Proposal 223 (Q1770): Difference between revisions

gm @here -- I wanted to proactively share some answers to frequent questions we’ve been getting:--**Aren’t you VC-backed?**-Yes, we are. That’s why we’ve geared this prop to deliver an entirely open-source, openly owned codebase — so there is no centralized value capture, and anyone can host, build on top of, and monetize the end deliverables. We think this completely aligns incentives and will help a strong, open ecosystem.--**What does open sourcing mean here?**-This means everything from the repo to the APIs will be open access, so people with varying levels of technical acumen can clone and re-host and build on top of House of Nouns. We’ll also be doing continual data dumps to Arweave for any offchain data.--**Budget?**-While ETH is going up in price, we’ve decreased our prop’s total cost by ~$100k. We heavily increased deliverables and the speed at which we deliver them. We’re looking for 9ETH/month/developer, which is less than any other active developers for Nouns. We think that deliverables and actual matter the most, and think they are very justifiable for the cost of 190ETH in terms of the long-term impact they can have on the DAO’s success.--**Integrations?**-We’re looking to be as open and composable as possible, and help accelerate the adoption of the infrastructure built by others in the ecosystem. Our goal is to integrate the amazing work of others everywhere it makes sense, versus create clones and replicate any functionality. We’re working on this on a case-by-case basis, but wherever infrastructure is open, we want to help accelerate its adoption instead of competing with it.