Proposal 219 (Q1898)

From Nouns Dev
A Nouns proposal.
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Proposal 219
A Nouns proposal.

    Statements

    0 references
    16
    0 references
    22
    0 references
    30 January 2023
    0 references
    81
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    219
    0 references
    Proliferate – Measure – Repeat
    0 references
    Lil data pod
    0 references
    30 January 2023
    0 references
    Are we hoping to get good proposals out of this?
    Good proposals are subjective, but through visible consensus and giving builders the freedom to bring their own metric, the hope is that this mandated round helps (re)define what a good proposal is or could be. The intention is to crowdsource metrics by using a mandated round and then use the data to create a usable framework for builders to use for future prop house rounds.
    0 references
    But what are we getting consensus on? The prop or the metric? Or how the metric relates to the prop? --And does any of that matter?
    Getting consensus on how the prop relates to the metric matters because it is a step at clarifying/defining Nounish Impact and equips future builders with some understanding of how they can measure impact. However, there are concerns about the complexity of the proposal and its effectiveness in yielding good results. The proposal will be refined and updated based on the feedback received.
    0 references
    Hello, I think I don't understand this prop. Any insights?
    The intention of the proposal is to crowdsource metrics by using a mandated round. The data gathered would then be used to create a usable framework for builders to use for future prop house rounds. However, the proposal was considered overly complex and confusing, so it will be canceled, refined, and rewritten based on the feedback received.
    0 references
    I find this prop quite confusing if im honest. Could you give an example of what a prop house round might look like?
    A prop house round with a focus on metrics might look like this: submissions would heavily emphasize the kind of metrics they'll employ to measure the success of their proposal and argue the importance of said metric. An example of a proposal could measure its success by generating up to a certain amount of smiles, increasing foot traffic to the area by a certain percentage, etc. The intention is to bring attention to the difference between Impact and Nounish Impact by giving builders the freedom to bring their own measure of success so voters use that to make their voting decisions.
    0 references
    I’m not being dense on purpose…but I still don’t get it. --Could you give a brief example of what the description in a prop house round might look like?
    In a prop house round with a focus on Nounish metrics, a builder would write a proposal and include their own unique metric to highlight the Nounish impact of their proposal. The submission to the prop house round would consist of the proposal and the embedded metric. Voters would then look at the proposal and the embedded metric to make their decision. The various metrics could be extrapolated and made into a usable framework for builders and proposers to (re)use.
    0 references
    perhaps something like this:--> You want to build and you want to show how much of an impact your proposal makes. Time to bring your own metric.-> This prop house round is for proposals with Nounish metrics. We want to see proposals that have a unique way of measuring their impact. We want you, the builder to define impact, and to measure it. -> Time to go beyond ‘number of views’ or ‘likes’ and ‘retweets’. Bring your own unique metric. How much foot traffic will your proposal generate? How many number of hugs do you hope to give? These are just some examples…
    In the proposed prop house round, builders will submit a proposal that includes a unique metric to highlight the Nounish impact of their proposal. The submissions will consist of the proposal and the metric. Voters will then look at the proposal and the embedded metric to make their decision. The various metrics could be extrapolated and made into a useable framework for builders and proposers to (re)use.
    0 references
    So you have to create a fully fledged proposal you want to put on chain or wherever and then talk about the metrics for it?
    In the proposed round, builders will write a proposal and add their own metric to highlight the Nounish impact of their proposal. They will submit the proposal with the unique metric to the prop house round. Voters will look at the proposal and the embedded metric to make their decision. The various metrics could be extrapolated and made into a usable framework for builders and proposers to (re)use. The submissions to the prop house round will be a proposal with a metric.
    0 references
    0
    0 references
    34
    0 references
    34
    0 references
    The proposal suggests a new Prop House round where builders submit a proposal with their own unique metric for measuring Nounish impact. This differs from Open Rounds as it requires builders to include their own metr ics and argue their importance within their proposal. The aim is to discover nuances in metrics used for measuring proliferation. Lil Data Pod will analyze the results to identify effective data-driven approaches.
    0 references
    3
    0 references