Proposal 253 (Q150)

From Nouns Dev
Revision as of 15:02, 17 July 2023 by TiagoLubiana (talk | contribs) (‎Changed an Item)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
A Nouns proposal.
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Proposal 253
A Nouns proposal.

    Statements

    0 references
    0 references
    96
    0 references
    Nouns Hack Week
    0 references
    253
    0 references
    Generating lots of ideas and approaches around tools is key to evolving onchain societies and should be encouraged
    0 references
    Love this idea - I think events like these are great for concentrating collective energy around Nouns into singular moments, which can drive a lot of creativity and innovation. It also has the opportunity to attract a lot of new developers and creatives into the community.
    0 references
    This is our prop, so we are naturally in support of it. Were excited to see the entire Nouns community hyped around a single week event, building cool things, and celebrating the work everyone is doing. Keep nouns weird. ⌐◨-◨
    0 references
    I don’t disagree with the tracks myself and think this is a great idea so voting FOR but would advocate listening to the dissenting views and incorporating them into the final tracks we go with. trust the explorer grants team to handle that well 🙏
    0 references
    **FOR - 38 VOTES** **heyjeff.eth** | *hack = win* **byhardy** | *loved this idea from the first time martin posted it on Twitter. hes been grinding on it. absolutely huge idea that can bring a ton of positive attention to the ecosystem. win for everyone imo. cant wait!* **nonodynamo** | *Seems like it just a lot of prop houses in one week. I am not sure it will get the best ideas because it is so much all at once. Or the right attention to the ideas.* **AGAINST - 9 VOTES** **Classic_Craig** | *Would like to see Marketing added*
    0 references
    Too rushed, categories dont make sense, push it back a week and do it more thoughtfully to maximize the impact.
    0 references
    like the idea, disagree with the tracks chosen
    0 references
    Reasons given in my newsletter: https://paragraph.xyz/@thebower/active-governance-noun-582-4
    0 references
    154
    0 references
    16 March 2023
    0 references
    89
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    Isaac (builder, zora) + toady (tns)
    0 references
    16 March 2023
    0 references
    Imagine a world where voting does not exist. In this world, we would have no need for rules or principles. But in our world, voting is a reality. So we have a simple rule: we only vote against. We use a “Squad Vote” for each proposal. If more people vote against than vote for or abstain, we vote against on-chain. Otherwise, we abstain. This is our rule. According to the “squad vote” result for proposal 253, which is 6 for, 10 against and 11 abstain, we choose to vote abstain.The viewpoints of our different members are as follows (source not listed): Opinions opposing this proposal: 1. The theme of Hack Week is not clear, and the proposal is a bit rough. 2. Time. The poster indicates that it will be held from 3.27-4.2, which is very urgent. 70% of the effect of Hack Week comes from early preparation and BD, especially as an online hackathon, the promotion and BD time in the early stage needs to be longer. 3. 99 ETH expenditure is too high. Its unreasonable to hastily organize a Nouns ecosystem Hack Week for about $200,000. Supporting views on the proposal: 1. A replicable growth model has been proven in the Nouns ecosystem. From Open Round and private voting research rounds, this is the best Nouns growth model. And every launch will attract enough attention and increase community cohesion. This proposal belongs to repeating an already successful model to promote ecological growth for Nouns with no logical problems. 2. The difference in this proposal is that Hack Week will involve more operational work than Prop House rounds without promotion or operation; this replicable model can actually be optimized by Proposal 253 for mature growth within Nouns ecosystem. 3. Behind Proposal 253 are teams such as Nouns.build, Nouns Square, Grant Protocol etc., who together form a golden team among all proposals related to nouns - they are trustworthy due to their understanding of noun spirits as well as professionalism and execution capabilities. 4. On another note: I am concerned that overly professional requirements for proposals may stifle community atmosphere. Many proposers have no problem with logic or implementation but may get bogged down in how professional their proposals should be instead of focusing on whats best for nouns.
    0 references
    6
    0 references
    99
    0 references
    99
    0 references
    1
    0 references
    Nouns Hack Week is a decentralized one-week event for the Nouns community to explore new ideas, celebrate each other, and attract new contributors. The event will be fully community -run, encouraging all Nounish communities to host their own events during the week. The theme is keep nouns weird.
    0 references
    <@738431505927241828> <@362737590430072862> could you share your ideal track setups? so I can make them voting options
    0 references
    im pro more prop house rounds, but this seems vague and lacks direction. which is kinda the goal. but would be nice to have and end focus. for instance I really like dthe prop house hackathon, but nothing was put into production as far as I know. so kinda a waste? IDK . --is there an explorer grants page on how things have gone so far? since we are adding 4 (2 new 2 old) to that project as well?
    There isn't a specific explorer grants page on how things have gone so far. However, you can check https://twitter.com/explorergrants for updates. The team is open to feedback and tweaks regarding the prize breakdown and can set up a vote for the rounds and weighting of what goes where.
    0 references
    or we could do weighted voting where you allocated to track, but not sure exaclty how that works on Snapshot - if someone has 1 noun can they split it by 0.1?
    0 references