Nouns DAO (legacy) - treasury-management (Q5067)

From Nouns Dev
Revision as of 21:07, 7 July 2023 by TiagoLubiana (talk | contribs) (‎Changed an Item)
A Nouns discord channel.
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Nouns DAO (legacy) - treasury-management
A Nouns discord channel.

    Statements

    0 references
    <@603240181050638346> seems to have a very good handle on the practical side of implementing various proposals.--If we were to go in the direction of staking some eth would it be best to perhaps stake 1% of treasury (or even just 0.01 eth) as trial? Or would stand protocol be to just vote on the end final result rather than in stages?
    Based on the conversation, it seems that the idea of staking a small percentage of the treasury as a trial was discussed, but no definitive answer was given. The conversation included suggestions for different percentages and potential risks, but no clear consensus or final decision was reached.
    0 references
    <@910382387983179797> would you trade your noun for a noun in the first 50? First 20? First 10?
    Noun 19/Cookie Nounster#3464: <@910382387983179797> would you trade your noun for a noun in the first 50? First 20? First 10?--Answer: Probably not.
    0 references
    Also I’m confused how can new members join the dao forever, don’t daos have to be capped at some #?
    GuyZalaxy#1925's question about whether DAOs have to be capped at some number was addressed by Noun 12#8966, who explained that there is no cap on DAO members and that there are hundreds of DAOs with more members/public keys than 200. They also mentioned that Nouns DAO benefits from a constant refreshing supply of new members and that the cadence of auctions can be changed in governance.
    0 references
    Are the economics of sETH not expected based on making ETH2 not tradable until after the merge? Looking at crypto, wouldn't one expect that the first thing that would happen would be the creation of a derivative, and that the nature of liquidity would make that derivative winner take all? It seems like hopium to expect that something else would have played out here (reminds me of soulbound nfts tbh). Does this problem not go away on its own once beacon chain withdrawals are possible?
    Yes, as soon as the conversion is liquid the peg will restore. The problem is expected to go away on its own once beacon chain withdrawals are possible.
    0 references