0x00cda37bfc3dd20349aa901fe8646688218d8772 (Q424): Difference between revisions

From Nouns Dev
(‎Changed an Item)
(‎Changed an Item)
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 316 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 316 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 316 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: - Cheap - Tangible - Cheerful Seems like a very high leverage play *sent from voter.wtf*
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 311 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 311 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 311 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: I love it. Would fund another two or three teams like this if it was an option. *sent from voter.wtf*
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 310 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 310 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 323 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 323 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 323 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: The good: This is the kind of thing that makes people feel something. It warms new people up to Nouns, it starts nounish conversations, and it reinforces ties among the community. The bad: $9 beer can lol To me, this nets out to a slam dunk yes. We should be doing things that dont scale, laying groundwork even where the unit cost isnt optimal, building muscle for this kind of thing, and extending tendrils out into the world of atoms. I say let them cook [wort] *sent from voter.wtf*
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 321 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 321 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 321 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Seems like a great price and this is kinda our version of client diversity. We should be asking ourselves, am I willing to spend five percent *of one percent* of the treasury on getting a gifted builder to allocate their time and energy to Nouns? That feels like a yes to me. *sent from voter.wtf*
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 313 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 313 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 303 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 303 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1

Latest revision as of 23:46, 17 July 2023

Individual
Language Label Description Also known as
English
0x00cda37bfc3dd20349aa901fe8646688218d8772
Individual

    Statements

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    - Cheap - Tangible - Cheerful Seems like a very high leverage play *sent from voter.wtf*
    0 references
    I love it. Would fund another two or three teams like this if it was an option. *sent from voter.wtf*
    0 references
    0 references
    The good: This is the kind of thing that makes people feel something. It warms new people up to Nouns, it starts nounish conversations, and it reinforces ties among the community. The bad: $9 beer can lol To me, this nets out to a slam dunk yes. We should be doing things that dont scale, laying groundwork even where the unit cost isnt optimal, building muscle for this kind of thing, and extending tendrils out into the world of atoms. I say let them cook [wort] *sent from voter.wtf*
    0 references
    Seems like a great price and this is kinda our version of client diversity. We should be asking ourselves, am I willing to spend five percent *of one percent* of the treasury on getting a gifted builder to allocate their time and energy to Nouns? That feels like a yes to me. *sent from voter.wtf*
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references