication and campaigning for support within the DAO. | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 271 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 271 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 271 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Light hearted Nounish novels for middle schoolers is an excellent idea, and the first two chapters were fun. I would read more. For pitching purposes I wish the plot was explained in more detail. What I read was fun exposition, but Im uncertain about the heart of the novels conflict. You mention a few careless words summon a threat to the Nouniverse - elaborating on that and getting us hooked on the grand adventure would go a long way. I appreciate how the Nouns are presented and look forward to seeing all of the different personalities and the situations they cause. The compensation is generous, but given that youve committed to releasing this into the public domain and forgoing all traditional royalties, I think its fair. The key details of the Open Edition mint should have been included here, including revenue split. Have you considered minting each chapter? Ideally you build up an audience as you go. Once complete, what are the plans for publishing this and getting it out into the world? How are we going to get people to read this? I would love to see publishers that work with traditional public domain material printing and selling this at their own expense. If this is not the case, possibly use funds from the OE mint to fund a vanity publisher. On the whole - excited to see this happen, excited to read the novel. ``` “Hide!” Ruth whispered. “What?” the hairspray creature said indignantly. “I will not! I am an artist! I stand by my work!” ``` | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 269 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 269 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 269 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Over time I expect droposals will have increased competition for the provenance of minting through Nouns DAO and we will naturally fine tune our instincts about details like the % revenue returned. In the short term, this is entertaining. The songs are fun and deploying this costs next to nothing. Im voting for. If this doesnt pass I think it makes sense for Gnars to deploy this themselves. | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 268 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 268 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 268 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: There has been considerable discussion around how the DAO could acquire Nouns to allocate to builders as part of proposals. There has not been clear consensus on the matter. Rather than letting disagreement stall the DAO I believe its important to support a few competitive solutions and let them prove themselves. This is interesting technology, its already built, and it would allow us to trustlessly funnel Nouns into the treasury. This tech does not allow for precise head selection (Beer for Bud Light, Chicken for Stoopid Buddy), which means there still is a place for a centralized group like NAC and other technical solutions being developed. This is called a Trial but a broader vision is not communicated. I wish it were. Im going to imagine that the next steps would be to fund this with much more ETH and let it run continuously. I am not a fan of the effect this would have on the auction experience for bidders and for people watching the auctions. Having a bot effectively enforce a price floor feels less fun and makes our core mechanism less authentic and entertaining. Also, as a builder who would love to be compensated with a Noun at some point, this tool isnt the ideal method for me. I would prefer to receive ETH so I can buy a Noun at auction and get the full Nouns experience. I support us buying 1 Noun with this tool, as an experiment. | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 263 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 263 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 263 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Nouns Esports is, in my opinion, one of the most successful things Nouns has funded. They are building enthusiastic, authentic audiences in a space traditionally hostile to anything crypto related. They are winning over a difficult crowd on top of winning games and tournaments. Choosing DOTA was smart, and Ive seen the noggle decals and flags in countless clips now. It feels like the players are making a name for themselves in the leagues, getting press, building their own following. And it all ties back to Nouns DAO in a way that feels genuine. I trust the Nouns Esports crew and want to see them continue their work. I also feel like their compensation asks are reasonable, and that theyre negotiating fair deals with everyone involved. My one request is for more high quality video content celebrating the players and Nouns. More highlight reels, more tournament winning celebrations, more player AMAs, more videos of people spamming noggles in the chat, more videos of players getting carried out with the crowd chanting their name. You are creating these iconic moments and I want to see them documented and celebrated. ⌐[g]-[g] | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 262 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 262 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 262 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: https://twitter.com/danitpeleg3d/status/1629106351698837504 While Im not terribly interested in billboards by themselves, this is additional spend to support marketing the efforts of Prop 251. If something we do is getting traction & press (ie a write up in Vogue) I think its fair to continue supporting further marketing efforts. | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 260 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 260 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 260 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: The art is beautiful here, I respect that youve positioned this all as an open source public good, have more games planned, and covered the development and public audit costs yourselves. Personally Im interested in seeing you explore on-chain mechanics that are a bit more creative, and if youre looking to launch the collection from the Nouns I think you will have more success if you return a percentage of the ETH back to the DAO. | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 256 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 256 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 256 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: This video gets me: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5DI64O15Ow And I really want to tell people that Nouns sponsored the worlds first triple backflip in a wheelchair, it feels like a Nounish thing to do. I see this as an exciting memorable event, an entertaining video, and a fundraiser for a cause Nouns can proudly support. I appreciate the focus on providing and collecting CC0 footage for the community, and doing the open edition droposal (50% to Nouns DAO, 50% to charity). Looking forward to seeing this one happen. | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 317 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 317 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 316 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 316 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 314 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 314 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 314 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: I feel obliged to include a reason here. | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 311 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 311 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 306 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 306 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 306 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: This is a fun way to get a significant amount of legit artists to contribute creatively to Nouns. It would be valuable to present all artists with an optional CC0 release for the commissions, and I would also hope that all pages will be scanned and archived online. On the whole Im excited to see all of the creative work! | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 304 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 304 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 304 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Nouns DAO was built on Ethereum. If we take the public goods thesis seriously, we need to be thoughtful leaders in the support of Ethereum development and community. We need to lean into this direction hard. I appreciate the thorough explanations and links in this prop. Telling the story and identifying its importance is just as valuable as the donation. A proposal like this serves as a press release, a piece of history, and the story we tell lasts far longer than the ETH we donate. In terms of storytelling this proposal is a serious step up from Prop 184 (ZachXBT). It makes it all much more meaningful to me. I would like to see future proposals continue this trend, striving towards thoughtful documents that people actually share. | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 303 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 303 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 303 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Building public infrastructure feels core to current Nouns ideology. Both ASK and TSP feel like highly aligned partners and this project is a unique and interesting opportunity. This project has already received city approvals and feels like a solid win for us. The Noggles grind rail is essential here. They communicate the meme of Nouns, will last for a long time, and are fun and photo friendly. I would strongly encourage the group to try and work more lasting Nounish items into the project. Can more be done within this budget? Perhaps a mural? The biggest line item is Spohn Ranch Skateparks - how can their work connect with Nouns and proliferate? I feel like this could use more care put into the Nouns element. Perhaps a Nounish launch party? On the whole I trust Oni, and really appreciate the previous skate park projects hes been a part of. I want this to happen and hope they can deliver an excellent Nouns experience. | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 302 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 302 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 301 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 301 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 301 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: The art / tech here is compelling, and we stand to benefit from continued expansion into the New York art scene. Prop 224 was intended to market the Nouns auction and increase prices. I think we stand to benefit from explicitly approaching this. Lets try to actually learn some lessons in the grand virtuous cycle experiment. In the previous prop past art was referenced as selling for more than 250k, yet the pieces from Prop 224 did not raise auction prices by anywhere close to that. We did not move the needle on auction prices as planned, there was a disconnect. But - they did a few things right. They raised auction prices in a way that was clearly attributed to their efforts, meaning they effectively caught peoples attention and converted this into bids, proving that the approach is a possibility. They earned genuine enthusiasm from a number of Nouners during the week, I enjoyed their posts on twitter, the events they held, and this video: https://vimeo.com/829178232. I think it makes sense to readjust and try again, and they have. This proposal offers 1001 physical pieces at a significantly lower per-piece cost to the DAO. On top of this, and most importantly, this is paired with 10 months of marketing, comms, and events. I am in favour of this proposal. For it to be considered a success, and receive further funding, we need to see a sustained increase in average auction price. If it increases by about 1 ETH over the next 264 days we break even. If this passes I hope the team puts serious effort into drawing attention to their art and the daily Nouns auction. I expect to see buzz on Twitter and other socials celebrating the Noun of the day. | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 323 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 323 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 323 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Love the branding. Im most interested in the on-boarding of further international breweries here. Im ok with the approach taken for partnership in the short term - ultimately the question is, can you make this scale? The design and recipes are CC0, can we generate enough demand to make using these obvious? Will the breweries continue brewing this and using the designs? For this to be successful imho we need to see breweries making decent money from beer sales here. It should be so successful that current breweries keep brewing, and additional breweries jump in permissionlessly because its a money making and marketing opportunity. In future iterations I would like to see plans to try and get press coverage. | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 321 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 321 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 319 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 319 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 319 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Some context, and a few question answers🙏 Nermans first proposal ( https://nouns.wtf/vote/77 ) was very long, specific, and ambitious. We almost entirely automated governance in Nouncil and completed a variety of out-of-scope features to make sure Nouncils governance ran smoothly. Now, Nouncil is the most active voting member of Nouns DAO, with Nerman automating the 10,000+ votes of over 100 Nouncillors voting on more than 200 Nouns DAO props. We navigated the changing world of Nouns Discords as the official one closed, always building for an expanding decentralized social group. Whenever a good idea arose we implemented further features, like the Nouns Nymz feed. We continued working on the bots, at our own expense, long after the initial proposals end date. At the end of the process the feature list felt limiting, preventing us from continuously learning and refining our direction according to user interest and DAO priority. For instance, when we wrote this proposal Nouns had an official Discord. Things change fast here. I also had several people note (semi-joking, semi-serious) that prop 77 was too long of a read. So - this proposal is shorter and focused on a broader vision over a specific time period. This gives us a clear roadmap, as well as the flexibility to learn, grow, and pivot as we work. The primary focus of this prop is actually the Nounish developer SDK, not a discord bot. `npm install nerman`. The first version of the Nerman.js SDK was essential to all the bots we built and one of the most impactful things delivered. This proposal is not an extensive documentation of the features we will add. This is a proposal to keep the team focused on the project, working as hard as we can towards the vision specified for 6 months. We are currently a team of three, with me working part time leading, planning, and coding. This proposal does not cover any of my time spent on other Nouns projects - Yitong, you can still expect an ambitious Nouns Short Shorts proposal. Some of the items here will be very significant to do extensively and correctly. Were not just checking boxes, this library should be the cleanest, most intuitive way of interacting with the Nouniverse. There is easily enough work here for the team to stay busy for 6 months. Each of the features listed is a potential rabbit hole. Properly indexing all Nouns DAO data and coding interestin | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 326 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 326 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 325 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 325 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 325 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Pudgy Penguins is launching a new collection of toys. There will be 499 red and 499 blue penguins wearing Noggles. They are asking for 10 ETH, which will cover adding 10 gold penguins with gold plated Noggles as random prizes to the collection launch. In exchange Nouns DAO is getting extensive inclusion in the Pudgy Penguins collection marketing, generating millions of impressions to the Nouns brand. Im going to simply vote FOR. The value is here. Welcome to our world Pudgy Penguins. But I have to be honest - this collaboration could be so much more exciting. I encourage you to dive deep into Nouns DAO and look at the DAOs emergent values. Public goods, decentralized creation, absurdity, charity. There are a lot and we dont always agree on everything. Try to find something you connect with on a deeper level and make it absolutely central to the collaboration. Pudgy Penguins wants to be ALLIES IN THE FIGHT AGAINST THE EVIL BEARS OF NEGATIVITY. Very Nounish. The current proposal doesnt put up much of a fight against the evil bears. The best collaboration you can bring to the table is one that leaves us with a well crafted story to tell. Gold plated Noggles are less Nounish than say, Penguin conservation efforts, 1/1 artist collaborations, the Cut Bank penguin statue, actual igloos, the fact that penguins can dive up to 1500 ft, icebergs, Macaroni penguins, Werner Herzogs penguin doc ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KriRCtS4rs ) etc etc. | |||||||
Property / Abstained | |||||||
Property / Abstained: Proposal 295 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Abstained: Proposal 295 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Abstained | |||||||
Property / Abstained: Proposal 291 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Abstained: Proposal 291 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Abstained: Proposal 291 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: There is a definite need for milestone payments. In the event that we do need to halt funding to a project, milestone dates provide specific moments where the DAO can focus attention on evaluating proposal outcomes. This also adds incentive for proposers to create reasonable timelines and goals that they need to hit. I am supportive of development in this area. This proposal is to retrofund an audit by 0xMacro and cover deployment costs. In general I think this is reasonable ask, however in proposal discussions further serious issues were found with the code. The audit clearly states this audit should not solely be relied upon for security. Suddenly covering the audit costs becomes less compelling. So what are we supposed to do? What should we rely on for security? Multiple audits? Code4rena? Is there a way to formalize and decentralize how we approach both DAO upgrades and contract interactions? I am abstaining on this one. | |||||||
Property / Abstained | |||||||
Property / Abstained: Proposal 270 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Abstained: Proposal 270 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Abstained | |||||||
Property / Abstained: Proposal 194 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Abstained: Proposal 194 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Abstained | |||||||
Property / Abstained: Proposal 308 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Abstained: Proposal 308 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Abstained | |||||||
Property / Abstained: Proposal 300 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Abstained: Proposal 300 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Opposed | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 258 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 258 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
Property / Opposed | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 285 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 285 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 285 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: This team is clearly doing great things in Brazil. I love seeing the São Paulo mayor with Noggle VR glasses. The Lounge is the most compelling thing to me here. Building community and having fun with real people in the space. Likewise, the Metaverse item could be interesting if people actually use it during the event. Im less interested in the general sponsorship package and the street gallery items. | |||||||
Property / Opposed | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 283 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 283 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 283 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: leblancstudios prior work looks solid, and I respect the plans for a self-sufficient brand that can continue proliferating past the initial investment. Im not feeling fully enthusiastic about the mockups. Id be in favour of less variation, ensuring that you only produce the best designs that people will actually buy. | |||||||
Property / Opposed | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 276 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 276 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 276 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: The art is fun but Im not drawn to the idea of teaching players about Nouns DAO in a game. Using Nouns art and resources is all the DAO connection I need. IMO this is only worth it if were aiming for an audience bigger than Nouns DAO. My only requirement is that the game needs to be fun and compelling, and an MVP of game play would go a long way there. I would support something simple and multiplayer, like https://lolbeans.io/ | |||||||
Property / Opposed | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 272 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 272 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 272 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: I cannot support any official blessing of this technology without full communication of the vision for how it will be used by the DAO. | |||||||
Property / Opposed | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 266 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 266 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 266 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Theres a lot of potential here. The MK ecosystem is a compelling niche, and if you deliver excellence this could reach an interesting audience. In order for me to support this proposal I would like to see you: - choose a designer and let them express their vision as part of this proposal. The creative direction makes or breaks this. I dont want to see Noggles slapped on a keyboard - I want to see innovation, a high quality keyboard that authentically captures the attention of everyone interested in MK. - consider further integration with and support of VIA. Open source public infrastructure is very Nounish. For instance, allocating a portion of the revenue to them would be interesting. - just start MK DAO. Zoras tools have made this very easy and I would like to see a community form that isnt dependent on a proposal getting passed in Nouns DAO. - clearly explain what happens to the revenue generated. | |||||||
Property / Opposed | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 261 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 261 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 261 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: I prepared this document to help make a decision: https://twitter.com/JoelCares_/status/1643017030042370049 I agree with Noun 40 in that Im mostly interested in Dynamic Quorum as a security measure, but understand that ultimately these values are another tool to affect proposal outcomes. We recently implemented a vote threshold in Nouncil and have increasingly voted to abstain in Nouns DAO when our internal threshold is not met. Its a bit disheartening to have the majority vote FOR and then process an abstain because our vote didnt meet threshold, both for the proposers and the voters. There is a social consequence to the DAO in modifying these values and I would advocate for experimenting with smaller changes. | |||||||
Property / Opposed | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 255 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 255 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 255 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Enabling mobile push-notifications for token holders is interesting, but I wonder how many Nouners would use this specific tool or even want these on-chain events appearing as notifications on their phone. There isnt enough obvious utility for me here. The prop also talks about Nouns lacking a simple real-time communication layer but doesnt seem to offer any further communication tools, like messaging. Poolsuites work is fun and significantly Nounish, happy to have them present and proposing. Im voting no on this prop but definitely encourage them to come back with more proposals. | |||||||
Property / Opposed | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 315 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 315 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 315 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: The sponsorship opportunities are interesting. Im also also supportive of connecting them to a larger vision, a brand, a platform, ie NounsTennisFam. However, if were funding the entire platform development I believe it needs to be clearly positioned as and make intuitive sense as a public good. | |||||||
Property / Opposed | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 312 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 312 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 312 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: I dig the project - Im going to mint one of these myself after this. However the Nounish integrations presented here arent compelling enough for us to cover the entire production and publishing costs. | |||||||
Property / Opposed | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 310 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 310 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 310 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: There is an audience for these videos, and its positive to see a high initial view count on a new channel. However, when I search for Baa Baa Black Sheep Cartoons songs for Kids on YouTube I get an endless stream of similar videos. Im not sold on just adding more to this content pile. For me to support this project the videos need to be uniquely compelling to parents with children. We need to bring a Nounish wave of innovation to everything we do. | |||||||
Property / Proposed | |||||||
Property / Proposed: Proposal 259 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Proposed | |||||||
Property / Proposed: Proposal 319 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Proposed | |||||||
Property / Proposed: Proposal 337 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 23:47, 17 July 2023
Individual
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | 0x281ec184e704ce57570614c33b3477ec7ff07243 |
Individual |
Statements
I really enjoy archives.wtf and have sent the link out many times. Am I the only one who has actually used this site? Its great! Theres an overwhelming amount of Nouns art on here and communicates a broad sense of Nouns and Nounish aesthetic. Its currently my 2nd favorite reference to send artists for research, second only to the actual Nouns DAO playground. If Nouns is going to last forever, shouldnt we be archiving everything? I would be happy to fund this as is, but it doesnt look like it will pass. In the next iteration of this prop I would like to see the following: 1. A continued focus on CC0. The art is all interesting, mostly for skimming though. I can actually use the CC0 content! I can put it in videos, art, put it on a shirt. The more this focuses on CC0 media the more it enables and encourages viral permissionless growth of Nouns. 2. The Nouns DAO on-chain proposals section needs to be fleshed out more, and could also be a serious justification for this project. Each funded DAO proposal should have a ton of meta-media. Behind the scenes shots, interviews with the proposer, images from the on-chain prop, screenshots and screen recordings of anything digital. Currently most props have 1-4 images and it doesnt feel comprehensive. Work with the prop submitters and teams to really get a thorough pile of media from them. 3. Better top-level organization of content. I dont really understand the difference between NOUNS SPECIAL and NOUNS WORLD and NOUNS on the front page - it should be way more intuitive. Each item on the front page needs to be essential and obvious. 4. This prop is probably too focused on the design and tech. It looks beautiful, and the arweave uploader is cool, but I think the focus really needs to be on usability, figuring out exactly what needs this fulfills, and on the content itself. I know on-chain rejections are challenging, but I encourage this team to workshop the proposal one more time and submit again. There is high quality work being done here and I would like to see it continued.
0 references
the Nouns Running Club has made remarkable strides What a gem of a proposal. First and foremost I love the focus on defining what you want Nouns to mean. The culture, values, and general vibe. Positivity, health, organic local community growth. This all feels very wholesome and I like the effort here. I chuckled at the R in FRENS: Refrain from promoting your project or business. Lol. You already have existing clubs, youre already running. Thousands of cumulative KM run is an excellent success metric. Adding some Nounish swag makes a lot of sense to me. To Noun 12s point - I think an interesting path forward is for these running clubs to remain self-sustaining groups that continue to exist regardless of Nouns funding. That means not depending on Nouns funding for general operations, instead just focusing DAO bucks specifically on Nouns proliferation. Something to think about when starting new groups. These clubs are much more valuable to us if they arent temporary and plan to exist with or without further funding. My main request: more cell phone running videos! More Noggle-y running montages!
0 references
Nouns. An infinite work of moisturizing art. Fragrance free - for delicate skin. This is a funny, thoughtful prop. A pharmacy / retail tag team with extensive wet wipe experience. I appreciate the proposers attention to costs. Everything here is very reasonable, the unit costs, design and marketing costs, and the fact that they only get paid if they sell all of the items. These would continue to be on the market with no additional costs to the DAO. On a simple level - easy, affordable merch for IRL activations. This feels like an entry point to a larger strategy and Im excited to see where these efforts lead. I hope they continue to engage with designers on future projects, I dont know if Im ever really willing to compromise on design quality. I hope they take their profits and reinvest into developing their own proliferation flywheel with this, contributing to future growth alongside Nouns DAO. On a tangent. I wonder if low-cost high-volume items is good for developing the brand, or if we should be targeting boutique high end products. But the ask is so reasonable here, and this carries the potential of becoming a self-sustaining Nouns proliferating flywheel. I say we let them wipe.
0 references
This sounds like a lot of fun. $26/pizza feels expensive for buying in bulk, but supporting independent pizzerias sits nicely with me. throwing a global pizza party is a good team-building exercise for Spaceship Earth!
0 references
There is an inherent risk to passing proposals in a DAO. Passed proposals signify action. ETH is spent, configurations altered. Something could break. Someone could rug the treasury. Fundamentally, I understand why we would give extra weight to Against votes. When a proposal is rejected, nothing happens. We are safe. Dynamic quorums original intention was to defend against DAO attacks which target voter apathy. Was Prop 269 an attack? The more we talk about dynamic quorum parameters the more it just feels fiddly to me, like were micromanaging the DAOs actual decisions. Everyone was watching Prop 271 because the outcome could be determined by a single vote. I find myself yearning for simplicity. Life is more exciting on the other side of the threshold. I think were looking at technical solutions for what is ultimately a social issue of consensus. If we want to spend less, or more, or fund more art, or less art, or more blockchain public goods, I think the path forward is communication and campaigning for support within the DAO.
0 references
Light hearted Nounish novels for middle schoolers is an excellent idea, and the first two chapters were fun. I would read more. For pitching purposes I wish the plot was explained in more detail. What I read was fun exposition, but Im uncertain about the heart of the novels conflict. You mention a few careless words summon a threat to the Nouniverse - elaborating on that and getting us hooked on the grand adventure would go a long way. I appreciate how the Nouns are presented and look forward to seeing all of the different personalities and the situations they cause. The compensation is generous, but given that youve committed to releasing this into the public domain and forgoing all traditional royalties, I think its fair. The key details of the Open Edition mint should have been included here, including revenue split. Have you considered minting each chapter? Ideally you build up an audience as you go. Once complete, what are the plans for publishing this and getting it out into the world? How are we going to get people to read this? I would love to see publishers that work with traditional public domain material printing and selling this at their own expense. If this is not the case, possibly use funds from the OE mint to fund a vanity publisher. On the whole - excited to see this happen, excited to read the novel. ``` “Hide!” Ruth whispered. “What?” the hairspray creature said indignantly. “I will not! I am an artist! I stand by my work!” ```
0 references
Over time I expect droposals will have increased competition for the provenance of minting through Nouns DAO and we will naturally fine tune our instincts about details like the % revenue returned. In the short term, this is entertaining. The songs are fun and deploying this costs next to nothing. Im voting for. If this doesnt pass I think it makes sense for Gnars to deploy this themselves.
0 references
There has been considerable discussion around how the DAO could acquire Nouns to allocate to builders as part of proposals. There has not been clear consensus on the matter. Rather than letting disagreement stall the DAO I believe its important to support a few competitive solutions and let them prove themselves. This is interesting technology, its already built, and it would allow us to trustlessly funnel Nouns into the treasury. This tech does not allow for precise head selection (Beer for Bud Light, Chicken for Stoopid Buddy), which means there still is a place for a centralized group like NAC and other technical solutions being developed. This is called a Trial but a broader vision is not communicated. I wish it were. Im going to imagine that the next steps would be to fund this with much more ETH and let it run continuously. I am not a fan of the effect this would have on the auction experience for bidders and for people watching the auctions. Having a bot effectively enforce a price floor feels less fun and makes our core mechanism less authentic and entertaining. Also, as a builder who would love to be compensated with a Noun at some point, this tool isnt the ideal method for me. I would prefer to receive ETH so I can buy a Noun at auction and get the full Nouns experience. I support us buying 1 Noun with this tool, as an experiment.
0 references
Nouns Esports is, in my opinion, one of the most successful things Nouns has funded. They are building enthusiastic, authentic audiences in a space traditionally hostile to anything crypto related. They are winning over a difficult crowd on top of winning games and tournaments. Choosing DOTA was smart, and Ive seen the noggle decals and flags in countless clips now. It feels like the players are making a name for themselves in the leagues, getting press, building their own following. And it all ties back to Nouns DAO in a way that feels genuine. I trust the Nouns Esports crew and want to see them continue their work. I also feel like their compensation asks are reasonable, and that theyre negotiating fair deals with everyone involved. My one request is for more high quality video content celebrating the players and Nouns. More highlight reels, more tournament winning celebrations, more player AMAs, more videos of people spamming noggles in the chat, more videos of players getting carried out with the crowd chanting their name. You are creating these iconic moments and I want to see them documented and celebrated. ⌐[g]-[g]
0 references
https://twitter.com/danitpeleg3d/status/1629106351698837504 While Im not terribly interested in billboards by themselves, this is additional spend to support marketing the efforts of Prop 251. If something we do is getting traction & press (ie a write up in Vogue) I think its fair to continue supporting further marketing efforts.
0 references
The art is beautiful here, I respect that youve positioned this all as an open source public good, have more games planned, and covered the development and public audit costs yourselves. Personally Im interested in seeing you explore on-chain mechanics that are a bit more creative, and if youre looking to launch the collection from the Nouns I think you will have more success if you return a percentage of the ETH back to the DAO.
0 references
This video gets me: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5DI64O15Ow And I really want to tell people that Nouns sponsored the worlds first triple backflip in a wheelchair, it feels like a Nounish thing to do. I see this as an exciting memorable event, an entertaining video, and a fundraiser for a cause Nouns can proudly support. I appreciate the focus on providing and collecting CC0 footage for the community, and doing the open edition droposal (50% to Nouns DAO, 50% to charity). Looking forward to seeing this one happen.
0 references
This is a fun way to get a significant amount of legit artists to contribute creatively to Nouns. It would be valuable to present all artists with an optional CC0 release for the commissions, and I would also hope that all pages will be scanned and archived online. On the whole Im excited to see all of the creative work!
0 references
Nouns DAO was built on Ethereum. If we take the public goods thesis seriously, we need to be thoughtful leaders in the support of Ethereum development and community. We need to lean into this direction hard. I appreciate the thorough explanations and links in this prop. Telling the story and identifying its importance is just as valuable as the donation. A proposal like this serves as a press release, a piece of history, and the story we tell lasts far longer than the ETH we donate. In terms of storytelling this proposal is a serious step up from Prop 184 (ZachXBT). It makes it all much more meaningful to me. I would like to see future proposals continue this trend, striving towards thoughtful documents that people actually share.
0 references
Building public infrastructure feels core to current Nouns ideology. Both ASK and TSP feel like highly aligned partners and this project is a unique and interesting opportunity. This project has already received city approvals and feels like a solid win for us. The Noggles grind rail is essential here. They communicate the meme of Nouns, will last for a long time, and are fun and photo friendly. I would strongly encourage the group to try and work more lasting Nounish items into the project. Can more be done within this budget? Perhaps a mural? The biggest line item is Spohn Ranch Skateparks - how can their work connect with Nouns and proliferate? I feel like this could use more care put into the Nouns element. Perhaps a Nounish launch party? On the whole I trust Oni, and really appreciate the previous skate park projects hes been a part of. I want this to happen and hope they can deliver an excellent Nouns experience.
0 references
The art / tech here is compelling, and we stand to benefit from continued expansion into the New York art scene. Prop 224 was intended to market the Nouns auction and increase prices. I think we stand to benefit from explicitly approaching this. Lets try to actually learn some lessons in the grand virtuous cycle experiment. In the previous prop past art was referenced as selling for more than 250k, yet the pieces from Prop 224 did not raise auction prices by anywhere close to that. We did not move the needle on auction prices as planned, there was a disconnect. But - they did a few things right. They raised auction prices in a way that was clearly attributed to their efforts, meaning they effectively caught peoples attention and converted this into bids, proving that the approach is a possibility. They earned genuine enthusiasm from a number of Nouners during the week, I enjoyed their posts on twitter, the events they held, and this video: https://vimeo.com/829178232. I think it makes sense to readjust and try again, and they have. This proposal offers 1001 physical pieces at a significantly lower per-piece cost to the DAO. On top of this, and most importantly, this is paired with 10 months of marketing, comms, and events. I am in favour of this proposal. For it to be considered a success, and receive further funding, we need to see a sustained increase in average auction price. If it increases by about 1 ETH over the next 264 days we break even. If this passes I hope the team puts serious effort into drawing attention to their art and the daily Nouns auction. I expect to see buzz on Twitter and other socials celebrating the Noun of the day.
0 references
Love the branding. Im most interested in the on-boarding of further international breweries here. Im ok with the approach taken for partnership in the short term - ultimately the question is, can you make this scale? The design and recipes are CC0, can we generate enough demand to make using these obvious? Will the breweries continue brewing this and using the designs? For this to be successful imho we need to see breweries making decent money from beer sales here. It should be so successful that current breweries keep brewing, and additional breweries jump in permissionlessly because its a money making and marketing opportunity. In future iterations I would like to see plans to try and get press coverage.
0 references
Some context, and a few question answers🙏 Nermans first proposal ( https://nouns.wtf/vote/77 ) was very long, specific, and ambitious. We almost entirely automated governance in Nouncil and completed a variety of out-of-scope features to make sure Nouncils governance ran smoothly. Now, Nouncil is the most active voting member of Nouns DAO, with Nerman automating the 10,000+ votes of over 100 Nouncillors voting on more than 200 Nouns DAO props. We navigated the changing world of Nouns Discords as the official one closed, always building for an expanding decentralized social group. Whenever a good idea arose we implemented further features, like the Nouns Nymz feed. We continued working on the bots, at our own expense, long after the initial proposals end date. At the end of the process the feature list felt limiting, preventing us from continuously learning and refining our direction according to user interest and DAO priority. For instance, when we wrote this proposal Nouns had an official Discord. Things change fast here. I also had several people note (semi-joking, semi-serious) that prop 77 was too long of a read. So - this proposal is shorter and focused on a broader vision over a specific time period. This gives us a clear roadmap, as well as the flexibility to learn, grow, and pivot as we work. The primary focus of this prop is actually the Nounish developer SDK, not a discord bot. `npm install nerman`. The first version of the Nerman.js SDK was essential to all the bots we built and one of the most impactful things delivered. This proposal is not an extensive documentation of the features we will add. This is a proposal to keep the team focused on the project, working as hard as we can towards the vision specified for 6 months. We are currently a team of three, with me working part time leading, planning, and coding. This proposal does not cover any of my time spent on other Nouns projects - Yitong, you can still expect an ambitious Nouns Short Shorts proposal. Some of the items here will be very significant to do extensively and correctly. Were not just checking boxes, this library should be the cleanest, most intuitive way of interacting with the Nouniverse. There is easily enough work here for the team to stay busy for 6 months. Each of the features listed is a potential rabbit hole. Properly indexing all Nouns DAO data and coding interestin
0 references
Pudgy Penguins is launching a new collection of toys. There will be 499 red and 499 blue penguins wearing Noggles. They are asking for 10 ETH, which will cover adding 10 gold penguins with gold plated Noggles as random prizes to the collection launch. In exchange Nouns DAO is getting extensive inclusion in the Pudgy Penguins collection marketing, generating millions of impressions to the Nouns brand. Im going to simply vote FOR. The value is here. Welcome to our world Pudgy Penguins. But I have to be honest - this collaboration could be so much more exciting. I encourage you to dive deep into Nouns DAO and look at the DAOs emergent values. Public goods, decentralized creation, absurdity, charity. There are a lot and we dont always agree on everything. Try to find something you connect with on a deeper level and make it absolutely central to the collaboration. Pudgy Penguins wants to be ALLIES IN THE FIGHT AGAINST THE EVIL BEARS OF NEGATIVITY. Very Nounish. The current proposal doesnt put up much of a fight against the evil bears. The best collaboration you can bring to the table is one that leaves us with a well crafted story to tell. Gold plated Noggles are less Nounish than say, Penguin conservation efforts, 1/1 artist collaborations, the Cut Bank penguin statue, actual igloos, the fact that penguins can dive up to 1500 ft, icebergs, Macaroni penguins, Werner Herzogs penguin doc ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KriRCtS4rs ) etc etc.
0 references
There is a definite need for milestone payments. In the event that we do need to halt funding to a project, milestone dates provide specific moments where the DAO can focus attention on evaluating proposal outcomes. This also adds incentive for proposers to create reasonable timelines and goals that they need to hit. I am supportive of development in this area. This proposal is to retrofund an audit by 0xMacro and cover deployment costs. In general I think this is reasonable ask, however in proposal discussions further serious issues were found with the code. The audit clearly states this audit should not solely be relied upon for security. Suddenly covering the audit costs becomes less compelling. So what are we supposed to do? What should we rely on for security? Multiple audits? Code4rena? Is there a way to formalize and decentralize how we approach both DAO upgrades and contract interactions? I am abstaining on this one.
0 references
This team is clearly doing great things in Brazil. I love seeing the São Paulo mayor with Noggle VR glasses. The Lounge is the most compelling thing to me here. Building community and having fun with real people in the space. Likewise, the Metaverse item could be interesting if people actually use it during the event. Im less interested in the general sponsorship package and the street gallery items.
0 references
leblancstudios prior work looks solid, and I respect the plans for a self-sufficient brand that can continue proliferating past the initial investment. Im not feeling fully enthusiastic about the mockups. Id be in favour of less variation, ensuring that you only produce the best designs that people will actually buy.
0 references
The art is fun but Im not drawn to the idea of teaching players about Nouns DAO in a game. Using Nouns art and resources is all the DAO connection I need. IMO this is only worth it if were aiming for an audience bigger than Nouns DAO. My only requirement is that the game needs to be fun and compelling, and an MVP of game play would go a long way there. I would support something simple and multiplayer, like https://lolbeans.io/
0 references
I cannot support any official blessing of this technology without full communication of the vision for how it will be used by the DAO.
0 references
Theres a lot of potential here. The MK ecosystem is a compelling niche, and if you deliver excellence this could reach an interesting audience. In order for me to support this proposal I would like to see you: - choose a designer and let them express their vision as part of this proposal. The creative direction makes or breaks this. I dont want to see Noggles slapped on a keyboard - I want to see innovation, a high quality keyboard that authentically captures the attention of everyone interested in MK. - consider further integration with and support of VIA. Open source public infrastructure is very Nounish. For instance, allocating a portion of the revenue to them would be interesting. - just start MK DAO. Zoras tools have made this very easy and I would like to see a community form that isnt dependent on a proposal getting passed in Nouns DAO. - clearly explain what happens to the revenue generated.
0 references
I prepared this document to help make a decision: https://twitter.com/JoelCares_/status/1643017030042370049 I agree with Noun 40 in that Im mostly interested in Dynamic Quorum as a security measure, but understand that ultimately these values are another tool to affect proposal outcomes. We recently implemented a vote threshold in Nouncil and have increasingly voted to abstain in Nouns DAO when our internal threshold is not met. Its a bit disheartening to have the majority vote FOR and then process an abstain because our vote didnt meet threshold, both for the proposers and the voters. There is a social consequence to the DAO in modifying these values and I would advocate for experimenting with smaller changes.
0 references
Enabling mobile push-notifications for token holders is interesting, but I wonder how many Nouners would use this specific tool or even want these on-chain events appearing as notifications on their phone. There isnt enough obvious utility for me here. The prop also talks about Nouns lacking a simple real-time communication layer but doesnt seem to offer any further communication tools, like messaging. Poolsuites work is fun and significantly Nounish, happy to have them present and proposing. Im voting no on this prop but definitely encourage them to come back with more proposals.
0 references
The sponsorship opportunities are interesting. Im also also supportive of connecting them to a larger vision, a brand, a platform, ie NounsTennisFam. However, if were funding the entire platform development I believe it needs to be clearly positioned as and make intuitive sense as a public good.
0 references
I dig the project - Im going to mint one of these myself after this. However the Nounish integrations presented here arent compelling enough for us to cover the entire production and publishing costs.
0 references
There is an audience for these videos, and its positive to see a high initial view count on a new channel. However, when I search for Baa Baa Black Sheep Cartoons songs for Kids on YouTube I get an endless stream of similar videos. Im not sold on just adding more to this content pile. For me to support this project the videos need to be uniquely compelling to parents with children. We need to bring a Nounish wave of innovation to everything we do.
0 references