0x7d81478ad18ad375e53de6f74f3122f6be3499ca (Q4108): Difference between revisions

From Nouns Dev
(‎Changed an Item)
(‎Changed an Item)
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 245 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 245 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 242 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 242 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 233 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 233 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 229 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 229 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 124 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 124 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 118 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 118 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 116 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 116 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 114 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 114 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 112 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 112 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 94 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 94 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 92 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 92 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 91 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 91 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 90 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 90 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 244 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 244 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 241 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 241 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 238 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 238 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 232 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 232 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 228 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 228 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 130 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 130 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 127 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 127 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 120 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 120 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 89 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 89 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 240 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 240 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 134 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 134 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 245 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 245 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 245 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: i know a no brainer when i see one
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 242 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 242 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 242 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: * the community is using its tooling * team has hacked on PoCs without asking for funding which is very Nounish * having a third unified client outside of nouns.wtf and nounsagora is +EV thanks for coming back a third time. Lets put this team back to work
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 233 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 233 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 233 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: i agree with the sentiment that we should avoid putting proposals on-chain that dont modify on-chain state, and as such, Ill be abstaining from any future proposals that fit this description. however, I strongly believe that Nouns acquired using DAO funds as a form of future compensation shouldnt be utilized for governance until theyve been correctly distributed to their intended recipients.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 229 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 229 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 229 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: the proposed infra offers proper decentralized execution across sub-communities. it is imperative to promote governance and mitigate intermediaries that can be subject to external influence. the ability to engage in trustless governance across subDAOs is the type of innovation id like to see Nouns showcase. i do think there is a chance that trustless participation can increase demand for Nouns, even if by a small margin. ripe and wiz are excellent builders, and i am happy to support this initiative.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 124 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 124 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 124 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: no 🧠
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 118 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 118 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 118 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: a vote of confidence in beautyandthepunk.eth
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 116 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 116 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 116 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: 🤖 + ⌐◨-◨ + ✅
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 114 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 114 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 114 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: we do a little act of pixel perfection
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 112 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 112 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 112 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: no brainer - esports, particularly with the folks spearheading this prop, has been a remarkable experiment in proliferating the meme.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 94 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 94 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 94 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: I am not entirely sure how this will proliferate the Noun meme, but in the interest of supporting the cc0 photography vertical, particularly one of space exploration, I am curious to see if there can be an audience reached here that would otherwise not reach. Cost is negligible for the bet.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 92 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 92 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 92 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Enthusiastic to support an extension for David.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 91 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 91 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 91 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Excited to see Nouns continue to proliferate eSports. The price to pay here seems negligible for the potential upside.
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 90 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 90 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 90 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: I have a tab browser open at all times with Goldys memes to facilitate the proliferation of Nouns, so this is a no-brainer for me.
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 244 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 244 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 244 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: We built something similar on nouns.center/ideas, and without network effects, it becomes a ghost yard. I am bearish that novel ideas will come from public forums. Id be glad to be proven wrong here, but I am almost positive YCombinator doesnt do anything internal like this. Quality proposals will come from ultra-skilled, smaller teams (Atrium, Goldy, Danit, Stoopid Buddy, albeit not so small, Prop House, etc.), that have very specific skill sets. Id be much more inclined to further fund work on this proposal if it has moved the needle forward within the Lil Nouns community, where this tool seems to already be in place.
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 241 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 241 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 241 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: i am a fan of DigitalOil and would vote yes for them to work on ideas that would benefit the DAO. my opinion remains unchanged though in that i do not believe that functional props will lead to better governance for the DAO at this time.
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 238 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 238 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 238 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: while I appreciate the intention behind this proposal, i am not convinced it would significantly move the DAO forward. having a clear and concise ask is important to the proposal process. rather than relying on game theory to skew outcomes, the DAO should vote on a static ask. off-chain discussion might be a better fit for this topic, as social consensus often leads to meaningful results. that being said, i like DigitalOil and am excited to see what other ideas they have for the DAO. i am always happy to vote in favor of proposals that will have a significant impact on the DAO.
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 232 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 232 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 232 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: i am not sold on this spreading the Noun meme effectively or that it will contribute to higher demand in daily auctions. with current outflows > inflows, prefer to stay conservative here and vote no.
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 228 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 228 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 228 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Not a bad proposal, but I have concerns about these ephemeral events and their potential impact on daily auction appreciation. Instead, I would like to concentrate on voting for high-value infrastructure and projects with the potential for significant auction growth. The ask is reasonable, but we shouldnt be voting yes just because 10e is a drop in a bucket. The drops will ultimately overflow the bucket.
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 130 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 130 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 130 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: seems a bit much for a book
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 127 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 127 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 127 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: feels like minimum nounish proliferation happening here
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 120 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 120 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 120 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: appreciate the sentiment here, but 200e for a wellness app seems like an overreach
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 89 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 89 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 89 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Appreciate the intention behind this prop. I am not sold on the value proposition of spending the requested ETH here on an ephemeral piece slated to EOL by July 10. Landing pages should be substantially more affordable, too. The team looks solid, but I am struggling with the short-lived value add here (relative to cost).
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 240 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 240 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 240 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: i like the builders on this team and would happily vote for them to build helpful tech for the DAO. i dont think the proposal in this current form moves the DAO forward. there is an expensive tax to build an architecture of this magnitude into production, and the tax is on all of the individual data stores to expose their off-chain data to the consumers of this index. anything on-chain is already composable. centralized data stores such as discourse already have APIs that can be consumed (https://docs.discourse.org). i think distracting builders with this tax right now is -EV, and some might not have the bandwidth to pull it off at all, leaving us with just adding an API on top of data sources that already have APIs whether in the form of HTTP or RPC-JSON on-chain calls. i think we have much bigger problems to tackle and this isnt a blocker for client developers as of today. id love to fund this team to work on something else.
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 134 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 134 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 2
Amount2
Unit1
Property / Abstained: Proposal 134 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: dont have an opinion here

Latest revision as of 22:46, 14 July 2023

Individual
Language Label Description Also known as
English
0x7d81478ad18ad375e53de6f74f3122f6be3499ca
Individual

    Statements

    instance of
    Individual
    0 references
    Supported
    Proposal 237
    Vote Weight
    2
    0 references
    Proposal 236
    Vote Weight
    2
    0 references
    Proposal 231
    Vote Weight
    2
    0 references
    Proposal 139
    Vote Weight
    2
    0 references
    Proposal 135
    Vote Weight
    2
    0 references
    Proposal 129
    Vote Weight
    2
    0 references
    Proposal 128
    Vote Weight
    2
    0 references
    Proposal 126
    Vote Weight
    2
    0 references
    Proposal 125
    Vote Weight
    2
    0 references
    Proposal 123
    Vote Weight
    2
    0 references
    Proposal 119
    Vote Weight
    2
    0 references
    Proposal 117
    Vote Weight
    2
    0 references
    Proposal 113
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 93
    Vote Weight
    1
    0 references
    Proposal 245
    Vote Weight
    2
    Vote Reason
    i know a no brainer when i see one
    0 references
    Proposal 242
    Vote Weight
    2
    Vote Reason
    * the community is using its tooling * team has hacked on PoCs without asking for funding which is very Nounish * having a third unified client outside of nouns.wtf and nounsagora is +EV thanks for coming back a third time. Lets put this team back to work
    0 references
    Proposal 233
    Vote Weight
    2
    Vote Reason
    i agree with the sentiment that we should avoid putting proposals on-chain that dont modify on-chain state, and as such, Ill be abstaining from any future proposals that fit this description. however, I strongly believe that Nouns acquired using DAO funds as a form of future compensation shouldnt be utilized for governance until theyve been correctly distributed to their intended recipients.
    0 references
    Proposal 229
    Vote Weight
    2
    Vote Reason
    the proposed infra offers proper decentralized execution across sub-communities. it is imperative to promote governance and mitigate intermediaries that can be subject to external influence. the ability to engage in trustless governance across subDAOs is the type of innovation id like to see Nouns showcase. i do think there is a chance that trustless participation can increase demand for Nouns, even if by a small margin. ripe and wiz are excellent builders, and i am happy to support this initiative.
    0 references
    Proposal 124
    Vote Weight
    2
    Vote Reason
    no 🧠
    0 references
    Proposal 118
    Vote Weight
    2
    Vote Reason
    a vote of confidence in beautyandthepunk.eth
    0 references
    Proposal 116
    Vote Weight
    1
    Vote Reason
    🤖 + ⌐◨-◨ + ✅
    0 references
    Proposal 114
    Vote Weight
    1
    Vote Reason
    we do a little act of pixel perfection
    0 references
    Proposal 112
    Vote Weight
    1
    Vote Reason
    no brainer - esports, particularly with the folks spearheading this prop, has been a remarkable experiment in proliferating the meme.
    0 references
    Proposal 94
    Vote Weight
    1
    Vote Reason
    I am not entirely sure how this will proliferate the Noun meme, but in the interest of supporting the cc0 photography vertical, particularly one of space exploration, I am curious to see if there can be an audience reached here that would otherwise not reach. Cost is negligible for the bet.
    0 references
    Proposal 92
    Vote Weight
    1
    Vote Reason
    Enthusiastic to support an extension for David.
    0 references
    Proposal 91
    Vote Weight
    1
    Vote Reason
    Excited to see Nouns continue to proliferate eSports. The price to pay here seems negligible for the potential upside.
    0 references
    Proposal 90
    Vote Weight
    1
    Vote Reason
    I have a tab browser open at all times with Goldys memes to facilitate the proliferation of Nouns, so this is a no-brainer for me.
    0 references
    Opposed
    Proposal 136
    Vote Weight
    2
    0 references
    Proposal 131
    Vote Weight
    2
    0 references
    Proposal 122
    Vote Weight
    2
    0 references
    Proposal 244
    Vote Weight
    2
    Vote Reason
    We built something similar on nouns.center/ideas, and without network effects, it becomes a ghost yard. I am bearish that novel ideas will come from public forums. Id be glad to be proven wrong here, but I am almost positive YCombinator doesnt do anything internal like this. Quality proposals will come from ultra-skilled, smaller teams (Atrium, Goldy, Danit, Stoopid Buddy, albeit not so small, Prop House, etc.), that have very specific skill sets. Id be much more inclined to further fund work on this proposal if it has moved the needle forward within the Lil Nouns community, where this tool seems to already be in place.
    0 references
    Proposal 241
    Vote Weight
    2
    Vote Reason
    i am a fan of DigitalOil and would vote yes for them to work on ideas that would benefit the DAO. my opinion remains unchanged though in that i do not believe that functional props will lead to better governance for the DAO at this time.
    0 references
    Proposal 238
    Vote Weight
    2
    Vote Reason
    while I appreciate the intention behind this proposal, i am not convinced it would significantly move the DAO forward. having a clear and concise ask is important to the proposal process. rather than relying on game theory to skew outcomes, the DAO should vote on a static ask. off-chain discussion might be a better fit for this topic, as social consensus often leads to meaningful results. that being said, i like DigitalOil and am excited to see what other ideas they have for the DAO. i am always happy to vote in favor of proposals that will have a significant impact on the DAO.
    0 references
    Proposal 232
    Vote Weight
    2
    Vote Reason
    i am not sold on this spreading the Noun meme effectively or that it will contribute to higher demand in daily auctions. with current outflows > inflows, prefer to stay conservative here and vote no.
    0 references
    Proposal 228
    Vote Weight
    2
    Vote Reason
    Not a bad proposal, but I have concerns about these ephemeral events and their potential impact on daily auction appreciation. Instead, I would like to concentrate on voting for high-value infrastructure and projects with the potential for significant auction growth. The ask is reasonable, but we shouldnt be voting yes just because 10e is a drop in a bucket. The drops will ultimately overflow the bucket.
    0 references
    Proposal 130
    Vote Weight
    2
    Vote Reason
    seems a bit much for a book
    0 references
    Proposal 127
    Vote Weight
    2
    Vote Reason
    feels like minimum nounish proliferation happening here
    0 references
    Proposal 120
    Vote Weight
    2
    Vote Reason
    appreciate the sentiment here, but 200e for a wellness app seems like an overreach
    0 references
    Proposal 89
    Vote Weight
    1
    Vote Reason
    Appreciate the intention behind this prop. I am not sold on the value proposition of spending the requested ETH here on an ephemeral piece slated to EOL by July 10. Landing pages should be substantially more affordable, too. The team looks solid, but I am struggling with the short-lived value add here (relative to cost).
    0 references
    Abstained
    Proposal 133
    Vote Weight
    2
    0 references
    Proposal 240
    Vote Weight
    2
    Vote Reason
    i like the builders on this team and would happily vote for them to build helpful tech for the DAO. i dont think the proposal in this current form moves the DAO forward. there is an expensive tax to build an architecture of this magnitude into production, and the tax is on all of the individual data stores to expose their off-chain data to the consumers of this index. anything on-chain is already composable. centralized data stores such as discourse already have APIs that can be consumed (https://docs.discourse.org). i think distracting builders with this tax right now is -EV, and some might not have the bandwidth to pull it off at all, leaving us with just adding an API on top of data sources that already have APIs whether in the form of HTTP or RPC-JSON on-chain calls. i think we have much bigger problems to tackle and this isnt a blocker for client developers as of today. id love to fund this team to work on something else.
    0 references
    Proposal 134
    Vote Weight
    2
    Vote Reason
    dont have an opinion here
    0 references
     
    Retrieved from "https://nounsdev.wikibase.cloud/w/index.php?title=Item:Q4108&oldid=7927"