Proposal 146 (Q1872): Difference between revisions
From Nouns Dev
TiagoLubiana (talk | contribs) (Changed an Item) |
TiagoLubiana (talk | contribs) (Changed an Item) |
||
| Property / Question & Answer | |||
has anyone had a chance to read our proposal?- -we can use non-transferable tokens to govern a collective noun. | |||
| Property / Question & Answer: has anyone had a chance to read our proposal?- -we can use non-transferable tokens to govern a collective noun. / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / Question & Answer: has anyone had a chance to read our proposal?- -we can use non-transferable tokens to govern a collective noun. / qualifier | |||
| Property / Question & Answer: has anyone had a chance to read our proposal?- -we can use non-transferable tokens to govern a collective noun. / qualifier | |||
Answer: Yes, some users have read the proposal and found it interesting. Wag#5265 mentioned that it's interesting to think about nouns as issued to represent subdaos and more naturally suited to fractionalization in some way, such as each partial 'gaggle' owner being issued a goose nounlet. | |||
Revision as of 18:20, 8 July 2023
A Nouns proposal.
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Proposal 146 |
A Nouns proposal. |
Statements
54
0 references
28 September 2022
0 references
35
0 references
Noundry Community Compensation
0 references
146
0 references
45
0 references
> This doesnt have to mean that every year we neccesarily reward the community for contributions to any other noundry upgrades this way (if we set expectations/rewards ahead of time especially, it should be much cleaner next time), but this past year it was an all-in group effort where a lot of value was created by many of the artists who ultimately didnt make it into the final collection. If we’re retroactively rewarding the winners and committee (without rules ahead of time) it feels fair and honest to also share some of that with the a wider set of contributors to the process. The downside feels limited, and curious to see how these funds get shared around. Hopefully with very limited GIVES per coordinape participants, this is going to reward the top contributors as judged by the community. ⌐◨-◨
0 references
We like the community rewards.
0 references
noundry was a collaborative experience and this proposal serves as a gesture of gratitude and acknowledgment of the valuable role the community played in the process.
0 references
15
⌐◨-◨ 🙏 Yes wins. (50 yes, 1 no, 7 abstain, 1 x) ~~ ThaSwami ~~ I think its great to reward everyone who submitted traits, but Coordinape voting might be overkill. Im of the view that anyone who took the time to contribute some art should get rewarded, irrespective of how many they submitted, quality of work or who they interacted with. Im in favour of a simple pro-rata of ETH amongst the number of artists. We could setup clearer guidelines for rewards next season ~~ JoelCares ~~ Personally think this would be fun, help build community across the broad group of participants, and give the community a voice in evaluating quality. The current structure (3 GIVE tokens) would not be rewarding general participation, it would be rewarding the runner up work valued most by the community.
0 references
I support artists and participated in the Noundry submissions but do not think this prop is ready in its current state.
0 references
Although Im very excited to fund builders on the expectation of (or based on the history of) great impact, Im generally more weary of funding effort as an end goal in itself.
0 references
Noundry community compensation
0 references
The Noundry Community Compensation proposal aims to retroactively compensate the Noundry community with a total of 25 ETH for their contributions to Season 0s success. The community transformed Noundry into a co llaborative experience, with artists worldwide working together. The proposal acknowledges the importance of this collaboration.
0 references
28 September 2022
0 references
I’m abstaining on this one. The prop team put in a lot of work to try and come up with a solution here but I’m on the fence as to whether we should set precedent on funding participation.
0 references
<@357667384342872074> or anyone interested- could you make a 3D glasses blue and red inspired nounhead or trait? 🟦🟥
The lost traits, including the 3D glasses blue and red inspired nounhead or trait, can be found at https://lostnouns.wtf/traits.
0 references
<@!557727542149120010> Thank you for sharing these insights. Good things for us to think about for designing new Noun heads.--Can you speak about some of the stylistic choices you kept in mind in regards to something being nounish?
Some stylistic choices kept in mind for designing Noun heads include:--1. Avoiding obvious weapons (e.g., guns, knives) but allowing cartoon violence (e.g., bomb).-2. Not including skin on the body, except for generic recognizable iconography (e.g., yellow thumbs up).-3. Not using people heads where it would seem like the noun is a person in a costume (e.g., clown).-4. Avoiding professions/hobbies as body accessories to prevent implying that nouns have jobs or are specifically sports fans, etc.--Additionally, the placement and style of the mouth on the Noun heads contribute to the nounish look.
0 references
<@731246793765027992> <@813421644298321961> <@202986009216942080> is the Noundry marketplace with 100% going back to the Artist something Nouns would fund as an internal initiative?
A proper team compensation model needs to be figured out. Using a Nouns DAO fork will allow for 2 layers of funding the artists and team essentially, with sales on noundry auctions and also request for funds when submitting DAO to DAO proposals to include traits in the Nouns protocol. This can potentially handle much more frequent updates as well.
0 references
<@813421644298321961> I’m looking at getting some artists to release their work under CC0 license and I’m wondering about the form used for noundry submissions. Is this something that was setup legally and paid for that is private? Or am I able to see the form and potentially use the form for a very similar purpose?-For reference, I’m encouraging artists of nounish skate deck art from a contest to release their work and in setting up a store to buy physicals and splitting revenue with the artists interested.-Thanks in advance for any info 🙏
The form used for noundry submissions seems to be private and specifically set up for the Nouns DAO. However, SerNoadz#3802 shared a link to a Contributor License Agreement (CLA) that was used when submissions were through GitHub: https://github.com/nounsDAO/noundry/blob/main/CLA.md. Benbodhi#1111 mentioned they could model off this if needed.
0 references
am i high? where's the pixel cluster on the beer head?
The pixel cluster on the beer head is barely perceptible. You can find it by looking at the left and right areas of the beer color and zooming way in.
0 references
and by submission you mean PR in the noundry repo?
Yes, by submission, it means a PR in the noundry repo.
0 references
Any articles to read about this proj?
The recommended article can be found by following the link in the channel <#887048695818899546>, as suggested by Goldy#0420.
0 references
appreciate you taking the time to get through it 🙏 as a final step, could you take a look at the license agreement and comment `I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA` on the pull request if you agree https://github.com/nounsDAO/noundry/pull/11
I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA.
0 references
Are the lost traits published somewhere?
The lost traits can be found at https://lostnouns.wtf/traits.
0 references
are there set rules / process for how art from the noundry makes its way into the on-chain trait set? v curious
Yes, there is a process for how art from the noundry makes its way into the on-chain trait set. Submissions are currently being gathered, and there will likely be some sort of poll or vote later this summer.
0 references
are these regulation colours?
Some of the colors are regulation colors, while others have been tweaked a little by greta_gremplin#3195.
0 references
but wouldn't the contract know? and its public
The question was about whether the contract would know and if it's public. H O N K D I D D L Y#2881 mentioned that it's very easy with state channels, publicly available signed messages, merkle proofs, bonds, and dispute periods.
0 references
Can we still continue to use the channel as before only the designs wont be included for this year's addition?
Yes, the channel can still be used as before, but the designs won't be included for this year's addition. The community members seem to agree that the noundry can be a year-round experience, and they can create a new channel for year 1 curation.
0 references
could i get a copy pasta of the unicode noggles?
You can find a whole Unicode noggle set with a copy function at Noundation: https://www.noundation.wtf/resources/noggles
0 references
Did anyone already propose a swan noun?
Yes, a swan noun was proposed. Krel#0404 mentioned that they tried to make a swan conform to the profile picture limitations.
0 references
Does anyone have examples of pixel noun sprites? something you would see in Gameboy Advanced or something
SerNoadz#3802: Similar to what you’re looking for. Tagged you in <#855538581434007635>-Coral Orca#4823: Timpers did some stuff along these lines with the nouns dancefloor-Coral Orca#4823: https://discord.com/channels/849745721544146955/855538581434007635/1001859610677874839-Coral Orca#4823: https://discord.com/channels/849745721544146955/855538581434007635/1001185152464064632--These messages provide examples of pixel noun sprites that are similar to what you would see in Gameboy Advanced.
0 references
Floppy disk noun head anyone?
Floppy disk noun head anyone?--Yes, a floppy disk noun head was created and merged into the Nouns DAO repository.
0 references
gm, punk6529 recently wrote a thread about creating a Nouns meme card https://twitter.com/punk6529/status/1567625161645477889. Would this be the proper channel to start a convo? I'm here to help coordinate the process between Nouns and 6529's team! <@813421644298321961>
Yes, the proper channel to start a conversation about creating a Nouns meme card with punk6529 is the noundry channel. Usergnome#0001 confirmed that the channel is fine to use for this purpose.
0 references
has anyone had a chance to read our proposal?- -we can use non-transferable tokens to govern a collective noun.
Yes, some users have read the proposal and found it interesting. Wag#5265 mentioned that it's interesting to think about nouns as issued to represent subdaos and more naturally suited to fractionalization in some way, such as each partial 'gaggle' owner being issued a goose nounlet.
0 references
