Proposal 146 (Q1872)
From Nouns Dev
A Nouns proposal.
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Proposal 146 |
A Nouns proposal. |
Statements
54
0 references
28 September 2022
0 references
Noundry
0 references
35
0 references
Noundry Community Compensation
0 references
This text is about a proposal to compensate the Noundry community for their contribution to making Season 0 a success. The proposal suggests using Coordinape, a community compen sation platform, to allocate a pool of 24 eth for the Noundry season 0 community to split up amongst themselves.
0 references
146
0 references
45
0 references
> This doesnt have to mean that every year we neccesarily reward the community for contributions to any other noundry upgrades this way (if we set expectations/rewards ahead of time especially, it should be much cleaner next time), but this past year it was an all-in group effort where a lot of value was created by many of the artists who ultimately didnt make it into the final collection. If we’re retroactively rewarding the winners and committee (without rules ahead of time) it feels fair and honest to also share some of that with the a wider set of contributors to the process. The downside feels limited, and curious to see how these funds get shared around. Hopefully with very limited GIVES per coordinape participants, this is going to reward the top contributors as judged by the community. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
We like the community rewards.
0 references
noundry was a collaborative experience and this proposal serves as a gesture of gratitude and acknowledgment of the valuable role the community played in the process.
0 references
15
⌐◨-◨ 🙏 Yes wins. (50 yes, 1 no, 7 abstain, 1 x) ~~ ThaSwami ~~ I think its great to reward everyone who submitted traits, but Coordinape voting might be overkill. Im of the view that anyone who took the time to contribute some art should get rewarded, irrespective of how many they submitted, quality of work or who they interacted with. Im in favour of a simple pro-rata of ETH amongst the number of artists. We could setup clearer guidelines for rewards next season ~~ JoelCares ~~ Personally think this would be fun, help build community across the broad group of participants, and give the community a voice in evaluating quality. The current structure (3 GIVE tokens) would not be rewarding general participation, it would be rewarding the runner up work valued most by the community.
0 references
I support artists and participated in the Noundry submissions but do not think this prop is ready in its current state.
0 references
Although Im very excited to fund builders on the expectation of (or based on the history of) great impact, Im generally more weary of funding effort as an end goal in itself.
0 references
