0x59a55a61b6590f6a84a02ba93f256dba6a994da4 (Q510)
From Nouns Dev
Individual
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | 0x59a55a61b6590f6a84a02ba93f256dba6a994da4 |
Individual |
Statements
Hello! thanks for putting together this proposal :D Im generally very in favour of creating a nounish display font, but unfortunately the current glyphs dont feel like theyre quite there yet. Theyre in an awkward spot between playful and formal, without being fully either, and therefore hard to use in practice. Would encourage the propose to lean more heavily into the playful direction Would encourage the proposer to refine the design further and re-propose.
0 references
Love this new iteration of the prop. Thank you for revising and resubmitting!
0 references
+1 for physical objects of the digital world, love it.
0 references
Easy yes! I see these all the time, and theyre delightful. – yitong voting via liquid delegation
0 references
I love these kinds of projects. Getting the Nouns brand around new consumer products in subtle and not so subtle ways is a huge plus for me. Extra bonus that it involves a new receipe. I am here for this.
0 references
Was I swayed by the mention of a duckhead? No, but do I love these kinds of projects, yes, yes I do. I almost gave this a no given that I still think we just need a way to get more quality nouns merch and logo profileration around celebs and I worry that this kind of thing is too small, to go viral and repeated globally. Really we need more ambitious propopsals that are looking to do this activation in 10 cities at the same time. But I love the energy and the shot at making this work. Quick feedback: Unsure what the Morph legal folks would be doing / getting paid for? This feels like a GPT task given how low risk any legal exposure is, but thats a nit pick.
0 references
+1 Wilsons reason - Yitong (liquid delegation from Agora)
0 references
Given the bad buzz around concerns of Lido I think a hedging / diversification strategy here is a good one. My main concerns would be around the risk of adding in a new attack vector given a new contract but it looks as if the audit went well and there is minimal risk there, or equal risk to building our own DCA contract to move a position that way. Also love that its all on-chain.
0 references
Bots are an incredible distribution channel for Nouns activity, and Joel has been building and maintaining almost all of them. Im very grateful for his work – both as a beneficiary through the Agora discord, but also personally as a voter. Im a yes on this prop based on the value demonstrated so far, and on the trust I have in Joels commitment to building valuable tools for Nouns. Some specific thoughts for the future: 1. It feels like the roadmap for purely maintaining bots is limited, and if Joel & team have 3 devs, id encourage them to think about additional ways they can contribute on the tooling front. 2. Personally for Joel, I wonder if this prop is also partially funding his ability to work on short shorts. If so, Id like to see a separate prop focused on an ambitious expansion of that program. Otherwise, look forward to all the amazing things Joel & team will do :D - Yitong voting via Agora liquid delegation
0 references
This is why I love Nouns. 100% yes. Build and spread the love of the Noggles to the masses in a positive way. Lets go!
0 references
Love this! Proliferation + bringing more creative decentralized builders into the Noun community. All day, lets go.
0 references
I love Voadz and the idea of making nounish art more discoverable, but the archive approach doesnt seem like its gained traction over the last few months, so dont think we should continue pursuing this direction. Would welcome another attempt at this idea under a different form. Thank you for taking the time to propose and repropose! 🙏
0 references
100% think Nouns should explore investing in games. However, as with most first time efforts, Id much rather see a dedicated effort at making a single instance well instead of trying to pitch a platform. Much as Im open to working directly with tennis players, but against a Tennis platform (at least at first). Id be very excited to fund a compelling nounish game (especially an onchain one that leverages the NFTs somehow), but against an elaborate partnership with a publisher. Unfortunately the Nouns bowling game trailer simply does not meet my quality bar as a standalone game effort. I appreciate the team for proposing and invite them to revise and try again 💛 - Yitong voting via Agora liquid delegation
0 references
Not against funding some kind of sponsorship / collaboration directly with players, but this NTF platform feels like it unnecessarily complexifies what would otherwise be a more simple prop. Would encourage proposers to try again with a player centric prop! Basically, echoing coralorcas sentiment. - Yitong, via liquid delegation
0 references
