Nouns DAO (legacy) - 14-brave-takeover (Q5085)
From Nouns Dev
A Nouns discord channel.
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Nouns DAO (legacy) - 14-brave-takeover |
A Nouns discord channel. |
Statements
1. def in favor of page 2 for the irl empire state. find the GM copy distracting on top of the building. do we think both statue of liberty and empire state might be stronger without the additional copy?-2. what's the thinking behind changing the color and placement of the nouns on page 1? is it contrast with the brave UI? imo the original was much stronger-3. okay with no .wtf but find this to be a strangely conservative position for a product like brave
1. The question about whether the Statue of Liberty and Empire State might be stronger without the additional copy was not directly answered in the conversation.--2. The thinking behind changing the color and placement of the nouns on page 1 is to create contrast with the Brave UI. The original design was considered stronger, but the change was necessary for contrast.--3. The conversation shows that the decision to not use .wtf was considered a strangely conservative position for a product like Brave, but later in the conversation, it was confirmed that they are good to use .wtf in the logo.
0 references
<@!394697578715021314> im assuming we'll use the same logo asset for the 3 images, right?
Yes, the same logo asset will be used for the 3 images.
0 references
<@!394697578715021314> Question: does it specifically have to be a .PSD? I'm using Figma rn - if your team uses figma too I can just drop you a link where you can edit it freely
It does not specifically have to be a .PSD file. You can supply the final JPEGs, and using Figma is also acceptable.
0 references
<@!813421644298321961> - I imagine this would be cool, but wanted to flag that I'm writing a blog post about the Nouns & Brave takeover and wanted to confirm we have permission to share the results of the takeover publicly? We'll be publishing the post on our blog, socials, and submitting to press to hopefully be picked up by some publishers in the advertising, tech, and crypto space.
Yes, you have permission to share the results of the takeover publicly. The Small Grants and Retroactive Funding group sent out 0.69 ETH to the artists behind each of the 3 winning submissions.
0 references
<@813421644298321961> we’re going to share the blog post with some ad/crypto press before we publish it, and they may have some questions for the Nouns for their articles. Who should we direct these questions to? Is there an email address we can provide?
The question was answered by 4156#9052, who provided the email address 4156punk@gmail.com for directing questions related to the blog post and ad/crypto press inquiries.
0 references
<@884962731034284043> depends what you're after! We do different things at Brave, but we're a big family and love collabing with Nouns. What do you have in mind?
It seems like the user deity#3387 was asking about potential collaborations between Brave and Nouns. In response, 0xigami#0001 suggested celebrating the artistry of extreme sports with a Brave x Gnars collaboration, as bravery is a significant aspect of extreme sports. The conversation continued with FLVCKO#0832, davinoyesigye#8954, and 0xigami#0001 discussing setting up a call to further discuss the idea.
0 references
Also, if I’m interpreting slide 11 on the guidelines pdf correctly - this means we could have a maximum of 3 brand images, is that correct? If so, and in the spirit of community, I’d love to suggest multiple artists could be selected. Or alternatively consider a series of works (composed all by one artist, or multiple artists working together) that forms a single cohesive aesthetic/narrative as an entry. Is that possible?
Yes, a maximum of 3 brand images is allowed. Multiple artists could be selected, or a series of works forming a single cohesive aesthetic/narrative as an entry is also possible.
0 references
Can I use this as Nerman's Twitter header image for a bit?
Yes, you can use the image as Nerman's Twitter header. Goldy#0420 gave permission with their response: yeh of course.
0 references
could we see a triple stack of text like on nouns.wtf homepage? 🙏
Goldy#0420 tried to create a triple stack of text like on the nouns.wtf homepage but abandoned the idea due to the amount of content in the top left corner.
0 references
Gm 🌞 --There is an opportunity for Nouns to do another Brave Takeover on Super Bowl Sunday, Feb, 13. We could do USA again or go Global. --Should I whip up another proposal?
Yes, you should whip up another proposal for a Brave Takeover on Super Bowl Sunday, Feb 13. It could be a fun opportunity to create Super Bowl-themed inspired Nouns wallpapers, maybe with a tie-in to the ad.
0 references
hey lukas, thanks for reaching out!--when is this needed by? what are you envisioning from the quote? could it be any nouner?
The question was not directly answered in the conversation. However, based on the context, it seems that the quote can come from any Nouner, and the theme for the takeover is up to the Nouns. They could choose to focus on NounsDAO as a whole or highlight a specific initiative funded by the DAO.
0 references
Hi <#901243837735915610> - I just posted a reminder in the general Nouns chat, but wanted to cross post here for visibility. The window of opportunity for SuperBowl Sunday is closing and we have space tentatively reserved for the Nouns that other advertisers are actively eyeing. Are any Nouners willing to submit this proposal on chain so that we can move towards a definitive answer on wether or not to proceed? Thanks! <:noun_goat:902921897833025576> https://discord.com/channels/849745721544146955/855538581434007635/940618123655135252
The question was whether any Nouners are willing to submit the proposal on chain for the SuperBowl Sunday opportunity. The answer is that the general sentiment during the weekly town hall was that they are not quite prepared for this proposal at the moment due to feeling time-poor for the spend. They are interested in doing more things with Brave in the future.
0 references
Is Plausible's analytics Javascript/cookie based or is it server level analytics? If it's the former it'll be blocked by standard ad blockers including Brave shields which are enabled by default for users. If it's using server level data it will work but the provider may not recognize Brave as a source of traffic and thus would roll up under the Chrome data.
Plausible's analytics is Javascript/cookie-based, and it can be blocked by standard ad blockers, including Brave shields. Netlify provides some simple server-level analytics that can be checked for Brave browser traffic.
0 references
Is there a certain theme for the takeover?
There isn't a specific theme mentioned for the takeover. However, the conversation discusses various ideas and suggestions for the assets and content to be used, such as highlighting a recent big proposal or aligning it with an event in August/Early September. They also discuss using artwork from the one-year anniversary of NounsDAO and other submitted images.
0 references
is there an option to completely swap out the content for mobile, or is it always just a crop?
Always a crop, unfortunately. We can get specific with the exact X/Y values of where we crop but we are limited to using the same background images and logos across all screens.
0 references
Is this a ss of reporting on Brave’s “ads manager”?
Correct, this is from the Brave Ads platform!
0 references
Just heard 4156 mention the takeover. Love to participate. Is there a deadline for final selection?
jAcoB#7488: <@!713771101515415582> yoooo mate, I think the ddl is around Wed or Thu!
0 references
Just wondering, would it be possible to use threeJS for this potential competition?
It would not be possible to use threeJS for the potential competition, as the current takeover product cannot support animation/interaction. However, they could link to a website where that is available. The reason for this limitation is to keep the load light and maintain the fastest browsing experience for users.
0 references
