The Jungle: Nouns DAO - 206-nouns-on-the-ground-2023-⌐◨-◨ (Q5044)
From Nouns Dev
A Nouns discord channel.
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | The Jungle: Nouns DAO - 206-nouns-on-the-ground-2023-⌐◨-◨ |
A Nouns discord channel. |
Statements
Aubtoshi livestreamed contest entries for EnterTheNouniverse and shared links to episodes. Hindsight raised concerns about "bad behaviors" in the Discord chat. JoshuaFisher praised Aubtoshi's hard work and dedication. Oni stated that everyone is free to express their opinions but discussions should not be forced. Bixbite encouraged open discussion and suggested treating everyone equally. Lituus questioned the majority of users not being holders and expressed frustration with unanswered questions. Aubtoshi defended their right to use their platform as they wish. Bixbite disagreed with using a Nouns-sponsored platform for discussing volatile cryptocurrencies but respected Aubtoshi's work. Aubtoshi reiterated their support for other communities and artists. Lituus insisted their intention was to resolve misunderstandings.
9 May 2023
0 references
Aubtoshi livestreamed contest entries for EnterTheNouniverse and shared links to episodes. Hindsight raised concerns about bad behaviors in the Discord chat. JoshuaFisher praised Aubtoshi's hard work and dedication. Oni stated that everyone is free to express their opinions but discussions should not be forced. Bixbite encouraged open discussion and suggested treating everyone equally. Lituus questioned the majority of users not being holders and expressed frustration with unanswered questions. Aubtoshi defended their right to use their platform as they wish. Bixbite disagreed with using a Nouns-sponsored platform for discussing volatile cryptocurrencies but respected Aubtoshi's work. Aubtoshi reiterated their support for other communities and artists. Lituus insisted their intention was to resolve misunderstandings.
9 May 2023
0 references
This Month:-1. Chat participants express concerns about the promotion of shitcoins and its potential impact on the community.-2. Importance of open discussion and equal treatment is emphasized.-3. Aubtoshi is excited about future BudLight + Nouns activations and meeting Nouners in real life.
1 June 2023
0 references
This Week:-1. Chat participants express concerns about the promotion of shitcoins.-2. Importance of open discussion and equal treatment is emphasized.-3. Some participants defend their actions and contributions.-4. Others call for a more productive conversation.-5. Main issue revolves around promotion of certain coins and potential impact on the community.
16 May 2023
0 references
.-**1) Is this basically 3 proposals in 1, with OTG + Podcast + Documentary sections tacked on?**--Nouns OTG 2022 was focused just on sending Aubtoshi to events around the world, and OTG 2023 asks to do more of this AND also produce a podcast series and a documentary, for which there is zero evidence that these are things that the proposer can do well. Perhaps if there were others on the team, this would be a different matter. Can you speak to these new areas of focus?
This proposal includes three main components: OTG (On The Ground) events, a podcast series, and a documentary. The proposer, Aubtoshi, has experience with OTG events but has not provided evidence of their ability to produce a podcast series or a documentary. The proposal aims to continue sending Aubtoshi to events around the world and expand into these new areas of focus.
0 references
.-**2) This is a 1 person pod for 520 ETH. How does this scale?**--Are there other members on the team? Who will work on the podcast and the documentary while Aubtoshi is flying around the world attending events and planning for said events. How does this scale if we’re not sharing knowledge with anyone else in the Nouns community?
There are concerns about the scalability of the 1 person pod for 520 ETH and how it would work with Aubtoshi attending events and planning for them. There is no clear answer on how this would scale or if there are other team members involved. However, the conversation does discuss the importance of finding a balance between funding proposals and holding them accountable for the long-term health of the DAO.
0 references
Aubtoshi is constantly working on behalf of the DAO and how she spends her own money shouldn’t concern you and even if it does why not ask questions rather than make accusations and cause drama? It’s not necessary and not helpful.
The concern raised in the conversation is whether Nouns directly sponsoring or endorsing a token could paint a negative representation of Nouns, especially if the token's value crashes. The discussion emphasizes the importance of being cautious and knowledgeable about such matters and considering the potential impact on the community. However, no specific solution or prevention method is agreed upon in the conversation.
0 references
Can you explain your relationship with Bloomz and his overall involvement in Nouns OTG?
Bloomz is not mentioned in the provided conversation, so the relationship between Bloomz and Nouns OTG cannot be determined from the given context.
0 references
Hi <@930317640487030854> 👋 thanks for taking the time to write this proposal and all of yours and NounsOTGs work to date.--One thing I wished was more clearly laid out in your proposal is data around how your previous Props 110 and 166 went. How did these Props impact the numbers around NounsOTG?--I believe we have to be more data driven about how we deploy money for groups that are raising money through a third Prop and up. Similar to early stage investing, we can give a check to and make a bet on the people at PreSeed/Seed without too much data, but at Series A+ we need to start making bets on sustainable models of growth and that starts by looking at the numbers.
There isn't a clear answer provided in the conversation regarding the impact of Props 110 and 166 on the numbers around NounsOTG. The conversation mainly focuses on the need for more data-driven decision-making and the importance of showing quantified impact and progress from previous proposals.
0 references
I dont think the concern lies in what she is doing with her own personal money..... I think that the concern is: since the content was streamed from a Nouns sponsored platform, could it be seen as Nouns directly sponsoring or endorsing the token..... and since it crashed down almost 40% at one point today alot of people prob got REKT.... could that paint a negative representation of Nouns?
The concern about whether Nouns directly sponsoring or endorsing the token could paint a negative representation of Nouns is a valid conversation to have. However, it's important to treat each other with respect and seek understanding before jumping to conclusions. The discussion suggests that Nouns-funded entrepreneurs, like Aubtoshi, can talk about various topics on their platforms, including Nouns and other projects, without necessarily endorsing them. It's essential for individuals to do their own research and make their own decisions regarding investments.
0 references
I'm trying to understand if he is actually a valued/legitimate member of the team, why is he asking lil nouns dao for 58 eth (either from our treasury, or to sponsor him in a separate prop to nouns dao) to join you instead of getting his expenses covered in this prop? Who's expenses besides yourself does this cover?
It is not clear who is asking for the 58 ETH, but the proposal covers 2-3 airline tickets (depending on the size of the event) to events, insurance, and checked bag fees for Aubtoshi and production crew members. The travel expenses/airline ticket price was calculated with 10% added to the total cost. Accommodation is also covered at each event for Aubtoshi and production crew members.
0 references
