Proposal 1 (Q1952): Difference between revisions

From Nouns Dev
(‎Changed an Item)
(‎Changed an Item)
 
(46 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Property / Opposer Count
0
Amount0
Unit1
 
Property / Opposer Count: 0 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Proposal Type
 
Property / Proposal Type: Charities / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Proposal Type
 
Property / Proposal Type: Governance / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Proposal Type
 
Property / Proposal Type: Nouns dao / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Proposal Type
 
Property / Proposal Type: Eth / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Proposal Type
 
Property / Proposal Type: Ecosystem / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Related Channel
 
Property / Related Channel: Nouns DAO (legacy) - 63-impact-rewards / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Related Channel
 
Property / Related Channel: Nouns DAO (legacy) - 27-nouns-center / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Question & Answer
<@!410593947027505162> do you have a repo for the nouns center?
 
Property / Question & Answer: <@!410593947027505162> do you have a repo for the nouns center? / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Question & Answer: <@!410593947027505162> do you have a repo for the nouns center? / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer: <@!410593947027505162> do you have a repo for the nouns center? / qualifier
Answer: The repo for the Nouns Center exists, but it is currently private. It will be open source when they launch.
 
Property / Question & Answer
<@410593947027505162> I remember the first iteration of <a:noun_earth:923689442324144178>** Nouns Center** always having a persistent sidebar menu. Is there a reason for the always hidden menu? (definitely looks cleaner, but today as I was browsing the site, I found it to be tedious to keep clicking the menu to go to a new page.)
 
Property / Question & Answer: <@410593947027505162> I remember the first iteration of <a:noun_earth:923689442324144178>** Nouns Center** always having a persistent sidebar menu. Is there a reason for the always hidden menu? (definitely looks cleaner, but today as I was browsing the site, I found it to be tedious to keep clicking the menu to go to a new page.) / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Question & Answer: <@410593947027505162> I remember the first iteration of <a:noun_earth:923689442324144178>** Nouns Center** always having a persistent sidebar menu. Is there a reason for the always hidden menu? (definitely looks cleaner, but today as I was browsing the site, I found it to be tedious to keep clicking the menu to go to a new page.) / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer: <@410593947027505162> I remember the first iteration of <a:noun_earth:923689442324144178>** Nouns Center** always having a persistent sidebar menu. Is there a reason for the always hidden menu? (definitely looks cleaner, but today as I was browsing the site, I found it to be tedious to keep clicking the menu to go to a new page.) / qualifier
Answer: The reason for the always hidden menu in the first iteration of Nouns Center was to create more real estate and a better design, similar to HBO Max's hamburger menu on desktop. However, after receiving feedback, an update was pushed to make the menu folders default to open, while still allowing them to be closed if desired. This change aimed to improve accessibility and user experience while maintaining a clean design.
 
Property / Question & Answer
<@!410593947027505162> do you have a repo for the nouns center?
 
Property / Question & Answer: <@!410593947027505162> do you have a repo for the nouns center? / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Question & Answer: <@!410593947027505162> do you have a repo for the nouns center? / qualifier
Answer: The repo for the Nouns Center exists, but it is currently private. It will be open source when they launch.
 
Property / Question & Answer
Gn Everynoun, just found out about the Reverse Job board and submitted my application to be featured! --Wondering what are the steps from here?
 
Property / Question & Answer: Gn Everynoun, just found out about the Reverse Job board and submitted my application to be featured! --Wondering what are the steps from here? / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Question & Answer: Gn Everynoun, just found out about the Reverse Job board and submitted my application to be featured! --Wondering what are the steps from here? / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer: Gn Everynoun, just found out about the Reverse Job board and submitted my application to be featured! --Wondering what are the steps from here? / qualifier
Answer: After submitting your application to be featured on the Reverse Job board, cdt#3727 will add you to the board. There might be a backlog since they handle a lot of data, but they will eventually get you on there. Your profile picture on the Reverse Job board will be a randomly generated Noun using Noun API.
 
Property / Question & Answer
has there been any discussion/plans for linking to nouns center from nouns.wtf ?
 
Property / Question & Answer: has there been any discussion/plans for linking to nouns center from nouns.wtf ? / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Question & Answer: has there been any discussion/plans for linking to nouns center from nouns.wtf ? / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer: has there been any discussion/plans for linking to nouns center from nouns.wtf ? / qualifier
Answer: Yes, there has been a discussion about linking to Nouns Center from nouns.wtf. cdt#3727 mentioned they were thinking of opening a PR for this.
 
Property / Question & Answer
Nice! Is all the info from the notion docs ported to Nouns Center? I think I looked a while ago and it wasn’t
 
Property / Question & Answer: Nice! Is all the info from the notion docs ported to Nouns Center? I think I looked a while ago and it wasn’t / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Question & Answer: Nice! Is all the info from the notion docs ported to Nouns Center? I think I looked a while ago and it wasn’t / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer: Nice! Is all the info from the notion docs ported to Nouns Center? I think I looked a while ago and it wasn’t / qualifier
Answer: No, not all the info from the notion docs has been ported to Nouns Center. There isn't a 1:1 `Docs` page on Nouns Center.
 
Property / Question & Answer
sure, agreed. how much of this already exists can be sent to me. i’m assuming the nounders have a generic email for these things? what is it?--who would write the primer/overview, if this doesn’t already exist.--we have glasses not but i think for blogposts it’d be good to send them other assets too but need Nounder/Nouner alignment.- - Logo PNGs (glasses & text)- - Glasses files- - maybe a set or full constricted nouns (10?) to use at will- - couple promo images (screenshot of first auction, group of nouns together, and maybe a collage of derivatives).--if stories are written on nouns they’ll touch in history, cc0 (derivatives), and impact. so just thinking of imagery to best support that and be able to hand off nicely--i hate to keep throwing it back but none of this content should be coming from non-Nounders imo so best i can do i aggregate & host it.
 
Property / Question & Answer: sure, agreed. how much of this already exists can be sent to me. i’m assuming the nounders have a generic email for these things? what is it?--who would write the primer/overview, if this doesn’t already exist.--we have glasses not but i think for blogposts it’d be good to send them other assets too but need Nounder/Nouner alignment.- - Logo PNGs (glasses & text)- - Glasses files- - maybe a set or full constricted nouns (10?) to use at will- - couple promo images (screenshot of first auction, group of nouns together, and maybe a collage of derivatives).--if stories are written on nouns they’ll touch in history, cc0 (derivatives), and impact. so just thinking of imagery to best support that and be able to hand off nicely--i hate to keep throwing it back but none of this content should be coming from non-Nounders imo so best i can do i aggregate & host it. / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Question & Answer: sure, agreed. how much of this already exists can be sent to me. i’m assuming the nounders have a generic email for these things? what is it?--who would write the primer/overview, if this doesn’t already exist.--we have glasses not but i think for blogposts it’d be good to send them other assets too but need Nounder/Nouner alignment.- - Logo PNGs (glasses & text)- - Glasses files- - maybe a set or full constricted nouns (10?) to use at will- - couple promo images (screenshot of first auction, group of nouns together, and maybe a collage of derivatives).--if stories are written on nouns they’ll touch in history, cc0 (derivatives), and impact. so just thinking of imagery to best support that and be able to hand off nicely--i hate to keep throwing it back but none of this content should be coming from non-Nounders imo so best i can do i aggregate & host it. / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer: sure, agreed. how much of this already exists can be sent to me. i’m assuming the nounders have a generic email for these things? what is it?--who would write the primer/overview, if this doesn’t already exist.--we have glasses not but i think for blogposts it’d be good to send them other assets too but need Nounder/Nouner alignment.- - Logo PNGs (glasses & text)- - Glasses files- - maybe a set or full constricted nouns (10?) to use at will- - couple promo images (screenshot of first auction, group of nouns together, and maybe a collage of derivatives).--if stories are written on nouns they’ll touch in history, cc0 (derivatives), and impact. so just thinking of imagery to best support that and be able to hand off nicely--i hate to keep throwing it back but none of this content should be coming from non-Nounders imo so best i can do i aggregate & host it. / qualifier
Answer: The question was about the existence of a generic email for Nounders and who would write the primer/overview. 4156#9052 replied that they will work on getting the requested information and assets within 1-2 weeks.
 
Property / Question & Answer
thanks, open to others opinion. i’ve thought about this a lot and i’m sure i’ll have to revisit layout as the number of projects scale.--question for you. do we include all projects on the same page and allow ppl to filter by category? --ie. we have different project types:- - Noadz (available to purchase)- - Coloring book (free download)- - Nounspedia (website)--🅰️: one project page with filters-🅱️: separate page per project type--feel free to vote
 
Property / Question & Answer: thanks, open to others opinion. i’ve thought about this a lot and i’m sure i’ll have to revisit layout as the number of projects scale.--question for you. do we include all projects on the same page and allow ppl to filter by category? --ie. we have different project types:- - Noadz (available to purchase)- - Coloring book (free download)- - Nounspedia (website)--🅰️: one project page with filters-🅱️: separate page per project type--feel free to vote / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Question & Answer: thanks, open to others opinion. i’ve thought about this a lot and i’m sure i’ll have to revisit layout as the number of projects scale.--question for you. do we include all projects on the same page and allow ppl to filter by category? --ie. we have different project types:- - Noadz (available to purchase)- - Coloring book (free download)- - Nounspedia (website)--🅰️: one project page with filters-🅱️: separate page per project type--feel free to vote / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer: thanks, open to others opinion. i’ve thought about this a lot and i’m sure i’ll have to revisit layout as the number of projects scale.--question for you. do we include all projects on the same page and allow ppl to filter by category? --ie. we have different project types:- - Noadz (available to purchase)- - Coloring book (free download)- - Nounspedia (website)--🅰️: one project page with filters-🅱️: separate page per project type--feel free to vote / qualifier
Answer: A. one project page with filters
 
Property / Question & Answer
what would be the point of finding out which categories are most vs least clicked on? reordering the buttons? if i only have 3-4 filters for the order matter that much?--i don’t think i’d remove any _type_ of project even if it gets less clicks?
 
Property / Question & Answer: what would be the point of finding out which categories are most vs least clicked on? reordering the buttons? if i only have 3-4 filters for the order matter that much?--i don’t think i’d remove any _type_ of project even if it gets less clicks? / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Question & Answer: what would be the point of finding out which categories are most vs least clicked on? reordering the buttons? if i only have 3-4 filters for the order matter that much?--i don’t think i’d remove any _type_ of project even if it gets less clicks? / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer: what would be the point of finding out which categories are most vs least clicked on? reordering the buttons? if i only have 3-4 filters for the order matter that much?--i don’t think i’d remove any _type_ of project even if it gets less clicks? / qualifier
Answer: The point of finding out which categories are most vs least clicked on would be to understand the most popular ways users want to filter the projects and learn how users categorize. It's not about removing any type of project but rather arriving at good sorting filters.
 
Property / Question & Answer
Will the complete list of Nouns subDAOs be uploaded on https://nouns.center/subdaos soon?
 
Property / Question & Answer: Will the complete list of Nouns subDAOs be uploaded on https://nouns.center/subdaos soon? / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Question & Answer: Will the complete list of Nouns subDAOs be uploaded on https://nouns.center/subdaos soon? / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer: Will the complete list of Nouns subDAOs be uploaded on https://nouns.center/subdaos soon? / qualifier
Answer: The complete list of Nouns subDAOs is being worked on and should be uploaded on https://nouns.center/subdaos by the end of the month.
 
Property / Question & Answer
Any idea when the Impact Rewards ends? Or is that dependent on when everyone distributes their GIVE
 
Property / Question & Answer: Any idea when the Impact Rewards ends? Or is that dependent on when everyone distributes their GIVE / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Question & Answer: Any idea when the Impact Rewards ends? Or is that dependent on when everyone distributes their GIVE / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer: Any idea when the Impact Rewards ends? Or is that dependent on when everyone distributes their GIVE / qualifier
Answer: The Impact Rewards end date was not explicitly mentioned in the conversation. However, it seems that the rewards have already been distributed, as JoelCares#5898 mentioned, Check your wallets 🙏 and We sent out 101 payments totalling 100 ETH.
 
Property / Question & Answer
Henlo Nounish Folk!--We have 100 ETH for people building in the Nouniverse, as per Prop 63 - https://nouns.wtf/vote/63. We have compiled a huge list of people, once it's finalized we will hold a large coordinape round with those nominated and disperse the 100 ETH accordingly.--**BIG LIST OF NOMINEES**-https://nouncil.notion.site/nouncil/e52614f01e56475aa710d716ee8c69b7?v=6d1fe0cff7b645b5ab551c629cf02b16--See yourself on that list? If you have information to add please submit it to us using this form: --**PROP 63 NOMINEE DETAILS FORM - SUBMIT**-https://www.addressform.io/form/ff77863b-f160-4d63-b70e-1ed986a8da07--We need Discord / twitter usernames, wallet addresses, and short & sweet summaries of Nounish contributions. You can also post small updates to <#970759473624940564>. --Dont see yourself on the list? Let us know about your contribution and we will add you.--Nominations and Form Edits will be accepted up until end-of-day July 31. We will manually confirm wallet addresses with Nominees after that by private DM, and then move forward with the Coordinape.
 
Property / Question & Answer: Henlo Nounish Folk!--We have 100 ETH for people building in the Nouniverse, as per Prop 63 - https://nouns.wtf/vote/63. We have compiled a huge list of people, once it's finalized we will hold a large coordinape round with those nominated and disperse the 100 ETH accordingly.--**BIG LIST OF NOMINEES**-https://nouncil.notion.site/nouncil/e52614f01e56475aa710d716ee8c69b7?v=6d1fe0cff7b645b5ab551c629cf02b16--See yourself on that list? If you have information to add please submit it to us using this form: --**PROP 63 NOMINEE DETAILS FORM - SUBMIT**-https://www.addressform.io/form/ff77863b-f160-4d63-b70e-1ed986a8da07--We need Discord / twitter usernames, wallet addresses, and short & sweet summaries of Nounish contributions. You can also post small updates to <#970759473624940564>. --Dont see yourself on the list? Let us know about your contribution and we will add you.--Nominations and Form Edits will be accepted up until end-of-day July 31. We will manually confirm wallet addresses with Nominees after that by private DM, and then move forward with the Coordinape. / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Question & Answer: Henlo Nounish Folk!--We have 100 ETH for people building in the Nouniverse, as per Prop 63 - https://nouns.wtf/vote/63. We have compiled a huge list of people, once it's finalized we will hold a large coordinape round with those nominated and disperse the 100 ETH accordingly.--**BIG LIST OF NOMINEES**-https://nouncil.notion.site/nouncil/e52614f01e56475aa710d716ee8c69b7?v=6d1fe0cff7b645b5ab551c629cf02b16--See yourself on that list? If you have information to add please submit it to us using this form: --**PROP 63 NOMINEE DETAILS FORM - SUBMIT**-https://www.addressform.io/form/ff77863b-f160-4d63-b70e-1ed986a8da07--We need Discord / twitter usernames, wallet addresses, and short & sweet summaries of Nounish contributions. You can also post small updates to <#970759473624940564>. --Dont see yourself on the list? Let us know about your contribution and we will add you.--Nominations and Form Edits will be accepted up until end-of-day July 31. We will manually confirm wallet addresses with Nominees after that by private DM, and then move forward with the Coordinape. / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer: Henlo Nounish Folk!--We have 100 ETH for people building in the Nouniverse, as per Prop 63 - https://nouns.wtf/vote/63. We have compiled a huge list of people, once it's finalized we will hold a large coordinape round with those nominated and disperse the 100 ETH accordingly.--**BIG LIST OF NOMINEES**-https://nouncil.notion.site/nouncil/e52614f01e56475aa710d716ee8c69b7?v=6d1fe0cff7b645b5ab551c629cf02b16--See yourself on that list? If you have information to add please submit it to us using this form: --**PROP 63 NOMINEE DETAILS FORM - SUBMIT**-https://www.addressform.io/form/ff77863b-f160-4d63-b70e-1ed986a8da07--We need Discord / twitter usernames, wallet addresses, and short & sweet summaries of Nounish contributions. You can also post small updates to <#970759473624940564>. --Dont see yourself on the list? Let us know about your contribution and we will add you.--Nominations and Form Edits will be accepted up until end-of-day July 31. We will manually confirm wallet addresses with Nominees after that by private DM, and then move forward with the Coordinape. / qualifier
Answer: The question asked was about the 100 ETH for people building in the Nouniverse as per Prop 63. The conversation provided details about the nomination process, the list of nominees, and how to submit information using the provided form. Nominations and form edits were accepted until the end of July 31. The conversation also included reminders and discussions about updating information and submitting the address form.
 
Property / Question & Answer
sharing some questions after reading the doc off the bat:-* are we thinking the target entity that we nominate / vote for are only individuals or also proposals? (noting that proposals are often teams / groups) -> I think it's a trade off. we might not have enough ETH for this to be meaningful rewards towards past proposals. but limiting it to non-proposals might skew the conversation towards people and not projects. that might be what we want but worth thinking about. --* are we thinking that the people that vote are nominees only OR are we thinking non-nominees (e.g. general nouners) also vote?-> my gut is to leverage non-nominees too but maybe it's hard to get enough participation? also if it's weighted by number of nouns owned, then we might end up with nounders + a few whales by and large deciding the outcome. --* is self-nomination allowed?-> I think we should and no reason to shame/limit against imo.--* are nominees allowed / encouraged to campaign? is there going to be some forum for them to write out their work & impact from their own view? -> I think it might be important to set the right tone. I personally would like a culture where ppl are encouraged to shamelessly advocate for themselves. at least all performance conversations I'm used to start from the individual giving an overview / advocating for the impact of their work. also if this isn't encouraged then only the more visible & top of mind people / projects might get voted for since there is no new information to consider holistically. --* are voters (beyond the person nominating) going to be able to share supporting comments (reasons) associated with their vote?-> I think this would be a key way in which people that worked closely to an individual or a project can offer their view on the details and impact of the work. I think this and the question above can help reduce the likelihood of the Nightmare Scenario outlined in the doc where ppl feel hurt due to feeling underrecognized by peers.--* what is the time period of the impact we're evaluating?-> easy / fair approach could be all past contribution since inception. but then again maybe we don't have enough ETH for since inception. or maybe we do. idk. --* how do we gauge success? -> the strongest signal for me would be if the rewardees' long-term contribution trajectory towards the DAO moves up materially. the number of people that h
 
Property / Question & Answer: sharing some questions after reading the doc off the bat:-* are we thinking the target entity that we nominate / vote for are only individuals or also proposals? (noting that proposals are often teams / groups) -> I think it's a trade off. we might not have enough ETH for this to be meaningful rewards towards past proposals. but limiting it to non-proposals might skew the conversation towards people and not projects. that might be what we want but worth thinking about. --* are we thinking that the people that vote are nominees only OR are we thinking non-nominees (e.g. general nouners) also vote?-> my gut is to leverage non-nominees too but maybe it's hard to get enough participation? also if it's weighted by number of nouns owned, then we might end up with nounders + a few whales by and large deciding the outcome. --* is self-nomination allowed?-> I think we should and no reason to shame/limit against imo.--* are nominees allowed / encouraged to campaign? is there going to be some forum for them to write out their work & impact from their own view? -> I think it might be important to set the right tone. I personally would like a culture where ppl are encouraged to shamelessly advocate for themselves. at least all performance conversations I'm used to start from the individual giving an overview / advocating for the impact of their work. also if this isn't encouraged then only the more visible & top of mind people / projects might get voted for since there is no new information to consider holistically. --* are voters (beyond the person nominating) going to be able to share supporting comments (reasons) associated with their vote?-> I think this would be a key way in which people that worked closely to an individual or a project can offer their view on the details and impact of the work. I think this and the question above can help reduce the likelihood of the Nightmare Scenario outlined in the doc where ppl feel hurt due to feeling underrecognized by peers.--* what is the time period of the impact we're evaluating?-> easy / fair approach could be all past contribution since inception. but then again maybe we don't have enough ETH for since inception. or maybe we do. idk. --* how do we gauge success? -> the strongest signal for me would be if the rewardees' long-term contribution trajectory towards the DAO moves up materially. the number of people that h / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Question & Answer: sharing some questions after reading the doc off the bat:-* are we thinking the target entity that we nominate / vote for are only individuals or also proposals? (noting that proposals are often teams / groups) -> I think it's a trade off. we might not have enough ETH for this to be meaningful rewards towards past proposals. but limiting it to non-proposals might skew the conversation towards people and not projects. that might be what we want but worth thinking about. --* are we thinking that the people that vote are nominees only OR are we thinking non-nominees (e.g. general nouners) also vote?-> my gut is to leverage non-nominees too but maybe it's hard to get enough participation? also if it's weighted by number of nouns owned, then we might end up with nounders + a few whales by and large deciding the outcome. --* is self-nomination allowed?-> I think we should and no reason to shame/limit against imo.--* are nominees allowed / encouraged to campaign? is there going to be some forum for them to write out their work & impact from their own view? -> I think it might be important to set the right tone. I personally would like a culture where ppl are encouraged to shamelessly advocate for themselves. at least all performance conversations I'm used to start from the individual giving an overview / advocating for the impact of their work. also if this isn't encouraged then only the more visible & top of mind people / projects might get voted for since there is no new information to consider holistically. --* are voters (beyond the person nominating) going to be able to share supporting comments (reasons) associated with their vote?-> I think this would be a key way in which people that worked closely to an individual or a project can offer their view on the details and impact of the work. I think this and the question above can help reduce the likelihood of the Nightmare Scenario outlined in the doc where ppl feel hurt due to feeling underrecognized by peers.--* what is the time period of the impact we're evaluating?-> easy / fair approach could be all past contribution since inception. but then again maybe we don't have enough ETH for since inception. or maybe we do. idk. --* how do we gauge success? -> the strongest signal for me would be if the rewardees' long-term contribution trajectory towards the DAO moves up materially. the number of people that h / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer: sharing some questions after reading the doc off the bat:-* are we thinking the target entity that we nominate / vote for are only individuals or also proposals? (noting that proposals are often teams / groups) -> I think it's a trade off. we might not have enough ETH for this to be meaningful rewards towards past proposals. but limiting it to non-proposals might skew the conversation towards people and not projects. that might be what we want but worth thinking about. --* are we thinking that the people that vote are nominees only OR are we thinking non-nominees (e.g. general nouners) also vote?-> my gut is to leverage non-nominees too but maybe it's hard to get enough participation? also if it's weighted by number of nouns owned, then we might end up with nounders + a few whales by and large deciding the outcome. --* is self-nomination allowed?-> I think we should and no reason to shame/limit against imo.--* are nominees allowed / encouraged to campaign? is there going to be some forum for them to write out their work & impact from their own view? -> I think it might be important to set the right tone. I personally would like a culture where ppl are encouraged to shamelessly advocate for themselves. at least all performance conversations I'm used to start from the individual giving an overview / advocating for the impact of their work. also if this isn't encouraged then only the more visible & top of mind people / projects might get voted for since there is no new information to consider holistically. --* are voters (beyond the person nominating) going to be able to share supporting comments (reasons) associated with their vote?-> I think this would be a key way in which people that worked closely to an individual or a project can offer their view on the details and impact of the work. I think this and the question above can help reduce the likelihood of the Nightmare Scenario outlined in the doc where ppl feel hurt due to feeling underrecognized by peers.--* what is the time period of the impact we're evaluating?-> easy / fair approach could be all past contribution since inception. but then again maybe we don't have enough ETH for since inception. or maybe we do. idk. --* how do we gauge success? -> the strongest signal for me would be if the rewardees' long-term contribution trajectory towards the DAO moves up materially. the number of people that h / qualifier
Answer: The question asked was about various aspects of the nomination and voting process for the Nouns DAO impact rewards. The conversation provided some thoughts and opinions on these aspects, but no definitive answers were given. The conversation mainly served as a starting point for further discussion and planning.
 
Property / Proposal Type
 
Property / Proposal Type: 5 eth / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Proposal Type
 
Property / Proposal Type: 6 charities / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Proposal Type
 
Property / Proposal Type: Nouns dao governance / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstain Count
 
0
Amount0
Unit1
Property / Abstain Count: 0 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Transfer Value in ETH
 
5
Amount5
Unit1
Property / Transfer Value in ETH: 5 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposer Count
 
0
Amount0
Unit1
Property / Opposer Count: 0 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Related Channel
 
Property / Related Channel: Nouns DAO (legacy) - 63-impact-rewards / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Related Channel
 
Property / Related Channel: Nouns DAO (legacy) - 27-nouns-center / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer
 
which address should i be using to vote?
Property / Question & Answer: which address should i be using to vote? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: which address should i be using to vote? / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer: which address should i be using to vote? / qualifier
 
Answer: The address you should be using to vote can be found beside your name in this document: https://nouncil.notion.site/nouncil/e52614f01e56475aa710d716ee8c69b7?v=6d1fe0cff7b645b5ab551c629cf02b16
Property / Question & Answer
 
<@!410593947027505162> do you have a repo for the nouns center?
Property / Question & Answer: <@!410593947027505162> do you have a repo for the nouns center? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: <@!410593947027505162> do you have a repo for the nouns center? / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer: <@!410593947027505162> do you have a repo for the nouns center? / qualifier
 
Answer: The repo for the Nouns Center exists, but it is currently private. It will be open source when they launch.
Property / Question & Answer
 
<@410593947027505162> I remember the first iteration of <a:noun_earth:923689442324144178>** Nouns Center** always having a persistent sidebar menu. Is there a reason for the always hidden menu? (definitely looks cleaner, but today as I was browsing the site, I found it to be tedious to keep clicking the menu to go to a new page.)
Property / Question & Answer: <@410593947027505162> I remember the first iteration of <a:noun_earth:923689442324144178>** Nouns Center** always having a persistent sidebar menu. Is there a reason for the always hidden menu? (definitely looks cleaner, but today as I was browsing the site, I found it to be tedious to keep clicking the menu to go to a new page.) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: <@410593947027505162> I remember the first iteration of <a:noun_earth:923689442324144178>** Nouns Center** always having a persistent sidebar menu. Is there a reason for the always hidden menu? (definitely looks cleaner, but today as I was browsing the site, I found it to be tedious to keep clicking the menu to go to a new page.) / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer: <@410593947027505162> I remember the first iteration of <a:noun_earth:923689442324144178>** Nouns Center** always having a persistent sidebar menu. Is there a reason for the always hidden menu? (definitely looks cleaner, but today as I was browsing the site, I found it to be tedious to keep clicking the menu to go to a new page.) / qualifier
 
Answer: The reason for the always hidden menu in the first iteration of Nouns Center was to create more real estate and a better design, similar to HBO Max's hamburger menu on desktop. However, after receiving feedback, an update was pushed to make the menu folders default to open, while still allowing them to be closed if desired. This change aimed to improve accessibility and user experience while maintaining a clean design.
Property / Question & Answer
 
Gn Everynoun, just found out about the Reverse Job board and submitted my application to be featured! --Wondering what are the steps from here?
Property / Question & Answer: Gn Everynoun, just found out about the Reverse Job board and submitted my application to be featured! --Wondering what are the steps from here? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: Gn Everynoun, just found out about the Reverse Job board and submitted my application to be featured! --Wondering what are the steps from here? / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer: Gn Everynoun, just found out about the Reverse Job board and submitted my application to be featured! --Wondering what are the steps from here? / qualifier
 
Answer: After submitting your application to be featured on the Reverse Job board, cdt#3727 will add you to the board. There might be a backlog since they handle a lot of data, but they will eventually get you on there. Your profile picture on the Reverse Job board will be a randomly generated Noun using Noun API.
Property / Question & Answer
 
has there been any discussion/plans for linking to nouns center from nouns.wtf ?
Property / Question & Answer: has there been any discussion/plans for linking to nouns center from nouns.wtf ? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: has there been any discussion/plans for linking to nouns center from nouns.wtf ? / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer: has there been any discussion/plans for linking to nouns center from nouns.wtf ? / qualifier
 
Answer: Yes, there has been a discussion about linking to Nouns Center from nouns.wtf. cdt#3727 mentioned they were thinking of opening a PR for this.
Property / Question & Answer
 
Nice! Is all the info from the notion docs ported to Nouns Center? I think I looked a while ago and it wasn’t
Property / Question & Answer: Nice! Is all the info from the notion docs ported to Nouns Center? I think I looked a while ago and it wasn’t / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: Nice! Is all the info from the notion docs ported to Nouns Center? I think I looked a while ago and it wasn’t / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer: Nice! Is all the info from the notion docs ported to Nouns Center? I think I looked a while ago and it wasn’t / qualifier
 
Answer: No, not all the info from the notion docs has been ported to Nouns Center. There isn't a 1:1 `Docs` page on Nouns Center.
Property / Question & Answer
 
sure, agreed. how much of this already exists can be sent to me. i’m assuming the nounders have a generic email for these things? what is it?--who would write the primer/overview, if this doesn’t already exist.--we have glasses not but i think for blogposts it’d be good to send them other assets too but need Nounder/Nouner alignment.- - Logo PNGs (glasses & text)- - Glasses files- - maybe a set or full constricted nouns (10?) to use at will- - couple promo images (screenshot of first auction, group of nouns together, and maybe a collage of derivatives).--if stories are written on nouns they’ll touch in history, cc0 (derivatives), and impact. so just thinking of imagery to best support that and be able to hand off nicely--i hate to keep throwing it back but none of this content should be coming from non-Nounders imo so best i can do i aggregate & host it.
Property / Question & Answer: sure, agreed. how much of this already exists can be sent to me. i’m assuming the nounders have a generic email for these things? what is it?--who would write the primer/overview, if this doesn’t already exist.--we have glasses not but i think for blogposts it’d be good to send them other assets too but need Nounder/Nouner alignment.- - Logo PNGs (glasses & text)- - Glasses files- - maybe a set or full constricted nouns (10?) to use at will- - couple promo images (screenshot of first auction, group of nouns together, and maybe a collage of derivatives).--if stories are written on nouns they’ll touch in history, cc0 (derivatives), and impact. so just thinking of imagery to best support that and be able to hand off nicely--i hate to keep throwing it back but none of this content should be coming from non-Nounders imo so best i can do i aggregate & host it. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: sure, agreed. how much of this already exists can be sent to me. i’m assuming the nounders have a generic email for these things? what is it?--who would write the primer/overview, if this doesn’t already exist.--we have glasses not but i think for blogposts it’d be good to send them other assets too but need Nounder/Nouner alignment.- - Logo PNGs (glasses & text)- - Glasses files- - maybe a set or full constricted nouns (10?) to use at will- - couple promo images (screenshot of first auction, group of nouns together, and maybe a collage of derivatives).--if stories are written on nouns they’ll touch in history, cc0 (derivatives), and impact. so just thinking of imagery to best support that and be able to hand off nicely--i hate to keep throwing it back but none of this content should be coming from non-Nounders imo so best i can do i aggregate & host it. / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer: sure, agreed. how much of this already exists can be sent to me. i’m assuming the nounders have a generic email for these things? what is it?--who would write the primer/overview, if this doesn’t already exist.--we have glasses not but i think for blogposts it’d be good to send them other assets too but need Nounder/Nouner alignment.- - Logo PNGs (glasses & text)- - Glasses files- - maybe a set or full constricted nouns (10?) to use at will- - couple promo images (screenshot of first auction, group of nouns together, and maybe a collage of derivatives).--if stories are written on nouns they’ll touch in history, cc0 (derivatives), and impact. so just thinking of imagery to best support that and be able to hand off nicely--i hate to keep throwing it back but none of this content should be coming from non-Nounders imo so best i can do i aggregate & host it. / qualifier
 
Answer: The question was about the existence of a generic email for Nounders and who would write the primer/overview. 4156#9052 replied that they will work on getting the requested information and assets within 1-2 weeks.
Property / Question & Answer
 
thanks, open to others opinion. i’ve thought about this a lot and i’m sure i’ll have to revisit layout as the number of projects scale.--question for you. do we include all projects on the same page and allow ppl to filter by category? --ie. we have different project types:- - Noadz (available to purchase)- - Coloring book (free download)- - Nounspedia (website)--🅰️: one project page with filters-🅱️: separate page per project type--feel free to vote
Property / Question & Answer: thanks, open to others opinion. i’ve thought about this a lot and i’m sure i’ll have to revisit layout as the number of projects scale.--question for you. do we include all projects on the same page and allow ppl to filter by category? --ie. we have different project types:- - Noadz (available to purchase)- - Coloring book (free download)- - Nounspedia (website)--🅰️: one project page with filters-🅱️: separate page per project type--feel free to vote / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: thanks, open to others opinion. i’ve thought about this a lot and i’m sure i’ll have to revisit layout as the number of projects scale.--question for you. do we include all projects on the same page and allow ppl to filter by category? --ie. we have different project types:- - Noadz (available to purchase)- - Coloring book (free download)- - Nounspedia (website)--🅰️: one project page with filters-🅱️: separate page per project type--feel free to vote / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer: thanks, open to others opinion. i’ve thought about this a lot and i’m sure i’ll have to revisit layout as the number of projects scale.--question for you. do we include all projects on the same page and allow ppl to filter by category? --ie. we have different project types:- - Noadz (available to purchase)- - Coloring book (free download)- - Nounspedia (website)--🅰️: one project page with filters-🅱️: separate page per project type--feel free to vote / qualifier
 
Answer: A. one project page with filters
Property / Question & Answer
 
what would be the point of finding out which categories are most vs least clicked on? reordering the buttons? if i only have 3-4 filters for the order matter that much?--i don’t think i’d remove any _type_ of project even if it gets less clicks?
Property / Question & Answer: what would be the point of finding out which categories are most vs least clicked on? reordering the buttons? if i only have 3-4 filters for the order matter that much?--i don’t think i’d remove any _type_ of project even if it gets less clicks? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: what would be the point of finding out which categories are most vs least clicked on? reordering the buttons? if i only have 3-4 filters for the order matter that much?--i don’t think i’d remove any _type_ of project even if it gets less clicks? / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer: what would be the point of finding out which categories are most vs least clicked on? reordering the buttons? if i only have 3-4 filters for the order matter that much?--i don’t think i’d remove any _type_ of project even if it gets less clicks? / qualifier
 
Answer: The point of finding out which categories are most vs least clicked on would be to understand the most popular ways users want to filter the projects and learn how users categorize. It's not about removing any type of project but rather arriving at good sorting filters.
Property / Question & Answer
 
Will the complete list of Nouns subDAOs be uploaded on https://nouns.center/subdaos soon?
Property / Question & Answer: Will the complete list of Nouns subDAOs be uploaded on https://nouns.center/subdaos soon? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: Will the complete list of Nouns subDAOs be uploaded on https://nouns.center/subdaos soon? / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer: Will the complete list of Nouns subDAOs be uploaded on https://nouns.center/subdaos soon? / qualifier
 
Answer: The complete list of Nouns subDAOs is being worked on and should be uploaded on https://nouns.center/subdaos by the end of the month.
Property / Question & Answer
 
Any idea when the Impact Rewards ends? Or is that dependent on when everyone distributes their GIVE
Property / Question & Answer: Any idea when the Impact Rewards ends? Or is that dependent on when everyone distributes their GIVE / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: Any idea when the Impact Rewards ends? Or is that dependent on when everyone distributes their GIVE / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer: Any idea when the Impact Rewards ends? Or is that dependent on when everyone distributes their GIVE / qualifier
 
Answer: The Impact Rewards end date was not explicitly mentioned in the conversation. However, it seems that the rewards have already been distributed, as JoelCares#5898 mentioned, Check your wallets 🙏 and We sent out 101 payments totalling 100 ETH.
Property / Question & Answer
 
Henlo Nounish Folk!--We have 100 ETH for people building in the Nouniverse, as per Prop 63 - https://nouns.wtf/vote/63. We have compiled a huge list of people, once it's finalized we will hold a large coordinape round with those nominated and disperse the 100 ETH accordingly.--**BIG LIST OF NOMINEES**-https://nouncil.notion.site/nouncil/e52614f01e56475aa710d716ee8c69b7?v=6d1fe0cff7b645b5ab551c629cf02b16--See yourself on that list? If you have information to add please submit it to us using this form: --**PROP 63 NOMINEE DETAILS FORM - SUBMIT**-https://www.addressform.io/form/ff77863b-f160-4d63-b70e-1ed986a8da07--We need Discord / twitter usernames, wallet addresses, and short & sweet summaries of Nounish contributions. You can also post small updates to <#970759473624940564>. --Dont see yourself on the list? Let us know about your contribution and we will add you.--Nominations and Form Edits will be accepted up until end-of-day July 31. We will manually confirm wallet addresses with Nominees after that by private DM, and then move forward with the Coordinape.
Property / Question & Answer: Henlo Nounish Folk!--We have 100 ETH for people building in the Nouniverse, as per Prop 63 - https://nouns.wtf/vote/63. We have compiled a huge list of people, once it's finalized we will hold a large coordinape round with those nominated and disperse the 100 ETH accordingly.--**BIG LIST OF NOMINEES**-https://nouncil.notion.site/nouncil/e52614f01e56475aa710d716ee8c69b7?v=6d1fe0cff7b645b5ab551c629cf02b16--See yourself on that list? If you have information to add please submit it to us using this form: --**PROP 63 NOMINEE DETAILS FORM - SUBMIT**-https://www.addressform.io/form/ff77863b-f160-4d63-b70e-1ed986a8da07--We need Discord / twitter usernames, wallet addresses, and short & sweet summaries of Nounish contributions. You can also post small updates to <#970759473624940564>. --Dont see yourself on the list? Let us know about your contribution and we will add you.--Nominations and Form Edits will be accepted up until end-of-day July 31. We will manually confirm wallet addresses with Nominees after that by private DM, and then move forward with the Coordinape. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: Henlo Nounish Folk!--We have 100 ETH for people building in the Nouniverse, as per Prop 63 - https://nouns.wtf/vote/63. We have compiled a huge list of people, once it's finalized we will hold a large coordinape round with those nominated and disperse the 100 ETH accordingly.--**BIG LIST OF NOMINEES**-https://nouncil.notion.site/nouncil/e52614f01e56475aa710d716ee8c69b7?v=6d1fe0cff7b645b5ab551c629cf02b16--See yourself on that list? If you have information to add please submit it to us using this form: --**PROP 63 NOMINEE DETAILS FORM - SUBMIT**-https://www.addressform.io/form/ff77863b-f160-4d63-b70e-1ed986a8da07--We need Discord / twitter usernames, wallet addresses, and short & sweet summaries of Nounish contributions. You can also post small updates to <#970759473624940564>. --Dont see yourself on the list? Let us know about your contribution and we will add you.--Nominations and Form Edits will be accepted up until end-of-day July 31. We will manually confirm wallet addresses with Nominees after that by private DM, and then move forward with the Coordinape. / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer: Henlo Nounish Folk!--We have 100 ETH for people building in the Nouniverse, as per Prop 63 - https://nouns.wtf/vote/63. We have compiled a huge list of people, once it's finalized we will hold a large coordinape round with those nominated and disperse the 100 ETH accordingly.--**BIG LIST OF NOMINEES**-https://nouncil.notion.site/nouncil/e52614f01e56475aa710d716ee8c69b7?v=6d1fe0cff7b645b5ab551c629cf02b16--See yourself on that list? If you have information to add please submit it to us using this form: --**PROP 63 NOMINEE DETAILS FORM - SUBMIT**-https://www.addressform.io/form/ff77863b-f160-4d63-b70e-1ed986a8da07--We need Discord / twitter usernames, wallet addresses, and short & sweet summaries of Nounish contributions. You can also post small updates to <#970759473624940564>. --Dont see yourself on the list? Let us know about your contribution and we will add you.--Nominations and Form Edits will be accepted up until end-of-day July 31. We will manually confirm wallet addresses with Nominees after that by private DM, and then move forward with the Coordinape. / qualifier
 
Answer: The question asked was about the 100 ETH for people building in the Nouniverse as per Prop 63. The conversation provided details about the nomination process, the list of nominees, and how to submit information using the provided form. Nominations and form edits were accepted until the end of July 31. The conversation also included reminders and discussions about updating information and submitting the address form.
Property / Question & Answer
 
sharing some questions after reading the doc off the bat:-* are we thinking the target entity that we nominate / vote for are only individuals or also proposals? (noting that proposals are often teams / groups) -> I think it's a trade off. we might not have enough ETH for this to be meaningful rewards towards past proposals. but limiting it to non-proposals might skew the conversation towards people and not projects. that might be what we want but worth thinking about. --* are we thinking that the people that vote are nominees only OR are we thinking non-nominees (e.g. general nouners) also vote?-> my gut is to leverage non-nominees too but maybe it's hard to get enough participation? also if it's weighted by number of nouns owned, then we might end up with nounders + a few whales by and large deciding the outcome. --* is self-nomination allowed?-> I think we should and no reason to shame/limit against imo.--* are nominees allowed / encouraged to campaign? is there going to be some forum for them to write out their work & impact from their own view? -> I think it might be important to set the right tone. I personally would like a culture where ppl are encouraged to shamelessly advocate for themselves. at least all performance conversations I'm used to start from the individual giving an overview / advocating for the impact of their work. also if this isn't encouraged then only the more visible & top of mind people / projects might get voted for since there is no new information to consider holistically. --* are voters (beyond the person nominating) going to be able to share supporting comments (reasons) associated with their vote?-> I think this would be a key way in which people that worked closely to an individual or a project can offer their view on the details and impact of the work. I think this and the question above can help reduce the likelihood of the Nightmare Scenario outlined in the doc where ppl feel hurt due to feeling underrecognized by peers.--* what is the time period of the impact we're evaluating?-> easy / fair approach could be all past contribution since inception. but then again maybe we don't have enough ETH for since inception. or maybe we do. idk. --* how do we gauge success? -> the strongest signal for me would be if the rewardees' long-term contribution trajectory towards the DAO moves up materially. the number of people that h
Property / Question & Answer: sharing some questions after reading the doc off the bat:-* are we thinking the target entity that we nominate / vote for are only individuals or also proposals? (noting that proposals are often teams / groups) -> I think it's a trade off. we might not have enough ETH for this to be meaningful rewards towards past proposals. but limiting it to non-proposals might skew the conversation towards people and not projects. that might be what we want but worth thinking about. --* are we thinking that the people that vote are nominees only OR are we thinking non-nominees (e.g. general nouners) also vote?-> my gut is to leverage non-nominees too but maybe it's hard to get enough participation? also if it's weighted by number of nouns owned, then we might end up with nounders + a few whales by and large deciding the outcome. --* is self-nomination allowed?-> I think we should and no reason to shame/limit against imo.--* are nominees allowed / encouraged to campaign? is there going to be some forum for them to write out their work & impact from their own view? -> I think it might be important to set the right tone. I personally would like a culture where ppl are encouraged to shamelessly advocate for themselves. at least all performance conversations I'm used to start from the individual giving an overview / advocating for the impact of their work. also if this isn't encouraged then only the more visible & top of mind people / projects might get voted for since there is no new information to consider holistically. --* are voters (beyond the person nominating) going to be able to share supporting comments (reasons) associated with their vote?-> I think this would be a key way in which people that worked closely to an individual or a project can offer their view on the details and impact of the work. I think this and the question above can help reduce the likelihood of the Nightmare Scenario outlined in the doc where ppl feel hurt due to feeling underrecognized by peers.--* what is the time period of the impact we're evaluating?-> easy / fair approach could be all past contribution since inception. but then again maybe we don't have enough ETH for since inception. or maybe we do. idk. --* how do we gauge success? -> the strongest signal for me would be if the rewardees' long-term contribution trajectory towards the DAO moves up materially. the number of people that h / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: sharing some questions after reading the doc off the bat:-* are we thinking the target entity that we nominate / vote for are only individuals or also proposals? (noting that proposals are often teams / groups) -> I think it's a trade off. we might not have enough ETH for this to be meaningful rewards towards past proposals. but limiting it to non-proposals might skew the conversation towards people and not projects. that might be what we want but worth thinking about. --* are we thinking that the people that vote are nominees only OR are we thinking non-nominees (e.g. general nouners) also vote?-> my gut is to leverage non-nominees too but maybe it's hard to get enough participation? also if it's weighted by number of nouns owned, then we might end up with nounders + a few whales by and large deciding the outcome. --* is self-nomination allowed?-> I think we should and no reason to shame/limit against imo.--* are nominees allowed / encouraged to campaign? is there going to be some forum for them to write out their work & impact from their own view? -> I think it might be important to set the right tone. I personally would like a culture where ppl are encouraged to shamelessly advocate for themselves. at least all performance conversations I'm used to start from the individual giving an overview / advocating for the impact of their work. also if this isn't encouraged then only the more visible & top of mind people / projects might get voted for since there is no new information to consider holistically. --* are voters (beyond the person nominating) going to be able to share supporting comments (reasons) associated with their vote?-> I think this would be a key way in which people that worked closely to an individual or a project can offer their view on the details and impact of the work. I think this and the question above can help reduce the likelihood of the Nightmare Scenario outlined in the doc where ppl feel hurt due to feeling underrecognized by peers.--* what is the time period of the impact we're evaluating?-> easy / fair approach could be all past contribution since inception. but then again maybe we don't have enough ETH for since inception. or maybe we do. idk. --* how do we gauge success? -> the strongest signal for me would be if the rewardees' long-term contribution trajectory towards the DAO moves up materially. the number of people that h / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer: sharing some questions after reading the doc off the bat:-* are we thinking the target entity that we nominate / vote for are only individuals or also proposals? (noting that proposals are often teams / groups) -> I think it's a trade off. we might not have enough ETH for this to be meaningful rewards towards past proposals. but limiting it to non-proposals might skew the conversation towards people and not projects. that might be what we want but worth thinking about. --* are we thinking that the people that vote are nominees only OR are we thinking non-nominees (e.g. general nouners) also vote?-> my gut is to leverage non-nominees too but maybe it's hard to get enough participation? also if it's weighted by number of nouns owned, then we might end up with nounders + a few whales by and large deciding the outcome. --* is self-nomination allowed?-> I think we should and no reason to shame/limit against imo.--* are nominees allowed / encouraged to campaign? is there going to be some forum for them to write out their work & impact from their own view? -> I think it might be important to set the right tone. I personally would like a culture where ppl are encouraged to shamelessly advocate for themselves. at least all performance conversations I'm used to start from the individual giving an overview / advocating for the impact of their work. also if this isn't encouraged then only the more visible & top of mind people / projects might get voted for since there is no new information to consider holistically. --* are voters (beyond the person nominating) going to be able to share supporting comments (reasons) associated with their vote?-> I think this would be a key way in which people that worked closely to an individual or a project can offer their view on the details and impact of the work. I think this and the question above can help reduce the likelihood of the Nightmare Scenario outlined in the doc where ppl feel hurt due to feeling underrecognized by peers.--* what is the time period of the impact we're evaluating?-> easy / fair approach could be all past contribution since inception. but then again maybe we don't have enough ETH for since inception. or maybe we do. idk. --* how do we gauge success? -> the strongest signal for me would be if the rewardees' long-term contribution trajectory towards the DAO moves up materially. the number of people that h / qualifier
 
Answer: The question asked was about various aspects of the nomination and voting process for the Nouns DAO impact rewards. The conversation provided some thoughts and opinions on these aspects, but no definitive answers were given. The conversation mainly served as a starting point for further discussion and planning.
Property / Question & Answer
 
So does everyone win in this scenario or only those with most allocations?
Property / Question & Answer: So does everyone win in this scenario or only those with most allocations? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: So does everyone win in this scenario or only those with most allocations? / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer: So does everyone win in this scenario or only those with most allocations? / qualifier
 
Answer: In this scenario, everyone wins. The amount of ETH each person receives is calculated using the formula:--`(Give you receive / total Give sent) * 100 ETH`
Property / Question & Answer
 
Thanks for this sheet! Is it good if I use some of this data in my upcoming article on Prop 63?
Property / Question & Answer: Thanks for this sheet! Is it good if I use some of this data in my upcoming article on Prop 63? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: Thanks for this sheet! Is it good if I use some of this data in my upcoming article on Prop 63? / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer: Thanks for this sheet! Is it good if I use some of this data in my upcoming article on Prop 63? / qualifier
 
Answer: You can use the data from the sheet in your upcoming article on Prop 63. The allocation of ETH works as a percentage point, so you can work something out from there without worrying about individual allocations.
Property / Question & Answer
 
to that end, maybe a good time to see about scheduling a call? do we think we've done enough to make nouners/nouncillors aware of the channel?
Property / Question & Answer: to that end, maybe a good time to see about scheduling a call? do we think we've done enough to make nouners/nouncillors aware of the channel? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: to that end, maybe a good time to see about scheduling a call? do we think we've done enough to make nouners/nouncillors aware of the channel? / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer: to that end, maybe a good time to see about scheduling a call? do we think we've done enough to make nouners/nouncillors aware of the channel? / qualifier
 
Answer: The question was whether they have done enough to make nouners/nouncillors aware of the channel. JoelCares#5898 replied, I think so yeah, we can pull together a list of Nouns / Nouncillors in here who've expressed interest in being an admin and move forward with next steps.
Property / Question & Answer
 
again, there's no design here yet (help pixelz plz), but ignore design and focus on the idea. we'll need a way to best structure this cause you can already see how Oni's 8ish notes are already taking up a lot of room. what happens when we have a years worth of notes? so we'll have to fix that design challenge, but i like this idea as far as data creation & management goes. so each Nouner's workflow isn't disturbed.
Property / Question & Answer: again, there's no design here yet (help pixelz plz), but ignore design and focus on the idea. we'll need a way to best structure this cause you can already see how Oni's 8ish notes are already taking up a lot of room. what happens when we have a years worth of notes? so we'll have to fix that design challenge, but i like this idea as far as data creation & management goes. so each Nouner's workflow isn't disturbed. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: again, there's no design here yet (help pixelz plz), but ignore design and focus on the idea. we'll need a way to best structure this cause you can already see how Oni's 8ish notes are already taking up a lot of room. what happens when we have a years worth of notes? so we'll have to fix that design challenge, but i like this idea as far as data creation & management goes. so each Nouner's workflow isn't disturbed. / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer
 
Can #NounsCentre fix our portfolios?
Property / Question & Answer: Can #NounsCentre fix our portfolios? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: Can #NounsCentre fix our portfolios? / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer
 
gm <@!410593947027505162> , i put together ready-for-prod assets for the noun glasses in various resolutions for press/people who are less familiar with figma/ps. thought we could add to nouns center. maybe we could expand into its own press kit section?
Property / Question & Answer: gm <@!410593947027505162> , i put together ready-for-prod assets for the noun glasses in various resolutions for press/people who are less familiar with figma/ps. thought we could add to nouns center. maybe we could expand into its own press kit section? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: gm <@!410593947027505162> , i put together ready-for-prod assets for the noun glasses in various resolutions for press/people who are less familiar with figma/ps. thought we could add to nouns center. maybe we could expand into its own press kit section? / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer
 
has there ever been an ETH arcade? thats be a fun site
Property / Question & Answer: has there ever been an ETH arcade? thats be a fun site / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: has there ever been an ETH arcade? thats be a fun site / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer
 
i appreciate these thoughts and have asked a lot of the same questions. --i like all this because when i wanted to “build in public” that also means decision-making with the community and what we all would want to see.--please engage and let’s make this site great. i also wonder if i should try something new with this proposal and hold weekly or every two weekly public calls in general voice channel to hash this stuff out publicly? i welcome all input and could be a fun community experiment
Property / Question & Answer: i appreciate these thoughts and have asked a lot of the same questions. --i like all this because when i wanted to “build in public” that also means decision-making with the community and what we all would want to see.--please engage and let’s make this site great. i also wonder if i should try something new with this proposal and hold weekly or every two weekly public calls in general voice channel to hash this stuff out publicly? i welcome all input and could be a fun community experiment / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: i appreciate these thoughts and have asked a lot of the same questions. --i like all this because when i wanted to “build in public” that also means decision-making with the community and what we all would want to see.--please engage and let’s make this site great. i also wonder if i should try something new with this proposal and hold weekly or every two weekly public calls in general voice channel to hash this stuff out publicly? i welcome all input and could be a fun community experiment / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer
 
if A, we have one nice place to see **everything** and you can filter as you wish--if B, less overwhelming? if B, that makes ~100 projects over all time to date and we’re anticipate growing a lot. --buckets for B could be (monetized projects, funded by official proposal projects, and some 3rd catch-all bucket for fun sites/games that aren’t either proposal projects or monetized derivatives.
Property / Question & Answer: if A, we have one nice place to see **everything** and you can filter as you wish--if B, less overwhelming? if B, that makes ~100 projects over all time to date and we’re anticipate growing a lot. --buckets for B could be (monetized projects, funded by official proposal projects, and some 3rd catch-all bucket for fun sites/games that aren’t either proposal projects or monetized derivatives. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: if A, we have one nice place to see **everything** and you can filter as you wish--if B, less overwhelming? if B, that makes ~100 projects over all time to date and we’re anticipate growing a lot. --buckets for B could be (monetized projects, funded by official proposal projects, and some 3rd catch-all bucket for fun sites/games that aren’t either proposal projects or monetized derivatives. / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer
 
is this pertaining to nouns center? otherwise might make sense to discuss in another channel, sounds like a fun idea though <:noun_face:863562478546190358>
Property / Question & Answer: is this pertaining to nouns center? otherwise might make sense to discuss in another channel, sounds like a fun idea though <:noun_face:863562478546190358> / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: is this pertaining to nouns center? otherwise might make sense to discuss in another channel, sounds like a fun idea though <:noun_face:863562478546190358> / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer
 
May I recommend or suggest that nouns.center redirects to a /projects or some other page?
Property / Question & Answer: May I recommend or suggest that nouns.center redirects to a /projects or some other page? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: May I recommend or suggest that nouns.center redirects to a /projects or some other page? / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer
 
What are we thinking about an on-chain inside-NFT nouns glasses based tetris game generative drop?
Property / Question & Answer: What are we thinking about an on-chain inside-NFT nouns glasses based tetris game generative drop? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: What are we thinking about an on-chain inside-NFT nouns glasses based tetris game generative drop? / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer
 
All done, tried to priorities those that I don't think are being rewarded so much in other ways. There is no final submit button right? (just allocate all give and click save allocation?)
Property / Question & Answer: All done, tried to priorities those that I don't think are being rewarded so much in other ways. There is no final submit button right? (just allocate all give and click save allocation?) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: All done, tried to priorities those that I don't think are being rewarded so much in other ways. There is no final submit button right? (just allocate all give and click save allocation?) / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer
 
Check your wallets 🙏--We sent out 101 payments totalling 100 ETH. Thank you for your participation in the Pilot Collectivized Nounish Allocation round. Make sure you check out the Coordinape - you might have received some kind notes along with the GIVE you received. Also if you click the MAP tab there's an interactive tool that visualizes the allocations.--**Nouns DAO - Prop 63**-https://nouns.wtf/vote/63--**Nounish Builders Nominated + Work Summaries:**-https://nouncil.notion.site/nouncil/e52614f01e56475aa710d716ee8c69b7?v=6d1fe0cff7b645b5ab551c629cf02b16--**Coordinape**-https://app.coordinape.com/circles/3373/history--This project was intended as an experiment, providing a collective decision on how to retroactively allocate ETH to Nounish contributors for their work in Nouns. We asked the question and left the answer to the community. Would people allocate it all to the top achievers? Spread it evenly through the community? Would bad actors try to scheme ways to play the system?--We chose a commonly used DAO tool (Coordinape) and hoped to see where it shines, where it falls short, observing the emergent behaviour. We could then take that knowledge and produce some recommendations for the future. I have attached the final ETH values below, and will be doing my own analysis of lessons learned on this one. I will post them here, and publicly, as a final wrap-up of this project. Everyone else is welcome to post your own lessons and analyses.--On a very simple level this is a list of Nounish contributors who are **here**, present, spending their attention on Nouns, building in public, creating our culture, collectively steering the Nounish ship. You are the building blocks of of the Nouniverse. It's not an exhaustive list, we are missing several influential contributors, but it's a good list. It's a community.--Thank you all for being here. This last year with Nouns has been a blessing and I'm excited for many more years of this. 🙏
Property / Question & Answer: Check your wallets 🙏--We sent out 101 payments totalling 100 ETH. Thank you for your participation in the Pilot Collectivized Nounish Allocation round. Make sure you check out the Coordinape - you might have received some kind notes along with the GIVE you received. Also if you click the MAP tab there's an interactive tool that visualizes the allocations.--**Nouns DAO - Prop 63**-https://nouns.wtf/vote/63--**Nounish Builders Nominated + Work Summaries:**-https://nouncil.notion.site/nouncil/e52614f01e56475aa710d716ee8c69b7?v=6d1fe0cff7b645b5ab551c629cf02b16--**Coordinape**-https://app.coordinape.com/circles/3373/history--This project was intended as an experiment, providing a collective decision on how to retroactively allocate ETH to Nounish contributors for their work in Nouns. We asked the question and left the answer to the community. Would people allocate it all to the top achievers? Spread it evenly through the community? Would bad actors try to scheme ways to play the system?--We chose a commonly used DAO tool (Coordinape) and hoped to see where it shines, where it falls short, observing the emergent behaviour. We could then take that knowledge and produce some recommendations for the future. I have attached the final ETH values below, and will be doing my own analysis of lessons learned on this one. I will post them here, and publicly, as a final wrap-up of this project. Everyone else is welcome to post your own lessons and analyses.--On a very simple level this is a list of Nounish contributors who are **here**, present, spending their attention on Nouns, building in public, creating our culture, collectively steering the Nounish ship. You are the building blocks of of the Nouniverse. It's not an exhaustive list, we are missing several influential contributors, but it's a good list. It's a community.--Thank you all for being here. This last year with Nouns has been a blessing and I'm excited for many more years of this. 🙏 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: Check your wallets 🙏--We sent out 101 payments totalling 100 ETH. Thank you for your participation in the Pilot Collectivized Nounish Allocation round. Make sure you check out the Coordinape - you might have received some kind notes along with the GIVE you received. Also if you click the MAP tab there's an interactive tool that visualizes the allocations.--**Nouns DAO - Prop 63**-https://nouns.wtf/vote/63--**Nounish Builders Nominated + Work Summaries:**-https://nouncil.notion.site/nouncil/e52614f01e56475aa710d716ee8c69b7?v=6d1fe0cff7b645b5ab551c629cf02b16--**Coordinape**-https://app.coordinape.com/circles/3373/history--This project was intended as an experiment, providing a collective decision on how to retroactively allocate ETH to Nounish contributors for their work in Nouns. We asked the question and left the answer to the community. Would people allocate it all to the top achievers? Spread it evenly through the community? Would bad actors try to scheme ways to play the system?--We chose a commonly used DAO tool (Coordinape) and hoped to see where it shines, where it falls short, observing the emergent behaviour. We could then take that knowledge and produce some recommendations for the future. I have attached the final ETH values below, and will be doing my own analysis of lessons learned on this one. I will post them here, and publicly, as a final wrap-up of this project. Everyone else is welcome to post your own lessons and analyses.--On a very simple level this is a list of Nounish contributors who are **here**, present, spending their attention on Nouns, building in public, creating our culture, collectively steering the Nounish ship. You are the building blocks of of the Nouniverse. It's not an exhaustive list, we are missing several influential contributors, but it's a good list. It's a community.--Thank you all for being here. This last year with Nouns has been a blessing and I'm excited for many more years of this. 🙏 / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer
 
Hello Nounish Frens 🙏--Through DMs, voice calls, and Carrier Pigeons, we have officially collected all of the Nounish work descriptions we can, manually confirmed wallet addresses, and have a nominee table for Prop 63. There are 105 Nounish builders with a variety of contributions from I stir the pot to prop builders and sub DAO founders covering the entire Nouniverse. We have 100 ETH to split between them.--**105 NOMINATED NOUNISH BUILDERS**-https://nouncil.notion.site/nouncil/e52614f01e56475aa710d716ee8c69b7?v=6d1fe0cff7b645b5ab551c629cf02b16--**INSTRUCTIONS FOR COORDINAPE NOMINEES**-If you were nominated you can now take part in our gigantic coordinape. You have 10 days to do the following:-- - Read through the contribution descriptions from the 105 nominees- - Open the Coordinape cicle: https://app.coordinape.com/circles/3373/history- - Allocate your 1000 GIVE tokens as you see fit- - at the end of the EPOCH you can see how many tokens you were allocated- - GET PAID--**WHAT BUT HOW DO I DECIDE WHO TO ALLOCATE TO**-Choose your own adventure. You could:-- - equally split tokens between all nominees- - go through the nominee list and assign each one a token amount that seems appropriate- - divide nominees into categories (minor, major, MVP) and allocate more tokens to people in higher categories- - give all your tokens to a small group you thought had the most impact on Nouns- - give all your tokens to a single person you thought had the most impact in Nouns- - don't allocate your tokens at all and watch your Grinch-Heart shrivel up--People will be able to see how much tokens you allocated them and you can't allocate to yourself. Feel free to discuss allocation strategies here. How do we reward Nounish builders? How do we bring the best talent in, how do we build a strong community. It's an experiment!--And above all else, have fun, and don't hurt yourself <:salute:865651240562327602>
Property / Question & Answer: Hello Nounish Frens 🙏--Through DMs, voice calls, and Carrier Pigeons, we have officially collected all of the Nounish work descriptions we can, manually confirmed wallet addresses, and have a nominee table for Prop 63. There are 105 Nounish builders with a variety of contributions from I stir the pot to prop builders and sub DAO founders covering the entire Nouniverse. We have 100 ETH to split between them.--**105 NOMINATED NOUNISH BUILDERS**-https://nouncil.notion.site/nouncil/e52614f01e56475aa710d716ee8c69b7?v=6d1fe0cff7b645b5ab551c629cf02b16--**INSTRUCTIONS FOR COORDINAPE NOMINEES**-If you were nominated you can now take part in our gigantic coordinape. You have 10 days to do the following:-- - Read through the contribution descriptions from the 105 nominees- - Open the Coordinape cicle: https://app.coordinape.com/circles/3373/history- - Allocate your 1000 GIVE tokens as you see fit- - at the end of the EPOCH you can see how many tokens you were allocated- - GET PAID--**WHAT BUT HOW DO I DECIDE WHO TO ALLOCATE TO**-Choose your own adventure. You could:-- - equally split tokens between all nominees- - go through the nominee list and assign each one a token amount that seems appropriate- - divide nominees into categories (minor, major, MVP) and allocate more tokens to people in higher categories- - give all your tokens to a small group you thought had the most impact on Nouns- - give all your tokens to a single person you thought had the most impact in Nouns- - don't allocate your tokens at all and watch your Grinch-Heart shrivel up--People will be able to see how much tokens you allocated them and you can't allocate to yourself. Feel free to discuss allocation strategies here. How do we reward Nounish builders? How do we bring the best talent in, how do we build a strong community. It's an experiment!--And above all else, have fun, and don't hurt yourself <:salute:865651240562327602> / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: Hello Nounish Frens 🙏--Through DMs, voice calls, and Carrier Pigeons, we have officially collected all of the Nounish work descriptions we can, manually confirmed wallet addresses, and have a nominee table for Prop 63. There are 105 Nounish builders with a variety of contributions from I stir the pot to prop builders and sub DAO founders covering the entire Nouniverse. We have 100 ETH to split between them.--**105 NOMINATED NOUNISH BUILDERS**-https://nouncil.notion.site/nouncil/e52614f01e56475aa710d716ee8c69b7?v=6d1fe0cff7b645b5ab551c629cf02b16--**INSTRUCTIONS FOR COORDINAPE NOMINEES**-If you were nominated you can now take part in our gigantic coordinape. You have 10 days to do the following:-- - Read through the contribution descriptions from the 105 nominees- - Open the Coordinape cicle: https://app.coordinape.com/circles/3373/history- - Allocate your 1000 GIVE tokens as you see fit- - at the end of the EPOCH you can see how many tokens you were allocated- - GET PAID--**WHAT BUT HOW DO I DECIDE WHO TO ALLOCATE TO**-Choose your own adventure. You could:-- - equally split tokens between all nominees- - go through the nominee list and assign each one a token amount that seems appropriate- - divide nominees into categories (minor, major, MVP) and allocate more tokens to people in higher categories- - give all your tokens to a small group you thought had the most impact on Nouns- - give all your tokens to a single person you thought had the most impact in Nouns- - don't allocate your tokens at all and watch your Grinch-Heart shrivel up--People will be able to see how much tokens you allocated them and you can't allocate to yourself. Feel free to discuss allocation strategies here. How do we reward Nounish builders? How do we bring the best talent in, how do we build a strong community. It's an experiment!--And above all else, have fun, and don't hurt yourself <:salute:865651240562327602> / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer
 
should we set up 1st call for this week in the public channel? maybe tmrw after nouncil call?
Property / Question & Answer: should we set up 1st call for this week in the public channel? maybe tmrw after nouncil call? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: should we set up 1st call for this week in the public channel? maybe tmrw after nouncil call? / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer
 
Will nouners be voting after that round too?
Property / Question & Answer: Will nouners be voting after that round too? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: Will nouners be voting after that round too? / qualifier
 
Property / Team Size
 
3
Amount3
Unit1
Property / Team Size: 3 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Proposal Budget in ETH
 
30
Amount30
Unit1
Property / Proposal Budget in ETH: 30 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 14:54, 17 July 2023

A Nouns proposal.
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Proposal 1
A Nouns proposal.

    Statements

    instance of
    Proposal
    0 references
    Label
    Donate 5 ETH each to 6 Charities
    0 references
    Status
    EXECUTED
    0 references
    Quorumvotes
    1
    0 references
    Id
    1
    0 references
    Proposal Type
    Donate
    0 references
    5 eth
    0 references
    6 charities
    0 references
    Nouns dao governance
    0 references
    ExecutionETA
    19 August 2021
    0 references
    Summary
    Donate 5 ETH each to 6 Charities --- --- *Past Discussions* --- - [Original proposal with emoji consensus]( --- - [SharkDAO adds Coral Restoration Foundation]( --- - [4156 adds GiveCrypto]( --- --- As the first test of Nouns DAO governance and to demonstrate to the community how the ecosystem works, we will donate 5 ETH each to 6 charities. With the exception of Coral Restoration Foundation and GiveCrypto, these charities were chosen because they have publicly available Ethereum donation addresses. --- Coral Restoration Foundation was recommended by SharkDAO and their representative Goldy.mov generated an address on the charity's site. GiveCrypto was recommended by 4156 and he generated an address on the charity's site. --- --- Charity List --- *The order of the charities below matches the order of addresses in this proposal's `targets` attribute* --- 1. [Coral Restoration Foundation]( --- - 0x0e09cEb98492715ec5B080d2b95B5004ddF43947 (Generated by Goldy.mov) --- 2. [Freedom Of The Press Foundation]( --- - 0x998F25Be40241CA5D8F5fCaF3591B5ED06EF3Be7 --- 3. [Internet Archive]( --- - 0xFA8E3920daF271daB92Be9B87d9998DDd94FEF08 --- 4. [Rainforest Foundation US]( --- - 0x54334Ebc8c9ef04bc28D614Caa557143ED8AfC87 --- 5. [Tor Project]( --- - 0x532Fb5D00f40ced99B16d1E295C77Cda2Eb1BB4F --- 6.
    0 references
    Supporter Count
    7
    0 references
    Team Name
    Nouns dao
    0 references
    Proposal Submission Date
    19 August 2021
    0 references
    Abstain Count
    0
    0 references
    Transfer Value in ETH
    5
    0 references
    Opposer Count
    0
    0 references
    Question & Answer
    which address should i be using to vote?
    Related Channel
    Nouns DAO (legacy) - 63-impact-rewards
    Answer
    The address you should be using to vote can be found beside your name in this document: https://nouncil.notion.site/nouncil/e52614f01e56475aa710d716ee8c69b7?v=6d1fe0cff7b645b5ab551c629cf02b16
    0 references
    <@!410593947027505162> do you have a repo for the nouns center?
    Related Channel
    Nouns DAO (legacy) - 27-nouns-center
    Answer
    The repo for the Nouns Center exists, but it is currently private. It will be open source when they launch.
    0 references
    <@410593947027505162> I remember the first iteration of <a:noun_earth:923689442324144178>** Nouns Center** always having a persistent sidebar menu. Is there a reason for the always hidden menu? (definitely looks cleaner, but today as I was browsing the site, I found it to be tedious to keep clicking the menu to go to a new page.)
    Related Channel
    Nouns DAO (legacy) - 27-nouns-center
    Answer
    The reason for the always hidden menu in the first iteration of Nouns Center was to create more real estate and a better design, similar to HBO Max's hamburger menu on desktop. However, after receiving feedback, an update was pushed to make the menu folders default to open, while still allowing them to be closed if desired. This change aimed to improve accessibility and user experience while maintaining a clean design.
    0 references
    Gn Everynoun, just found out about the Reverse Job board and submitted my application to be featured! --Wondering what are the steps from here?
    Related Channel
    Nouns DAO (legacy) - 27-nouns-center
    Answer
    After submitting your application to be featured on the Reverse Job board, cdt#3727 will add you to the board. There might be a backlog since they handle a lot of data, but they will eventually get you on there. Your profile picture on the Reverse Job board will be a randomly generated Noun using Noun API.
    0 references
    has there been any discussion/plans for linking to nouns center from nouns.wtf ?
    Related Channel
    Nouns DAO (legacy) - 27-nouns-center
    Answer
    Yes, there has been a discussion about linking to Nouns Center from nouns.wtf. cdt#3727 mentioned they were thinking of opening a PR for this.
    0 references
    Nice! Is all the info from the notion docs ported to Nouns Center? I think I looked a while ago and it wasn’t
    Related Channel
    Nouns DAO (legacy) - 27-nouns-center
    Answer
    No, not all the info from the notion docs has been ported to Nouns Center. There isn't a 1:1 `Docs` page on Nouns Center.
    0 references
    sure, agreed. how much of this already exists can be sent to me. i’m assuming the nounders have a generic email for these things? what is it?--who would write the primer/overview, if this doesn’t already exist.--we have glasses not but i think for blogposts it’d be good to send them other assets too but need Nounder/Nouner alignment.- - Logo PNGs (glasses & text)- - Glasses files- - maybe a set or full constricted nouns (10?) to use at will- - couple promo images (screenshot of first auction, group of nouns together, and maybe a collage of derivatives).--if stories are written on nouns they’ll touch in history, cc0 (derivatives), and impact. so just thinking of imagery to best support that and be able to hand off nicely--i hate to keep throwing it back but none of this content should be coming from non-Nounders imo so best i can do i aggregate & host it.
    Related Channel
    Nouns DAO (legacy) - 27-nouns-center
    Answer
    The question was about the existence of a generic email for Nounders and who would write the primer/overview. 4156#9052 replied that they will work on getting the requested information and assets within 1-2 weeks.
    0 references
    thanks, open to others opinion. i’ve thought about this a lot and i’m sure i’ll have to revisit layout as the number of projects scale.--question for you. do we include all projects on the same page and allow ppl to filter by category? --ie. we have different project types:- - Noadz (available to purchase)- - Coloring book (free download)- - Nounspedia (website)--🅰️: one project page with filters-🅱️: separate page per project type--feel free to vote
    Related Channel
    Nouns DAO (legacy) - 27-nouns-center
    Answer
    A. one project page with filters
    0 references
    what would be the point of finding out which categories are most vs least clicked on? reordering the buttons? if i only have 3-4 filters for the order matter that much?--i don’t think i’d remove any _type_ of project even if it gets less clicks?
    Related Channel
    Nouns DAO (legacy) - 27-nouns-center
    Answer
    The point of finding out which categories are most vs least clicked on would be to understand the most popular ways users want to filter the projects and learn how users categorize. It's not about removing any type of project but rather arriving at good sorting filters.
    0 references
    Will the complete list of Nouns subDAOs be uploaded on https://nouns.center/subdaos soon?
    Related Channel
    Nouns DAO (legacy) - 27-nouns-center
    Answer
    The complete list of Nouns subDAOs is being worked on and should be uploaded on https://nouns.center/subdaos by the end of the month.
    0 references
    Any idea when the Impact Rewards ends? Or is that dependent on when everyone distributes their GIVE
    Related Channel
    Nouns DAO (legacy) - 63-impact-rewards
    Answer
    The Impact Rewards end date was not explicitly mentioned in the conversation. However, it seems that the rewards have already been distributed, as JoelCares#5898 mentioned, Check your wallets 🙏 and We sent out 101 payments totalling 100 ETH.
    0 references
    Henlo Nounish Folk!--We have 100 ETH for people building in the Nouniverse, as per Prop 63 - https://nouns.wtf/vote/63. We have compiled a huge list of people, once it's finalized we will hold a large coordinape round with those nominated and disperse the 100 ETH accordingly.--**BIG LIST OF NOMINEES**-https://nouncil.notion.site/nouncil/e52614f01e56475aa710d716ee8c69b7?v=6d1fe0cff7b645b5ab551c629cf02b16--See yourself on that list? If you have information to add please submit it to us using this form: --**PROP 63 NOMINEE DETAILS FORM - SUBMIT**-https://www.addressform.io/form/ff77863b-f160-4d63-b70e-1ed986a8da07--We need Discord / twitter usernames, wallet addresses, and short & sweet summaries of Nounish contributions. You can also post small updates to <#970759473624940564>. --Dont see yourself on the list? Let us know about your contribution and we will add you.--Nominations and Form Edits will be accepted up until end-of-day July 31. We will manually confirm wallet addresses with Nominees after that by private DM, and then move forward with the Coordinape.
    Related Channel
    Nouns DAO (legacy) - 63-impact-rewards
    Answer
    The question asked was about the 100 ETH for people building in the Nouniverse as per Prop 63. The conversation provided details about the nomination process, the list of nominees, and how to submit information using the provided form. Nominations and form edits were accepted until the end of July 31. The conversation also included reminders and discussions about updating information and submitting the address form.
    0 references
    sharing some questions after reading the doc off the bat:-* are we thinking the target entity that we nominate / vote for are only individuals or also proposals? (noting that proposals are often teams / groups) -> I think it's a trade off. we might not have enough ETH for this to be meaningful rewards towards past proposals. but limiting it to non-proposals might skew the conversation towards people and not projects. that might be what we want but worth thinking about. --* are we thinking that the people that vote are nominees only OR are we thinking non-nominees (e.g. general nouners) also vote?-> my gut is to leverage non-nominees too but maybe it's hard to get enough participation? also if it's weighted by number of nouns owned, then we might end up with nounders + a few whales by and large deciding the outcome. --* is self-nomination allowed?-> I think we should and no reason to shame/limit against imo.--* are nominees allowed / encouraged to campaign? is there going to be some forum for them to write out their work & impact from their own view? -> I think it might be important to set the right tone. I personally would like a culture where ppl are encouraged to shamelessly advocate for themselves. at least all performance conversations I'm used to start from the individual giving an overview / advocating for the impact of their work. also if this isn't encouraged then only the more visible & top of mind people / projects might get voted for since there is no new information to consider holistically. --* are voters (beyond the person nominating) going to be able to share supporting comments (reasons) associated with their vote?-> I think this would be a key way in which people that worked closely to an individual or a project can offer their view on the details and impact of the work. I think this and the question above can help reduce the likelihood of the Nightmare Scenario outlined in the doc where ppl feel hurt due to feeling underrecognized by peers.--* what is the time period of the impact we're evaluating?-> easy / fair approach could be all past contribution since inception. but then again maybe we don't have enough ETH for since inception. or maybe we do. idk. --* how do we gauge success? -> the strongest signal for me would be if the rewardees' long-term contribution trajectory towards the DAO moves up materially. the number of people that h
    Related Channel
    Nouns DAO (legacy) - 63-impact-rewards
    Answer
    The question asked was about various aspects of the nomination and voting process for the Nouns DAO impact rewards. The conversation provided some thoughts and opinions on these aspects, but no definitive answers were given. The conversation mainly served as a starting point for further discussion and planning.
    0 references
    So does everyone win in this scenario or only those with most allocations?
    Related Channel
    Nouns DAO (legacy) - 63-impact-rewards
    Answer
    In this scenario, everyone wins. The amount of ETH each person receives is calculated using the formula:--`(Give you receive / total Give sent) * 100 ETH`
    0 references
    Thanks for this sheet! Is it good if I use some of this data in my upcoming article on Prop 63?
    Related Channel
    Nouns DAO (legacy) - 63-impact-rewards
    Answer
    You can use the data from the sheet in your upcoming article on Prop 63. The allocation of ETH works as a percentage point, so you can work something out from there without worrying about individual allocations.
    0 references
    to that end, maybe a good time to see about scheduling a call? do we think we've done enough to make nouners/nouncillors aware of the channel?
    Related Channel
    Nouns DAO (legacy) - 63-impact-rewards
    Answer
    The question was whether they have done enough to make nouners/nouncillors aware of the channel. JoelCares#5898 replied, I think so yeah, we can pull together a list of Nouns / Nouncillors in here who've expressed interest in being an admin and move forward with next steps.
    0 references
    again, there's no design here yet (help pixelz plz), but ignore design and focus on the idea. we'll need a way to best structure this cause you can already see how Oni's 8ish notes are already taking up a lot of room. what happens when we have a years worth of notes? so we'll have to fix that design challenge, but i like this idea as far as data creation & management goes. so each Nouner's workflow isn't disturbed.
    Related Channel
    Nouns DAO (legacy) - 27-nouns-center
    0 references
    Can #NounsCentre fix our portfolios?
    Related Channel
    Nouns DAO (legacy) - 27-nouns-center
    0 references
    gm <@!410593947027505162> , i put together ready-for-prod assets for the noun glasses in various resolutions for press/people who are less familiar with figma/ps. thought we could add to nouns center. maybe we could expand into its own press kit section?
    Related Channel
    Nouns DAO (legacy) - 27-nouns-center
    0 references
    has there ever been an ETH arcade? thats be a fun site
    Related Channel
    Nouns DAO (legacy) - 27-nouns-center
    0 references
    i appreciate these thoughts and have asked a lot of the same questions. --i like all this because when i wanted to “build in public” that also means decision-making with the community and what we all would want to see.--please engage and let’s make this site great. i also wonder if i should try something new with this proposal and hold weekly or every two weekly public calls in general voice channel to hash this stuff out publicly? i welcome all input and could be a fun community experiment
    Related Channel
    Nouns DAO (legacy) - 27-nouns-center
    0 references
    if A, we have one nice place to see **everything** and you can filter as you wish--if B, less overwhelming? if B, that makes ~100 projects over all time to date and we’re anticipate growing a lot. --buckets for B could be (monetized projects, funded by official proposal projects, and some 3rd catch-all bucket for fun sites/games that aren’t either proposal projects or monetized derivatives.
    Related Channel
    Nouns DAO (legacy) - 27-nouns-center
    0 references
    is this pertaining to nouns center? otherwise might make sense to discuss in another channel, sounds like a fun idea though <:noun_face:863562478546190358>
    Related Channel
    Nouns DAO (legacy) - 27-nouns-center
    0 references
    May I recommend or suggest that nouns.center redirects to a /projects or some other page?
    Related Channel
    Nouns DAO (legacy) - 27-nouns-center
    0 references
    What are we thinking about an on-chain inside-NFT nouns glasses based tetris game generative drop?
    Related Channel
    Nouns DAO (legacy) - 27-nouns-center
    0 references
    All done, tried to priorities those that I don't think are being rewarded so much in other ways. There is no final submit button right? (just allocate all give and click save allocation?)
    Related Channel
    Nouns DAO (legacy) - 63-impact-rewards
    0 references
    Check your wallets 🙏--We sent out 101 payments totalling 100 ETH. Thank you for your participation in the Pilot Collectivized Nounish Allocation round. Make sure you check out the Coordinape - you might have received some kind notes along with the GIVE you received. Also if you click the MAP tab there's an interactive tool that visualizes the allocations.--**Nouns DAO - Prop 63**-https://nouns.wtf/vote/63--**Nounish Builders Nominated + Work Summaries:**-https://nouncil.notion.site/nouncil/e52614f01e56475aa710d716ee8c69b7?v=6d1fe0cff7b645b5ab551c629cf02b16--**Coordinape**-https://app.coordinape.com/circles/3373/history--This project was intended as an experiment, providing a collective decision on how to retroactively allocate ETH to Nounish contributors for their work in Nouns. We asked the question and left the answer to the community. Would people allocate it all to the top achievers? Spread it evenly through the community? Would bad actors try to scheme ways to play the system?--We chose a commonly used DAO tool (Coordinape) and hoped to see where it shines, where it falls short, observing the emergent behaviour. We could then take that knowledge and produce some recommendations for the future. I have attached the final ETH values below, and will be doing my own analysis of lessons learned on this one. I will post them here, and publicly, as a final wrap-up of this project. Everyone else is welcome to post your own lessons and analyses.--On a very simple level this is a list of Nounish contributors who are **here**, present, spending their attention on Nouns, building in public, creating our culture, collectively steering the Nounish ship. You are the building blocks of of the Nouniverse. It's not an exhaustive list, we are missing several influential contributors, but it's a good list. It's a community.--Thank you all for being here. This last year with Nouns has been a blessing and I'm excited for many more years of this. 🙏
    Related Channel
    Nouns DAO (legacy) - 63-impact-rewards
    0 references
    Hello Nounish Frens 🙏--Through DMs, voice calls, and Carrier Pigeons, we have officially collected all of the Nounish work descriptions we can, manually confirmed wallet addresses, and have a nominee table for Prop 63. There are 105 Nounish builders with a variety of contributions from I stir the pot to prop builders and sub DAO founders covering the entire Nouniverse. We have 100 ETH to split between them.--**105 NOMINATED NOUNISH BUILDERS**-https://nouncil.notion.site/nouncil/e52614f01e56475aa710d716ee8c69b7?v=6d1fe0cff7b645b5ab551c629cf02b16--**INSTRUCTIONS FOR COORDINAPE NOMINEES**-If you were nominated you can now take part in our gigantic coordinape. You have 10 days to do the following:-- - Read through the contribution descriptions from the 105 nominees- - Open the Coordinape cicle: https://app.coordinape.com/circles/3373/history- - Allocate your 1000 GIVE tokens as you see fit- - at the end of the EPOCH you can see how many tokens you were allocated- - GET PAID--**WHAT BUT HOW DO I DECIDE WHO TO ALLOCATE TO**-Choose your own adventure. You could:-- - equally split tokens between all nominees- - go through the nominee list and assign each one a token amount that seems appropriate- - divide nominees into categories (minor, major, MVP) and allocate more tokens to people in higher categories- - give all your tokens to a small group you thought had the most impact on Nouns- - give all your tokens to a single person you thought had the most impact in Nouns- - don't allocate your tokens at all and watch your Grinch-Heart shrivel up--People will be able to see how much tokens you allocated them and you can't allocate to yourself. Feel free to discuss allocation strategies here. How do we reward Nounish builders? How do we bring the best talent in, how do we build a strong community. It's an experiment!--And above all else, have fun, and don't hurt yourself <:salute:865651240562327602>
    Related Channel
    Nouns DAO (legacy) - 63-impact-rewards
    0 references
    should we set up 1st call for this week in the public channel? maybe tmrw after nouncil call?
    Related Channel
    Nouns DAO (legacy) - 63-impact-rewards
    0 references
    Will nouners be voting after that round too?
    Related Channel
    Nouns DAO (legacy) - 63-impact-rewards
    0 references
    Team Size
    3
    0 references
    Proposal Budget in ETH
    30
    0 references
     
    Retrieved from "https://nounsdev.wikibase.cloud/w/index.php?title=Item:Q1952&oldid=9399"