Proposal 91 (Q1940): Difference between revisions
From Nouns Dev
TiagoLubiana (talk | contribs) (Changed an Item) |
TiagoLubiana (talk | contribs) (Changed an Item) |
||||||
| Property / Supported By | |||||||
| Property / Supported By: 0x73222225044ce0fc672ff9b6f9730d0a0421382c / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported By: 0x73222225044ce0fc672ff9b6f9730d0a0421382c / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported By | |||||||
| Property / Supported By: 0x7d81478ad18ad375e53de6f74f3122f6be3499ca / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported By: 0x7d81478ad18ad375e53de6f74f3122f6be3499ca / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported By | |||||||
| Property / Supported By: 0xa86882277e69fbf0a51805cdc8b0a3a113079e63 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported By: 0xa86882277e69fbf0a51805cdc8b0a3a113079e63 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported By | |||||||
| Property / Supported By: 0xcc2688350d29623e2a0844cc8885f9050f0f6ed5 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported By: 0xcc2688350d29623e2a0844cc8885f9050f0f6ed5 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported By | |||||||
| Property / Supported By: 0xd19bf5f0b785c6f1f6228c72a8a31c9f383a49c4 / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported By: 0xd19bf5f0b785c6f1f6228c72a8a31c9f383a49c4 / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported By | |||||||
| Property / Supported By: 0xdb94daa8bf1b6f45b122f442f922a2c4dd2f7ade / rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported By: 0xdb94daa8bf1b6f45b122f442f922a2c4dd2f7ade / qualifier | |||||||
| |||||||
| Property / Supported By | |||||||
| Property / Supported By: 0x73222225044ce0fc672ff9b6f9730d0a0421382c / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported By: 0x73222225044ce0fc672ff9b6f9730d0a0421382c / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
| Property / Supported By: 0x73222225044ce0fc672ff9b6f9730d0a0421382c / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⌐◨-◨ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩⬛🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩⬛⬛⬛🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩⬛🟩⬛⬛⬛🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩⬛⬛🟩⬛⬛⬛🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬛⬛🟩⬛⬛⬛🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩⬛⬛🟩⬛⬛⬛🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩⬛🟩⬛🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩⬛🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 | |||||||
| Property / Supported By | |||||||
| Property / Supported By: 0x7d81478ad18ad375e53de6f74f3122f6be3499ca / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported By: 0x7d81478ad18ad375e53de6f74f3122f6be3499ca / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
| Property / Supported By: 0x7d81478ad18ad375e53de6f74f3122f6be3499ca / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Excited to see Nouns continue to proliferate eSports. The price to pay here seems negligible for the potential upside. | |||||||
| Property / Supported By | |||||||
| Property / Supported By: 0xa86882277e69fbf0a51805cdc8b0a3a113079e63 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported By: 0xa86882277e69fbf0a51805cdc8b0a3a113079e63 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported By: 0xa86882277e69fbf0a51805cdc8b0a3a113079e63 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: E-sports can be a great way to do digital activations outside of the crypto sphere. DOTA prop 68 seems like a success so far. Welcome more experiments like this. (Also, making a tiiny initial move in the direction of Nintendo/Pokemon is enticing.) | |||||||
| Property / Supported By | |||||||
| Property / Supported By: 0xcc2688350d29623e2a0844cc8885f9050f0f6ed5 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported By: 0xcc2688350d29623e2a0844cc8885f9050f0f6ed5 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 13
| |||||||
| Property / Supported By: 0xcc2688350d29623e2a0844cc8885f9050f0f6ed5 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: r-[ g ]-[ g ] | |||||||
| Property / Supported By | |||||||
| Property / Supported By: 0xd19bf5f0b785c6f1f6228c72a8a31c9f383a49c4 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported By: 0xd19bf5f0b785c6f1f6228c72a8a31c9f383a49c4 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
| Property / Supported By: 0xd19bf5f0b785c6f1f6228c72a8a31c9f383a49c4 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Pleased with the reception from the last Esports prop. Im excited to see this experiment continue, and I trust those at the helm. I want to see Nouns permeate the gaming community more. | |||||||
| Property / Supported By | |||||||
| Property / Supported By: 0xdb94daa8bf1b6f45b122f442f922a2c4dd2f7ade / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
| Property / Supported By: 0xdb94daa8bf1b6f45b122f442f922a2c4dd2f7ade / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
| Property / Supported By: 0xdb94daa8bf1b6f45b122f442f922a2c4dd2f7ade / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Seeing the reach we received from the last esports initiative makes this a no-brainer. | |||||||
Revision as of 15:50, 1 July 2023
A Nouns proposal.
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Proposal 91 |
A Nouns proposal. |
Statements
Nouns DAO esports - Pokémon Unite expansion & BLVKHVND partnership trial
0 references
91
0 references
0
0 references
7 June 2022
0 references
123
0 references
33
0 references
⌐◨-◨ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩⬛🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩⬛⬛⬛🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩⬛🟩⬛⬛⬛🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩⬛⬛🟩⬛⬛⬛🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬛⬛🟩⬛⬛⬛🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩⬛⬛🟩⬛⬛⬛🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩⬛🟩⬛🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩⬛🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
0 references
Excited to see Nouns continue to proliferate eSports. The price to pay here seems negligible for the potential upside.
0 references
E-sports can be a great way to do digital activations outside of the crypto sphere. DOTA prop 68 seems like a success so far. Welcome more experiments like this. (Also, making a tiiny initial move in the direction of Nintendo/Pokemon is enticing.)
0 references
Pleased with the reception from the last Esports prop. Im excited to see this experiment continue, and I trust those at the helm. I want to see Nouns permeate the gaming community more.
0 references
Seeing the reach we received from the last esports initiative makes this a no-brainer.
0 references
Summary: Nouns DAO esports plans to expand its operations and audience reach by partnering with Pokémon Unite team Random Gaming for three months. The team will represent Nouns DAO in the Unite Championship Series, competing for a total prize pool of $550,000.
0 references
Random gaming
0 references
7 June 2022
0 references
