0x9d4162ca2f01583e2f34cb594e8cf198ace99dd3 (Q511): Difference between revisions

From Nouns Dev
(‎Changed an Item)
(‎Changed an Item)
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 189 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 189 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 170 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 170 / qualifier
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
 
Property / Supported
 
Property / Supported: Proposal 189 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supported: Proposal 189 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Supported: Proposal 189 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: Gami and gnars have been amazing to see. I dont know how funds will be spent exactly, but seems like the right model to lean into trust when we see talented builders with a lot of momentum.
Property / Opposed
 
Property / Opposed: Proposal 170 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposed: Proposal 170 / qualifier
 
Vote Weight: 1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Opposed: Proposal 170 / qualifier
 
Vote Reason: TLDR: not yet; I think this should be re-proposed with further feedback and iteration. Id love to fund further proliferation of NNS, and to retro reward the work done so far. However, the proposals budget allocation is too vague for me to assess if the funds will be well spent; for example, with the current greatest challenge being proliferation, its unclear how much will be spent on that; Id also love to have more granular details on what proliferation experiments will take place, since I have no past data to be confident on reputation alone. Finally a pet peeve of mine: all multisigs handling large amounts should have more than 3 signers, particularly when the signers dont have a strong security reputation.

Latest revision as of 16:30, 1 July 2023

Individual
Language Label Description Also known as
English
0x9d4162ca2f01583e2f34cb594e8cf198ace99dd3
Individual

    Statements

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    Gami and gnars have been amazing to see. I dont know how funds will be spent exactly, but seems like the right model to lean into trust when we see talented builders with a lot of momentum.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    TLDR: not yet; I think this should be re-proposed with further feedback and iteration. Id love to fund further proliferation of NNS, and to retro reward the work done so far. However, the proposals budget allocation is too vague for me to assess if the funds will be well spent; for example, with the current greatest challenge being proliferation, its unclear how much will be spent on that; Id also love to have more granular details on what proliferation experiments will take place, since I have no past data to be confident on reputation alone. Finally a pet peeve of mine: all multisigs handling large amounts should have more than 3 signers, particularly when the signers dont have a strong security reputation.
    0 references
    0 references