0x387a161c6b25aa854100abaed39274e51aaffffd (Q209): Difference between revisions
From Nouns Dev
TiagoLubiana (talk | contribs) (Created a new Item) |
TiagoLubiana (talk | contribs) (Changed an Item) |
||||||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||||||
Property / Opposed | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 264 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 264 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
Property / Opposed | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 261 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 261 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
Property / Opposed | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 210 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 210 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
Property / Opposed | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 204 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 204 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
Property / Opposed | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 203 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 203 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
Property / Opposed | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 200 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 200 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
Property / Opposed | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 196 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 196 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Opposed | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 81 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 81 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Opposed | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 199 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 199 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 199 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Having purchased six pairs already, as the person who originally asked salvino for an allocation which led to proposal 185, I think this proposal should focus on proliferation. Getting the nouns vision noggles onto the faces of public figures, like the pro skaters Gnars DAO is hooking up, is far more impactful than randomly sending them to a group of people who are almost entirely pseudonymous and dont show their faces publicly. | |||||||
Property / Opposed | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 158 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 158 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Opposed: Proposal 158 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: $100 CPM without supporting market research and competitive analysis seems high (Id expect $10 CPM + expenses). This proposal should lean heavily on audience targeting data available through TikToks advertising platform. Would be delighted to consult on a revision of this prop and want to highlight that I love the team and know theyre capable, but a more data driven approach would be ideal. | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 262 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 262 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 259 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 259 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 209 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 209 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 207 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 207 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 206 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 206 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 195 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 195 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 194 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 194 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 166 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 166 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 152 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 152 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 85 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 85 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 84 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 84 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 83 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 83 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 82 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 82 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 70 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 70 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 69 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 69 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 68 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 68 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 67 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 67 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 65 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 65 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 64 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 64 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 63 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 63 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 57 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 57 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 53 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 53 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 52 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 52 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 266 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 266 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 266 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Thoughtful proposal that helps solve real problems within a thriving subculture, while offering a high leverage way of proliferating Nouns to an aligned community. Check out the related subreddits by keywords and users - https://subredditstats.com/r/MechanicalKeyboards - not to mention the similarities between MK and NFT collectors. Both communities gather around luxury goods, pay a premium to collect the best, and loudly support the creators that make their subcultures so vibrant. These arent gaming laptops. They are carefully curated works of art thoughtfully pieced together and handled with care (notice the care instructions and white gloves used by enthusiasts?). | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 263 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 263 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 263 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Cultivating subculture to populate the front page ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 260 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 260 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 260 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Back yourself: find your people, know your place, do your thing ⌐◨-◨ | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 202 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 202 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 202 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: brand awareness enabled by this change worth far more than 1 ETH so the reward is warranted | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 201 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 201 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 201 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: the price is sprite | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 193 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 193 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 193 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: !swish | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 190 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 190 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 190 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: collective creation | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 189 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 189 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 189 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬛🟨⬛🟨⬛ ⬛🟨🟧🟧⬛ ⬛🟨🟨🟧⬛ ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 162 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 162 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 162 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Fantastic execution at previous events. Many lasting memories and impressions made. Will be emulating for NFT Fest Australia under the name Nouns DAOn Under. | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 161 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 161 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 161 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: will price, brill, nice. | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 159 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 159 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 159 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: likely means more proposals. which in turn mean more on-chain data to learn from. especially since _nuking discord_ has already resulted in more reasoning on-chain. | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 157 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 157 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 157 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: i should submit a retroactive prop for half of the $30k i spent on extremely nounish times square activation during nft nyc | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 156 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 156 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 156 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: honk threatened to stab me if i voted against | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 155 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 155 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 155 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: cdt = mvp | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 75 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 75 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 75 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: makes me madhappy | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 72 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 72 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 72 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: nouns are intentionally lo-fi so artists can more easily riff on them, this proposal speaks to that and id like to see more renditions that stray from the original pixels | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 71 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 71 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 71 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: choice as bro | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 62 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 62 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 62 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: if we had some eggs, we could have some bacon and eggs, if we had some bacon. | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 61 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 61 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 61 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Chads Deserve Triumph | |||||||
Property / Supported | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 56 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 56 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Supported: Proposal 56 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: Klims experience speaks for itself. Shark DAOs support does too. | |||||||
Property / Abstained | |||||||
Property / Abstained: Proposal 164 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Abstained: Proposal 164 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 2
| |||||||
Property / Abstained | |||||||
Property / Abstained: Proposal 51 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Abstained: Proposal 51 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 1
| |||||||
Property / Abstained | |||||||
Property / Abstained: Proposal 205 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Abstained: Proposal 205 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Weight: 3
| |||||||
Property / Abstained: Proposal 205 / qualifier | |||||||
Vote Reason: already voted for prop 202 and believe the brand awareness is worth a reward. | |||||||
Property / Proposed | |||||||
Property / Proposed: Proposal 164 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Proposed | |||||||
Property / Proposed: Proposal 189 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Proposed | |||||||
Property / Proposed: Proposal 260 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank | |||||||
Property / Proposed | |||||||
Property / Proposed: Proposal 51 / rank | |||||||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 16:31, 1 July 2023
Individual
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | 0x387a161c6b25aa854100abaed39274e51aaffffd |
Individual |
Statements
Having purchased six pairs already, as the person who originally asked salvino for an allocation which led to proposal 185, I think this proposal should focus on proliferation. Getting the nouns vision noggles onto the faces of public figures, like the pro skaters Gnars DAO is hooking up, is far more impactful than randomly sending them to a group of people who are almost entirely pseudonymous and dont show their faces publicly.
0 references
$100 CPM without supporting market research and competitive analysis seems high (Id expect $10 CPM + expenses). This proposal should lean heavily on audience targeting data available through TikToks advertising platform. Would be delighted to consult on a revision of this prop and want to highlight that I love the team and know theyre capable, but a more data driven approach would be ideal.
0 references
Thoughtful proposal that helps solve real problems within a thriving subculture, while offering a high leverage way of proliferating Nouns to an aligned community. Check out the related subreddits by keywords and users - https://subredditstats.com/r/MechanicalKeyboards - not to mention the similarities between MK and NFT collectors. Both communities gather around luxury goods, pay a premium to collect the best, and loudly support the creators that make their subcultures so vibrant. These arent gaming laptops. They are carefully curated works of art thoughtfully pieced together and handled with care (notice the care instructions and white gloves used by enthusiasts?).
0 references
Cultivating subculture to populate the front page ⌐◨-◨
0 references
Back yourself: find your people, know your place, do your thing ⌐◨-◨
0 references
brand awareness enabled by this change worth far more than 1 ETH so the reward is warranted
0 references
Fantastic execution at previous events. Many lasting memories and impressions made. Will be emulating for NFT Fest Australia under the name Nouns DAOn Under.
0 references
likely means more proposals. which in turn mean more on-chain data to learn from. especially since _nuking discord_ has already resulted in more reasoning on-chain.
0 references
i should submit a retroactive prop for half of the $30k i spent on extremely nounish times square activation during nft nyc
0 references
nouns are intentionally lo-fi so artists can more easily riff on them, this proposal speaks to that and id like to see more renditions that stray from the original pixels
0 references
if we had some eggs, we could have some bacon and eggs, if we had some bacon.
0 references
Klims experience speaks for itself. Shark DAOs support does too.
0 references
already voted for prop 202 and believe the brand awareness is worth a reward.
0 references