Proposal 63 (Q1901) : Difference between revisions

0x2573c60a6d127755aa2dc85e342f7da2378a0cc5

5

0 references

0x387a161c6b25aa854100abaed39274e51aaffffd

26

0 references

0x6f9e3976fa3b5b22761fe5d635e1f0d9d9aeb85d

1

0 references

0x8323f1c687f7e2296ec71ee3549a7430ea7ec730

1

0 references

0xa4e232fceedb3f43c8e707f8cf20b6bcf30f10e1

1

0 references

0xb47a70df538b9a3b591bc5d75da66a04c879b291

2

0 references

0xf86a6fa100f50e9e715b57d176214c93e6d6bcea

1

0 references

0x4754b7e3dede42d71d6c92978f25f306176ec7e9

1

0 references

15

0x91dccaa260cc4616e1a6e6b693db7207c5e42937

I will be judging the success or failure of this pilot based on how efficient it is at allocating money - both ROI and time expended

0 references

1

0xa555d1ee16780b2d414ed97f4f169c0740099615

wag has contributed an immense amount of time and brainpower towards ensuring the dao is maximally nounish. i support this pilot and am excited to see the nouncillors engaged as well.

0 references

1

0xbd7dbab9aeb52d6c8d0e80fcebde3af4cc86204a

I think we should experiment with rewards more and I trust wag. I dont yet know if this pilot will scale well to rewarding success outcomes of proposals, but could still work well at the non-proposal contributor scale.

0 references

6

0xcc2688350d29623e2a0844cc8885f9050f0f6ed5

Rewarding contributors, Nounish ⌐◨-◨

0 references

5

0xf6c625851d48fe26b50d96b821a87efc7e35c222

⌐◨-◨ ❄

0 references

1

0xf8a065f287d91d77cd626af38ffa220d9b552a2b

What A Great experiment

0 references

1

0xe8d24be3abf6eb27b800f752a969d3c1e84fd401

I like the nouncil

0 references

Opposed By

0x32d1a53f6709a03f4b6cf4cb0501204ba188d4f5

1

0 references

Team Name

Pilot collectivized nounish allocation

0 references

Proposal Submission Date

22 April 2022

0 references

Abstained By

1

0 references

0 references

Abstain Count

1

0 references

Transfer Value in ETH

100

0 references

Team Size

1

0 references

Proposal Budget in ETH

100

0 references

Summary

The text discusses a plan to democratize funding for contributors to the NounsDAO protocol. The plan involves a 100 Ξ fund, which will be co-administered by members of the Nouns Discord server who have been given the Nouncillor role.

0 references

Question & Answer

All done, tried to priorities those that I don't think are being rewarded so much in other ways. There is no final submit button right? (just allocate all give and click save allocation?)

0 references

Any idea when the Impact Rewards ends? Or is that dependent on when everyone distributes their GIVE

The Impact Rewards end date was not explicitly mentioned in the conversation. However, it seems that the rewards have already been distributed, as JoelCares#5898 mentioned, Check your wallets 🙏 and We sent out 101 payments totalling 100 ETH.

0 references

Check your wallets 🙏--We sent out 101 payments totalling 100 ETH. Thank you for your participation in the Pilot Collectivized Nounish Allocation round. Make sure you check out the Coordinape - you might have received some kind notes along with the GIVE you received. Also if you click the MAP tab there's an interactive tool that visualizes the allocations.--**Nouns DAO - Prop 63**-https://nouns.wtf/vote/63--**Nounish Builders Nominated + Work Summaries:**-https://nouncil.notion.site/nouncil/e52614f01e56475aa710d716ee8c69b7?v=6d1fe0cff7b645b5ab551c629cf02b16--**Coordinape**-https://app.coordinape.com/circles/3373/history--This project was intended as an experiment, providing a collective decision on how to retroactively allocate ETH to Nounish contributors for their work in Nouns. We asked the question and left the answer to the community. Would people allocate it all to the top achievers? Spread it evenly through the community? Would bad actors try to scheme ways to play the system?--We chose a commonly used DAO tool (Coordinape) and hoped to see where it shines, where it falls short, observing the emergent behaviour. We could then take that knowledge and produce some recommendations for the future. I have attached the final ETH values below, and will be doing my own analysis of lessons learned on this one. I will post them here, and publicly, as a final wrap-up of this project. Everyone else is welcome to post your own lessons and analyses.--On a very simple level this is a list of Nounish contributors who are **here**, present, spending their attention on Nouns, building in public, creating our culture, collectively steering the Nounish ship. You are the building blocks of of the Nouniverse. It's not an exhaustive list, we are missing several influential contributors, but it's a good list. It's a community.--Thank you all for being here. This last year with Nouns has been a blessing and I'm excited for many more years of this. 🙏

0 references

Hello Nounish Frens 🙏--Through DMs, voice calls, and Carrier Pigeons, we have officially collected all of the Nounish work descriptions we can, manually confirmed wallet addresses, and have a nominee table for Prop 63. There are 105 Nounish builders with a variety of contributions from I stir the pot to prop builders and sub DAO founders covering the entire Nouniverse. We have 100 ETH to split between them.--**105 NOMINATED NOUNISH BUILDERS**-https://nouncil.notion.site/nouncil/e52614f01e56475aa710d716ee8c69b7?v=6d1fe0cff7b645b5ab551c629cf02b16--**INSTRUCTIONS FOR COORDINAPE NOMINEES**-If you were nominated you can now take part in our gigantic coordinape. You have 10 days to do the following:-- - Read through the contribution descriptions from the 105 nominees- - Open the Coordinape cicle: https://app.coordinape.com/circles/3373/history- - Allocate your 1000 GIVE tokens as you see fit- - at the end of the EPOCH you can see how many tokens you were allocated- - GET PAID--**WHAT BUT HOW DO I DECIDE WHO TO ALLOCATE TO**-Choose your own adventure. You could:-- - equally split tokens between all nominees- - go through the nominee list and assign each one a token amount that seems appropriate- - divide nominees into categories (minor, major, MVP) and allocate more tokens to people in higher categories- - give all your tokens to a small group you thought had the most impact on Nouns- - give all your tokens to a single person you thought had the most impact in Nouns- - don't allocate your tokens at all and watch your Grinch-Heart shrivel up--People will be able to see how much tokens you allocated them and you can't allocate to yourself. Feel free to discuss allocation strategies here. How do we reward Nounish builders? How do we bring the best talent in, how do we build a strong community. It's an experiment!--And above all else, have fun, and don't hurt yourself <:salute:865651240562327602>

0 references

Henlo Nounish Folk!--We have 100 ETH for people building in the Nouniverse, as per Prop 63 - https://nouns.wtf/vote/63. We have compiled a huge list of people, once it's finalized we will hold a large coordinape round with those nominated and disperse the 100 ETH accordingly.--**BIG LIST OF NOMINEES**-https://nouncil.notion.site/nouncil/e52614f01e56475aa710d716ee8c69b7?v=6d1fe0cff7b645b5ab551c629cf02b16--See yourself on that list? If you have information to add please submit it to us using this form: --**PROP 63 NOMINEE DETAILS FORM - SUBMIT**-https://www.addressform.io/form/ff77863b-f160-4d63-b70e-1ed986a8da07--We need Discord / twitter usernames, wallet addresses, and short & sweet summaries of Nounish contributions. You can also post small updates to <#970759473624940564>. --Dont see yourself on the list? Let us know about your contribution and we will add you.--Nominations and Form Edits will be accepted up until end-of-day July 31. We will manually confirm wallet addresses with Nominees after that by private DM, and then move forward with the Coordinape.

The question asked was about the 100 ETH for people building in the Nouniverse as per Prop 63. The conversation provided details about the nomination process, the list of nominees, and how to submit information using the provided form. Nominations and form edits were accepted until the end of July 31. The conversation also included reminders and discussions about updating information and submitting the address form.

0 references

sharing some questions after reading the doc off the bat:-* are we thinking the target entity that we nominate / vote for are only individuals or also proposals? (noting that proposals are often teams / groups) -> I think it's a trade off. we might not have enough ETH for this to be meaningful rewards towards past proposals. but limiting it to non-proposals might skew the conversation towards people and not projects. that might be what we want but worth thinking about. --* are we thinking that the people that vote are nominees only OR are we thinking non-nominees (e.g. general nouners) also vote?-> my gut is to leverage non-nominees too but maybe it's hard to get enough participation? also if it's weighted by number of nouns owned, then we might end up with nounders + a few whales by and large deciding the outcome. --* is self-nomination allowed?-> I think we should and no reason to shame/limit against imo.--* are nominees allowed / encouraged to campaign? is there going to be some forum for them to write out their work & impact from their own view? -> I think it might be important to set the right tone. I personally would like a culture where ppl are encouraged to shamelessly advocate for themselves. at least all performance conversations I'm used to start from the individual giving an overview / advocating for the impact of their work. also if this isn't encouraged then only the more visible & top of mind people / projects might get voted for since there is no new information to consider holistically. --* are voters (beyond the person nominating) going to be able to share supporting comments (reasons) associated with their vote?-> I think this would be a key way in which people that worked closely to an individual or a project can offer their view on the details and impact of the work. I think this and the question above can help reduce the likelihood of the Nightmare Scenario outlined in the doc where ppl feel hurt due to feeling underrecognized by peers.--* what is the time period of the impact we're evaluating?-> easy / fair approach could be all past contribution since inception. but then again maybe we don't have enough ETH for since inception. or maybe we do. idk. --* how do we gauge success? -> the strongest signal for me would be if the rewardees' long-term contribution trajectory towards the DAO moves up materially. the number of people that h

The question asked was about various aspects of the nomination and voting process for the Nouns DAO impact rewards. The conversation provided some thoughts and opinions on these aspects, but no definitive answers were given. The conversation mainly served as a starting point for further discussion and planning.

0 references

should we set up 1st call for this week in the public channel? maybe tmrw after nouncil call?

0 references

So does everyone win in this scenario or only those with most allocations?

In this scenario, everyone wins. The amount of ETH each person receives is calculated using the formula:--`(Give you receive / total Give sent) * 100 ETH`

0 references

Thanks for this sheet! Is it good if I use some of this data in my upcoming article on Prop 63?

You can use the data from the sheet in your upcoming article on Prop 63. The allocation of ETH works as a percentage point, so you can work something out from there without worrying about individual allocations.

0 references

to that end, maybe a good time to see about scheduling a call? do we think we've done enough to make nouners/nouncillors aware of the channel?

The question was whether they have done enough to make nouners/nouncillors aware of the channel. JoelCares#5898 replied, I think so yeah, we can pull together a list of Nouns / Nouncillors in here who've expressed interest in being an admin and move forward with next steps.

0 references

which address should i be using to vote?

The address you should be using to vote can be found beside your name in this document: https://nouncil.notion.site/nouncil/e52614f01e56475aa710d716ee8c69b7?v=6d1fe0cff7b645b5ab551c629cf02b16

0 references

Will nouners be voting after that round too?