Proposal 314 (Q5213): Difference between revisions

Support this proposal. I like that this is a tool that (1) has utility to the DAO (cool voter client), (2) introduces new stuff for us to play with (likes, non-Noun voting, and other mechanics make this feel social, which is what voting is all about), (3) is open source ftw. In addition, I think wilsons process of building the thing, launching the thing, and then asking for funding is a very principled thing to have done, and should be encouraged more. I like the idea of retro-funding, because it self selects for execution oriented builders, and by definition youre verifying someones extant contribution as opposed to speculating on their eventual delivery. Totally understand that some props require large funding up front to pursue and want to be supportive of those larger capital investments, but I am much more amenable to voting for a retro fund proposal. PS - I think im the first to vote on this one. Is there a special award or easter egg? Paging wilsoncusack.eth *sent from voter.wtf*