Proposal 223 (Q1770): Difference between revisions
From Nouns Dev
TiagoLubiana (talk | contribs) (Changed an Item) |
TiagoLubiana (talk | contribs) (Changed an Item) |
||
| Property / Related Channel | |||
| Property / Related Channel: Nouns DAO (legacy) - house-of-nouns / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Revision as of 20:00, 7 July 2023
A Nouns proposal.
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Proposal 223 |
A Nouns proposal. |
Statements
45
0 references
102
0 references
House of Nouns v2: Public Good
0 references
1 February 2023
0 references
89
0 references
223
0 references
28
1. If a Proposal misleads in their text, I wont vote for it. I expect better. 2. The model here should be: let Nouns DAO subsidize you experimenting and making us your test bed to launch what you are doing and we both win, if you make something that ends up having fit for us, or we lose a little if you dont. BuilderDAO giving you 25 ETH as they have, us voting on whether to give you 50 ETH or not, and you figuring out how to bridge the rest is a model that this DAO can support.
0 references
more transparency for what the 190E is used for?
0 references
Reasonings compiled here: https://cbites.substack.com/p/active-governance-noun-582-1
0 references
House of Nouns is important governance infrastructure that Nouns paid to see an MVP on. The team has delivered so far and wants to develop it into a more robust tool. The ask seems overall comparable to other proposals from similar teams and we look forward to seeing the platform become even more useful to the DAO (and to other DAOs when it is made Open Source.)
0 references
id like a non discourse and more interactive client to see nouner verified discussions
0 references
I like HoN. I think its valuable infra for the ecosystem.
0 references
Love the vision and the execution. And the transparency. Well done.
0 references
I wanted to proactively share some answers to frequent questions we’ve been getting: Aren’t you VC-backed? Yes, we are. That’s why we’ve geared this prop to deliver an entirely open-source, openly owned codebase — so there is no centralized value capture, and anyone can host, build on top of, and monetize the end deliverables. We think this completely aligns incentives and will help build a strong, open ecosystem. What does open sourcing mean here? This means everything from the repo to the APIs will be open access, so people with varying levels of technical acumen can clone and re-host and build on top of House of Nouns. We’ll also be doing continual data dumps to Arweave for any offchain data. Budget? While ETH is going up in price, we’ve decreased our prop’s total cost by ~$100k. We heavily increased deliverables and the speed at which we deliver them. We’re looking for 9ETH/month/developer, which is less than any other active developers for Nouns. We think that deliverables and actual matter the most, and think they are very justifiable for the cost of 190ETH in terms of the long-term impact they can have on the DAO’s success. Integrations? We’re looking to be as open and composable as possible. We want to integrate the amazing work of others everywhere it makes sense, versus create clones and replicate any functionality. We want to be a bridge between the disjoint governance infrastructure in the ecosystem. Thank you for your time sers <3
0 references
Voting yes here despite som reservations. I want to support a team that has dedicated a lot of time to serving the DAO and has built a tool that I use on every prop. I think we should help them as they try to figure out a model to make their work sustainable. I wish there was more clarity on exactly what the model is. 5 months is not a lot of time, and I find the ask/salaries to be pretty high. Would prefer we were being charged some like annual fee as a DAO. But as usual, our task is to vote on the proposal that’s been put up, and not the one we wish was, and I think the main thing is I want to make sure the team can keep building and figure out a long term plan.
0 references
12
**Prop 223: Nouncil Votes YES** --- **YES - 33 votes** - I use HON everyday for the show and I love the direction that they want to take it. I believe there is a need for a central discussion point for those who want to participate in the DAO but dont have time to go to multiple sites digging for conversation and prop information. - yes BUT! can you implement the key elements of the nouns creative direction? Fonts, color scale, etc. I feel like for phase 2 this would be grand!! - but please change that hideous header - HON is excellent - I think it is appropriate, House of Nouns has shown to be of great help to the DAO. **NO - 13 votes** - I am likely in the minority, but Im not a big fan of these unique clients that need to be used, but perhaps I just need to be educated on it all. I do not think a unique dashboard is the difference. - The cost is way too high **ABSTAIN - 3 votes** --- (7 Nouncillors abstained from this decision.)
0 references
Collective
0 references
House of Nouns v2 is a revised proposal seeking 190 ETH to fund 5 months of development for a governance platform for Nounish DAOs. The platform aims to streamline pre-proposal processes, generate and vote on ideas, and provide open-source infrastructure for future governance clients.
0 references
1 February 2023
0 references
