0x7898fd5d80b52f6d8a9b7a8b908185536650f108 (Q3805): Difference between revisions

@@ Property / Opposed @@
-Proposal 210
@@ Property / Opposed: Proposal 210 / rank @@
-Normal rank
@@ Property / Opposed: Proposal 210 / qualifier @@
-Vote Weight: 3Amount 3
Unit 1
 Amount
 Unit
@@ Property / Opposed @@
-Proposal 202
@@ Property / Opposed: Proposal 202 / rank @@
-Normal rank
@@ Property / Opposed: Proposal 202 / qualifier @@
-Vote Weight: 3Amount 3
Unit 1
 Amount
 Unit
@@ Property / Supported @@
-Proposal 208
@@ Property / Supported: Proposal 208 / rank @@
-Normal rank
@@ Property / Supported: Proposal 208 / qualifier @@
-Vote Weight: 3Amount 3
Unit 1
 Amount
 Unit
@@ Property / Supported @@
-Proposal 207
@@ Property / Supported: Proposal 207 / rank @@
-Normal rank
@@ Property / Supported: Proposal 207 / qualifier @@
-Vote Weight: 3Amount 3
Unit 1
 Amount
 Unit
@@ Property / Supported @@
-Proposal 205
@@ Property / Supported: Proposal 205 / rank @@
-Normal rank
@@ Property / Supported: Proposal 205 / qualifier @@
-Vote Weight: 3Amount 3
Unit 1
 Amount
 Unit
@@ Property / Opposed @@
+Proposal 210
@@ Property / Opposed: Proposal 210 / rank @@
+Normal rank
@@ Property / Opposed: Proposal 210 / qualifier @@
+Vote Weight: 3Amount 3
Unit 1
 Amount
 Unit
@@ Property / Opposed: Proposal 210 / qualifier @@
+Vote Reason: No need to give up this source of revenue with no clear upside.
@@ Property / Opposed @@
+Proposal 202
@@ Property / Opposed: Proposal 202 / rank @@
+Normal rank
@@ Property / Opposed: Proposal 202 / qualifier @@
+Vote Weight: 3Amount 3
Unit 1
 Amount
 Unit
@@ Property / Opposed: Proposal 202 / qualifier @@
+Vote Reason: Voting no on this prop because of the free alternative with proposal 205. This doesnt set a negative precedent since a healthy competitive atmosphere for funding is positive for Nouns and the treasury.
@@ Property / Supported @@
+Proposal 208
@@ Property / Supported: Proposal 208 / rank @@
+Normal rank
@@ Property / Supported: Proposal 208 / qualifier @@
+Vote Weight: 3Amount 3
Unit 1
 Amount
 Unit
@@ Property / Supported: Proposal 208 / qualifier @@
+Vote Reason: Down for booze
@@ Property / Supported @@
+Proposal 207
@@ Property / Supported: Proposal 207 / rank @@
+Normal rank
@@ Property / Supported: Proposal 207 / qualifier @@
+Vote Weight: 3Amount 3
Unit 1
 Amount
 Unit
@@ Property / Supported: Proposal 207 / qualifier @@
+Vote Reason: Voting yes on behalf of brennen.eth
@@ Property / Supported @@
+Proposal 205
@@ Property / Supported: Proposal 205 / rank @@
+Normal rank
@@ Property / Supported: Proposal 205 / qualifier @@
+Vote Weight: 3Amount 3
Unit 1
 Amount
 Unit
@@ Property / Supported: Proposal 205 / qualifier @@
+Vote Reason: Reverse ENS addresses FTW!
@@ Property / Proposed @@
+Proposal 204
@@ Property / Proposed: Proposal 204 / rank @@
+Normal rank

Latest revision as of 22:46, 14 July 2023

Individual

Language	Label	Description	Also known as
English	0x7898fd5d80b52f6d8a9b7a8b908185536650f108	Individual

Statements

0 references

3

0 references

Proposal 210

Vote Weight

3

Vote Reason

No need to give up this source of revenue with no clear upside.

0 references

Proposal 202

Vote Weight

3

Vote Reason

Voting no on this prop because of the free alternative with proposal 205. This doesnt set a negative precedent since a healthy competitive atmosphere for funding is positive for Nouns and the treasury.

0 references

Abstained

Proposal 209

Vote Weight

3

0 references

Supported

Proposal 206

Vote Weight

3

0 references

Proposal 204