0x9d4162ca2f01583e2f34cb594e8cf198ace99dd3 (Q511)
From Nouns Dev
Individual
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | 0x9d4162ca2f01583e2f34cb594e8cf198ace99dd3 |
Individual |
Statements
Gami and gnars have been amazing to see. I dont know how funds will be spent exactly, but seems like the right model to lean into trust when we see talented builders with a lot of momentum.
0 references
TLDR: not yet; I think this should be re-proposed with further feedback and iteration. Id love to fund further proliferation of NNS, and to retro reward the work done so far. However, the proposals budget allocation is too vague for me to assess if the funds will be well spent; for example, with the current greatest challenge being proliferation, its unclear how much will be spent on that; Id also love to have more granular details on what proliferation experiments will take place, since I have no past data to be confident on reputation alone. Finally a pet peeve of mine: all multisigs handling large amounts should have more than 3 signers, particularly when the signers dont have a strong security reputation.
0 references
