0x538c4f2afa012911851dadf0655cb61377e7a8eb (Q201): Difference between revisions

From Nouns Dev
(‎Changed an Item)
(‎Changed an Item)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 240 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 240 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 239 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 239 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 238 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 238 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 289 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 289 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 274 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 274 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 244 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 244 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 241 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 241 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 216 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 216 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 170 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 170 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 240 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 240 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 240 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: I think this is interesting and theres a need for a central API for nounish builders to use. However, Im voting against this prop in its current form. You mention quite a few things that will be built after the infrastructure is stood up, including several untested new applications that people may or may not use. I think what would be most valuable and what this should focus on is getting all existing Noun data on ceramic and set up infrastructure to add new in real time. For example all traits and auction data. Make a system so its easy for anyone to query trait stats. Give me all Nouns with gameboy head. Or give me todays auction and all traits. Dont fuck with the other stuff right now. We are missing a good API to query all existing noun data. Focus on that first and then focus on the other stuff.
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 239 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 239 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 239 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: My concern is that its a big unknown as to whether or not the community will buy 5,000 copies of each issue. Theres a non-trivial chance that they end up sitting in a warehouse and not many are sold. Since comic book stores will be placing orders I think it would be advantageous to provide an accessible list of which stores have the comic in stock so the community can purchase directly from the stores carrying the comic. This list should be on the comic dao website.
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 238 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 238 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 238 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: From a technical standpoint I think this is really cool. However I have a hard time seeing this being widely adopted and Im not sure there are many props that would benefit from these tools.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 289 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 289 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 289 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: I understand why some would vote no for this proposal given the price tag and analytics. However, I see the content the Nounish team is putting out is one of the few things helping Nouns stay on brand. Without the brand Nouns is just another NFT project with a floor price that is trending down. The brand/culture is what will differentiate Nouns. Need to stick to the mission.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 274 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 274 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 274 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Definitely yes. Oni has been putting in work free of charge for some time.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 244 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 244 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 244 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: I support funding open infrastructure to solve DAO problems. This piece of software has also been successfully piloted via Lil Nouns.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 241 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 241 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 241 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Im into it. I think various funding mechanics are a good thing and the ability to fund via treasury owned NFTs is also cool.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 216 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 216 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 216 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: I like this proposal because technical research is something that is lacking from Noun proposals. Nouns can become a leader in funding research of breakthrough technology. Looking forward to seeing how this plays out and how we can build on it.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 170 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 170 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 170 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Would love to see more devs on the team. Happy to help where I can.
Property / Proposed
 
Property / Proposed: Proposal 246 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 22:45, 14 July 2023

Individual
Language Label Description Also known as
English
0x538c4f2afa012911851dadf0655cb61377e7a8eb
Individual

    Statements

    instance of
    Individual
    0 references
    Opposed
    Proposal 296
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 286
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 273
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 271
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 232
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 215
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 211
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 240
    Vote Weight
    2
    Vote Reason
    I think this is interesting and theres a need for a central API for nounish builders to use. However, Im voting against this prop in its current form. You mention quite a few things that will be built after the infrastructure is stood up, including several untested new applications that people may or may not use. I think what would be most valuable and what this should focus on is getting all existing Noun data on ceramic and set up infrastructure to add new in real time. For example all traits and auction data. Make a system so its easy for anyone to query trait stats. Give me all Nouns with gameboy head. Or give me todays auction and all traits. Dont fuck with the other stuff right now. We are missing a good API to query all existing noun data. Focus on that first and then focus on the other stuff.
    0 references
    Proposal 239
    Vote Weight
    2
    Vote Reason
    My concern is that its a big unknown as to whether or not the community will buy 5,000 copies of each issue. Theres a non-trivial chance that they end up sitting in a warehouse and not many are sold. Since comic book stores will be placing orders I think it would be advantageous to provide an accessible list of which stores have the comic in stock so the community can purchase directly from the stores carrying the comic. This list should be on the comic dao website.
    0 references
    Proposal 238
    Vote Weight
    1
    Vote Reason
    From a technical standpoint I think this is really cool. However I have a hard time seeing this being widely adopted and Im not sure there are many props that would benefit from these tools.
    0 references
    Supported
    Proposal 246
    Vote Weight
    2
    0 references
    Proposal 231
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 208
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 169
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 289
    Vote Weight
    1
    Vote Reason
    I understand why some would vote no for this proposal given the price tag and analytics. However, I see the content the Nounish team is putting out is one of the few things helping Nouns stay on brand. Without the brand Nouns is just another NFT project with a floor price that is trending down. The brand/culture is what will differentiate Nouns. Need to stick to the mission.
    0 references
    Proposal 274
    Vote Weight
    1
    Vote Reason
    Definitely yes. Oni has been putting in work free of charge for some time.
    0 references
    Proposal 244
    Vote Weight
    2
    Vote Reason
    I support funding open infrastructure to solve DAO problems. This piece of software has also been successfully piloted via Lil Nouns.
    0 references
    Proposal 241
    Vote Weight
    2
    Vote Reason
    Im into it. I think various funding mechanics are a good thing and the ability to fund via treasury owned NFTs is also cool.
    0 references
    Proposal 216
    Vote Weight
    1
    Vote Reason
    I like this proposal because technical research is something that is lacking from Noun proposals. Nouns can become a leader in funding research of breakthrough technology. Looking forward to seeing how this plays out and how we can build on it.
    0 references
    Proposal 170
    Vote Weight
    1
    Vote Reason
    Would love to see more devs on the team. Happy to help where I can.
    0 references
    Proposed
    Proposal 246
    0 references
     
    Retrieved from "https://nounsdev.wikibase.cloud/w/index.php?title=Item:Q201&oldid=7890"