0x7898fd5d80b52f6d8a9b7a8b908185536650f108 (Q3805): Difference between revisions

From Nouns Dev
(‎Created a new Item)
 
(‎Changed an Item)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 211 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 211 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 210 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 210 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 210 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: No need to give up this source of revenue with no clear upside.
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 202 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 202 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 202 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Voting no on this prop because of the free alternative with proposal 205. This doesnt set a negative precedent since a healthy competitive atmosphere for funding is positive for Nouns and the treasury.
Property / Abstained
 
Property / Abstained: Proposal 209 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstained: Proposal 209 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 206 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 206 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 204 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 204 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 203 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 203 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 208 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 208 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 208 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Down for booze
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 207 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 207 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 207 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Voting yes on behalf of brennen.eth
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 205 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 205 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 205 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Reverse ENS addresses FTW!
Property / Proposed
 
Property / Proposed: Proposal 204 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 22:46, 14 July 2023

Individual
Language Label Description Also known as
English
0x7898fd5d80b52f6d8a9b7a8b908185536650f108
Individual

    Statements

    0 references
    0 references
    No need to give up this source of revenue with no clear upside.
    0 references
    Voting no on this prop because of the free alternative with proposal 205. This doesnt set a negative precedent since a healthy competitive atmosphere for funding is positive for Nouns and the treasury.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    Voting yes on behalf of brennen.eth
    0 references
    Reverse ENS addresses FTW!
    0 references
    0 references